1
|
Winther-Larsen A, Madsen AT, Nissen PH, Hoffmann-Lücke E, Greibe E. Short-term biological variation of plasma uracil in a Caucasian healthy population. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023; 61:1490-1496. [PMID: 36856054 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Plasma uracil is a new biomarker to assess the activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase before cancer treatment with fluoropyrimidine drugs. Knowledge on the biological variation of plasma uracil is important to assess the applicability of plasma uracil as a biomarker of drug tolerance and efficacy. METHODS A total of 33 apparently healthy individuals were submitted to sequential blood draws for three days. On the second day, blood draws were performed every third hour for 12 h. Plasma uracil was quantified by LC-MS/MS. The within-subject (CVI) and between-subject (CVG) biological variation estimates were calculated using linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS The overall median value of plasma uracil was 10.6 ng/mL (range 5.6-23.1 ng/mL). The CVI and CVG were 13.5 and 22.1%, respectively. Plasma uracil remained stable during the day, and there was no day-to-day variation observed. No differences in biological variation components were found between sex and no correlation to age was found. Four samples were calculated to be required to estimate the homeostatic set-point ±15% with 95% confidence. CONCLUSIONS Plasma uracil is subject to tight homeostatic regulation without semidiurnal and day-to-day variation, however between-subject variation exists. This emphasizes plasma uracil as a well-suited biomarker for evaluation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity, but four samples are required to establish the homeostatic set-point in a patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Winther-Larsen
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anne Tranberg Madsen
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
| | - Peter H Nissen
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Elke Hoffmann-Lücke
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Eva Greibe
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thomas F, Launay M, Guitton J, Loriot MA, Boyer JC, Haufroid V, Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Royer B. Plasma Uracil as a DPD Phenotyping Test: Pre-Analytical Handling Matters! Clin Pharmacol Ther 2023; 113:471-472. [PMID: 36412238 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabienne Thomas
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie, Inserm, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier and IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Manon Launay
- Plateau de Biologie, CHU Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France
| | - Jérôme Guitton
- Laboratoire de Pharmacologie Toxicologie, CHU de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Marie-Anne Loriot
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,INSERM UMRS1138, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Vincent Haufroid
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Louvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (LTAP), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Bernard Royer
- Laboratoire de Pharmacologie Clinique et Toxicologie, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France.,INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, Interactions Hôte-Greffon-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knikman JE, Rosing H, Guchelaar HJ, Cats A, Beijnen JH. Assay performance and stability of uracil and dihydrouracil in clinical practice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2023; 91:257-266. [PMID: 36905444 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-023-04518-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Measurement of endogenous uracil (U) is increasingly being used as a dose-individualization method in the treatment of cancer patients with fluoropyrimidines. However, instability at room temperature (RT) and improper sample handling may cause falsely increased U levels. Therefore we aimed to study the stability of U and dihydrouracil (DHU) to ensure proper handling conditions. METHODS Stability of U and DHU in whole blood, serum, and plasma at RT (up to 24 h) and long-term stability (≥ 7 days) at - 20 °C were studied in samples from 6 healthy individuals. U and DHU levels of patients were compared using standard serum tubes (SSTs) and rapid serum tubes (RSTs). The performance of our validated UPLC-MS/MS assay was assessed over a period of 7 months. RESULTS U and DHU levels significantly increased at RT in whole blood and serum after blood sampling with increases of 12.7 and 47.6% after 2 h, respectively. A significant difference (p = 0.0036) in U and DHU levels in serum was found between SSTs and RSTs. U and DHU were stable at - 20 °C at least 2 months in serum and 3 weeks in plasma. Assay performance assessment fulfilled the acceptance criteria for system suitability, calibration standards, and quality controls. CONCLUSION A maximum of 1 h at RT between sampling and processing is recommended to ensure reliable U and DHU results. Assay performance tests showed that our UPLC-MS/MS method was robust and reliable. Additionally, we provided a guideline for proper sample handling, processing and reliable quantification of U and DHU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan E Knikman
- Division of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Hilde Rosing
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk-Jan Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Cats
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos H Beijnen
- Division of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tybirk L, Hoffmann-Lücke E, Greibe E. Instability of uracil in whole blood might affect cancer treatment with fluoropyrimidines. Clin Chim Acta 2023; 538:87-90. [PMID: 36347332 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Measurement of plasma uracil is used before cancer treatment with fluoropyrimidines to determine if patients tolerate a full dose. Incorrect preanalytical handling may cause falsely elevated concentration and result in suboptimal cancer treatment. We aimed to examine the stability of uracil in whole blood stored at room temperature (RT) and the effect of centrifugation temperature. MATERIALS AND METHODS EDTA tubes (6x4 mL) were collected from 25 healthy volunteers. Five samples were stored 0, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 h at RT and centrifuged at 4 °C. The sixth sample was centrifuged at RT after 1.5 h. Uracil was measured using an in-house LC-MS/MS method. RESULTS Storage of whole blood at RT followed by centrifugation at 4 °C caused a rapid increase in uracil concentration. Already after 1.5 h, the mean change (20.5 % (95 % CI: 11.9-29.2 %)) exceeded the maximum permissible difference. Centrifugation at RT instead of 4 °C after 1.5 h resulted in a smaller increase (7.0 % (95 % CI: 0.7-13.4 %)), although not statistically significant (p = 0.0527). CONCLUSION Uracil was unstable in samples processed according to current recommendations. Our data indicates better stability when centrifugation is performed at RT compared with 4 °C but further research into this is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Tybirk
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
| | - Elke Hoffmann-Lücke
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Eva Greibe
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de With M, Knikman J, de Man FM, Lunenburg CATC, Henricks LM, van Kuilenburg ABP, Maring JG, van Staveren MC, de Vries N, Rosing H, Beijnen JH, Pluim D, Modak A, Imholz ALT, van Schaik RHN, Schellens JHM, Gelderblom H, Cats A, Guchelaar HJ, Mathijssen RHJ, Swen JJ, Meulendijks D. Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Phenotyping Using Pretreatment Uracil: A Note of Caution Based on a Large Prospective Clinical Study. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2022; 112:62-68. [PMID: 35397172 PMCID: PMC9322339 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
In clinical practice, 25-30% of the patients treated with fluoropyrimidines experience severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. Extensively clinically validated DPYD genotyping tests are available to identify patients at risk of severe toxicity due to decreased activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the rate limiting enzyme in fluoropyrimidine metabolism. In April 2020, the European Medicines Agency recommended that, as an alternative for DPYD genotype-based testing for DPD deficiency, also phenotype testing based on pretreatment plasma uracil levels is a suitable method to identify patients with DPD deficiency. Although the evidence for genotype-directed dosing of fluoropyrimidines is substantial, the level of evidence supporting plasma uracil levels to predict DPD activity in clinical practice is limited. Notwithstanding this, uracil-based phenotyping is now used in clinical practice in various countries in Europe. We aimed to determine the value of pretreatment uracil levels in predicting DPD deficiency and severe treatment-related toxicity. To this end, we determined pretreatment uracil levels in 955 patients with cancer, and assessed the correlation with DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity. We identified substantial issues concerning the use of pretreatment uracil in clinical practice, including large between-center study differences in measured pretreatment uracil levels, most likely as a result of pre-analytical factors. Importantly, we were not able to correlate pretreatment uracil levels with DPD activity nor were uracil levels predictive of severe treatment-related toxicity. We urge that robust clinical validation should first be performed before pretreatment plasma uracil levels are used in clinical practice as part of a dosing strategy for fluoropyrimidines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam de With
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jonathan Knikman
- Division of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke M de Man
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carin A T C Lunenburg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Linda M Henricks
- Division of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - André B P van Kuilenburg
- Laboratory Genetic Metabolic Diseases, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan G Maring
- Department of Pharmacy, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.,Isala Diaconessen Hospital, Meppel, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice C van Staveren
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Treant Healthgroup, Scheper Hospital, Emmen, The Netherlands
| | - Niels de Vries
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hilde Rosing
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos H Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dick Pluim
- Division of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anil Modak
- Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Tewksbury, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alex L T Imholz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Ron H N van Schaik
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan H M Schellens
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Cats
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk-Jan Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics (LNPT), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jesse J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics (LNPT), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Didier Meulendijks
- Division of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Late Development Oncology, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|