1
|
Nordin N, Ab Rahim SN, Wan Omar WFA, Zulkarnain S, Sinha S, Kumar S, Haque M. Preanalytical Errors in Clinical Laboratory Testing at a Glance: Source and Control Measures. Cureus 2024; 16:e57243. [PMID: 38559530 PMCID: PMC10981510 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The accuracy of diagnostic results in clinical laboratory testing is paramount for informed healthcare decisions and effective patient care. While the focus has traditionally been on the analytical phase, attention has shifted towards optimizing the preanalytical phase due to its significant contribution to total laboratory errors. This review highlights preanalytical errors, their sources, and control measures to improve the quality of laboratory testing. Blood sample quality is a critical concern, with factors such as hemolysis, lipemia, and icterus leading to erroneous results. Sources of preanalytical errors encompass inappropriate test requests, patient preparation lapses, and errors during sample collection, handling, and transportation. Mitigating these errors includes harmonization efforts, education and training programs, automated methods for sample quality assessment, and quality monitoring. Collaboration between laboratory personnel and healthcare professionals is crucial for implementing and sustaining these measures to enhance the accuracy and reliability of diagnostic results, ultimately improving patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nani Nordin
- Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| | - Siti Nadirah Ab Rahim
- Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| | | | - Sarah Zulkarnain
- Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| | - Susmita Sinha
- Physiology, Khulna City Medical College and Hospital, Khulna, BGD
| | - Santosh Kumar
- Periodontology and Implantology, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, IND
| | - Mainul Haque
- Karnavati Scientific Research Center (KSRC), Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, IND
- Pharmacology and Therapeutics, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ab Rahim SN, Nordin N, Wan Omar WFA, Zulkarnain S, Kumar S, Sinha S, Haque M. The Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives of Magnesium Imbalance. Cureus 2023; 15:e49835. [PMID: 38045630 PMCID: PMC10693313 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Magnesium (Mg2+) is a predominantly intracellular cation that plays significant roles in various enzymatic, membrane, and structural body functions. As a calcium (Ca2+) antagonist, it is imperative for numerous neuromuscular activities. The imbalance of body Mg2+ concentration leads to clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic to severe life-threatening complications. Therefore, the contribution of Mg2+ measurement regarding various laboratory and clinical aspects cannot be ignored. Mg2+ is often described as the forgotten analyte. However, its close relationship with body potassium (K+), Ca2+, and phosphate homeostasis proves that Mg2+ imbalance could co-exist as the root cause or the consequence of other electrolyte disorders. Meanwhile, several preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical aspects could influence Mg2+ measurement. This review highlights Mg2+ measurement's laboratory and clinical issues and some analyte disturbances associated with its imbalance. Understanding this basis could aid clinicians and laboratory professionals in Mg2+ result interpretation and patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siti Nadirah Ab Rahim
- Fakulti Perubatan and Kesihatan Pertahanan, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| | - Nani Nordin
- Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| | | | - Sarah Zulkarnain
- Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| | - Santosh Kumar
- Periodontology and Implantology, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, IND
| | - Susmita Sinha
- Physiology, Khulna City Medical College and Hospital, Khulna, BGD
| | - Mainul Haque
- Research, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, IND
- Pharmacology and Therapeutics, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Colombini A, Divieto C, Tomaiuolo R, Mortati L, Petiti J, Di Resta C, Banfi G. The total testing process harmonization: the case study of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023; 61:2084-2093. [PMID: 37540644 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
The total testing process harmonization is central to laboratory medicine, leading to the laboratory test's effectiveness. In this opinion paper the five phases of the TTP are analyzed, describing, and summarizing the critical issues that emerged in each phase of the TTP with the SARS-CoV-2 serological tests that have affected their effectiveness. Testing and screening the population was essential for defining seropositivity and, thus, driving public health policies in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the many differences in terminology, the unit of measurement, reference ranges and parameters for interpreting results make analytical results difficult to compare, leading to the general confusion that affects or completely precludes the comparability of data. Starting from these considerations related to SARS-CoV-2 serological tests, through interdisciplinary work, the authors have highlighted the most critical points and formulated proposals to make total testing process harmonization effective, positively impacting the diagnostic effectiveness of laboratory tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carla Divieto
- Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica INRIM, Turin, Italy
| | - Rossella Tomaiuolo
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Jessica Petiti
- Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica INRIM, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Banfi
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Katanić J, Stanimirov B, Sekeruš V, Đanić M, Pavlović N, Mikov M, Stankov K. Drug interference with biochemical laboratory tests. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2023; 33:020601. [PMID: 37143715 PMCID: PMC10152617 DOI: 10.11613/bm.2023.020601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical laboratory practice represents an essential part of clinical decision-making, as it influences 60-70% of medical decisions at all levels of health care. Results of biochemical laboratory tests (BLTs) have a key role in establishment of adequate diagnosis as well as in evaluation of treatment progress and outcome. The prevalence of drug-laboratory test interactions (DLTIs) is up to 43% of patients who had laboratory results influenced by drugs. Unrecognized DLTIs may lead to misinterpreted BLTs results, incorrect or delayed diagnosis, extra costs for unnecessary additional tests or inadequate therapy, as all may cause false clinical decisions. The significance of timely and adequate recognition of DLTIs is to prevent common clinical consequences such as incorrectly interpreted test results, delayed or non-treated condition due to erroneous diagnosis or unnecessary extra tests or therapy. Medical professionals should be educated that it is essential to obtain patient data about medications especially for the drugs used in the last 10 days before biological material collection. Our mini-review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state in this important domain of medical biochemistry with detailed analysis of the effect of drugs on BLTs and to give detailed information to medical specialists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmina Katanić
- Department of Biochemistry, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Bojan Stanimirov
- Department of Biochemistry, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Vanesa Sekeruš
- Department of Biochemistry, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Maja Đanić
- Department of Pharmacology, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Nebojša Pavlović
- Department of Pharmacy, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Momir Mikov
- Department of Pharmacology, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Karmen Stankov
- Department of Biochemistry, Medical faculty, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
- Corresponding author:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Plebani M. Quality in laboratory medicine and the Journal: walking together. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022; 61:713-720. [PMID: 35969689 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Quality in laboratory medicine is defined as "an unfinished journey", as the more essential the laboratory information provided, the more assured its quality should be. In the past decades, the Journal Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine has provided a valuable forum for garnering new insights into the analytical and extra-analytical phases of the testing cycle, and for debating crucial aspects of quality in clinical laboratories. The impressive number of papers published in the Journal is testimony to the efforts made by laboratory professionals, national and international scientific societies and federations in the quest to continuously improve upon the pre-, intra- and post-analytical steps of the testing cycle, thus enhancing the quality of laboratory information. The paper appearing in this special issue summarizes the most important and interesting contributions published in the Journal, thus updating our knowledge on quality in laboratory medicine and offering further stimuli to identify the most valuable measures of quality in clinical laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Plebani
- Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA
| |
Collapse
|