Evaluation of serum neurofilament light in the early management of mTBI patients

S100B vs. "GFAP and UCH-L1" assays in the management of mTBI patients

OBJECTIVES

To compare for the first time the performance of "GFAP and UCH-L1" vs. S100B in a cohort of patients managed for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) according to actualized French guidelines.

METHODS

A prospective study was recently carried at the Emergency Department of Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital in France. Patients with mTBI presenting a medium risk of complications were enrolled. Blood S100B and "GFAP and UCHL-1" were sampled and measured according to French guidelines. S100B was measured in patients with samples within 3 h of trauma (Cobas®, Roche Diagnostics), while GFAP and UCHL-1 were measured in all patients (samples <3 h and 3-12 h) using another automated assay (i-STAT® Alinity, Abbott).

RESULTS

For sampling <3 h, serum S100B correctly identifies intracranial lesions with a specificity of 25.7 % (95 % CI; 19.5-32.6 %), a sensitivity of 100 % (95 % CI; 66.4-100 %), and a negative predictive value of 100 % (95 % CI; 92.5-100 %). For sampling <12 h, plasma "GFAP and UCH-L1" levels correctly identify intracranial lesions with a specificity of 31.7 % (95 % CI; 25.7-38.2 %), a sensitivity of 100 % (95 % CI; 73.5-100 %), and a negative predictive value of 100 % (95 % CI; 95-100 %). Comparison of specificities (25.7 vs. 31.7 %) did not reveal a statistically significant difference (p=0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

We highlight the usefulness of measuring plasma "GFAP and UCH-L1" levels to target mTBI patients (sampling within 12 h post-injury) and optimize the reduction of CT scans.

Blood Biomarkers for the Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Despite the use of validated guidelines in the management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), processes to limit unnecessary brain scans are still not sufficient and need to be improved. The use of blood biomarkers represents a relevant adjunct to identify patients at risk for intracranial injury requiring computed tomography (CT) scan.

CONTENT

Biomarkers currently recommended in the management of mTBI in adults and children are discussed in this review. Protein S100 beta (S100B) is the best-documented blood biomarker due to its validation in large observational and interventional studies. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyterminal hydrolase L-1 (UCH-L1) have also recently demonstrated their usefulness in patients with mTBI. Preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical performance are presented to aid in their interpretation in clinical practice. Finally, new perspectives on biomarkers and mTBI are discussed.

SUMMARY

In adults, the inclusion of S100B in Scandinavian and French guidelines has reduced the need for CT scans by at least 30%. S100B has significant potential as a diagnostic biomarker, but limitations include its rapid half-life, which requires blood collection within 3 h of trauma, and its lack of neurospecificity. In 2018, the FDA approved the use of combined determination of GFAP and UCH-L1 to aid in the assessment of mTBI. Since 2022, new French guidelines also recommend the determination of GFAP and UCH-L1 in order to target a larger number of patients (sampling within 12 h post-injury) and optimize the reduction of CT scans. In the future, new cut-offs related to age and promising new biomarkers are expected for both diagnostic and prognostic applications.

Importance of serum IRAK3 as a biochemical marker in relation to severity and neurological outcome of human severe traumatic brain injury: A prospective longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND

Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 3 (IRAK3) may modulate inflammation in brain immunity. We determined the prognostic role of serum IRAK3 in severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI).

METHODS

In this prospective longitudinal cohort study, serum IRAK3 concentrations of 131 sTBI patients and 131 controls were quantified. Extended Glasgow outcome scale (GOSE) scores of 1-4 at 180 days after trauma signified a poor prognosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were sequentially adopted to appraise severity correlations and prognosis associations.

RESULTS

There were significantly higher serum IRAK3 concentrations in patients than in controls. Serum IRAK3 concentrations of patients were independently correlated with Glasgow coma scale (GCS) scores, Rotterdam computed tomography (CT) scores and posttraumatic180-day GOSE scores. Also, IRAK3 concentrations were independently associated with 180-day poor prognosis, but not with death. Prognosis prediction model, in which GCS scores, Rotterdam scores and serum IRAK3 concentrations were merged, was portrayed using the nomogram. The model was rather stable, clinically usable and efficiently discriminative of poor prognosis under calibration curve, decision curve and receiver operating characteristic curve.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial enhancement of serum IRAK3 concentrations after head trauma is independently related to severity and neurological outcome, substantializing serum IRAK3 as a promising prognostic biomarker of sTBI.

The 2022 Lady Estelle Wolfson lectureship on neurofilaments

Neurofilament proteins (Nf) have been validated and established as a reliable body fluid biomarker for neurodegenerative pathology. This review covers seven Nf isoforms, Nf light (NfL), two splicing variants of Nf medium (NfM), two splicing variants of Nf heavy (NfH), α -internexin (INA) and peripherin (PRPH). The genetic and epigenetic aspects of Nf are discussed as relevant for neurodegenerative diseases and oncology. The comprehensive list of mutations for all Nf isoforms covers Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Charcot-Marie Tooth disease, Spinal muscular atrophy, Parkinson Disease and Lewy Body Dementia. Next, emphasis is given to the expanding field of post-translational modifications (PTM) of the Nf amino acid residues. Protein structural aspects are reviewed alongside PTMs causing neurodegenerative pathology and human autoimmunity. Molecular visualisations of NF PTMs, assembly and stoichiometry make use of Alphafold2 modelling. The implications for Nf function on the cellular level and axonal transport are discussed. Neurofilament aggregate formation and proteolytic breakdown are reviewed as relevant for biomarker tests and disease. Likewise, Nf stoichiometry is reviewed with regard to in vitro experiments and as a compensatory mechanism in neurodegeneration. The review of Nf across a spectrum of 87 diseases from all parts of medicine is followed by a critical appraisal of 33 meta-analyses on Nf body fluid levels. The review concludes with considerations for clinical trial design and an outlook for future research.

Neurofilaments contribution in clinic: state of the art

Neurological biomarkers are particularly valuable to clinicians as they can be used for diagnosis, prognosis, or response to treatment. This field of neurology has evolved considerably in recent years with the improvement of analytical methods, allowing the detection of biomarkers not only in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) but also in less invasive fluids like blood. These advances greatly facilitate the repeated quantification of biomarkers, including at asymptomatic stages of the disease. Among the various informative biomarkers of neurological disorders, neurofilaments (NfL) have proven to be of particular interest in many contexts, such as neurodegenerative diseases, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and cancer. Here we discuss these different pathologies and the potential value of NfL assay in the management of these patients, both for diagnosis and prognosis. We also describe the added value of NfL compared to other biomarkers currently used to monitor the diseases described in this review.