From big data to better patient outcomes

Big Data and Oral Health Disparities: A Critical Appraisal

Big data has emerged as a pivotal asset in addressing oral health disparities in recent years. Big data encompasses the vast pool of health care-related biomedical information sourced from diverse channels, such as claims data, patient registries, and electronic health records (EHRs). This study is a critical review that synthesizes the evidence, identifies gaps in knowledge, and discusses future implications regarding big data analytics and oral health disparities. Published reports from 2014 to 2023 that studied associations between big data, social determinants of oral health, and oral health disparities, published in English and available in electronic databases, were included. Search engines were MEDLINE via PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. A total of 23 studies were included in the review, and all were retrospective data analytics. Studies have used a variety of big data sources, including EHRs, claims, and national or regional registries. This study used a framework of data quality dimensions with intrinsic (data attributes) and contextual values (information provided by the data, in this case, oral health disparities) to critically appraise the included studies. Big data revealed disparities in oral health outcomes and dental care utilization based on race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographical location, insurance category, access to care, and other barriers to care. For the intrinsic data dimension, none of the studies addressed or reported data missingness or consistency of the data. The studies clearly provided contextual data dimensions. From a value-added perspective, several studies provided novel and new information related to racial oral health inequities. Several studies used more than one oral health disparities variable or a composite variable. However, the conclusions from several studies were based on association-based analytics, and few studies used artificial intelligence approaches to understand the population's oral health inequities-gaps were seen in the study designs and causal analytics.

Laboratory Data as a Potential Source of Bias in Healthcare Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Models

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are anticipated to transform the practice of medicine. As one of the largest sources of digital data in healthcare, laboratory results can strongly influence AI and ML algorithms that require large sets of healthcare data for training. Embedded bias introduced into AI and ML models not only has disastrous consequences for quality of care but also may perpetuate and exacerbate health disparities. The lack of test harmonization, which is defined as the ability to produce comparable results and the same interpretation irrespective of the method or instrument platform used to produce the result, may introduce aggregation bias into algorithms with potential adverse outcomes for patients. Limited interoperability of laboratory results at the technical, syntactic, semantic, and organizational levels is a source of embedded bias that limits the accuracy and generalizability of algorithmic models. Population-specific issues, such as inadequate representation in clinical trials and inaccurate race attribution, not only affect the interpretation of laboratory results but also may perpetuate erroneous conclusions based on AI and ML models in the healthcare literature.

Critical Results in Laboratory Medicine

BACKGROUND

Timely and accurate notification of critical results is crucial in laboratory medicine and mandated by accreditation standards like ISO15189. Alert lists do, however, vary widely and clinical laboratories typically rely on a combination of in-house agreed and/or literature-based critical values. Communication by phone is still the preferred method of notification, but digital communication could help improve communication of critical results.

CONTENT

We review the available evidence concerning critical result thresholds and critical result notification practices. The evidence is ranked using an adaptation of the Stockholm Hierarchy. In addition, we propose an evidence-based list of critical result thresholds for hospitalized patients that laboratories can use as a starter list and further customize based on the clinical needs of their patient population.

SUMMARY

A clear distinction between critical results and significantly abnormal results is essential for effective and timely healthcare interventions. Implementation of a policy using differentiated thresholds taking into account individual patient characteristics and how fast medical attention is needed, and the use alternative communication methods could enhance communication efficiency and reduce notification fatigue.

Cardiovascular Disease Risk Stratification Using Hybrid Deep Learning Paradigm: First of Its Kind on Canadian Trial Data

BACKGROUND

The risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has traditionally been predicted via the assessment of carotid plaques. In the proposed study, AtheroEdge™ 3.0HDL (AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA) was designed to demonstrate how well the features obtained from carotid plaques determine the risk of CVD. We hypothesize that hybrid deep learning (HDL) will outperform unidirectional deep learning, bidirectional deep learning, and machine learning (ML) paradigms.

METHODOLOGY

500 people who had undergone targeted carotid B-mode ultrasonography and coronary angiography were included in the proposed study. ML feature selection was carried out using three different methods, namely principal component analysis (PCA) pooling, the chi-square test (CST), and the random forest regression (RFR) test. The unidirectional and bidirectional deep learning models were trained, and then six types of novel HDL-based models were designed for CVD risk stratification. The AtheroEdge™ 3.0HDL was scientifically validated using seen and unseen datasets while the reliability and statistical tests were conducted using CST along with p-value significance. The performance of AtheroEdge™ 3.0HDL was evaluated by measuring the p-value and area-under-the-curve for both seen and unseen data.

RESULTS

The HDL system showed an improvement of 30.20% (0.954 vs. 0.702) over the ML system using the seen datasets. The ML feature extraction analysis showed 70% of common features among all three methods. The generalization of AtheroEdge™ 3.0HDL showed less than 1% (p-value < 0.001) difference between seen and unseen data, complying with regulatory standards.

CONCLUSIONS

The hypothesis for AtheroEdge™ 3.0HDL was scientifically validated, and the model was tested for reliability and stability and is further adaptable clinically.

A reference architecture for personal health data spaces using decentralized content-addressable storage networks

Introduction

This paper addresses the dilemmas of accessibility, comprehensiveness, and ownership related to health data. To resolve these dilemmas, we propose and justify a novel, globally scalable reference architecture for a Personal Health Data Space (PHDS). This architecture leverages decentralized content-addressable storage (DCAS) networks, ensuring that the data subject retains complete control and ownership of their personal health data. In today's globalized world, where people are increasingly mobile for work and leisure, healthcare is transitioning from episodic symptom-based treatment toward continuity of care. The main aims of this are patient engagement, illness prevention, and active and healthy longevity. This shift, along with the secondary use of health data for societal benefit, has intensified the challenges associated with health data accessibility, comprehensiveness, and ownership.

Method

The study is structured around four health data use case scenarios from the Estonian National Health Information System (EHIS): primary medical use, medical emergency use, secondary use, and personal use. We analyze these use cases from the perspectives of accessibility, comprehensiveness, and ownership. Additionally, we examine the security, privacy, and interoperability aspects of health data.

Results

The proposed architectural solution allows individuals to consolidate all their health data into a unified Personal Health Record (PHR). This data can come from various healthcare institutions, mobile applications, medical devices for home use, and personal health notes.

Discussions

The comprehensive PHR can then be shared with healthcare providers in a semantically interoperable manner, regardless of their location or the information systems they use. Furthermore, individuals maintain the autonomy to share, sell, or donate their anonymous or pseudonymous health data for secondary use with different systems worldwide. The proposed reference architecture aligns with the principles of the European Health Data Space (EHDS) initiative, enhancing health data management by providing a secure, cost-effective, and sustainable solution.

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: ChatGPT and Beyond

Artificial intelligence (AI), the simulation of human intelligence processes by machines, is having a growing impact on healthcare [...]

Bibliometric Analysis of Development Trends and Research Hotspots in the Study of Data Mining in Nursing Based on CiteSpace

Backgrounds

With the advent of the big data era, hospital information systems and mobile care systems, among others, generate massive amounts of medical data. Data mining, as a powerful information processing technology, can discover non-obvious information by processing large-scale data and analyzing them in multiple dimensions. How to find the effective information hidden in the database and apply it to nursing clinical practice has received more and more attention from nursing researchers.

Aim

To look over the articles on data mining in nursing, compiled research status, identified hotspots, highlighted research trends, and offer recommendations for how data mining technology might be used in the nursing area going forward.

Methods

Data mining in nursing publications published between 2002 and 2023 were taken from the Web of Science Core Collection. CiteSpace was utilized for reviewing the number of articles, countries/regions, institutions, journals, authors, and keywords.

Results

According to the findings, the pace of data mining in nursing progress is not encouraging. Nursing data mining research is dominated by the United States and China. However, no consistent core group of writers or organizations has emerged in the field of nursing data mining. Studies on data mining in nursing have been increasingly gradually conducted in the 21st century, but the overall number is not large. Institution of Columbia University, journal of Cin-computers Informatics Nursing, author Diana J Wilkie, Muhammad Kamran Lodhi, Yingwei Yao are most influential in nursing data mining research. Nursing data mining researchers are currently focusing on electronic health records, text mining, machine learning, and natural language processing. Future research themes in data mining in nursing most include nursing informatics and clinical care quality enhancement.

Conclusion

Research data shows that data mining gives more perspectives for the growth of the nursing discipline and encourages the discipline's development, but it also introduces a slew of new issues that need researchers to address.

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts and Challenges in Healthcare

Artificial Intelligence (AI) describes computer systems able to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision-making, and language translation. Examples of AI techniques are machine learning, neural networks, and deep learning. AI can be applied in many different areas, such as econometrics, biometry, e-commerce, and the automotive industry. In recent years, AI has found its way into healthcare as well, helping doctors make better decisions (“clinical decision support”), localizing tumors in magnetic resonance images, reading and analyzing reports written by radiologists and pathologists, and much more. However, AI has one big risk: it can be perceived as a “black box”, limiting trust in its reliability, which is a very big issue in an area in which a decision can mean life or death. As a result, the term Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has been gaining momentum. XAI tries to ensure that AI algorithms (and the resulting decisions) can be understood by humans. In this narrative review, we will have a look at some central concepts in XAI, describe several challenges around XAI in healthcare, and discuss whether it can really help healthcare to advance, for example, by increasing understanding and trust. Finally, alternatives to increase trust in AI are discussed, as well as future research possibilities in the area of XAI.