Development of a candidate reference measurement procedure by ID-LC-MS/MS for total tau protein measurement in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)

Insight into the status of plasma renin and aldosterone measurement: findings from 526 clinical laboratories in China

OBJECTIVES

Accurate measurements of renin and aldosterone levels play an important role in primary aldosteronism screening, which is of great importance in the management and categorization of hypertension. The objective of this study is to investigate the current status of plasma renin and aldosterone measurements in China, which is achieved by analyzing the results of 526 clinical laboratories nationwide for three pooled fresh plasma samples derived from more than 2,000 patients.

METHODS

Renin and aldosterone in three pooled plasma samples were measured four times in 526 laboratories employing various measurement systems. The inter- and intra-laboratory %CV were calculated and compared. To determine the source of the substantial inter-laboratory %CV, laboratories were categorized according to the measurement systems they are using, and both the inter- and intra-measurement-system %CV were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Regarding renin, the majority of laboratories use four primary commercial immunoassays. However, for aldosterone, in addition to commercial immunoassays, laboratory-developed liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods are also used by laboratories. The median values of intra-laboratory %CVs, intra-measurement-system %CVs, inter-laboratory %CVs, and inter-measurement systems %CVs varied between 1.6 and 2.6 %, 4.6 and 14.9 %, 8.3 and 25.7 %, and 10.0 and 34.4 % for renin, respectively. For aldosterone, these values ranged from 1.4 to 2.2 %, 2.5-14.7 %, 9.9-31.0 %, and 10.0-35.5 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The precision within laboratories and measurement systems for plasma renin and aldosterone measurements is satisfactory. However, the comparability between laboratories using different measurement systems remains lacking, indicating the long way to achieve standardization and harmonization for these two analytes.

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in clinical laboratory protein measurement

Proteins are essential components of human cells and tissues, and they are commonly measured in clinical laboratories using immunoassays. However, these assays have certain limitations, such as non-specificity binding, insufficient selectivity, and interference of antibodies. More sensitive, accurate, and efficient technology is required to overcome these limitations. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is a powerful analytical tool that provides high sensitivity and specificity, making it superior to traditional methods such as biochemical methods and immunoassays. While LC-MS/MS has been increasingly used for detecting small molecular analytes and steroid hormones in clinical practice recently, its application for protein or peptide analysis is still in its early stages. Established methods for quantifying proteins and peptides by LC-MS/MS are mainly focused on scientific research, and only a few proteins and peptides can be or have the potential to be detected and applied in clinical practice. Therefore, this article aims to review the clinical applications, advantages, and challenges of analyzing proteins and peptides using LC-MS/MS in clinical laboratories.

Evolution of LC-MS/MS in clinical laboratories

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has attracted significant attention in clinical practice owing to its numerous advantages. However, the widespread adoption of this technique is hindered by certain limitations, such as inappropriate analyte selection, low levels of automation, and a lack of specific reference intervals and quality control programs. This review comprehensively summarizes the current challenges associated with LC-MS/MS and proposes potential resolutions. The principle of utility should guide the selection of biomarkers, prioritizing their practical value over sheer quantity. To achieve full-process automation, methodological innovation is crucial for developing high-throughput equipment. Establishing reference intervals for mass spectrometry-based assays across multiple centers and diverse populations is essential for accurate result interpretation. Additionally, the development of commercial quality control materials assumes pivotal importance in ensuring assay reliability and reproducibility. Harmonization and standardization efforts should focus on the development of reference methods and materials for the clinical use of LC-MS/MS. In the future, commercial assay kits and laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) are expected to coexist in clinical laboratories, each offering distinct advantages. The collaborative efforts of diverse professionals is vital for addressing the challenges associated with the clinical application of LC-MS/MS. The anticipated advancements include simplification, increased automation, intelligence, and the standardization of LC-MS/MS, ultimately facilitating its seamless integration into clinical routines for both technicians and clinicians.