Regulation of the hepatic endothelin system in advanced biliary fibrosis in rats

Recent Advances in the Pathogenesis and Clinical Evaluation of Portal Hypertension in Chronic Liver Disease

In chronic liver disease, hepatic stellate cell activation and degeneration of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells lead to structural changes, which are secondary to fibrosis and the presence of regenerative nodules in the sinusoids, and to functional changes, which are related to vasoconstriction. The combination of such changes increases intrahepatic vascular resistance and causes portal hypertension. The subsequent increase in splanchnic and systemic hyperdynamic circulation further increases the portal blood flow, thereby exacerbating portal hypertension. In clinical practice, the hepatic venous pressure gradient is the gold-standard measure of portal hypertension; a value of ≥10 mm Hg is defined as clinically significant portal hypertension, which is severe and is associated with the risk of liver-related events. Hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement is somewhat invasive, so evidence on the utility of risk stratification by elastography and serum biomarkers is needed. The various stages of cirrhosis are associated with different outcomes. In viral hepatitis-related cirrhosis, viral suppression or elimination by nucleos(t)ide analog or direct-acting antivirals results in recompensation of liver function and portal pressure. However, careful follow-up should be continued, because some cases have residual clinically significant portal hypertension even after achieving sustained virologic response. In this study, we reviewed the current and future prospects for portal hypertension.

Biology of portal hypertension

Portal hypertension develops as a result of increased intrahepatic vascular resistance often caused by chronic liver disease that leads to structural distortion by fibrosis, microvascular thrombosis, dysfunction of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs), and hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation. While the basic mechanisms of LSEC and HSC dysregulation have been extensively studied, the role of microvascular thrombosis and platelet function in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension remains to be clearly characterized. As a secondary event, portal hypertension results in splanchnic and systemic arterial vasodilation, leading to the development of a hyperdynamic circulatory syndrome and subsequently to clinically devastating complications including gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy from the formation of portosystemic shunts, ascites, and renal failure due to the hepatorenal syndrome. This review article discusses: (1) mechanisms of sinusoidal portal hypertension, focusing on HSC and LSEC biology, pathological angiogenesis, and the role of microvascular thrombosis and platelets, (2) the mesenteric vasculature in portal hypertension, and (3) future directions for vascular biology research in portal hypertension.

Acute effects of endothelin receptor antagonists on hepatic hemodynamics of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic rats

Hepatic and circulating endothelin-1 (ET-1) are increased in patients with cirrhosis and in cirrhotic animals. However, the distinct roles of ET receptor subtypes ETA and ETB in cirrhosis and portal hypertension (PHT) have not been clearly elucidated. Thus, we studied the effects of selective ET-1 antagonists (ETA-ant or ETB-ant) and nonselective ET-1 antagonist (ETA/B-ant) on hepatic hemodynamics in cirrhotic rats. Liver fibrosis and PHT were induced by complete bile duct ligation (BDL) in rats. Two weeks after BDL or sham surgery, hemodynamic responses were measured during intraportal infusion of incremental doses of the following ET-ants: (i) BQ-123, (ii) BQ-788, and (iii) bosentan. After equilibration with vehicle, doses of ET-ants were infused for 30 min periods, and steady-state systemic and hepatic hemodynamics, portal venous pressure (PVP), and hepatic blood flow (HBF) were measured. BDL induced significant PHT and elevated concentrations of plasma ET-1 compared with sham. ETA-ant decreased PVP of cirrhotic rats but had no effect on sham, whereas ETB-ant increased PVP in sham but had no effect in BDL. Nonselective ETA/B-ant decreased PVP of BDL similarly to ETA-ant. Both ETA-ant and ETB-ant decreased local HBF, whereas a nonselective antagonist did not change HBF in sham; however no significant changes were observed in HBF of BDL rats with any of the antagonists. These findings suggest ETA activation contributes to PHT in cirrhotic rats, whereas ETB-mediated portal depressor effects are attenuated in cirrhotic rats compared with noncirrhotic rats.

Regulation of endothelin-A receptor sensitivity by cyclic adenosine monophosphate in rat hepatic stellate cells

Sensitization of the endothelin-A receptor (ET(A)) occurs during HSC transdifferentiation, but the underlying mechanisms remained unclear. Sensitization of ET(A) was studied in quiescent and activated hepatic stellate cells (HSC) at the levels of receptor phosphorylation, localization, endothelin (ET)-1-induced Ca(2+) signals, and cell contraction. The endothelin-1 (ET-1) concentrations required to obtain an ET(A)-mediated Ca(2+) signal in 50% of HSC cultured for 1 to 2 or 10 days were approximately 1.2 and 0.012 nmol/L, respectively. This transdifferentiation-dependent sensitization of ET(A) was accompanied by receptor translocation to the plasma membrane. Cyclic AMP rapidly desensitized ET(A) in activated HSC and shifted their ET-1 responsiveness from picomolar to nanomolar concentrations with respect to Ca(2+) signals and HSC contraction. ET(A) desensitization also occurred in response to prostaglandin E(2), adenosine, or ET(B) stimulation. Desensitization by cAMP in activated HSC was accompanied by an increased Ser/Thr phosphorylation of ET(A) and their rapid internalization. Quiescent HSC exhibited Ser/Thr phosphorylation of the ET(A) protein, which was not affected by cAMP. In conclusion, the ET(A) response in HSC is regulated by protein kinase A (PKA)-dependent receptor phosphorylation and internalization. This may explain the transdifferentiation-dependent sensitization of HSC towards ET-1 and its reversal by cAMP and ET(B) activation.