Differentiated CaCo-2 cells as an in-vitro model to evaluate de-novo apolipoprotein A-I production in the small intestine.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;
21:642-9. [PMID:
19445040 DOI:
10.1097/meg.0b013e328321b0c8]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Increasing HDL cholesterol concentrations by stimulating de-novo apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) production in the liver and/or in the small intestine is a potential strategy to reduce coronary heart disease risk. Although there is quite some knowledge concerning regulatory effects in the liver, less is known concerning potential agents that could elevate de-novo apoA-I production in the small intestine.
METHODS
Therefore, we compared side-by-side effects of various peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha, PPARgamma, retinoid-X-receptor alpha, and farnesoid-X-receptor agonists on de-novo apoA-I production in differentiated CaCo-2 and HepG2 cells.
RESULTS
For PPARa agonists, we showed that GW7647 elevated apoA-I concentrations in the medium of both cell models, whereas WY14643 elevated only de-novo apoA-I concentrations in differentiated CaCo-2 cells. Unexpectedly, fenofibric acid lowered apoA-I medium concentrations in both cell lines, which could not be explained by a lack of PPAR transactivation or a lack of retinoid-X-receptor a activation. For farnesoid-X-receptor agonists, chenodeoxycholic acid strongly reduced apoA-I concentrations both in differentiated CaCo-2 and HepG2 cells, whereas GW4064 and taurocholate only lowered apoA-I in CaCo-2 cells (GW4064) or in HepG2 cells (taurocholate). However, overall effects of all individual components on apoA-I production in differentiated CaCo-2 and HepG2 cells were highly correlated (r = 0.68; P = 0.037; N=9).
CONCLUSION
We conclude that differentiated CaCo-2 cells are suitable models to study de-novo small intestinal apoA-I production in vitro enabling the possibility to screen for potential bioactive dietary components. This cell model may also determine small-intestinal-specific effects, as some discrepancy was found between both cell models.
Collapse