In vitro inhibition of fibrinolysis by apolipoprotein(a) and lipoprotein(a) is size- and concentration-dependent

Lipoprotein (a): truly a direct prothrombotic factor in cardiovascular disease?

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] have been determined to be a causal risk factor for coronary heart disease, and may similarly play a role in other atherothrombotic disorders. Lp(a) consists of a lipoprotein moiety indistinguishable from LDL, as well as the plasminogen-related glycoprotein, apo(a). Therefore, the pathogenic role for Lp(a) has traditionally been considered to reflect a dual function of its similarity to LDL, causing atherosclerosis, and its similarity to plasminogen, causing thrombosis through inhibition of fibrinolysis. This postulate remains highly speculative, however, because it has been difficult to separate the prothrombotic/antifibrinolytic functions of Lp(a) from its proatherosclerotic functions. This review surveys the current landscape surrounding these issues: the biochemical basis for procoagulant and antifibrinolytic effects of Lp(a) is summarized and the evidence addressing the role of Lp(a) in both arterial and venous thrombosis is discussed. While elevated Lp(a) appears to be primarily predisposing to thrombotic events in the arterial tree, the fact that most of these are precipitated by underlying atherosclerosis continues to confound our understanding of the true pathogenic roles of Lp(a) and, therefore, the most appropriate therapeutic target through which to mitigate the harmful effects of this lipoprotein.

Association of Apo(a)isoform size with dyslipoproteinemia in male venous thrombosis patients

BACKGROUND

Lp(a) is a proatherogenic lipoprotein that may also be prothrombotic. Apo(a) size isoforms have differential effects on fibrinolysis. Whereas Lp(a) concentrations have been linked to venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) risk, apo(a) polymorphisms in VTE have not been studied.

METHODS

We used a standardized high resolution agarose gel electrophoresis technique to determine apo(a) isoform size, and a Lp(a) immunoassay insensitive to apo(a) size to measure Lp(a) concentration in 46 men with VTE and 46 age-matched healthy controls.

RESULTS

Apo(a) isoform distribution in VTE cases and controls was bimodal and VTE patients tended to have more medium-sized isoforms K(4)-(19-27) (54.3% vs. 34.8%, p=0.06). Cases and controls had the same median predominant apo(a) size isoform (23.5 K(4) repeats) and comparable Lp(a) concentrations. However, subgroup analysis based on apo(a) isoform size (K(4)< or =23 or K(4)> or =24) revealed that cases in the K(4)> or =24 subgroup had higher Lp(a) concentrations than the controls in this isofrom subgroup (14.5 mmol vs. 6.6 mmol, p=0.029). Also, dyslipoproteinemia (smaller LDL and HDL particles, higher LDL and lower HDL parameters) was strongly associated with VTE only in this larger apo(a) isoform group.

CONCLUSIONS

These observations provide the first evidence that determination of apo(a) isoforms may provide useful novel insights into VTE risk.

Lipoprotein(a) and atherosclerosis: new perspectives on the mechanism of action of an enigmatic lipoprotein

Although elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) have been identified as a risk factor for coronary heart disease, the pathophysiologic and physiologic roles of Lp(a) continue to elude basic researchers and clinicians alike. Lp(a) is a challenging lipoprotein to study because it has a complex structure consisting of a low-density lipoprotein-like moiety to which is covalently attached the unique glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)). Apo(a) contains multiply repeated kringle domains that are similar to a sequence found in the fibrinolytic proenzyme plasminogen; differing numbers of kringle sequences in apo(a) give rise to Lp(a) isoform size heterogeneity. In addition to elevated plasma concentrations of Lp(a), apo(a) isoform size has been identified as a risk factor for coronary heart disease, although studies addressing this relationship have been limited. The similarity of Lp(a) to low-density lipoprotein and plasminogen provides an enticing link between the processes of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, although a clear demonstration of this association in vivo has not been provided. Clearly, Lp(a) is a risk factor for both atherothrombotic and purely thrombotic events; a plethora of mechanisms to explain these clinical findings has been provided by both in vitro studies as well as animal models for Lp(a).