Immunobead multiplex RT-PCR detection of carcinoembryonic genes expressing cells in the blood of colorectal cancer patients

Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

Liquid biopsy is a promising method in detecting colorectal cancer (CRC). However, previous meta‐analyses only focused on the diagnostic performance of cell‐free DNA (cfDNA). Therefore, we firstly evaluated the overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods. The pooled sensitivities, specificities, diagnostic odds ratios, and area under curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic curve for all liquid biopsy methods, exosomes, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and cfDNA were calculated, respectively. A total of 62 articles involving 18 739 individuals were included. Fifty‐one articles were about cfDNA, five articles were about CTCs, and six articles were about exosomes. The overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods had a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76‐0.78), 0.89 (95% CI 0.88‐0.90), and 0.9004, respectively. The sensitivities were 0.82 (95% CI 0.79‐0.85), 0.76 (95% CI 0.72‐0.80), and 0.76 (95% CI 0.75‐0.77) for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The specificities were 0.97 (95% CI95% CI 0.95‐0.99), 0.92 (95% CI 0.89‐0.94), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.87‐0.89) for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The AUC were 0.9772, 0.9037, and 0.8963 for CTCs, exosomes, and cfDNA, respectively. The overall performance of all liquid biopsy methods had great diagnostic value in detecting CRC, regardless of subtypes. Among all liquid biopsy methods, CTCs showed the best diagnostic performance.

Common molecular markers between circulating tumor cells and blood exosomes in colorectal cancer: a systematic and analytical review

Nearly half of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, are diagnosed in the late stages of the disease. Appropriate treatment is not applied in a timely manner and nearly 90% of the patients who experience metastasis ultimately die. Timely detection of CRC can increase the five-year survival rate of patients. Existing histopathological and molecular classifications are insufficient for prediction of metastasis, which limits approaches to treatment. Detection of reliable cancer-related biomarkers can improve early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response prediction and recurrence risk. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and exosomes in peripheral blood can be used in a liquid biopsy to assess the status of a tumor. Exosomes are abundant and available in all fluids of the body, have a high half-life and are released by most cells. Tumor-derived exosomes are released from primary tumors or CTCs with selective cargo that represents the overall tumor. The current systematic review highlights new trends and approaches in the detection of CRC biomarkers to determine tumor signatures using CTC and exosomes. When these are combined, they could be used to guide molecular pathology and can revolutionize detection tools. Relevant observational studies published until July 24, 2019 which evaluated the expression of tumor markers in CTCs and exosomes were searched in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and ISI Web of Science databases. The extracted biomarkers were analyzed using String and EnrichR tools.

Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers: Where Are We Now?

Colorectal cancer is one of the major causes of cancer-related death in the Western world. Patient survival is highly dependent on the tumor stage at the time of diagnosis. Reduced sensitivity to chemotherapy is still a major obstacle in effective treatment of advanced disease. Due to the fact that colorectal cancer is mostly asymptomatic until it progresses to advanced stages, the implementation of screening programs aimed at early detection is essential to reduce incidence and mortality rates. Current screening and diagnostic methods range from semi-invasive procedures such as colonoscopy to noninvasive stool-based tests. The combination of the absence of symptoms, the semi-invasive nature of currently used methods, and the suboptimal accuracy of fecal blood tests results in colorectal cancer diagnosis at advanced stages in a significant number of individuals. Alterations in gene expression leading to colorectal carcinogenesis are reflected in dysregulated levels of nucleic acids and proteins, which can be used for the development of novel, minimally invasive molecular biomarkers. The purpose of this review is to discuss the commercially available colorectal cancer molecular diagnostic methods as well as to highlight some of the new candidate predictive and prognostic molecular markers for tumor, stool, and blood samples.

Molecular biomarkers for the detection of metastatic colorectal cancer cells

Approximately half of all patients with colorectal cancer develop local recurrence or distant metastasis during the course of their illness. Recently, the molecular detection of metastatic cancer cells in various types of clinical samples, such as lymph nodes, bone marrow, peripheral blood, and peritoneal lavage fluid, has been investigated as a potential prognostic marker. The prognostic value of molecular tumor cell detection was independent of the type of detection method used. As assays become more sensitive and quantitative, a more thorough assessment of the cancer status of patients will be based on molecular markers alone. At present, it is difficult to conclude that one specific molecular marker is superior to others. Comparative analyses are recommended to assess the prognostic impact of molecular analyses in the same patient and determine the biomarkers that provide the most accurate prognostic information.

Molecular biomarkers in esophageal, gastric, and colorectal adenocarcinoma

Cancers of the esophagus, stomach and colon contribute to a major health burden worldwide and over 20% of all cancer deaths. Biomarkers that should indicate pathogenic process and are measureable in an objective manner for these tumors are rare and not established in the clinical setting. In general biomarkers can be very useful for cancer management as they can improve clinical decision-making regarding diagnosis, surveillance, and therapy. Biomarkers can be different types of molecular entities (such as DNA, RNA or proteins), which can be detected, in different tissues or body fluids. However, more important is the type of biomarker itself, which allows diagnostic, prognostic or predictive analyses for different clinical problems. This review aims to systematically summarize the recent findings of genetic and epigenetic markers for gastrointestinal tumors within the last decade. While many biomarkers seem to be very promising, especially if used as panels, further development is urgently needed to address practical considerations of biomarkers in cancer treatment.

Molecular tests for colorectal cancer screening

Detecting and removing high-risk adenomas and early colorectal cancer (CRC) can reduce mortality of this disease. The noninvasive fecal occult blood test (FOBT; guaiac-based or immunochemical) is widely used in screening programs and although effective, it leaves room for improvement in terms of test accuracy. Molecular tests are expected to be more sensitive, specific and informative than current detection tests, and are promising future tools for CRC screening. This review provides an overview of the performances of DNA, RNA, and protein markers for CRC detection in stool and blood. Most emphasis currently is on DNA and protein markers. Among DNA markers there is trend to move away from mutation markers in favor of methylation markers. The recent boost in proteomics research leads to many new candidate protein markers. Usually in small series, some markers show better performance than the present FOBT. Evaluation in large well-controlled randomized trials is the next step needed to take molecular markers for CRC screening to the next level and warrant implementation in a screening setting.

Sensitivity estimates of blood-based tests for colorectal cancer detection: impact of overrepresentation of advanced stage disease

A large number of blood-based markers have been proposed for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). Their sensitivity for detecting CRC has mostly been evaluated in clinical settings, and found to be higher in more advanced stages compared with earlier stages of the disease. The aim of this study is to estimate the overall sensitivity of blood-based markers expected in screening settings, where the proportion of advanced stages is typically lower than in clinical settings. A systematic literature review was performed on studies evaluating sensitivity and specificity of blood-based markers for early detection of CRC. For each study, overall sensitivity expected in screening settings was estimated by weighting stage-specific sensitivities according to the stage distribution of CRC expected in the screening setting. The latter was derived from 12,605 CRC cases diagnosed in the German screening colonoscopy program during 2003-2007. Overall, 73 studies evaluating 55 blood-based markers were identified. Adjusted sensitivity was lower than reported sensitivity in 120 (90%) evaluations of different markers. Median absolute reduction in sensitivity after adjustment was 9.0% (interquartile range: 4.0-13.0) units, whereas median relative reduction was 19.5% (interquartile range: 11.3-33.3%). Blood-based markers for CRC detection reported from clinical settings showed higher sensitivities than expected in the screening setting in most cases, mainly due to substantially higher proportions of advanced stage cancers. Adjustment of sensitivity to the stage distribution expected in the screening setting is crucial to obtain realistic and comparable estimates of sensitivities.

Blood markers for early detection of colorectal cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite different available methods for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and their proven benefits, morbidity, and mortality of this malignancy are still high, partly due to low compliance with screening. Minimally invasive tests based on the analysis of blood specimens may overcome this problem. The purpose of this review was to give an overview of published studies on blood markers aimed at the early detection of CRC and to summarize their performance characteristics.

METHOD

The PUBMED database was searched for relevant studies published until June 2006. Only studies with more than 20 cases and more than 20 controls were included. Information on the markers under study, on the underlying study populations, and on performance characteristics was extracted. Special attention was given to performance characteristics by tumor stage.

RESULTS

Overall, 93 studies evaluating 70 different markers were included. Most studies were done on protein markers, but DNA markers and RNA markers were also investigated. Performance characteristics varied widely between different markers, but also between different studies using the same marker. Promising results were reported for some novel assays, e.g., assays based on SELDI-TOF MS or MALDI-TOF MS, for some proteins (e.g., soluble CD26 and bone sialoprotein) and also for some genetic assays (e.g., L6 mRNA), but evidence thus far is restricted to single studies with limited sample size and without further external validation.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger prospective studies using study populations representing a screening population are needed to verify promising results. In addition, future studies should pay increased attention to the potential of detecting precursor lesions.

Epithelial molecular markers in the peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer

Despite the modest improvements in patient survival from colorectal cancer in the last few decades, the overall five-year survival rate remains at 40 to 45 percent. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer; however, nearly one-half of all patients who undergo a potentially curative resection will relapse because of undetected micrometastasis. The fact that the overall survival rate remains poor strongly suggests that the dissemination of these cells occurs early in the disease process and emphasizes the need for finding feasible diagnostic methods with sufficient sensitivity and specificity. The most commonly used technique for the detection of nucleic acid material of disseminated tumor cells is the polymerase chain reaction. We critically review the literature on DNA and messenger ribonucleic acid molecular markers that have been used for the detection of circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer and other solid tumors as appropriate for comparison. The cytokeratins, particularly cytokeratin 19 and cytokeratin 20, are the most investigated prognostic markers, but even for these questions remain about their clinical value, and hence most recent studies are utilizing a combination of factors. There is an urgent need for standardized isolation and analysis techniques to be adopted thus allowing large-scale, appropriately controlled, multicenter trials to be undertaken on the most promising candidate markers.

Real-time reverse transcription PCR and the detection of occult disease in colorectal cancer

Molecular diagnostics offers the promise of accurately matching patient with treatment, and a resultant significant effect on improved disease outcome. More specifically, the real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), with its combination of conceptual simplicity and technical utility, has the potential to become a valuable analytical tool for the detection of mRNA targets from tissue biopsies and body fluids. Its potential is particularly promising in cancer patients, both as a prognostic assay and for monitoring response to therapy. Colorectal cancer provides an instructive paradigm for this potential as well as the problems associated with its use as a clinical assay. Currently, histopathological staging, which provides a static description of the anatomical extent of tumour spread within a surgical specimen, defines patient prognosis. The detection of lymph node (LN) metastasis constitutes the most important prognostic factor in colorectal cancer and as the primary indicator of systemic disease spread, LN status determines the choice of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. However, its limitations are emphasised by the considerable prognostic heterogeneity of patients within a given tumour stage: not all patients with LN-negative cancers are cured and not all patients with LN-positive tumours die from their disease. This has resulted in a search for more accurate staging protocols and has seen the introduction of the concept of "molecular staging", the incorporation of molecular parameters into clinical tumour staging. Quantification of disease-associated mRNA is one such parameter that utilises the qRT-PCR assay's potential for generating quantitative results. These are not only more informative than qualitative data, but contribute to assay standardisation and quality management. This review provides an assessment of the practical value to the clinician of RT-PCR-based molecular diagnostics. It points out reasons for the many contradictory results encountered in the literature and concludes that there is an urgent need for standardisation at every level, starting with pre-assay sample acquisition and template preparation, assay protocols and post-assay analysis.

Long-term prognostic value of detection of circulating colorectal cancer cells using CGM2 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay

BACKGROUND

The criteria commonly used for prognosis of colorectal cancer remain histoprognostic and are based on primarily TNM classification. The lack of discrimination of purely histoprognostic criteria is evidenced by the development of different outcomes in similarly staged patients. The aim of this work was to study the long-term prognostic value of preoperative detection of circulating enterocytes in the blood of colorectal cancer patients using the CGM2 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay.

METHODS

A nested RT-PCR with specific primers for CGM2 was used preoperatively to detect circulating enterocytes in 121 patients (64 men, 57 women; mean age, 70 years) with colorectal neoplasms.

RESULTS

Circulating enterocytes were detected in 58/121 (48%) patients. The positivity rate was not correlated with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging (stage I, 11/28 (39%); stage II, 13/34 (38%); stage III, 15/23 (65%); stage IV, 17/32 (53%); sterilized (after radiotherapy, no residual neoplasm) 2/4 (50%); not significant [NS]), but circulating enterocytes were detected more frequently in patients with metastatic lymph nodes (60% vs 41%, P = .06). Overall 5-year survival rates (mean +/- SD) were 40 +/- 13% and 45 +/- 13% for patients without and with circulating enterocytes, respectively (P = NS). Similarly, recurrence-free survival rates were 71 +/- 4% versus 72 +/- 14% (P = NS). Using univariate analysis, AJCC stage (P < .0001) was correlated with survival. AJCC stage (P = .007) and obstructive neoplasms (P = .043) were correlated with recurrence-free survival. Using multivariate analysis, AJCC stage was correlated with survival and recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative detection of circulating enterocytes using CGM2 RT-PCR assay provides no specific prognostic information and cannot be used as a decision criterion for adjuvant therapy.