Asymptomatic elevation of parathyroid hormone levels by antibodies against reagent alkaline phosphatase

CONTEXT

Although immunoassay interference is a well-known phenomenon, its detection in routine clinical practice remains challenging. Most immunoassay interference can be attributed to the presence of heterophilic or anti-hormone antibodies. However, reports on immunoassay interference specifically related to parathyroid hormone (PTH) are scarce.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 77-year-old woman with hypertension, nephrotic syndrome, and high PTH levels for one year was admitted to our Surgical Department for treatment. The patient had no specific symptoms and normal calcium and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels but markedly elevated PTH levels. PTH was 2172 pg/mL using the Beckman Coulter system, whereas the Roche, Abbot, and Siemens systems yielded normal results. PTH concentration decreased to 63.8 pg/mL after pretreatment with polyethylene glycol 6000 and did not decrease to normal levels following pretreatment with heterophilic blocking tube-50 (HBT-50), heterophilic blocking reagent (HBR)-21, or HBR-25. When the HBR-21 concentration was increased, serum PTH decreased to 99.0 pg/mL. After treatment with scavenger bovine alkaline phosphatase (inactive), the concentration of PTH decreased to a normal value (51.3 pg/mL). Additionally, PTH (1-84) concentration was 17.6 pg/mL using LC-MS/MS.

CONCLUSION

PTH was falsely evaluated due to anti-bovine ALP antibodies (antibodies against reagent ALP). Anti-bovine ALP antibodies should be considered in assays that use ALP as a signal generator.

Biochemical Assessment of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) require prompt consideration and efficient diagnosis and treatment to minimize associated morbidity and mortality. Once considered, appropriate biochemical testing is key to diagnosis. Advances in understanding catecholamine metabolism have clarified why measurements of the O-methylated catecholamine metabolites rather than the catecholamines themselves are important for effective diagnosis. These metabolites, normetanephrine and metanephrine, produced respectively from norepinephrine and epinephrine, can be measured in plasma or urine, with choice according to available methods or presentation of patients. For patients with signs and symptoms of catecholamine excess, either test will invariably establish the diagnosis, whereas the plasma test provides higher sensitivity than urinary metanephrines for patients screened due to an incidentaloma or genetic predisposition, particularly for small tumors or in patients with an asymptomatic presentation. Additional measurements of plasma methoxytyramine can be important for some tumors, such as paragangliomas, and for surveillance of patients at risk of metastatic disease. Avoidance of false-positive test results is best achieved by plasma measurements with appropriate reference intervals and preanalytical precautions, including sampling blood in the fully supine position. Follow-up of positive results, including optimization of preanalytics for repeat tests or whether to proceed directly to anatomic imaging or confirmatory clonidine tests, depends on the test results, which can also suggest likely size, adrenal vs extra-adrenal location, underlying biology, or even metastatic involvement of a suspected tumor. Modern biochemical testing now makes diagnosis of PPGL relatively simple. Integration of artificial intelligence into the process should make it possible to fine-tune these advances.

Heterophilic antibody interference in commercial immunoassays; a screening study using paired native and pre-blocked sera

Heterophilic antibodies are still an important source of interference in immunoassays. We have conducted a screening study for interference in a panel of commercially available assays using two sera known to contain high titer Fc-reactive heterophilic antibodies.

The sera were distributed to laboratories participating in the Nordic External Quality Assessment cooperation (EQANord). Duplicate samples pre-blocked with aggregated murine monoclonal MAK33 were also supplied. Discrepancies (>50%) between the results for native and blocked samples were used to classify the tested assays as susceptible to interference. A total of 170 different assay kits covering 91 analytes were tested.

We found that 21 assays, covering 19 different analytes, were susceptible to interference from the heterophilic antibodies in the two sera. Many of these are clinically and commercially important assays. Some of the false results were grossly elevated and could have been detrimental to patient care in a clinical setting.

Heterophilic antibodies with Fc-reactivity remain a threat. A more widespread use of antibody fragments and aggregated immunoglobulin could potentially improve the heterophilic antibody resistance of assays intended for clinical use.