The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)

DNA-Directed Protein Anchoring on Oligo/Alkanethiol-Coated Gold Nanoparticles: A Versatile Platform for Biosensing Applications

Herein, we report on a smart biosensing platform that exploits gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) functionalized through ssDNA self-assembled monolayers (SAM) and the DNA-directed immobilization (DDI) of DNA-protein conjugates; a novel, high-sensitivity optical characterization technique based on a miniaturized gel electrophoresis chip integrated with online thermal lens spectrometry (MGEC-TLS), for the high-sensitivity detection of antigen binding events. Specifically, we characterized the physicochemical properties of 20 nm AuNPs covered with mixed SAMs of thiolated single-stranded DNA and bio-repellent molecules, referred to as top-terminated oligo-ethylene glycol (TOEG6), demonstrating high colloidal stability, optimal binder surface density, and proper hybridization capacity. Further, to explore the design in the frame of cancer-associated antigen detection, complementary ssDNA fragments conjugated with a nanobody, called C8, were loaded on the particles and employed to detect the presence of the HER2-ECD antigen in liquid. At variance with conventional surface plasmon resonance detection, MGEC-TLS characterization confirmed the capability of the assay to titrate the HER2-ECD antigen down to concentrations of 440 ng/mL. The high versatility of the directed protein-DNA conjugates immobilization through DNA hybridization on plasmonic scaffolds and coupled with the high sensitivity of the MGEC-TLS detection qualifies the proposed assay as a potential, easily operated biosensing strategy for the fast and label-free detection of disease-relevant antigens.

Relationship between HER2 overexpression and long-term outcomes of early gastric cancer: a prospective observational study with a 6-year follow-up

Background

Studies have confirmed the prognostic value of the expression status of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in advanced gastric cancer. However, its role in early gastric cancer (EGC) remains largely unknown. This study explored the association between HER2 overexpression and clinical outcomes of patients with EGC.

Methods

A total of 211 patients who had undergone endoscopic treatment for pN0 EGC were enrolled. The HER2 expression status was assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Results

The prevalence of HER2 overexpression was 14.2%. HER2 overexpression showed a significant correlation with tumor location (P = 0.033). Multivariate analysis showed that HER2 overexpression was significantly associated with an increased risk of tumor recurrence in pN0 EGC (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30–12.14; P = 0.016) but not overall survival (OS) or disease-specific survival (DSS). Of the included patients, age was associated with OS (HR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.04–1.18; P = 0.002], whereas lymphovascular invasion was significantly associated with poor DSS (HR = 33.66; 95% CI 3.05–371.25; P = 0.004).

Conclusion

This study shows that HER2 overexpression is significantly associated with tumor recurrence in pN0 EGC. Hence, Her2 testing at diagnosis is important and differential treatment and/or follow up strategies for patients with Her2 overexpression may merit future study.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02309-7.

A prospective study to assess the clinical utility of serum HER2 extracellular domain in breast cancer with HER2 overexpression

Purpose

We explored the clinical utility of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 extracellular domain (HER2/ECD) in patients treated for an invasive breast cancer with HER2 overexpression.

Methods

We prospectively studied HER2/ECD levels in the sera of 334 women included between 2007 and 2014, all treated with trastuzumab. HER2/ECD levels were measured at diagnosis, during treatments, and along the follow-up. We investigated the relationship of HER2/ECD with other clinicopathological parameters at diagnosis, its prognosis value, and its utility during the monitoring of a neoadjuvant treatment and the follow-up.

Results

Elevated HER2/ECD at diagnosis correlated positively with parameters associated with tumor aggressiveness. Disease-free survival of non-metastatic patients was significantly shorter in patients with high HER2/ECD at diagnosis (HR = 13.6, 95 % CI 1.6–113.6, P < 0.0001). Progression-free survival of metastatic patients was better for patients with low HER2/ECD (HR = 2.6, 95 % CI 1.2–5.3, P = 0.033). A multivariate analysis revealed that HER2/ECD level at diagnosis was an independent prognosis factor. During neoadjuvant therapy, a significant decrease in HER2/ECD was reported only for the complete histological response group (P = 0.031). During the follow-up, HER2/ECD helped predict relapse, disease progression, and metastases before imaging in 18.6 % cases of the studied cohort.

Conclusions

HER2/ECD is a prognosis factor that is valuable in evaluating the neoadjuvant treatment efficiency. HER2/ECD also appears to be a helpful surveillance biomarker for the early diagnosis of relapses and to predict the fate of metastases. This study brings evidences to support the use of HER2/ECD in the management of HER2-positive breast cancer.

Laboratory medicine and medical oncology: the tale of two Cinderellas

Cancer represents a leading cause of death in the developed countries. The past 50 years have witnessed major progress in both laboratory medicine and clinical oncology that has translated into improved prognosis of cancer patients. From the humble beginnings as unrelated specialties, major advances in the understanding of molecular bases of cancer progression led to increased interactions between laboratory medicine and clinical (mostly medical) oncology. Laboratory medicine is now an integral part of the management of cancer patients. The many aspects of the role of laboratory medicine in clinical oncology include the determination of biomarkers that are used in establishing the diagnosis, predicting response to therapy or prognosis, study of the host response to tumor growth, detection of treatment toxicity and determining the concentrations of anticancer drugs.

Sensitivity of CA 15-3, CEA and serum HER2 in the early detection of recurrence of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this project was to investigate the sensitivity of CA 15-3, CEA and HER2 in the early diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Serial serum values of CA 15-3, CEA and HER2 were determined in 107 patients with recurrence after breast cancer. Fifteen of the patients had primary disseminated disease, nine patients only developed local recurrence during the follow-up period and the remaining 83 developed distant metastases.

RESULTS

In the group of patients with distant metastatic disease (n=83), elevated serum levels of CA 15-3 (>32.4 U/mL), CEA (>2.5 µg/L for non-smokers and >10 µg/L for smokers) and HER2 (>15 µg/L) were found in 49.4%, 38.6% and 32.5%, respectively, at the time of diagnosis of recurrence. CA 15-3 was significantly better than HER2 (p=0.027). The most sensitive combination was obtained using CA 15-3/CEA (60.2%) or CA 15-3/HER2 (57.8%). Combining all three tumour markers raised the sensitivity to 63.9%. In the subgroup of patients with tissue HER2+ tumours, the sensitivity of HER2 increased to 55.6%. The best combination in this group was CEA/HER2 (66.7%). In the subgroup of patients with tissue HER2- tumours, CA 15-3 was significantly better. The best combination was CA 15-3/HER2 or CA 15-3/CEA with a sensitivity of 55.8% and 59.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of several tumour markers enhances the sensitivity for detection of metastatic breast cancer. We recommend HER2 or the combination of CEA and HER2 in tissue HER2+ and CA 15-3 or the combination of CA 15-3 and CEA in tissue HER2-.

Usefulness of traditional serum biomarkers for management of breast cancer patients

The measurement of serum tumor markers levels in breast cancer (BC) patients is an economic and noninvasive diagnostic assay frequently requested by clinical oncologists to get information about the presence or absence of disease as well as its evolution. Despite their wide use in clinical practice, there is still an intense debate between scientific organizations about the real usefulness for patient monitoring during followup as well as response to therapy evaluation in case of advanced BC. In this review, we want to highlight the current recommendations published by scientific organizations about the use of “established” BC serum markers (CEA, TPA, TPS, CIFRA-21, CA15-3, and s-HER2) in clinical oncology practice. Moreover, we will focus on recent papers evidencing the usefulness of tumor markers levels measurement as a guide for the prescription and diagnostic integration of molecular imaging exams such as those performed by hybrid 18-fluorofeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography with integrated computed tomography. This technology is nowadays able to detect early cancer lesions undetectable by conventional morphological imaging investigation and most likely responsible for increasing of serum tumor markers levels.

Molecular and cellular heterogeneity in breast cancer: challenges for personalized medicine

Breast cancer is noted for disparate clinical behaviors and patient outcomes, despite common histopathological features at diagnosis. Molecular pathogenesis studies suggest that breast cancer is a collection of diseases with variable molecular underpinnings that modulate therapeutic responses, disease-free intervals, and long-term survival. Traditional therapeutic strategies for individual patients are guided by the expression status of the estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Although such methods for clinical classification have utility in selection of targeted therapies, short-term patient responses and long-term survival remain difficult to predict. Molecular signatures of breast cancer based on complex gene expression patterns have utility in prediction of long-term patient outcomes, but are not yet used for guiding therapy. Examination of the correspondence between these methods for breast cancer classification reveals a lack of agreement affecting a significant percentage of cases. To realize true personalized breast cancer therapy, a more complete analysis and evaluation of the molecular characteristics of the disease in the individual patient is required, together with an understanding of the contributions of specific genetic and epigenetic alterations (and their combinations) to management of the patient. Here, we discuss the molecular and cellular heterogeneity of breast cancer, the impact of this heterogeneity on practical breast cancer classification, and the challenges for personalized breast cancer treatment.