Naser NA, Alasedi KM, Khan ZA. New approach for determination of sulfadiazine in pharmaceutical preparations using 4(4-sulphophenylazo)pyrogallol: Kinetic spectrophotometric method.
SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA. PART A, MOLECULAR AND BIOMOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY 2018;
201:267-280. [PMID:
29758513 DOI:
10.1016/j.saa.2018.05.012]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Revised: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
A new trend describes the development and validation of a simple, sensitive and selective kinetic spectrophotometric methods for the determination of sulfadiazine in pharmaceutical formulations has been conducted. In this paper, sulfadiazine was derivatized as a new organic compound 4(4-sulphophenylazo) pyrogallol, 4-SPAP, by coupling pyrogallol with diazotized sulfadiazine in medium of controlled pH. 4-SPAP was characterized by techniques of FT-IR, H-NMR, GC-Mass, TG and DSC thermal analysis methods. Solvatochromic behavior in solvents of various polarities was also investigated. The determination of sulfadiazine was accomplished by initial rate and fixed time methods. These methods were based on the reaction of the compound containing sulfadiazine, 4-SPAP, with Ca(II) to form colored product with a maximum absorbance at 520 nm. The two methods were adopted for constructing the calibration curves and examined for their suitability for the quantitation of sulfadiazine in pharmaceuticals. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were found to be, by initial rate method, 0.35 and 1.05 μg·mL-1and that by fixed time method were found to be 0.69 and 2.07 μg·mL-1, respectively. The percent relative standard deviations (%RSD) for the results ranged from 1.04% to 1.76% and 0.85% to 1.42% for the initial rate and fixed time methods of the proposed kinetic spectrophotometric method, respectively. The existence of common excipients in the pharmaceutical formulation did not produce any significant interference. Statistical comparison was reported as indicated from the F- and t-test data of the proposed methods with that of reference method showing excellent agreement and indicating no significant difference in their accuracy and precision.
Collapse