Effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of bosutinib, a dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, when administered concomitantly to healthy subjects

Clinical pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia: A clinical perspective

In the past decade, numerous tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been introduced in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Given the significant interpatient variability in TKIs pharmacokinetics, potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can greatly impact patient therapy. This review aims to discuss the pharmacokinetic characteristics of TKIs, specifically focusing on their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion profiles. Additionally, it provides a comprehensive overview of the utilization of TKIs in special populations such as the elderly, children, and patients with liver or kidney dysfunction. We also highlight known or suspected DDIs between TKIs and other drugs, highlighting various clinically relevant interactions. Moreover, specific recommendations are provided to guide haemato-oncologists, oncologists, and clinical pharmacists in managing DDIs during TKI treatment in daily clinical practice.

[Optimizing the use of bosutinib in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: Recommendations of a panel of experts from the Fi-LMC (French CML working group)]

The treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia relies on orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the BCR::ABL1 oncoprotein. Bosutinib is a second generation adenosine triphosphate-competitive inhibitor approved for use in frontline adult chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia and all phases-chronic myeloid leukemia in the second line setting or beyond. Its efficacy was demonstrated in several pivotal clinical trials at 400mg once daily in the first line context and at 500mg once daily beyond first line. Bosutinib-related adverse events frequently occur early after treatment initiation and include gastro-intestinal symptoms and cytolytic hepatitis. These drug-related adverse events must be properly managed in order to preserve safety, efficacy and treatment acceptability. The French chronic myeloid leukemia study group gathered a panel of experts in hematology, pharmacology and hepatology in order to elaborate practical recommendations on the management of bosutinib treatment. These recommendations aim at optimizing the short and long-term tolerance and benefit/risk balance of bosutinib, mainly focusing at gastro-intestinal and liver toxicities.

Considering the Oral Bioavailability of Protein Kinase Inhibitors: Essential in Assessing the Extent of Drug-Drug Interaction and Improving Clinical Practice

Protein kinase inhibitors share pharmacokinetic (PK) pathways among themselves. They are all metabolized by several cytochromes P450 (CYP). For most of them, CYP3A4 is the predominant metabolic pathway. However, their oral bioavailability differs. For example, the oral bioavailability of imatinib has been estimated at nearly 100%, but that of ibrutinib averages 3% due to its high hepatic first-pass effect. Overall, the smaller the oral bioavailability, the larger its interindividual PK variability. Indeed, for drugs with low oral bioavailability, the extent of their absorption is an additional cause (along with elimination variability) of differences in drug exposure among patients. The impact of drug-drug interaction (DDI) also differs between drugs with low or high oral bioavailability. We describe and explain why the impact of CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers is much greater for protein kinase inhibitors with low oral bioavailability. The effect of food on protein kinase inhibitors and DDIs corresponding to plasma protein binding will also be considered. Finally, the benefits of these concepts in clinical practice (including therapeutic drug monitoring) will be discussed. Overall, our main objective was to apply fundamental PK concepts to understanding the main clinical issues of these oral anticancer drugs.

Involvement of Transporters in Intestinal Drug-Drug Interactions of Oral Targeted Anticancer Drugs Assessed by Changes in Drug Absorption Time

(1) Background: Oral targeted anticancer drugs are victims of presystemic pharmacokinetic drug−drug interactions (DDI). Identification of the nature of these DDIs, i.e., enzyme-based or/and transporter-based, is challenging, since most of these drugs are substrates of intestinal and/or hepatic cytochrome P-450 enzymes and of intestinal membrane transporters. (2) Methods: Variations in mean absorption time (MAT) between DDIs and control period (MAT ratios < 0.77 or >1.30) have been proposed to implicate transporters in DDIs at the intestinal level. This methodology has been applied to a large set of oral targeted anticancer drugs (n = 54, involved in 77 DDI studies), from DDI studies available either in the international literature and/or in publicly accessible FDA files. (3) Results: Significant variations in MAT were evidenced in 33 DDI studies, 12 of which could be explained by modulation of an efflux transporter. In 21 DDI studies, modulation of efflux transporters could not explain the MAT variation, suggesting a possible relevant role of influx transporters in the intestinal absorption. (4) Conclusions: This methodology allows one to suggest the involvement of intestinal transporters in DDIs, and should be used in conjunction with in vitro methodologies to help understanding the origin of DDIs.

A drug-drug interaction study to evaluate the impact of peficitinib on OCT1- and MATE1-mediated transport of metformin in healthy volunteers

Purpose

Peficitinib is an oral pan-Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Co-administration of peficitinib with metformin, a type 2 diabetes therapy, can occur in clinical practice. Hepatic and renal uptake of metformin is mediated by organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) and OCT2, respectively, and its renal excretion by multidrug and toxin extrusion 1 (MATE1) and MATE2-K. This study investigated the effect of peficitinib on metformin pharmacokinetics in vitro and in healthy volunteers.

Methods

Inhibitory effects of peficitinib and its metabolite H2 on metformin uptake into human OCT1/2- and MATE1/2-K-expressing cells were assessed in vitro. In an open-label, drug–drug interaction study, 24 healthy volunteers received a single dose of metformin 750 mg on Days 1 and 10, and a single dose of peficitinib 150 mg on Days 3 and 5–11. Blood and urine samples were collected pre-dose on Days 1 and 10, and at intervals ≤ 48 h post-dose. Metformin concentration was determined by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry and its pharmacokinetic parameters calculated.

Results

Peficitinib, but not H2, inhibited metformin uptake into OCT1- and MATE1/2-K-expressing cells. Repeated-dose administration of peficitinib reduced metformin area under the concentration–time curve from 0 h extrapolated to infinity (AUC_inf) by 17.4%, maximum plasma concentration (C_max) by 17.0%, and renal clearance (CL_R) by 12.9%. Co-administration of peficitinib with metformin was generally well tolerated.

Conclusion

Slight changes in AUC_inf, C_max and CL_R of metformin were observed when co-administered with peficitinib; however, these changes were considered not clinically relevant.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-02876-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Oral oncolytic and antiretroviral therapy administration: dose adjustments, drug interactions, and other considerations for clinical use

The rise in non-AIDS defining cancers (NADCs) is emerging as a leading cause of death for HIV and cancer patients. To address this, current literature and guidelines suggest the continuation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) with oral oncolytic agents to prevent adverse complications associated with HIV disease progression. However, such an approach has the potential for drug-drug interactions and adverse events for patients on such therapy. Further, recommendations on how to adjust these medications, when used concomitantly, are limited. As such, our purpose is to evaluate existing literature through such means as drug databases (e.g. Micromedex, Lexi-Comp, etc.) and package inserts along with PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar databases to develop a reference tool for providers to utilize when there is a decision to treat a patient with ART and oral oncolytic agents concurrently. Our findings suggest that there are many drug interactions that should be taken into consideration with dual therapy. Metabolism is a key determinant of dose adjustment, and many oncolytic agents and ART agents must have their dose adjusted as such. Most notably, several tyrosine kinase inhibitors require dose increases when used with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) but must be decreased when used concomitantly with protease inhibitors (PIs) and cobicistat. Further findings suggest that certain agents should not be used together, which include, but are not limited to, such combinations as bosutinib with NNRTIs, cobicistat, or PIs; idelalisib with maraviroc or PIs; neratinib with NNRTIs, cobicistat, or PIs; and venetoclax with NNRTIs. Overall, the most prominent oncolytic drug interactions were discovered when such agents were used concomitantly with PIs, cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir, or NNRTIs. Future studies are necessary to further evaluate the use of these agents together in disease therapy to generate absolute evidence of such findings. However, from the studies evaluated, much evidence exists to suggest that concomitant therapy is not without drug interactions. As such, clinical decisions regarding concomitant therapy should be evaluated in which the risk and benefit of dual therapy are assessed. Dose adjustments must be made accordingly and in consultation with both HIV and oncology clinicians and pharmacists to reduce the risk for adverse outcomes and disease progression for those with cancer and HIV/AIDS.

Reviewing the role of healthy volunteer studies in drug development

BACKGROUND

With the exception of genotoxic oncology drugs, first-in-human, Phase 1 clinical studies of investigational drugs have traditionally been conducted in healthy volunteers (HVs). The primary goal of these studies is to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel drug candidate, determine appropriate dosing, and document safety and tolerability.

MAIN BODY

When tailored to specific study objectives, HV studies are beneficial to manufacturers and patients alike and can be applied to both non-oncology and oncology drug development. Enrollment of HVs not only increases study accrual rates for dose-escalation studies but also alleviates the ethical concern of enrolling patients with disease in a short-term study at subtherapeutic doses when other studies (e.g. Phase 2 or Phase 3 studies) may be more appropriate for the patient. The use of HVs in non-oncology Phase 1 clinical trials is relatively safe but nonetheless poses ethical challenges because of the potential risks to which HVs are exposed. In general, most adverse events associated with non-oncology drugs are mild in severity, and serious adverse events are rare, but examples of severe toxicity have been reported. The use of HVs in the clinical development of oncology drugs is more limited but is nonetheless useful for evaluating clinical pharmacology and establishing an appropriate starting dose for studies in cancer patients. During the development of oncology drugs, clinical pharmacology studies in HVs have been used to assess pharmacokinetics, drug metabolism, food effects, potential drug-drug interactions, effects of hepatic and renal impairment, and other pharmacologic parameters vital for clinical decision-making in oncology. Studies in HVs are also being used to evaluate biosimilars versus established anticancer biologic agents.

CONCLUSION

A thorough assessment of toxicity and pharmacology throughout the drug development process is critical to ensure the safety of HVs. With the appropriate safeguards, HVs will continue to play an important role in future drug development.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bosutinib

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal myeloproliferative stem cell disorder. Bosutinib is an oral, once-daily SRC/ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor with very potent inhibitory activity. Bosutinib is effective against all phases of intolerant or resistant Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML that do not harbor the T315I or V299LABL kinase domain mutations. Peak plasma concentrations of bosutinib occur at 4-6 h following oral administration, and dose-proportional increases in exposure are observed at doses ranging from 200 to 800 mg. Absorption of bosutinib increases with food. Bosutinib is distributed extensively into the tissues. It is highly plasma protein bound (94 %) and is primarily metabolized in the liver by cytochrome P450 3A4. Bosutinib is well tolerated overall and has a unique but manageable toxicity profile. This article provides a review of the available clinical pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and drug-drug interaction data on bosutinib in healthy subjects, patients with CML, and special populations.

Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions Through Cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) for the Selective ALK Inhibitor Alectinib

The efficacy and safety of alectinib, a central nervous system-active and selective anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, has been demonstrated in patients with ALK-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing on crizotinib. Alectinib is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) to a major similarly active metabolite, M4. Alectinib and M4 show evidence of weak time-dependent inhibition and small induction of CYP3A in vitro. We present results from 3 fixed-sequence studies evaluating drug-drug interactions for alectinib through CYP3A. Studies NP28990 and NP29042 enrolled 17 and 24 healthy subjects, respectively, and investigated potent CYP3A inhibition with posaconazole and potent CYP3A induction through rifampin, respectively, on the single oral dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of alectinib. A substudy of the global phase 2 NP28673 study enrolled 15 patients with ALK+ NSCLC to determine the effect of multiple doses of alectinib on the single oral dose PK of midazolam, a sensitive substrate of CYP3A. Potent CYP3A inhibition or induction resulted in only minor effects on the combined exposure of alectinib and M4. Multiple doses of alectinib did not influence midazolam exposure. These results suggest that dose adjustments may not be needed when alectinib is coadministered with CYP3A inhibitors or inducers or for coadministered CYP3A substrates.

Pharmacogenetics of BCR/ABL Inhibitors in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Chronic myeloid leukemia was the first haematological neoplasia that benefited from a targeted therapy with imatinib nearly 15 years ago. Since then, several studies have investigated the role of genes, their variants (i.e., polymorphisms) and their encoded proteins in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase activity inhibitors (TKIs). Transmembrane transporters seem to influence in a significant manner the disposition of TKIs, especially that of imatinib at both cellular and systemic levels. In particular, members of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) family (namely ABCB1 and ABCG2) together with solute carrier (SLC) transporters (i.e., SLC22A1) are responsible for the differences in drug pharmacokinetics. In the case of the newer TKIs, such as nilotinib and dasatinib, the substrate affinity of these drugs for transporters is variable but lower than that measured for imatinib. In this scenario, the investigation of genetic variants as possible predictive markers has led to some discordant results. With the partial exception of imatinib, these discrepancies seem to limit the application of discovered biomarkers in the clinical settings. In order to overcome these issues, larger prospective confirmative trials are needed.

Bosutinib for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

In recent years the availability of several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in the therapeutic armamentarium for chronic myeloid leukemia has dramatically changed the objectives and expectations of healthcare providers and patients. For many, but not all, patients the forerunner of TKI, imatinib, is still an excellent treatment option. Unfortunately, nearly 30-40% of imatinib-treated patients discontinue therapy in the long-term, because of failure and/or intolerance. Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors are more potent drugs which are suitable for treatment of approximately 50% of patents for whom imatinib is unsuitable, and with high success and rapid responses. Bosutinib, an orally bioavailable Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has proved to be effective in vitro against resistant chronic myeloid leukemia cells that do not harbor the T315I or V299L ABL kinase domain mutations. During clinical development the manageable safety profile of bosutinib have become evident for both simple and more advanced treatment. In this review we summarize preclinical and clinical data for bosutinib and discuss its ideal field of action in comparison with other TKI.