Peanut components measured by ISAC: comparison with ImmunoCap and clinical relevance in peanut allergic children

Background

Specific IgE (sIgE) against the peanut component Arachis hypogaea (Ara h) 2 has been shown to be the most important allergen to discriminate between peanut allergy and peanut tolerance. Several studies determined sIgE cut off values for Ara h 2, determined by singleplex measurements. However, cut off values for Ara h 2 from multiplex arrays are less well defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between Ara h 2 sIgE determined by singleplex versus multiplex measurements and to assess the diagnostic value of the different peanut components included in Immuno Solid-phase Allergen Chip (ISAC) multiplex analysis in children with a suspected peanut allergy.

Methods

In this retrospective study we analyzed Ara h 2 sIgE values with singleplex Fluorescence Enzyme Immunoassay (FEIA, ImmunoCap) and multiplex microarray (ISAC) measurements in 117 children with a suspected peanut allergy. Also, other peanut components measured by ISAC were analyzed. Double blinded placebo controlled oral food challenges were used as golden standard.

Results

Among all studied peanut components FEIA Ara h 2 sIgE showed the highest area under the curve (AUC, 0.922), followed by ISAC Ara h 6 and Ara h 2 sIgE with AUCs of respectively 0.906 and 0.902. Best cut off values to diagnose peanut allergy were 4.40 kU/l for FEIA Ara h 2 sIgE and, 7.43 ISU and 8.13 ISU for respectively Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 sIgE in ISAC microarray. Ara h 2 sIgE determined in FEIA and ISAC showed a good correlation (r = 0.88; p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Ara h 6 and Ara h 2 sIgE in multiplex ISAC are both good predictors of clinical peanut allergy in Dutch children, and their performance is comparable to the use of Ara h 2 in singleplex FEIA. The simultaneous measurement of different peanut components using ISAC is an advantage and clinically useful to detect peanut allergic children that are Ara h 2 negative but sensitized to other peanut proteins such as Ara h 6.

Peanut allergy diagnosis: A 2020 practice parameter update, systematic review, and GRADE analysis

Given the burden of disease and the consequences of a diagnosis of peanut allergy, it is important that peanut allergy be accurately diagnosed so that an appropriate treatment plan can be developed. However, a test that indicates there is peanut sensitization present (eg, a "positive" test) is not always associated with clinical reactivity. This practice parameter addresses the diagnosis of IgE-mediated peanut allergy, both in children and adults, as pertaining to 3 fundamental questions, and based on the systematic reviews and meta-analyses, makes recommendations for the clinician who is evaluating a patient for peanut allergy. These questions relate to when diagnostic tests should be completed, which diagnostic tests to utilize, and the utility (or lack thereof) of diagnostic testing to predict the severity of a future allergic reaction to peanut.

Diagnosis of peanut allergy using continuous likelihood ratios

BACKGROUND

Peanut allergy (PA) is associated with an economic and psychological burden on patients and families. Its diagnosis includes tests for peanut specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE), the values of which usually are categorized as positive or negative using a predefined cutoff (usually 0.35 kU/L). With the use of Bayes' theorem, this categorization can be replaced with a continuous interpretation of sIgE, which accounts for the prevalence of PA and history of ingestion.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a method for estimating the likelihood ratio (LR) for each value of sIgE by performing a pilot investigation with the results of oral food challenges. The LR could be used to estimate the probability of PA.

METHODS

The outcomes of oral food challenges and serum IgE values from 117 children seen in an allergy clinic between January 2017 and November 2019 were obtained. Polynomial regression of the receiver operation characteristics curve was used to determine an LR for each value of sIgE. Linear regression was used to estimate an LR for each value of sIgE.

RESULTS

sIgE ranged from less than 0.1 kU/L to 35 kU/L. Bayes' theorem and a receiver operation characteristics curve were used to estimate LRs for each value of peanut sIgE. The value of IgE associated with an LR of 1 was 0.22 kU/L, which is comparable to other studies that used a value of 0.35 kU/L to separate positive from negative results.

CONCLUSION

When combined with estimates of pretest probability, this method should permit the development of computerized decision-making algorithms to estimate the probability that a patient has PA.

Accuracy of component-resolved diagnostics in peanut allergy: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Peanut allergy diagnosis relies on clinical reactivity to peanut supported by detection of specific IgE (sIgE) antibodies. Extract-based sIgE tests have low specificity, so component-resolved diagnostics may complement whole-extract testing.

METHODS

We systematically collected peanut allergen component data in seven databases and studied the diagnostic accuracy of peanut storage proteins (Arah1, 2, 3) and cross-reactive peanut proteins (Arah8 PR-10 and Arah9 lipid transfer protein) through meta-analyses. The systematic literature review included studies employing peanut components and oral food challenge (OFC) as reference standard in patients suspected of peanut allergy. Data for component sIgE at pre-defined detection thresholds were extracted and combined in random-effects bivariate meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed as recommended by Cochrane, with two additional quality items of importance for this review.

RESULTS

Nineteen eligible studies presented data suitable for meta-analysis. In cross-sectional pediatric studies, the pooled sensitivity of Arah2-sIgE at 0.35 kU_A /L cutoff was 83.3% [95% CI 75.6, 88.9] and specificity in diagnosing objective peanut allergy was 83.6% [95% CI 77.4, 88.4]. Compared with 0.1 and 1.0 kU_A /L, this threshold provided the best diagnostic accuracy. At 0.35 kU_A /L, Arah1 and Arah3 had comparable specificity (86.0% and 88.0%, respectively) but significantly lower sensitivity compared with Arah2 (37.0% and 39.1%, respectively; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

sIgE to Arah2 can enhance the certainty of diagnosis and reduce the number of OFC necessary to rule out clinical peanut allergy in unclear cases.