Al2O3 Concentration Effect on Deep Hydrodesulfurization of 4,6-Dimethyldibenzothiophene over NiWS/Al2O3-ZrO2 Catalysts

The Al2O3 concentration effect over NiWS/Al x Zr100-x catalysts was investigated for deep hydrodesulfurization (HDS) of 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene (4,6-DMDBT). The sol-gel method changed the wt % Al2O3 concentrations used to synthesize the Al x Zr100-x supports. The NiWS/Al x Zr100-x catalysts were prepared with ammonium metatungstate hydrate and nickel(II) nitrate hexahydrate by sequential incipient impregnation, calcination, and H2S/H2 activation. The catalytic evaluation data fit a pseudo-first-order trend in the 4,6-DMDBT HDS reactions. In the oxide phase, the catalysts presented Ni and W species in tetrahedral (td) and octahedral (oh) coordination, with the oh species prevailing as a function of the Al2O3 amount. The lower amount of Al2O3 can facilitate the "Type II" NiWS phase formation by weakening the interaction of the W-O-Al bond and promoting W and Ni species sulfidation. In the sulfide phase, catalysts with (oh) coordination and surface WO X species promote the formation of WS2 and NiWS species during the catalyst activation step. This species favors the reaction yield, where the hydrogenation route is predominant, with the highest initial reaction rate using the NiWS/Al25Zr75 catalyst. A direct correlation was found between high hydrogenation/hydrogenolysis ratio values and low Al2O3 concentrations.

Hydrodesulfurization of 4,6–Dimethyldibenzothiophene on NiMoP/γ–Al2O3 catalyst under reactive distillation conditions in a micro trickle bed reactor: solvent and temperature effect

In this work, the influence of pressure and temperature experimentally applied on reactive distillation (RD) under lower conditions than conventional hydrotreating (HDT) processes, the hydrodesulfurization (HDS) reaction of 4,6–dimethyldibenzothiophene (4,6–DMDBT) molecule and the experimental performance of a down-flow micro trickle bed reactor (micro-TBR) with n–dodecane and decalin were studied. Thermodynamic analyses to evaluate hydrogen solubility in liquid hydrocarbons and evaporation for n–dodecane and decalin as lineal and cyclic representative solvents, respectively, were considered. It was possible to define experimental conditions, producing a small deviation of the plug flow model (PFM) and diminished the gas–liquid (G–L) mass transfer limitation as determined from a reactor model at 2.5 MPa. The axial dispersion model (ADM) and PFM models adjust the experimental data at 2.5 MPa operational pressure and the 4,6–DMDBT conversion obtained was ca. 20–50% using n–dodecane; 1.5 times higher when decalin was using. This behavior was due to the liquid hydrogen fraction of n–dodecane was two times higher than for decalin for all operational pressures. In this sense, the use of n–dodecane as a solvent decreased the mass transfer resistance at the G–L and liquid–solid (L–S) interphases. The internal mass transfer resistance in the G–L interphase not only depends on the diffusivity of the solvent, but it also depends on both, the temperature and hydrogen pressure, finding that the RD conditions with n–dodecane are viable in the treatment of sterically impaired molecules in HDS processes.