Predictors of bone maturation, growth rate and adult height in children with central precocious puberty treated with depot leuprolide acetate

2022 Clinical practice guidelines for central precocious puberty of Korean children and adolescents

The Committee of Central Precocious Puberty of Korean Pediatrics and Adolescents of the Korean Society of Pediatric Endocrinology has newly developed evidence-based 2022 clinical practice guidelines for central precocious puberty in Korean children and adolescents. These guidelines provide the grade of recommendations, which includes both the strength of recommendations and the level of evidence. In the absence of sufficient evidence, recommendations are based on expert opinion. These guidelines have been revised and supplement the previous guidelines "Clinical Guidelines for Precocious Puberty 2011," and are drawn from a comprehensive review of the latest domestic and international research and the grade of recommendation appropriate to the domestic situation. This review summarizes the newly revised guidelines into 8 key questions and 27 recommendations and consists of 4 sections: screening, diagnosis, treatment, and long-term outcome of central precocious puberty.

Efficacy and Safety of Leuprolide Acetate 6-Month Depot for the Treatment of Central Precocious Puberty: A Phase 3 Study

Context

Treatment options for central precocious puberty (CPP) are important for individualization of therapy.

Objective

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 6-month 45-mg leuprolide acetate (LA) depot with intramuscular administration.

Methods

LA depot was administered at weeks 0 and 24 to treatment-naïve (n = 27) or previously treated (n = 18) children with CPP in a phase 3, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study (NCT03695237). Week 24 peak-stimulated luteinizing hormone (LH) suppression (<4 mIU/mL) was the primary outcome. Secondary/other outcomes included basal sex hormone suppression (girls, estradiol <20 pg/mL; boys, testosterone <30 ng/dL), suppression of physical signs, height velocity, bone age, patient/parent-reported outcomes, and adverse events.

Results

All patients (age, 7.8 ± 1.27 years) received both scheduled study doses. At 24 weeks, 39/45 patients (86.7%) had LH suppressed. Six were counted as unsuppressed; 2 because of missing data, 3 with LH of 4.35-5.30 mIU/mL and 1 with LH of 21.07 mIU/mL. Through 48 weeks, LH, estradiol, and testosterone suppression was achieved in ≥86.7%, ≥97.4%, and 100%, respectively (as early as week 4 for LH and estradiol and week 12 for testosterone). Physical signs were suppressed at week 48 (girls, 90.2%; boys, 75.0%). Mean height velocity ranged 5.0 to 5.3 cm/year post-baseline in previously treated patients and declined from 10.1 to 6.5 cm/year at week 20 in treatment-naïve patients. Mean bone age advanced slower than chronological age. Patient/parent-reported outcomes remained stable. No new safety signals were identified. No adverse event led to treatment discontinuation.

Conclusion

Six-month intramuscular LA depot demonstrated 48-week efficacy with a safety profile consistent with other GnRH agonist formulations.

Leuprolide and triptorelin treatment in children with idiopathic central precocious puberty: an efficacy/tolerability comparison study

Introduction

Central precocious puberty (CPP) results from premature activation of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, with the consequent increase of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH); GnRH agonists (GnRHa) represent the gold-standard therapy in children with CPP although their use might be responsible for pituitary GnRH receptors down-regulation, that in turn suppresses luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and blocks of gonadal sex hormones release. The most prescribed GnRHa in the clinical practice are leuprolide and triptorelin, whose use is generally safe and well tolerated; however, mild menopausal-like side effects could appear. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the efficacy and tolerability profile of leuprolide and triptorelin in CPP patients.

Methods

110 girls affected by CPP were enrolled in this retrospective study, carried out from 2018 to 2020. The enrolled patients received leuprolide (n = 48) or triptorelin (n = 62). Efficacy was investigated by the means of clinical parameters and radiological changes and side effects were also recorded to evaluate the possible relationship between the two GnRHa treatments and side effects appearance.

Results

At baseline triptorelin patients had significantly higher LH and LH peak levels than leuprolide patients, whereas no significant difference in other patient characteristics was observed between the two groups. The leuprolide treatment lasted 971 days [790-1,171 days] while the duration of triptorelin administration was 792 days [760-1,003 days] (p < 0.001). Overall 46 (41.8%) of the studied patients reported mild menopausal-like symptoms: among these 27 were treated with triptorelin and 19 with leuprolide (p = 0.558). Patients treated with triptorelin, or leuprolide showed headache (27.4% vs. 16.7%), mood swings (12.9% vs. 16.7%), increased appetite (12.9% vs. 18.8%) and nausea (1.6% vs. 10.4%) respectively. Moreover, the onset of side effects appearance related to GnRHa therapy significantly reduces with the increase of the initial bone age (p = 0.038).

Conclusion

Leuprolide and triptorelin treatment appear to be effective and safe without significant difference between the two drugs in term of efficacy and tolerability, making both good options for treating CPP.

The effect of triptorelin and leuprolide on the level of sex hormones in girls with central precocious puberty and its clinical efficacy analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the effects of triptorelin and leuprolide on serum hormone levels and the clinical efficacy of girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty (ICPP).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed on 128 girls with ICPP who were diagnosed and treated in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2020, including 71 girls in the leuprolide group and 57 girls in the triptorelin group. The differences of serum sex hormone level, ovarian volume, uterine volume, follicle diameter, bone age, growth rate (height change within half a year), maturity (bone age/living age), and other aspects between the two groups of girls were compared.

RESULTS

Before treatment, there was no significant difference in the baseline levels of sex hormones [estradiol (E2), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)] between the triptorelin group and the leuprorelin group (P>0.05). After 1 year of treatment, serum levels of E2 and FSH in the triptorelin group were lower than those in the leuprolide group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in LH levels between the two groups after 1 year of treatment (P>0.05). At baseline, there was no significant difference in the ovarian volume, follicle diameter, and uterine volume between the triptorelin group and the leuprolide group (P>0.05). After 1 year of treatment, the ovarian volume, follicle diameter, and uterine volume of the girls in the triptorelin group were all lower than those in the leuprolide group (P<0.05). Before treatment, there was no statistical difference in bone age, growth rate, and maturity between the triptorelin group and the leuprolide group (P>0.05). After 1 year of treatment, the growth rate and maturity of participants in the triptorelin group were lower than those in the leuprolide group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in bone age between the two groups after 1 year of treatment (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For girls with ICPP, triptorelin is superior to leuprolide in reducing sex hormone level, reducing uterine volume, follicle diameter, ovarian volume, slowing down the growth rate, and decreasing maturity. Triptorelin should be selected as a priority for the treatment of girls with ICPP.

Clinical findings influencing time to menarche post gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy in central precocious puberty

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the time interval to menarche after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) treatment in females with central precocious puberty (CPP) and to identify factors contributing to timing of menarche.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 39 females with CPP who reached menarche after GnRHa treatment (leuprolide or histrelin). CPP diagnostic criteria were breast development at &lt;8 years old, measurable pubertal luteinizing hormone and/or estradiol concentrations, and bone age advancement. Indications to treat were advanced bone age and psychosocial concerns. Descriptive summaries were reported as frequency and proportion for categorical variables and mean and standard deviation for continuous measures. Linear regression models were developed to evaluate the associations of clinical factors with the time interval to menarche.

RESULTS

Mean age was 9.4±1.6 years at treatment onset, and treatment duration was 2.2±1.4 years. Menarche occurred at 12.6±1.1 years, which was 1.04±0.5 years after treatment discontinuation. This was negatively associated with Tanner stage of breast development and bone age at treatment onset and change in bone age during treatment. No association was seen between time interval to menarche and treatment duration, medication, or body mass index.

CONCLUSION

We found the average time interval to menarche after GnRHa treatment in our population of female patients with CPP to be 1.04±0.5 years; this is in agreement with other reports. Tanner stage of breast development, bone age at treatment onset, and change in bone age were negatively associated with time interval to menarche. These data provide clinical correlates that assist providers during anticipatory guidance of patients with CPP after GnRHa treatment.

Long-term outcomes after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment in boys with central precocious puberty

Objective

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) treatment improves the potential for gaining height in patients with central precocious puberty (CPP). However, most studies have focused on girls because CPP in boys is relatively rare. Therefore, we aimed to determine the effect of GnRHa treatment on auxological outcomes in boys with CPP.

Methods

Eighty-five boys with CPP were treated with leuprolide or triptorelin acetate 3.75 mg over 2 years. Anthropometry, bone age, sexual maturity rating, and predicted adult height (PAH) were assessed every 6 months. Furthermore, 20 boys were followed up after treatment discontinuation until achievement of the final adult height (FAH).

Results

The mean chronological age (CA) and bone age (BA) of the patients with CPP at treatment initiation were 9.5 ± 0.5 years and 11.7 ± 0.9 years, respectively. The mean duration of treatment was 2.87 ± 0.63 years. The PAH at treatment initiation was 172.1 cm (-0.23 ± 1.05 PAH standard deviation score). The PAH at treatment discontinuation (176.2 ± 6.6 cm) was significantly higher than the pretreatment PAH. In addition, the mean final adult height in the 20 boys who were followed up after discontinuation of treatment was 173.4 ± 5.8 cm, which was significantly higher than the initial PAH (170.1 ± 4.5 cm; p = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, the height gain (the difference between the FAH and PAH at treatment initiation) significantly correlated with the target height.

Conclusion

Long-term GnRHa treatment significantly improved the growth potential and FAH in boys with CPP.

Phase 3 Trial of a Small-volume Subcutaneous 6-Month Duration Leuprolide Acetate Treatment for Central Precocious Puberty

CONTEXT

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHas) are standard of care for central precocious puberty (CPP). A 6-month subcutaneous injection has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

OBJECTIVE

Determine efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of 6-month 45-mg subcutaneous leuprolide acetate for CPP.

DESIGN

Phase 3 multicenter, open-label, single-arm study.

SETTING

25 sites in 6 countries.

SUBJECTS

64 GnRHa-naïve children with CPP (age: 7.5 ± 0.1 years) received study drug: 59 completed the study.

INTERVENTION(S)

2 doses of 45-mg subcutaneous leuprolide acetate (0.375 mL) at 0 and 24 weeks; children were followed for 48 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Percentage of children with serum luteinizing hormone (LH) <4 IU/L 30 minutes following GnRHa stimulation at week 24.

RESULTS

54/62 (87%) children achieved poststimulation LH <4 IU/L at week 24; 49/56 (88%) girls and 1/2 boys maintained peak LH <4 IU/L at week 48. Mean growth velocity decreased from 8.9 cm/year at week 4 to 6.0 cm/year at week 48. Mean bone age was advanced 3.0 years beyond chronological age at screening and 2.7 years at week 48. Breast pubertal stage regressed or was stable in 97% of girls and external genitalia development regressed in both boys. Adverse events were mild and did not cause treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

A small volume of 45-mg subcutaneous leuprolide acetate administered at a 6-month interval effectively suppressed pubertal hormones and stopped or caused regression of pubertal progression. This long-acting GnRHa preparation of leuprolide acetate is a new, effective, and well-tolerated therapy for children with CPP.

Use of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogs in Children: Update by an International Consortium

This update, written by authors designated by multiple pediatric endocrinology societies (see List of Participating Societies) from around the globe, concisely addresses topics related to changes in GnRHa usage in children and adolescents over the last decade. Topics related to the use of GnRHa in precocious puberty include diagnostic criteria, globally available formulations, considerations of benefit of treatment, monitoring of therapy, adverse events, and long-term outcome data. Additional sections review use in transgender individuals and other pediatric endocrine related conditions. Although there have been many significant changes in GnRHa usage, there is a definite paucity of evidence-based publications to support them. Therefore, this paper is explicitly not intended to evaluate what is recommended in terms of the best use of GnRHa, based on evidence and expert opinion, but rather to describe how these drugs are used, irrespective of any qualitative evaluation. Thus, this paper should be considered a narrative review on GnRHa utilization in precocious puberty and other clinical situations. These changes are reviewed not only to point out deficiencies in the literature but also to stimulate future studies and publications in this area.