Cross-sectional analysis: clinical presentation of children with persistently low ALP levels

Aetiologies of low alkaline phosphatase in a Canadian Paediatric Tertiary Care Centre

Objectives

Increasingly, laboratories flag low serum alkaline phosphatase (sALP) that are age-and sex-specific in paediatrics. The aim of this study was to report clinical manifestations of paediatric patients with age-and sex-specific low sALP, thereby increasing awareness of its potential aetiologies.

Methods

This retrospective Canadian tertiary care paediatric hospital study assessed all sALP of ambulatory patients aged less than 18 years from 2015 to 2017. The hospital used a Beckman Coulter AU assay to measure sALP and compared values to the Canadian age-and sex-specific reference intervals from CALIPER. All children who had at least one subnormal age-and sex-specific sALP were evaluated. A review of medical charts of included patients was performed and demographic characteristics, medical history and diagnosis were collected, and categorized under groups of medical disorders.

Results

Of 11,874 included patients, 1,001 patients (9.2%) had low sALP. Of those, 48% (485/1,001) had transient low sALP activity and 9.6% (96/1,001) had persistently low sALP. Prolonged immobilization and inflammatory bowel disease represented the main aetiologies for persistently low sALP. Interestingly, 13.5% (13/96) of patients with persistently low sALP had no apparent aetiology.

Conclusions

Our results report aetiologies of low sALP in a Canadian paediatric population using age-and sex-specific Canadian reference ranges. This study highlights that healthcare providers should be aware that a low sALP may have clinical significance and should be repeated if warranted based on further clinical assessment.

Piper nigrum Extract: Dietary Supplement for Reducing Mammary Tumor Incidence and Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicity

A low piperine fractional Piper nigrum extract (PFPE) was prepared by mixing cold-pressed coconut oil and honey in distilled water, namely, PFPE-CH. In this study, PFPE-CH was orally administered as a dietary supplement to decrease the risk of tumor formation and reduce the side effects of chemotherapeutic drugs during breast cancer treatment. The toxicity study demonstrated no mortality or adverse effects after administrating PFPE-CH at 5000 mg/kg during a 14-day observation period. Additionally, PFPE-CH at 86 mg/kg BW/day did not cause any harm to the kidney or liver function of the rats for six months. In a cancer prevention study, treatment with PFPE-CH at 100 mg/kg BW for 101 days induced oxidative stress and increased the immune response by altering the levels of cancer-associated cytokines (IL-4, IL-6, and IFN-g), leading to a reduction in the tumor incidence of up to 71.4% without any adverse effects. In combination with doxorubicin, PFPE-CH did not disrupt the anticancer effects of the drug in rats with mammary tumors. Surprisingly, PFPE-CH reduced chemotherapy-induced toxicity by improving some hematological and biochemical parameters. Therefore, our results suggest that PFPE-CH is safe and effective in reducing breast tumor incidence and toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs during cancer treatment in mammary tumor rats.

Urine phosphoethanolamine is a specific biomarker for hypophosphatasia in adults

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the utility of urine phosphoethanolamine (PEA) as a marker to aid in diagnosing and/or confirming hypophosphatasia (HPP) in adults and for monitoring patients on enzyme replacement therapy (ERT).

METHODS

Data was collected from seventy-eight adults who were referred to the Vanderbilt Program for Metabolic Bone Disease for evaluation of a possible or confirmatory HPP diagnosis between July 2014 through December 2019. Fifty-nine patients were diagnosed with HPP and nineteen were excluded from a diagnosis of HPP. The urine PEA results of those patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HPP and those patients with a diagnosis of HPP excluded were captured and compared to other laboratory and clinical parameters consistent with HPP, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, plasma pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP), the presence of musculoskeletal abnormalities, and genetic testing for pathogenic mutations in ALPL.

RESULTS

Initial urine PEA values in patients in our HPP cohort and not on ERT were significantly higher (median = 150.0 nmol/mg creatinine, IQR = 82.0-202.0) compared patients in our HPP negative group (median 18.0 nmol/mg creatinine, IQR = 14.0-30.0, p < 0.0001) and higher than patients on ERT (median 65.0 nmol/mg creatinine, IQR = 45.3-79.8). Patients who began ERT had a decline in urine PEA levels after treatment with a mean decrease of 68.1 %. Plasma ALP levels were significantly lower in the group of patients with HPP and not on ERT group (median = 24.0 U/L, IQR = 15.0-29.50) compared to the patients without HPP (median = 45.50 U/L, IQR = 34.0-62.0;) and plasma PLP levels were significantly higher in the HPP non-ERT group (median = 284.0 nmol/L, IQR = 141.0-469.4) compared to the patients without HPP (median = 97.5 nmol/L, IQR = 43.7-206.0;). The area under the curve (AUC) of urine PEA, ALP, and PLP to distinguish between HPP and non-HPP patients is 0.968, 0.927 and 0.781, respectively, in our cohort. Urine PEA had 100 % specificity (95 % CI of 83.2 % to 100.0 %) for diagnosing HPP at a value >53.50 nmol/mg creatinine with a sensitivity of 88.4 %; 95%CI 75.5 to 94.9 %. ALP had a 100 % specificity (95 % CI of 82.4 % to 100.0 %) for diagnosing HPP at a value <30.5 U/L with a sensitivity of 77.2 %; (95%CI 64.8 to 86.2 %). PLP had a 100 % specificity (95 % CI of 81.6 % to 100.0 %) for diagnosing HPP at a value >436 nmol/L with a sensitivity of 26.9 %; (95%CI 16.8 to 40.3 %). The most common pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations in our cohort were c.1250A>G (p.Asn417Ser), c.1133A>T (p.Asp378Val), c.881A>C (p.Asp294Ala), c.1171C>T (p.Arg391Cys), and c.571G>A, (p.Glu191Lys).

CONCLUSIONS

Urine PEA is a promising diagnostic and confirmatory marker for HPP in patients undergoing investigation for HPP. Urine PEA also has potential use as a marker to monitor ERT compliance. Future studies are necessary to evaluate the association between PEA levels and clinical outcomes.