1
|
Ragbourne SC, Charles E, Herincs M, Elwen F, Desai N. Impacted fetal head at cesarean delivery. J Clin Anesth 2024; 99:111598. [PMID: 39276524 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 08/08/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Impacted fetal head (IFH) can be defined as the deep engagement of the fetal head in the maternal pelvis at the time of cesarean delivery that leads to its difficult or impossible extraction with standard surgical maneuvers. In this narrative review, we aimed to ascertain its incidence, risk factors, management and complications from the perspective of the anesthesiologist as a multidisciplinary team member. METHODS Databases were searched from inception to 24 January 2023 for keywords and subject headings associated with IFH and cesarean delivery. RESULTS IFH has an incidence of 2.9-71.8 % in emergency cesarean section. Maternal risk factors are advanced cervical dilatation, second stage of labor and oxytocin augmentation. Anesthetic and obstetric risk factors include epidural analgesia and trial of instrumental delivery and junior obstetrician, respectively. Neonatal risk factors are fetal malposition, caput and molding. Current evidence indicates a lack of confidence in the management of IFH across the multidisciplinary team. Simple interventions in IFH include lowering the height or placing the operating table in the Trendelenburg position, providing a step for the obstetrician and administering pharmacological tocolysis. Maternal complications are postpartum hemorrhage and bladder injury while neonatal complications include hypoxic brain injury, skull fracture and death. Surgical complications are reviewed to remind the anesthesiologist to anticipate and prepare for potential problems and manage complications in a timely manner. CONCLUSION The anesthesiologist has a fundamental role in the facilitation of delivery in IFH. We have proposed an evidence based management algorithm which may be referred to in this emergency situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie C Ragbourne
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elinor Charles
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Herincs
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Francesca Elwen
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neel Desai
- Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Honorary Senior Clinical Lecturer, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Scheer JW, Cornthwaite K, Hewitt P, Bahl R, Randall W, Powell A, Ansari A, Attal B, Willars J, Woodward M, Brown IAF, Olsson A, Richards N, Price E, Giusti A, Leeding J, Hinton L, Burt J, Dixon-Woods M, Maistrello G, Fahy N, Lyons O, Draycott T. Training for managing impacted fetal head at caesarean birth: multimethod evaluation of a pilot. BMJ Open Qual 2023; 12:e002340. [PMID: 37524515 PMCID: PMC10391817 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation of national multiprofessional training for managing the obstetric emergency of impacted fetal head (IFH) at caesarean birth has potential to improve quality and safety in maternity care, but is currently lacking in the UK. OBJECTIVES To evaluate a training package for managing IFH at caesarean birth with multiprofessional maternity teams. METHODS The training included an evidence-based lecture supported by an animated video showing management of IFH, followed by hands-on workshops and real-time simulations with use of a birth simulation trainer, augmented reality and management algorithms. Guided by the Kirkpatrick framework, we conducted a multimethod evaluation of the training with multiprofessional maternity teams. Participants rated post-training statements about relevance and helpfulness of the training and pre-training and post-training confidence in their knowledge and skills relating to IFH (7-point Likert scales, strongly disagree to strongly agree). An ethnographer recorded sociotechnical observations during the training. Participants provided feedback in post-training focus groups. RESULTS Participants (N=57) included 21 midwives, 25 obstetricians, 7 anaesthetists and 4 other professionals from five maternity units. Over 95% of participants agreed that the training was relevant and helpful for their clinical practice and improving outcomes following IFH. Confidence in technical and non-technical skills relating to managing IFH was variable before the training (5%-92% agreement with the pre-training statements), but improved in nearly all participants after the training (71%-100% agreement with the post-training statements). Participants and ethnographers reported that the training helped to: (i) better understand the complexity of IFH, (ii) recognise the need for multiprofessional training and management and (iii) optimise communication with those in labour and their birth partners. CONCLUSIONS The evaluated training package can improve self-reported knowledge, skills and confidence of multiprofessional teams involved in management of IFH at caesarean birth. A larger-scale evaluation is required to validate these findings and establish how best to scale and implement the training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan W van der Scheer
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Katie Cornthwaite
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK
- Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Rachna Bahl
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Alison Powell
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Akbar Ansari
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bothaina Attal
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Janet Willars
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthew Woodward
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Imogen A F Brown
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Annabelle Olsson
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Natalie Richards
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Evleen Price
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alessandra Giusti
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joann Leeding
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lisa Hinton
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jenni Burt
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mary Dixon-Woods
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Oscar Lyons
- RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tim Draycott
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vamos CA, Foti TR, Reyes Martinez E, Pointer Z, Detman LA, Sappenfield WM. Identification of Clinician Training Techniques as an Implementation Strategy to Improve Maternal Health: A Scoping Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6003. [PMID: 37297607 PMCID: PMC10252379 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20116003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Training is a key implementation strategy used in healthcare settings. This study aimed to identify a range of clinician training techniques that facilitate guideline implementation, promote clinician behavior change, optimize clinical outcomes, and address implicit biases to promote high-quality maternal and child health (MCH) care. A scoping review was conducted within PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Cochrane databases using iterative searches related to (provider OR clinician) AND (education OR training). A total of 152 articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The training involved multiple clinician types (e.g., physicians, nurses) and was predominantly implemented in hospitals (63%). Topics focused on maternal/fetal morbidity/mortality (26%), teamwork and communication (14%), and screening, assessment, and testing (12%). Common techniques included didactic (65%), simulation (39%), hands-on (e.g., scenario, role play) (28%), and discussion (27%). Under half (42%) of the reported training was based on guidelines or evidence-based practices. A minority of articles reported evaluating change in clinician knowledge (39%), confidence (37%), or clinical outcomes (31%). A secondary review identified 22 articles related to implicit bias training, which used other reflective approaches (e.g., implicit bias tests, role play, and patient observations). Although many training techniques were identified, future research is needed to ascertain the most effective training techniques, ultimately improving patient-centered care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl A. Vamos
- USF’s Center of Excellence in Maternal and Child Health Education, Science & Practice, The Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Tara R. Foti
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (T.R.F.); (Z.P.)
| | - Estefanny Reyes Martinez
- College of Public Health, Florida Perinatal Quality Collaborative, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
| | - Zoe Pointer
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (T.R.F.); (Z.P.)
| | - Linda A. Detman
- The Chiles Center, College of Public Health, Florida Perinatal Quality Collaborative, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (L.A.D.); (W.M.S.)
| | - William M. Sappenfield
- The Chiles Center, College of Public Health, Florida Perinatal Quality Collaborative, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (L.A.D.); (W.M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martin A, Nzelu D, Briley A, Tydeman G, Shennan A. A comparison of technicques to disimpact the fetal head on a second stage caesearean simulator. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:34. [PMID: 35033006 PMCID: PMC8760761 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04322-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The rate of second stage caesarean section (CS) is rising with associated increases in maternal and neonatal morbidity, which may be related to impaction of the fetal head in the maternal pelvis. In the last 10 years, two devices have been developed to aid disimpaction and reduce these risks: the Fetal Pillow (FP) and the Tydeman Tube (TT). The aim of this study was to determine the distance of upward fetal head elevation achieved on a simulator for second stage CS using these two devices, compared to the established technique of per vaginum digital disimpaction by an assistant. Methods We measured elevation of the fetal head achieved with the two devices (TT and FP), compared to digital elevation, on a second stage Caesearean simulator (Desperate Debra ™ set at three levels of severity. Elevation was measured by both a single operator experienced with use of the TT and FP and also multiple assistants with no previous experience of using either device. All measurements were blinded Results The trained user achieved greater elevation of the fetal head at both moderate and high levels of severity with the TT (moderate: 30mm vs 12.5mm p<0.001; most severe: 25mm vs 10mm p<0.001) compared to digital elevation. The FP provided comparable elevation to digital at both settings (moderate: 10 vs 12.5mm p=0.149; severe 10 vs 10mm p=0.44). With untrained users, elevation was also significantly greater with the TT compared to digital elevation (20mm vs 10mm p<0.01). However digital disimpaction was significantly greater than the FP (10mm vs 0mm p<0.0001). Conclusion On a simulator, with trained operators, the TT provided greater fetal head elevation than digital elevation and the FP. The FP achieved similar elevation to the digital technique, especially when the user was trained in the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Martin
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Diane Nzelu
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Annette Briley
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University and King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Andrew Shennan
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|