Fetal heart examination at the time of 13 weeks scan: a 5 years' prospective study

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound screening for fetal structural abnormalities during the first and second trimester of pregnancy in low-risk and unselected populations

BACKGROUND

Prenatal ultrasound is widely used to screen for structural anomalies before birth. While this is traditionally done in the second trimester, there is an increasing use of first-trimester ultrasound for early detection of lethal and certain severe structural anomalies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting fetal structural anomalies before 14 and 24 weeks' gestation in low-risk and unselected pregnant women and to compare the current two main prenatal screening approaches: a single second-trimester scan (single-stage screening) and a first- and second-trimester scan combined (two-stage screening) in terms of anomaly detection before 24 weeks' gestation.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science), Social Sciences Citation Index (Web of Science), Arts & Humanities Citation Index and Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science) from 1 January 1997 to 22 July 2022. We limited our search to studies published after 1997 and excluded animal studies, reviews and case reports. No further restrictions were applied. We also screened reference lists and citing articles of each of the included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were eligible if they included low-risk or unselected pregnant women undergoing a first- and/or second-trimester fetal anomaly scan, conducted at 11 to 14 or 18 to 24 weeks' gestation, respectively. The reference standard was detection of anomalies at birth or postmortem.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently undertook study selection, quality assessment (QUADAS-2), data extraction and evaluation of the certainty of evidence (GRADE approach). We used univariate random-effects logistic regression models for the meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-seven studies covering 7,057,859 fetuses (including 25,202 with structural anomalies) were included. No study was deemed low risk across all QUADAS-2 domains. Main methodological concerns included risk of bias in the reference standard domain and risk of partial verification. Applicability concerns were common in studies evaluating first-trimester scans and two-stage screening in terms of patient selection due to frequent recruitment from single tertiary centres without exclusion of referrals. We reported ultrasound accuracy for fetal structural anomalies overall, by severity, affected organ system and for 46 specific anomalies. Detection rates varied widely across categories, with the highest estimates of sensitivity for thoracic and abdominal wall anomalies and the lowest for gastrointestinal anomalies across all tests. The summary sensitivity of a first-trimester scan was 37.5% for detection of structural anomalies overall (95% confidence interval (CI) 31.1 to 44.3; low-certainty evidence) and 91.3% for lethal anomalies (95% CI 83.9 to 95.5; moderate-certainty evidence), with an overall specificity of 99.9% (95% CI 99.9 to 100; low-certainty evidence). Two-stage screening had a combined sensitivity of 83.8% (95% CI 74.7 to 90.1; low-certainty evidence), while single-stage screening had a sensitivity of 50.5% (95% CI 38.5 to 62.4; very low-certainty evidence). The specificity of two-stage screening was 99.9% (95% CI 99.7 to 100; low-certainty evidence) and for single-stage screening, it was 99.8% (95% CI 99.2 to 100; moderate-certainty evidence). Indirect comparisons suggested superiority of two-stage screening across all analyses regarding sensitivity, with no significant difference in specificity. However, the certainty of the evidence is very low due to the absence of direct comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

A first-trimester scan has the potential to detect lethal and certain severe anomalies with high accuracy before 14 weeks' gestation, despite its limited overall sensitivity. Conversely, two-stage screening shows high accuracy in detecting most fetal structural anomalies before 24 weeks' gestation with high sensitivity and specificity. In a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 fetuses, the first-trimester scan is expected to correctly identify 113 out of 124 fetuses with lethal anomalies (91.3%) and 665 out of 1776 fetuses with any anomaly (37.5%). However, 79 false-positive diagnoses are anticipated among 98,224 fetuses (0.08%). Two-stage screening is expected to correctly identify 1448 out of 1776 cases of structural anomalies overall (83.8%), with 118 false positives (0.1%). In contrast, single-stage screening is expected to correctly identify 896 out of 1776 cases before 24 weeks' gestation (50.5%), with 205 false-positive diagnoses (0.2%). This represents a difference of 592 fewer correct identifications and 88 more false positives compared to two-stage screening. However, it is crucial to acknowledge the uncertainty surrounding the additional benefits of two-stage versus single-stage screening, as there are no studies directly comparing them. Moreover, the evidence supporting the accuracy of first-trimester ultrasound and two-stage screening approaches primarily originates from studies conducted in single tertiary care facilities, which restricts the generalisability of the results of this meta-analysis to the broader population.

Evaluation fetal heart in the first and second trimester: Results and limitations

Background

Cardiac heart defects affect nearly 6-12 per 1000 live births in the general population and are more frequent than common trisomies.

Aim

To assess the efficacy and technical limitations of first-trimester fetal heart evaluation in the 11-14^th-weeks' scan and comparison with the second-trimester anatomical exam by ultrasound.

Material and Method

Between April 2015 and July 2020, medical records and ultrasound data of 3295 pregnancies who underwent first-trimester fetal anatomy exams by ultrasound were reviewed retrospectively. All ultrasound exams were performed by the same two operators (TUKD, OP) with transabdominal transducers. Fetal situs, four-chamber view, outflow tracts, and three-vessel trachea view are the cornerstones of first-trimester fetal heart examination. Conventional grayscale mode and high-definition power Doppler mode were utilized. The same operators re-examined all cases between the 18 and 23 weeks of gestation by ISUOG guidelines.

Results

We performed a combined transvaginal and transabdominal approach for only 101 cases (3.06%). The mean maternal age was 31.28 ± 4.43, the median gestational age at the first-trimester ultrasound exam was 12.4 weeks, and the median CRL was 61.87 mm (range was 45.1-84 mm). Even combined approach situs, cardiac axis, and four-chamber view could not be visualized optimally in 28 cases (0.7%). Outflow tracts were visualized separately in 80% (2636 in 3295) cases. Three vessel-trachea views were obtained in 85.4% (2814 in 3295) cases by high-definition Doppler mode. There were 47 fetuses with cardiac defects in 3295 pregnancies with the known pregnancy outcome. Ten cases had abnormal karyotype results. Thirty-two fetuses with cardiac anomalies (9.7 in 1000 pregnancies) were detected in the first-trimester examination, and the remaining 15 (4.55 in 1000 pregnancies) cases were diagnosed in the second-trimester examination. The prevalence of congenital cardiac anomalies was 14.25 in 1000 pregnancies. Fifteen cases were missed in the first-trimester exam. Also, ten fetuses which had abnormal cardiac findings in the first-trimester exam were not confirmed in the second-trimester exam. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated as 65.3%, 99.7%, 66.8%, and 99.67%, respectively.

Conclusion

Late first-trimester examination of the fetus is feasible and allows earlier detection of many structural abnormalities of the fetus, including congenital heart defects. Suspicious and isolated cardiac abnormal findings should be re-examined and confirmed in the second-trimester exam. Previous abdominal surgery, high BMI, and subtle cardiac defects can cause missed cardiac abnormalities.

Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease at 12-13 gestational weeks: detailed analysis of false-negative cases

OBJECTIVES

To report on the early detection of congenital heart disease (CHD) in low- and high-risk populations managed at our hospital; and perform a detailed analysis of false-negative diagnoses, in order to derive possible recommendations on how to reduce their incidence.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study analyzing cases which underwent an ultrasound examination at the end of the first trimester at the Fetal Medicine and Surgery Unit of Gaslini Children's Hospital, Genoa, Italy, in the period January 2015 to December 2021. The study population included both low-risk pregnancies that underwent standard first-trimester combined screening and high-risk ones referred to our unit because of a positive combined test or suspicion of fetal anomalies raised in a regional community hospital. For each case, the following variables were retrieved and analyzed: number of fetuses, maternal body mass index, gestational age at first-trimester screening, whether the pregnancy was low or high risk, nuchal translucency thickness (normal or > 99th  centile), type of CHD, associated extracardiac anomalies, karyotype and pregnancy outcome. For low-risk pregnancies, suspicion of CHD was also recorded. In low-risk cases, sonographic cardiac screening comprised evaluation of the four-chamber view (grayscale and color/power Doppler) and three-vessel-and-trachea view (color/power Doppler). High-risk cases underwent early fetal echocardiography. False-negative cases were categorized according to likely cause of the missed diagnosis, as follows: human factor; technical factor; acoustic-window factor.

RESULTS

Gestational age at ultrasound ranged from 12 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks (crown-rump length (CRL), 50.1-84.0 mm) in the low-risk group and from 11 + 5 to 13 + 6 weeks (CRL, 45.1-84.0 mm) in the high-risk group. Over the 7-year study period, 7080 pregnancies were evaluated in the first trimester. Of these, 6879 (7167 fetuses) were low-risk and 201 were high-risk cases. In the low-risk group, there were 30 fetuses with CHD (including 15 major and 15 minor CHD), yielding a prevalence of 4.2/1000 (2.1/1000 for major CHD). Nine of the 30 CHD cases were suspected at screening ultrasound (7/15 major CHD). Excluding cases in which the CHD would not be expected to be associated with a modification of the screening views and would therefore not be detectable on screening ultrasound, 7/12 cases of major CHD were detected, corresponding to a sensitivity of 58.3%. Among the 201 high-risk cases, there were 46 fetuses with CHD (including 44 major and two minor CHD), of which 43 were detected, corresponding to a sensitivity for early fetal echocardiography of 93.5%, or 97.7% if the two cases that were unlikely to be detectable on first-trimester screening were excluded. Analysis of the 11 (of 24) false-negative cases that would be expected to be picked up on screening views revealed that human error (image interpretation and/or scanning approach) was involved in all 11 cases and technical factors (excessive color priority (color-balance function) and/or incorrect plane alignment) were present in two. There was impairment of the acoustic window (associated with maternal obesity and/or twin gestation) as a cofactor in five of the 11 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity for detection of major CHD of early cardiac screening in low-risk pregnancy is under 60%, partly due to the natural history of CHD and, it seems, partly relating to human error and technical issues with image quality. Factors associated with false-negative diagnoses may be categorized into three types: human error, technical factors and acoustic-window impairment. We recommend: appropriate assessment with fetal posterior spine; that sufficient time is spent on assessment of the fetal situs; and that color/power Doppler settings are adapted to the individual case. A lower threshold for referring doubtful cases for early fetal echocardiography should be adopted in cases of maternal obesity and in twin gestation. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

First-trimester ultrasound detection of fetal heart anomalies: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound at 11-14 weeks' gestation in the detection of fetal cardiac abnormalities and to evaluate factors that impact the detection rate.

METHODS

This was a systematic review of studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the detection of fetal cardiac anomalies at 11-14 weeks' gestation, performed by two independent reviewers. An electronic search of four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection and The Cochrane Library) was conducted for studies published between January 1998 and July 2020. Prospective and retrospective studies evaluating pregnancies at any prior level of risk and in any healthcare setting were eligible for inclusion. The reference standard used was the detection of a cardiac abnormality on postnatal or postmortem examination. Data were extracted from the included studies to populate 2 × 2 tables. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model in order to determine the performance of first-trimester ultrasound in the detection of major cardiac abnormalities overall and of individual types of cardiac abnormality. Data were analyzed separately for high-risk and non-high-risk populations. Preplanned secondary analyses were conducted in order to assess factors that may impact screening performance, including the imaging protocol used for cardiac assessment (including the use of color-flow Doppler), ultrasound modality, year of publication and the index of sonographer suspicion at the time of the scan. Risk of bias and quality assessment were undertaken for all included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool.

RESULTS

The electronic search yielded 4108 citations. Following review of titles and abstracts, 223 publications underwent full-text review, of which 63 studies, reporting on 328 262 fetuses, were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. In the non-high-risk population (45 studies, 306 872 fetuses), 1445 major cardiac anomalies were identified (prevalence, 0.41% (95% CI, 0.39-0.43%)). Of these, 767 were detected on first-trimester ultrasound examination of the heart and 678 were not detected. First-trimester ultrasound had a pooled sensitivity of 55.80% (95% CI, 45.87-65.50%), specificity of 99.98% (95% CI, 99.97-99.99%) and positive predictive value of 94.85% (95% CI, 91.63-97.32%) in the non-high-risk population. The cases diagnosed in the first trimester represented 63.67% (95% CI, 54.35-72.49%) of all antenatally diagnosed major cardiac abnormalities in the non-high-risk population. In the high-risk population (18 studies, 21 390 fetuses), 480 major cardiac anomalies were identified (prevalence, 1.36% (95% CI, 1.20-1.52%)). Of these, 338 were detected on first-trimester ultrasound examination and 142 were not detected. First-trimester ultrasound had a pooled sensitivity of 67.74% (95% CI, 55.25-79.06%), specificity of 99.75% (95% CI, 99.47-99.92%) and positive predictive value of 94.22% (95% CI, 90.22-97.22%) in the high-risk population. The cases diagnosed in the first trimester represented 79.86% (95% CI, 69.89-88.25%) of all antenatally diagnosed major cardiac abnormalities in the high-risk population. The imaging protocol used for examination was found to have an important impact on screening performance in both populations (P < 0.0001), with a significantly higher detection rate observed in studies using at least one outflow-tract view or color-flow Doppler imaging (both P < 0.0001). Different types of cardiac anomaly were not equally amenable to detection on first-trimester ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

First-trimester ultrasound examination of the fetal heart allows identification of over half of fetuses affected by major cardiac pathology. Future first-trimester screening programs should follow structured anatomical assessment protocols and consider the introduction of outflow-tract views and color-flow Doppler imaging, as this would improve detection rates of fetal cardiac pathology. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.