Pre-operative tranexemic acid vs. etamsylate in reducing blood loss during elective cesarean section: randomized controlled trial

Meta-analysis: the prophylactic use of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss during caesarean delivery

INTRODUCTION

The 2022 national guideline on The Prevention and Management of Primary Postpartum Haemorrhage (PPH) recommended consideration of prophylactic tranexamic acid (TXA) for women who are at high PPH risk undergoing caesarean section (CS). This meta-analysis reviews the basis for this recommendation.

METHOD

PubMed, OVID Medline, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, Scopus, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched (from inception to January 2024) for randomised controlled trials comparing prophylactic intravenous TXA with placebo or no treatment in women undergoing CS who received a uterotonic. Our main outcome was PPH > 1L. Secondary outcomes included estimated mean blood loss, blood transfusion, drop in haemoglobin, the need for additional uterotonics, or surgical intervention. Adverse effects of TXA were also assessed.

RESULTS

Sixty-one studies including 25,098 women were identified, and 12,446 received prophylactic TXA. Patients who received prophylactic TXA had significantly reduced likelihood of PPH > 1L (RR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.59), reduced estimated mean blood loss (MD 185.86 ml, 95% CI 159.14-212.59), and reduced drop in Hb (MD 0.84g/dl, 95% CI 0.72, 0.95). There was a significant reduction in need for additional uterotonics (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.39-0.57) or surgical intervention (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.95).

CONCLUSION

The reduced risk of PPH > 1L was greatest in patients at higher risk of bleeding. The greatest risk reduction was seen in smaller studies and in studies undertaken in developing economies. Prophylactic TXA administration is effective at reducing the incidence of PPH > 1L at CS. The clinical benefit of universal prophylaxis is questionable; women who are high risk of PPH are more likely to derive benefit.

Tranexamic acid for preventing postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth

RATIONALE

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is common and potentially life-threatening. The antifibrinolytic drug tranexamic acid (TXA) is thought to be effective for treating PPH. There is growing interest in whether TXA is effective for preventing PPH after vaginal birth. In randomised controlled trials (RCTs), TXA has been associated with increased risk of seizures and unexplained increased mortality when given more than three hours after traumatic bleeding. Reliable evidence on the effects, cost-effectiveness and safety of prophylactic TXA is required before considering widespread use. This review updates one published in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of TXA for preventing PPH compared to placebo or no treatment (with or without uterotonic co-treatment) in women following vaginal birth.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and WHO ICTRP (to 6 September 2024). We also searched reference lists of retrieved studies.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included RCTs evaluating TXA alone or in addition to standard care (uterotonics) for preventing PPH following vaginal birth. For this update, we required trials to be prospectively registered (before participant recruitment), and we applied a trustworthiness checklist.

OUTCOMES

Critical outcomes were blood loss ≥ 500 mL and blood loss ≥ 1000 mL. Important outcomes included maternal death, severe morbidity, blood transfusion, receipt of additional surgical interventions to control PPH, thromboembolic events, receipt of additional uterotonics, hysterectomy, and maternal satisfaction.

RISK OF BIAS

We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 1) to assess the risk of bias in the studies.

SYNTHESIS METHODS

Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and assessed trial trustworthiness. We used random-effects meta-analysis to combine data. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

INCLUDED STUDIES

We included three RCTs with 18,974 participants in total. The trials were conducted in both high- and low-resource settings and involved participants at both low and high risk of PPH. The trials compared intravenous TXA (1 g) and standard care versus placebo (saline) and standard care. After applying our trustworthiness checklist, we did not include any of the 12 trials in the previous version of this review.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

Prophylactic tranexamic acid in addition to standard care compared to placebo in addition to standard care TXA results in little to no difference in blood loss ≥ 500 mL (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 1.06; 2 studies, 18,897 participants; 5 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 15 fewer to 5 more; high-certainty evidence). TXA likely results in little to no difference in blood loss ≥ 1000 mL (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.07; 2 studies, 18,897 participants; 3 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 6 fewer to 1 more; moderate-certainty evidence). TXA likely results in little to no difference in severe morbidity (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.12; 1 study, 15,066 participants; 2 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 6 fewer to 2 more; moderate-certainty evidence). TXA results in little to no difference in receipt of blood transfusion (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.06; 3 studies, 18,972 participants; 0 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 10 fewer to 12 more; high-certainty evidence). TXA may result in little to no difference in receipt of additional surgical interventions to control PPH (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.23; 2 studies, 18,972 participants; 1 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 2 fewer to 1 more; low-certainty evidence). In women with anaemia, TXA results in little to no difference in receipt of additional uterotonics (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.10; 1 study, 15,066 participants; 3 more women per 1000, 95% CI 8 fewer to 24 more; high-certainty evidence). In women with no anaemia, TXA results in a slight reduction in receipt of additional uterotonics (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92; 1 study, 3891 participants; 24 fewer women per 1000, 95% CI 38 fewer to 8 fewer; high-certainty evidence). TXA likely results in little to no difference in maternal satisfaction. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of TXA on maternal death, thromboembolic events, and hysterectomy (very low-certainty evidence): maternal death (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.49; 2 studies, 15,081 participants; 0 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 1 fewer to 2 more); thromboembolic events (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.24; 3 studies, 18,774 participants; 3 fewer women per 10,000, 95% CI 4 fewer to 5 more); hysterectomy (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.36 to 2.19; 1 study, 15,066 participants; 1 fewer women per 10,000, 95% CI 9 fewer to 16 more).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Adding prophylactic TXA to standard care of women during vaginal birth makes little to no difference to blood loss ≥ 500 mL and likely makes little to no difference to blood loss ≥ 1000 mL or the risk of severe morbidity, compared to placebo and standard care. TXA may result in little to no difference in additional surgical interventions to control PPH and results in little to no difference in blood transfusions. One trial found that TXA reduced the use of additional uterotonics in women without anaemia, whereas the largest trial found little to no difference in the use of additional uterotonics in women with anaemia. Although there were very few serious adverse events reported, the evidence is insufficient to draw conclusions about the effect of TXA on maternal death, thromboembolic events, hysterectomy, or seizures. TXA likely results in little to no difference in maternal satisfaction. These findings are based mainly on two large trials. In the smaller of these, less than 30% of study participants were at high risk of PPH. In the largest trial, all participants had moderate to severe anaemia. Those making decisions about routine administration of prophylactic TXA for all women having vaginal births should consider that current evidence does not show a benefit of TXA for blood loss outcomes and related morbidity, and the evidence is very uncertain about serious adverse events.

FUNDING

This review was partially funded by the World Health Organization (WHO).

REGISTRATION

Protocol (2009) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007872 Original review (2010) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007872.pub2 Review update (2015) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007872.pub3.

Tranexamic acid for preventing postpartum haemorrhage after caesarean section

RATIONALE

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is common and potentially life-threatening. The antifibrinolytic drug tranexamic acid (TXA) is recommended for treating PPH; it reduces the risk of death from haemorrhage by one-third when given soon after bleeding onset, but not overall risk of death. Interest in whether TXA may be effective in preventing PPH is growing. Evidence indicates that TXA given more than three hours after injury to bleeding trauma patients increases mortality. Potential harm becomes critical in prophylactic use of TXA. Reliable evidence of the effect and safety profile of TXA is required before widespread prophylactic use can be considered.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of TXA for preventing PPH compared to placebo or no treatment (with or without uterotonic co-treatment) in women during caesarean birth.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and WHO ICTRP to 20 February 2024 and searched reference lists of retrieved studies.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of TXA alone or plus uterotonics during caesarean birth for preventing PPH. Trials needed to be prospectively registered (i.e. before starting recruitment). We applied a trustworthiness checklist.

OUTCOMES

The critical outcome was blood loss ≥ 1000 mL, measured using estimated or calculated methods. Important outcomes included maternal death, severe morbidity, blood transfusion, the use of additional surgical interventions to control PPH, thromboembolic events, use of additional uterotonics, hysterectomy, maternal satisfaction, and breastfeeding at discharge.

RISK OF BIAS

We assessed risk of bias in the included studies using Cochrane's RoB 1 tool.

SYNTHESIS METHODS

Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and trial trustworthiness. We pooled data using random-effects meta-analysis. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

INCLUDED STUDIES

We included six RCTs with 15,981 participants. All 12 trials in the previous version of this review were not included after review of trial registrations and trustworthiness checklists. Most included studies involved women at low risk of PPH and were conducted in high-resource settings.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

Prophylactic TXA in addition to standard care compared to placebo in addition to standard care or standard care alone TXA results in little to no difference in estimated blood loss ≥ 1000 mL (risk ratio (RR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 1.11; 4 RCTs; n = 13,042; high certainty evidence), resulting in 8 fewer per 1000 women having estimated blood loss ≥ 1000 mL (from 30 fewer to 16 more). TXA likely results in a slight reduction in calculated blood loss ≥ 1000 mL (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.92; 2 RCTs; n = 4327; moderate certainty evidence), resulting in 53 fewer per 1000 having calculated blood loss ≥ 1000 mL (from 75 fewer to 25 fewer). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of TXA on maternal death (one event in placebo group, none in TXA group). No trials measured severe morbidity. TXA likely results in little to no difference in blood transfusion (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.08; 5 RCTs; n = 15,740; moderate certainty evidence), resulting in 4 fewer per 1000 women requiring a blood transfusion (from 10 fewer to 3 more). TXA results in little to no difference in additional surgical interventions to control PPH (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.22; 4 RCTs; n = 15,631; high certainty evidence), resulting in 1 more per 1000 women requiring additional surgical intervention (from 4 fewer to 7 more). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of TXA on thromboembolic events (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.22 to 8.90; 4 RCTs; n = 14,480; very low certainty evidence), resulting in 1 more per 1000 women having a thromboembolic event (from 2 fewer to 17 more). TXA results in little to no difference in the need for additional uterotonics (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.00; 4 RCTs; n = 15,728; high certainty evidence), resulting in 15 fewer per 1000 women requiring additional uterotonics (from 27 fewer to 0 fewer). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of TXA on hysterectomy (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.29; 2 RCTs; n = 4546; very low certainty evidence), resulting in 3 fewer per 10,000 women requiring a hysterectomy (from 11 fewer to 31 more). One trial measuring maternal satisfaction reported no difference between groups at day two postpartum. No data were available on breastfeeding. Overall, studies had low risk of bias. We downgraded the certainty of evidence mainly for imprecision.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic TXA in addition to standard care during caesarean birth results in little to no difference in estimated blood loss ≥ 1000 mL and likely results in a slight reduction in calculated blood loss ≥ 1000 mL compared to placebo. There were no data for severe morbidity due to PPH. Event rates for further interventions to control PPH were low and similar across groups. Prophylactic TXA thus results in little to no difference between groups for additional surgical interventions (32 versus 31 per 1000), and likely results in little to no difference between groups for blood transfusions (31 versus 36 per 1000) and use of additional uterotonics (107 versus 121 per 1000). There were very few events for the outcomes maternal death (1 in placebo group), thromboembolic events (2 versus 3 per 1000), and hysterectomy (1 per 1000 in each group). Evidence for these serious adverse events is therefore very uncertain. Decisions about implementing routine prophylactic TXA during caesarean birth should not only consider outcomes related to blood loss, but also the relatively low rates of PPH morbidity and uncertainty of serious adverse events. Most studies included women at low risk of PPH, thereby precluding any conclusions about women at high risk of PPH. Cost associated with routine use of an additional drug for all caesarean births needs to be considered.

FUNDING

This Cochrane review was funded in part by the World Health Organization.

REGISTRATION

The published protocol and updates to the review can be accessed: Protocol (2009) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007872 Original Review (2010) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007872.pub2 Review Update (2015) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007872.pub3.

Prophylactic Tranexamic Acid Prevents Postpartum Hemorrhage and Transfusions in Cesarean Deliveries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide and PPH resulting in transfusion is the most common maternal morbidity in the United States. Literature demonstrates that tranexamic acid (TXA) can reduce blood loss in cesarean deliveries; however, there is little consensus on the impact on major morbidities like PPH and transfusions. We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate if administration of prophylactic intravenous (IV) TXA prevents PPH and/or transfusions following low-risk cesarean delivery. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines were followed. Five databases were searched: Cochrane, EBSCO, Ovid, PubMed, and ClinicalKey. RCTs published in English between January 2000 and December 2021 were included. Studies compared PPH and transfusions in cesarean deliveries between prophylactic IV TXA and control (placebo or no placebo). The primary outcome was PPH, and the secondary outcome was transfusions. Random effects models were used to calculate effect size (ES) of exposure in Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RR). All analysis was done at a confidence level (CI) of α = 0.5. Modeling showed that TXA led to significantly less risk of PPH than control (RR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.28-0.67). The effect on transfusion was comparable (RR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.21-0.73). Heterogeneity was minimal (I 2 = 0%). Due to the large sample sizes needed, many RCTs are not powered to interpret TXA's effect on PPH and transfusions. Pooling these studies in a meta-analysis allows for more power and analysis but is limited by the heterogeneity of studies. Our results minimize heterogeneity while demonstrating that prophylactic TXA can lower PPH occurrence and reduce the need for blood transfusion. We suggest considering prophylactic IV TXA as the standard of care in low-risk cesarean deliveries. KEY POINTS: · Consider TXA prior to incision for singleton, term pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean.. · Prophylactic TXA is effective in preventing PPH and blood transfusions.. · Routine use of TXA has the potential to decrease transfusion-related complications and costs..

Calcium oxide/silica nanocomposite and L. coromandelica bark incorporated κ-carrageenan/sodium alginate hydrogel for rapid hemostasis

Hemorrhage stands out as a leading factor contributing to fatalities in trauma cases. Hemorrhage is associated with the process of hemostasis. Hemostasis is the primary stage of wound healing. Hydrogels can aid in hemostasis and minimize the duration of wound healing. Calcium is one of the clotting factors and is a key component for the activation of the coagulation cascade. In this work, we have developed a polymeric hydrogel matrix made up of κ-carrageenan and sodium alginate containing a calcium silica nanocomposite and a natural drug, namely the bark of L. coromandelica. The nanocomposite was characterized using various modalities such as XRD, FTIR, FESEM and HRTEM. The rheological and morphological properties of the pure and composite hydrogels were examined. The antimicrobial activity, hemocompatibility and hemostatic efficacy of the materials were studied using various in vitro assays including bacterial growth curve analysis, colony counting, anti-biofilm assay, hemolysis assay and in vivo clotting studies. The drug incorporated nanocomposite hydrogel exhibited superior activity in animal models.

Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,649 patients

BACKGROUND

In this meta-analysis, we aimed to update the clinical evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of TXA in the prevention of PPH.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library from inception until December 2022 was conducted. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TXA with a placebo among pregnant women. All relevant outcomes, such as total blood loss, the occurrence of nausea and/or vomiting, and changes in hemoglobin, were combined as odds ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) in the meta-analysis models using STATA 17 MP.

RESULTS

We included 59 RCTs (18,649 patients) in this meta-analysis. For cesarean birth, TXA was favored over the placebo in reducing total blood loss (MD= -2.11 mL, 95%CI [-3.09 to -1.14], P < 0.001), and occurrence of nausea or/and vomiting (OR = 1.36, 95%CI [1.07 to 1.74], P = 0.01). For vaginal birth, the prophylactic use of TXA was associated with lower total blood loss, and higher occurrence of nausea and/or vomiting (MD= -0.89 mL, 95%CI [-1.47 to -0.31], OR = 2.36, 95%CI [1.32 to 4.21], P = 0.02), respectively. However, there were no differences between the groups in changes in hemoglobin during vaginal birth (MD = 0.20 g/dl, 95%CI [-0.07 to 0.48], P = 0.15). The overall risk of bias among the included studies varies from low to high risk of bias using ROB-II tool for RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggested that TXA administration is effective among women undergoing cesarean birth or vaginal birth in lowering total blood loss and limiting the occurrence of PPH. Further clinical trials are recommended to test its efficacy on high-risk populations.

Molecular mechanism by which spider-driving peptide potentiates coagulation factors

Hemostasis is a crucial process that quickly forms clots at injury sites to prevent bleeding and infections. Dysfunctions in this process can lead to hemorrhagic disorders, such as hemophilia and thrombocytopenia purpura. While hemostatic agents are used in clinical treatments, there is still limited knowledge about potentiators targeting coagulation factors. Recently, LCTx-F2, a procoagulant spider-derived peptide, was discovered. This study employed various methods, including chromogenic substrate analysis and dynamic simulation, to investigate how LCTx-F2 enhances the activity of thrombin and FXIIa. Our findings revealed that LCTx-F2 binds to thrombin and FXIIa in a similar manner, with the N-terminal penetrating the active-site cleft of the enzymes and the intermediate section reinforcing the peptide-enzyme connection. Interestingly, the C-terminal remained at a considerable distance from the enzymes, as evidenced by the retention of affinity for both enzymes using truncated peptide T-F2. Furthermore, results indicated differences in the bonding relationship of critical residues between thrombin and FXIIa, with His13 facilitating binding to thrombin and Arg7 being required for binding to FXIIa. Overall, our study sheds light on the molecular mechanism by which LCTx-F2 potentiates coagulation factors, providing valuable insights that may assist in designing drugs targeting procoagulation factors.

Tranexamic acid for the prevention of blood loss after cesarean section: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Tranexamic acid is a cost-effective intervention for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage among women who undergo cesarean delivery, but the evidence to support its use is conflicting. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in low- and high-risk cesarean deliveries.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform portal from inception to April 2022 (updated October 2022 and February 2023) with no language restrictions. In addition, grey literature sources were also explored.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials that investigated the prophylactic use of intravenous tranexamic acid in addition to standard uterotonic agents among women who underwent cesarean deliveries in comparison with a placebo, standard treatment, or prostaglandins were included in this meta-analysis.

METHODS

We used the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0) to assess the quality of the included randomized controlled trials. RevMan 5.4 was used to conduct all statistical analyses using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included 50 randomized controlled trials (6 in only high-risk patients and 2 with prostaglandins as the comparator) that evaluated tranexamic acid in our meta-analysis. Tranexamic acid reduced the risk for blood loss >1000 mL, the mean total blood loss, and the need for blood transfusion in both low- and high-risk patients. Tranexamic acid was associated with a beneficial effect in the secondary outcomes, including a decline in hemoglobin levels and the need for additional uterotonic agents. Tranexamic acid increased the risk for nonthromboembolic adverse events but, based on limited data, did not increase the incidence of thromboembolic events. The administration of tranexamic acid before skin incision, but not after cord clamping, was associated with a large benefit. The quality of evidence was rated as low to very low for outcomes in the low-risk population and moderate for most outcomes in the high-risk subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Tranexamic acid may reduce the risk for blood loss in cesarean deliveries with a higher benefit observed in high-risk patients, but the lack of high-quality evidence precludes any strong conclusions. The administration of tranexamic acid before skin incision, but not after cord clamping, was associated with a large benefit. Additional studies, especially in the high-risk population and focused on evaluating the timing of tranexamic acid administration, are needed to confirm or refute these findings.

Comparative study between oxytocin and combination of tranexamic acid and ethamsylate in reducing intra-operative bleeding during emergency and elective cesarean section after 38 weeks of normal pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

Cesarean Section (CS) is associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage. Many drugs are used to decrease this risk. We aim to compare the combination of ethamsylate and tranexamic acid, oxytocin, and placebo in women undergoing CS.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial between October and December 2020 in four university hospitals in Egypt. The study included all pregnant women in labor without any complications who accepted to participate in the study between October and December 2020. The participants were divided into three groups. The subjects were randomly allocated to receive either oxytocin (30 IU in 500 ml normal saline during cesarean section), combined one gram of tranexamic acid with 250 mg of ethamsylate once before skin incision, or distilled water. Our main outcome was the amount of blood loss during the operation. The secondary outcomes were the need for blood transfusion, hemoglobin and hematocrit changes, hospital stay, operative complications, and the need for a hysterectomy. The one-way ANCOVA test was used to compare the quantitative variables between the three groups while the Chi-square test was used to compare the qualitative variables. Post hoc analysis then was performed to compare the difference between every two groups regarding the quantitative variables.

RESULTS

Our study included 300 patients who were divided equally into three groups. Tranexamic acid with ethamsylate showed the least intra-operative blood loss (605.34 ± 158.8 ml) compared to oxytocin (625.26 ± 144.06) and placebo (669.73 ± 170.69), P = 0.015. In post hoc analysis, only tranexamic acid with ethamsylate was effective in decreasing the blood loss compared to placebo (P = 0.013); however, oxytocin did not reduce blood loss compared to saline (P = 0.211) nor to tranexamic acid with ethamsylate (P = 1). Other outcomes and CS complications showed no significant difference between the three groups except for post-operative thrombosis which was significantly higher in the tranexamic and ethamsylate group, P < 0.00001 and the need for a hysterectomy which was significantly increased in the placebo group, P = 0.017.

CONCLUSION

The combination of tranexamic acid and ethamsylate was significantly associated with the least amount of blood loss. However, in pairwise comparisons, only tranexamic acid with ethamsylate was significantly better than saline but not with oxytocin. Both oxytocin and tranexamic acid with ethamsylate were equally effective in reducing intra-operative blood loss and the risk of hysterectomy; however, tranexamic acid with ethamsylate increased the risk of thrombotic events. Further research with a larger number of participants is needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on Pan African Clinical Trials Registry with the following number: PACTR202009736186159 and was approved on 04/09/2020.

Effect of preoperative prophylactic intravenous tranexamic acid on perioperative blood loss control in patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the important risk factors leading to maternal mortality and intervention is essential. Oxytocin therapy is widely used clinically, but the effect is unsatisfactory. The efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) in hemostasis is notable, whereas its use in preventing PPH warrants exploration.

AIMS

To evaluate the effect of prophylactic administration of TXA on perioperative blood loss in women undergoing cesarean section by systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies.

METHODS

Bibliographic databases were screened from their inception to December 2022 to retrieve relevant studies. Study outcomes including blood loss during cesarean section, 2-h postpartum blood loss, total blood loss (during cesarean section and 2-h postpartum), and 6-h postpartum, as well as hemoglobin changes were extracted and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies, nine randomized clinical trials and 12 cohort studies, involving 1896 patients given TXA prophylactically and 1909 patients given placebo or no treatment, were analyzed. Compared with the control group, the preoperative prophylactic intravenous administration of TXA significantly reduced the intraoperative (RCT: P < 0.00001, cohort studies: P < 0.00001), 2-h postpartum (RCT: P = 0.02, cohort studies: P < 0.00001) and total blood loss (RCT: P < 0.00001, cohort studies: P = 0.0002), and reduced the decline in hemoglobin (RCT: P < 0.00001, cohort studies: P = 0.0001), but did not significantly affect blood loss at 6-h postpartum (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic intravenous TXA before cesarean section is helpful in preventing perioperative bleeding in women.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO , identifier: CRD 42022363450.

Current Practices and Guidelines for Perioperative Blood Management in Post-Bariatric Body Contouring Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Literature

With the increase in obesity prevalence, a noticeable increase in bariatric surgeries has been reported in national and international statistics. Therefore, body contouring surgeries have increased to help individuals achieve their desired body shape. Plastic surgeons need to consider potential hematologic complications that may occur in this specific group of patients before performing body contouring surgery. This review illustrates the perioperative medical, laboratory, and management strategies needed to minimize blood loss and blood transfusion requirements during body contouring. Using Google Scholar and PubMed, a comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify articles discussing post-bariatric body contouring perioperative blood management strategies, including the effects of bariatric surgery on hemostasis as well as basic hematology and coagulation. In preoperative blood management, blood investigations aid in the early detection of electrolytes, protein, and vitamin deficiencies and anemia, resulting in the early correction of nutritional deficiencies. In order to reduce postoperative complications, surgical and anesthesia techniques, as well as intraoperative pharmacological therapy, play an essential role. Postoperative blood transfusion and restrictive transfusion thresholds are tailored to the patient's needs and depend on various physiological indicators, such as heart rate, blood pressure, urine output, and laboratory findings, such as acidosis and hematocrit level. Generally, post-bariatric body contouring blood management measures are still lacking, and more research is required to develop standardized guidelines for optimizing patient safety and satisfaction.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Tranexamic acid for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in women undergoing cesarean delivery: an updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of prophylactic tranexamic acid administration vs standard uterotonic agents alone among women undergoing cesarean delivery.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar were systematically searched from inception to June 30, 2021.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous tranexamic acid administration with placebo in women undergoing cesarean delivery and receiving standard prophylactic uterotonic agents were held eligible.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

The risk of bias of individual studies was appraised with the Risk of Bias 2 tool. Meta-analysis was conducted by fitting random-effects models using restricted maximum likelihood. Subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of country, protocol availability, double-blinding, risk of bias, sample size, and tranexamic acid dose. A 1-stage meta-analysis was performed as a sensitivity analysis. The credibility of outcomes was appraised with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Overall, 36 studies with 10,659 women were included. Tranexamic acid administration was associated with significantly lower total blood loss (mean difference, -189.44 mL; 95% confidence intervals, -218.63 to -160.25), lower hemoglobin drop (mean difference, 8.22%; 95% confidence interval, 5.54-10.90), decreased risk of blood loss of >1000 mL (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.60), transfusion requirement (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.65), and need of additional uterotonics (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.52). Subgroup analysis indicated a greater effect of tranexamic acid on total blood loss reduction in low-middle income countries. The outcomes remained stable by separately evaluating women at low bleeding risk. The 1-stage meta-analysis demonstrated similar outcomes with the primary analysis. The quality of evidence was judged to be moderate regarding total blood loss and hemoglobin percentage change and low for the other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggested that prophylactic tranexamic acid administration is effective among women undergoing cesarean delivery in lowering postpartum blood loss and limiting hemoglobin drop. Further research is needed to test its efficacy in high-risk populations and verify its safety profile.