Evaluation of the labour process with serial transperineal ultrasonography and prediction of the type of birth

The predicting value of the ratio of levator hiatus diameter to fetal head circumference in pregnant women at 37 weeks of gestation in the progression of the second stage of labor and levator ani injury 6 weeks postpartum

Objective

This study investigated the predicting value of the ratio of levator hiatus diameter (LHS) to fetal head circumference (HC) in pregnant women at 37 weeks of gestation in the progression of the second stage of labor and levator ani injury 6 weeks postpartum.

Methods

A total of 120 first-time women who gave vaginal delivery at 37 weeks of pregnancy were selected as the subjects in our hospital during March 2021 to March 2022. The subjects were divided into the second stage of labor > 1 h group and the second stage of labor ≤ 1 h group, according to the delivery time of the second stage of labor. According to the 6-week postpartum follow-up ultrasound examination with or without levator ani injury, they were divided into levator ani injury group and no injury group. All primipara women underwent three-dimensional ultrasonography at 37 weeks of gestation, and the resting LHS, Valsalva LHS, fetal HC and the ratio of resting LHS and fetal HC were compared. The correlation between these factors and the length of the second labor stage was analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. The value of these factors in predicting labor progression and postpartum levator ani injury was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

The resting LHS, Valsalva LHS and the ratio of resting LHS and fetal HC in the levator ani injury group were lower than these in the no injury group, while fetal HC in the levator ani injury group was higher than that in the no injury group (P < 0.05). The resting LHS, Valsalva LHS and the ratio of resting LHS and fetal HC in the second stage of labor > 1 h group were lower than these in the second stage of labor ≤ 1 h group, while fetal HC in the second stage of labor > 1 h group was higher than that in the second stage of labor ≤ 1 h group (P < 0.05). A significant negative correlation was observed between resting LHS/HC and total labor process (=-0.333, P < 0.01). ROC curve analysis showed that the AUCs of resting LHS, Valsalva LHS, HC, and resting LHS/HC ratio in predicting prolongation of the second stage of labor were 0.741, 0.740, 0.702, and 0.843 respectively. Besides, the AUCs of resting LHS, Valsalva LHS, HC, and resting LHS/HC ratio in predicting the total labor process were 0.657, 0.684, 0.768, and 0.836 respectively. The AUCs of resting LHS, Valsalva LHS, HC, and resting LHS/HC ratio in predicting postpartum levator ani muscle injury were 0.769, 0.773, 0.747, and 0.885 respectively.These results suggested that the ratio of resting LHS and fetal HC may have certain clinical value in predicting levator ani injury in pregnant women.

Conclusion

LHS, fetal HC and the ratio of resting LHS and fetal HC are significantly correlated with labor progression and postpartum levator ani injury, which have certain value in predicting labor progress and postpartum levator ani injury. Therein, the ratio of resting LHS and fetal HC has the highest predictive value, and early detection of the ratio of resting LHS and fetal HC is helpful to guide the selection of appropriate delivery mode.

Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound: angle of progression to evaluate and predict the mode of delivery and labor progression

Intrapartum ultrasonography serves as a valuable tool for the objective evaluation of labor progression and effectively identifies underlying factors, such as asynclitism, in cases of abnormal labor progression. Among the various ultrasound measurement techniques, the angle of progression (AOP) demonstrates favorable reproducibility and accuracy in assessing fetal head descent. In the context of abnormal labor, interventions differ across different stages of labor, emphasizing the importance of investigating the utility of AOP according to labor stages in this review article. Pre-labor assessment of AOP can be beneficial in terms of counseling for the timing of induction of labor, while a wider AOP value during the prolonged first stage of labor has demonstrated a positive correlation with successful vaginal delivery and shorter time to delivery. In the second stage of labor, the AOP has exhibited efficacy in predicting the mode of delivery and complicated operative deliveries. Furthermore, it has assisted in predicting the duration of labor, thereby highlighting its potential as a decision-making model for labor progression. However, further research is needed to investigate aspects, such as the determination of cutoff values, of AOP, considering the multifaceted characteristics of labor progression, which are influenced by complex interactions among maternal, fetal, and other contributing factors.