Fetoscopic laser ablation therapy in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated at a single centre over 10 years: a retrospective study

Solomon technique vs selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal and perinatal outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain maternal and perinatal outcomes of monochorionic twin pregnancies complicated by twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) treated with the Solomon technique compared with selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (SFLP) of placental anastomoses.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant studies. The outcomes observed were perinatal loss and survival, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM), preterm birth (PTB), gestational age (GA) at delivery, interval between laser treatment and delivery, maternal bleeding, septostomy or chorioamniotic separation, placental abruption, twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS), recurrence of TTTS, neonatal morbidity and neurological morbidity. Random-effects head-to-head meta-analyses were used to analyze the data. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) and their 95% CIs were calculated.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in the systematic review. There was generally no difference in the main maternal and pregnancy characteristics between pregnancies treated using the Solomon technique and those treated using SFLP of placental anastomoses. The risks of fetal loss (pooled OR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.50-0.95); P = 0.023), neonatal death (pooled OR, 0.37 (95% CI, 0.16-0.84); P = 0.018) and perinatal loss (pooled OR, 0.56 (95% CI, 0.38-0.83); P = 0.004) were significantly lower in pregnancies treated using the Solomon technique than in those treated with SFLP. Likewise, pregnancies treated using the Solomon technique had a significantly higher chance of survival of at least one twin (pooled OR, 2.31 (95% CI, 1.03-5.19); P = 0.004) and double survival (pooled OR, 2.18 (95% CI, 1.29-3.70); P = 0.001). There was no difference in the risk of PPROM (P = 0.603), PPROM within 10 days from laser surgery (P = 0.982), PTB (P = 0.207), maternal bleeding (P = 0.219), septostomy or chorioamniotic separation (P = 0.224) or chorioamnionitis (P = 0.135) between the two groups, while the risk of placental abruption was higher in pregnancies treated using the Solomon technique (pooled OR, 2.90 (95% CI, 1.55-5.44); P = 0.001). In the Solomon technique group, pregnancies delivered at a significantly earlier GA than did those treated with SFLP (pooled MD, -0.625 weeks (95% CI, -0.90 to -0.35 weeks); P < 0.001), while there was no difference in the interval between laser treatment and delivery (P = 0.589). The rate of recurrence of TTTS was significantly lower in pregnancies undergoing the Solomon technique (pooled OR, 0.43 (95% CI, 0.22-0.81); P < 0.001), while there was no difference in the risk of TAPS between the two groups (P = 0.792). Finally, there was no difference in the overall risk of neonatal morbidity (P = 0.382) or neurological morbidity (P = 0.247) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Monochorionic twin pregnancies complicated by TTTS undergoing laser treatment using the Solomon technique had a significantly higher survival rate and lower recurrence rate of TTTS but were associated with an increased risk of placental abruption and earlier GA at delivery compared to those treated with SFLP. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Anesthesia for fetal operative procedures: A systematic review

Objective

The anesthetic management of fetal operative procedures (FOP) is a highly debated topic. Literature on fetal pain perception and response to external stimuli is rapidly expanding. Nonetheless, there is no consensus on the fetal consciousness nor on the instruments to measure pain levels. As a result, no guidelines or clinical recommendations on anesthesia modality during FOP are available. This systematic literature review aimed to collect the available knowledge on the most common fetal interventions, and summarize the reported outcomes for each anesthetic approach. Additional aim was to provide an overall evaluation of the most commonly used anesthetic agents.

Methods

Two systematic literature searches were performed in Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to December 2021. To best cover the available evidence, one literature search was mostly focused on fetal surgical procedures; while anesthesia during FOP was the main target for the second search. The following fetal procedures were included: fetal transfusion, laser ablation of placental anastomosis, twin-reversed arterial perfusion treatment, fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion, thoraco-amniotic shunt, vesico-amniotic shunt, myelomeningocele repair, resection of sacrococcygeal teratoma, ligation of amniotic bands, balloon valvuloplasty/septoplasty, ex-utero intrapartum treatment, and ovarian cyst resection/aspiration. Yielded articles were screened against the same inclusion criteria. Studies reporting anesthesia details and procedures’ outcomes were considered. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed and findings were reported in a narrative manner.

Results

The literature searches yielded 1,679 articles, with 429 being selected for full-text evaluation. A total of 168 articles were included. Overall, no significant differences were found among procedures performed under maternal anesthesia or maternal-fetal anesthesia. Procedures requiring invasive fetal manipulation resulted to be more effective when performed under maternal anesthesia only. Based on the available data, a wide range of anesthetic agents are currently deployed and no consistency has been found neither between centers nor procedures.

Conclusions

This systematic review shows great variance in the anesthetic management during FOP. Further studies, systematically reporting intraoperative fetal monitoring and fetal hormonal responses to external stimuli, are necessary to identify the best anesthetic approach. Additional investigations on pain pathways and fetal pain perception are advisable.