To drain or not to drain: a single institution experience with neonatal intestinal perforation

Is There Still a Role for Peritoneal Drains in Neonatal Pneumoperitoneum? A Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

Although pneumoperitoneum from necrotizing enterocolitis or spontaneous intestinal perforation is a surgical emergency, risk stratification to determine which neonates benefit from initial peritoneal drainage (PD) is lacking.

METHODS

Using a single-center retrospective review of very low birth weight neonates under 1500 g who underwent PD for pneumoperitoneum (January 2015 to December 2023) from necrotizing enterocolitis or spontaneous intestinal perforation, two cohorts were created: drain "responders" (patients managed definitively with PD; includes placement of a second drain) and "nonresponders" (patients who underwent subsequent laparotomy or died after PD). Antenatal/postnatal characteristics, periprocedural clinical data, and hospital outcomes were compared between responders and nonresponders using Student's t-test, chi-squared test, or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Fifty-six neonates were included: 31 (55%) drain responders and 25 (45%) nonresponders. Birth weight, gestational age, sex, ethnicity, use of postnatal steroids, and enteral feeds were similar between the cohorts. Nonresponders had higher base deficits (-3.4 versus -5.0, P = 0.032) and FiO2 (0.25 versus 0.52, P = 0.001) after drain placement. Drain responders had significantly shorter lengths of stay (89 versus 148 days, P = 0.014) and lower mortality (6.4% versus 56%, P < 0.001). A subgroup analysis of the nonresponders showed no differences in birth weight, vasopressor requirement, FiO2, or postdrain base deficit between nonresponders who had a drain alone versus laparotomy following drain placement.

CONCLUSIONS

PD remains a viable initial therapy for pneumoperitoneum in premature very low birth weight neonates (< 1500 g), demonstrating clinical response in more than half. Ongoing clinical assessment and judgment is imperative after drain placement to ensure continued clinical improvement.

Clinical Predictors of Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation vs Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Extremely and Very Low Birth Weight Neonates

PURPOSE

Spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) are distinct disease processes associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Initial treatment, laparotomy (LP) versus peritoneal drainage (PD), is disease specific however it can be difficult to distinguish these diagnoses preoperatively. We investigated clinical characteristics associated with each diagnosis and constructed a scoring algorithm for accurate preoperative diagnosis.

METHODS

A cohort of extreme and very low birth weight (<1500 g) neonates surgically treated for SIP or NEC between 07/2004-09/2022 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics included gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), feeding history, physical exam, and laboratory/radiological findings. Intraoperative diagnosis was used to determine SIP vs NEC. Pre-drain diagnosis was used for patients treated with PD only.

RESULTS

338 neonates were managed for SIP (n = 269, 79.6%) vs NEC (n = 69, 20.4%). PD was definitive treatment in 146 (43.2%) patients and 75 (22.2%) patients were treated with upfront LP. Characteristics associated with SIP included younger GA, younger age at initial laparotomy or drainage (ALD), and history of trophic or no feeds. Multivariate logistic regression determined pneumatosis, abdominal wall erythema, higher ALD and history of feeds to be highly predictive of NEC. A 0-8-point scale was designed based on these characteristics with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.819 (95% CI 0.756-0.882) for the diagnosis of NEC. A threshold score of 1.5 had a 95.2% specificity for NEC.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing clinical characteristics associated with SIP & NEC we developed a scoring system designed to assist surgeons accurately distinguish SIP vs NEC in neonates.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective Chart Review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Incidence of spontaneous intestinal perforations exceeds necrotizing enterocolitis in extremely low birth weight infants fed an exclusive human milk-based diet: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) are complications of extremely low birth weight (ELBW, ≤1000 g) infants. ELBW infants at Texas Children's Hospital receive an exclusive human milk-based diet, which has been associated with a reduction of NEC.

OBJECTIVES

1) Assess incidence of SIP and NEC (Stage II or greater) in ELBW infants receiving 100% human milk-based diet, 2) Describe mortality rates of ELBW infants with SIP and NEC.

METHODS

Prospective single-center observational cohort study of ELBW infants born between 2010 and 2014 with SIP or NEC (exclusion: congenital anomalies and death within 48 h).

RESULTS

Of 379 ELBW infants, 345 were eligible. Of these, 28 (8.1%) had SIP and 8 (2.3%) had NEC (medical n = 1, surgical n = 7). SIP infant mortality was 32% (n = 9) compared to 63% (n = 5) for NEC patients. Of SIP infants with PD (n = 25), 52% required subsequent exploratory laparotomy (LAP). Of NEC infants with peritoneal drainage (PD) (n = 2), both required subsequent LAP.

CONCLUSION

Using an exclusive human milk-based diet, the incidence of SIP exceeds NEC in ELBW infants at our institution. This shows a changing trend in the incidence of these two diagnoses in the era of human milk, as NEC had previously been more prevalent in ELBW infants. More than half of infants who initially received PD later required LAP. There were no differences in survival outcomes in both SIP and NEC groups based on surgical management.

Role of Nutrition in Prevention of Neonatal Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation and Its Complications: A Systematic Review

Background: Spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) is a devastating complication of prematurity, and extremely low birthweight (ELBW < 1000 g) infants born prior to 28 weeks are at highest risk. The role of nutrition and feeding practices in prevention and complications of SIP is unclear. The purpose of this review is to compile evidence to support early nutrition initiation in infants at risk for and after surgery for SIP. Methods: A search of PubMed, EMBASE and Medline was performed using relevant search terms according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Abstracts and full texts were reviewed by co-first authors. Studies with infants diagnosed with SIP that included information on nutrition/feeding practices prior to SIP and post-operatively were included. Primary outcome was time to first feed. Secondary outcomes were incidence of SIP, time to full enteral feeds, duration of parenteral nutrition, length of stay, neurodevelopmental outcomes and mortality. Results: Nineteen articles met inclusion criteria—nine studies included feeding/nutrition data prior to SIP and ten studies included data on post-operative nutrition. Two case series, one cohort study and sixteen historical control studies were included. Three studies showed reduced incidence of SIP with initiation of enteral nutrition in the first three days of life. Two studies showed reduced mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment in infants with early feeding. Conclusions: Available data suggest that early enteral nutrition in ELBW infants reduces incidence of SIP without increased mortality.

Does Surgical Management Alter Outcome in Necrotizing Enterocolitis?

Necrotizing enterocolitis occurs in 14% of infants less than 1000 g. Preoperative management varies widely, and the only absolute indication for surgery is pneumoperitoneum. Multiple biomarkers and scoring systems are under investigation, but clinical practice is still largely driven by surgeon judgment. Outcomes in panintestinal disease are poor, and multiple creative approaches are used to preserve bowel length. Overall, recovery is complicated in the short and long term. Major sequelae are stricture, short gut syndrome, and neurodevelopmental impairment. Resolving controversies in surgical necrotizing enterocolitis care requires multicenter collaboration for centralized data and tissue repositories, benchmarking, and carrying out prospective randomized controlled trials.

Agreement between study designs: a systematic review comparing observational studies and randomized trials of surgical treatments for necrotizing enterocolitis

Background: It is unknown whether observational studies comparing laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for surgical treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants differ from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the same interventions. Further, in the absence of sufficient RCT evidence, it is uncertain how best to use existing observational data to guide clinical decision making.Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles comparing laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for preterm infants with NEC. Two authors independently searched PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, from 1 January 1990 to 1 May 2017 and selected articles that: (1) included low birthweight (<2500 g) or preterm (<37-week gestation) infants, (2) compared laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for NEC, and (3) reported all-cause mortality (primary outcome) in both groups. The same two authors extracted data about study outcomes and about study quality, which was assessed using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist for reporting of RCTs and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for reporting of observational studies. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to generate weighted odds ratios (OR).Results: Twenty-five observational studies and two RCTs met all eligibility criteria. Outcomes were reported for 16,288 patients: 16,103 from observational studies and 185 from RCTs. Meta-analysis of observational studies demonstrated significantly lower mortality after laparotomy, as compared to peritoneal drainage (pooled OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.84). In contrast, RCTs demonstrated no difference in mortality (pooled OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.47-1.54). In post hoc analyses, observational studies were separated into two subgroups: low versus high quality of reporting, based on the STROBE checklist. Observational studies with low quality of reporting significantly favored laparotomy (pooled OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.81). In contrast and similar to RCTs, observational studies with high quality of reporting showed no difference in mortality (pooled OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.37-1.19).Conclusions: Neither RCTs nor observational studies with high quality of reporting demonstrate differences in mortality when preterm infants with surgical NEC are managed with laparotomy or peritoneal drainage. While RCTs remain a gold standard for evaluation of therapies, results from high quality observational studies may approximate the results of RCTs and might guide clinical practice until adequate RCT evidence is available.

Peritoneal drainage is associated with higher survival rates for necrotizing enterocolitis in premature, extremely low birth weight infants

BACKGROUND

To evaluate peritoneal drainage (PD) and laparotomy ± resection/ostomy (LAP) as initial approaches to the surgical management of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature, extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants.

METHODS

Kids' Inpatient Database (2003-2012) was searched for cases of NEC (International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] 777.5x) in premature (<37 weeks), extremely low birth weight (<1000 g) infants. Infants were admitted at <28 days of life. Propensity score (PS)-matched analyses were performed, using end points of hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and cost of hospitalization. Cases were matched 1:1 on 48 confounding variables (demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics and 39 comorbidities).

RESULTS

On PS-matched comparison, PD had higher survival versus LAP, P = 0.0009. LOS and cost were higher for PD versus LAP, P < 0.003. Survival rates did not differ between PD + LAP and PD-only treatments. LOS and cost were higher for PD + LAP versus PD-only, P < 0.02. PD + LAP infants had higher survival versus LAP, P = 0.0193. LOS and cost were higher for PD + LAP, P < 0.005.

CONCLUSIONS

A risk-adjusted PS-matched analysis of operative management in premature, ELBW infants with NEC found higher survival rates associated with PD placement versus LAP, whether PD was used as definitive treatment or with subsequent LAP even after controlling for potential contributors to selection bias (i.e., stability influencing management preference).

Early mortality after neonatal surgery: analysis of risk factors in an optimized health care system for the surgical newborn

OBJECTIVE

Anesthetic and operative interventions in neonates remain hazardous procedures, given the vulnerability of the patients in this pediatric population. The aim was to determine the preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with 30-day post-operative mortality and describe mortality outcomes following neonatal surgery under general anesthesia in our center.

METHODS

Infants less than 28 days of age who underwent general anesthesia for surgery during an 11-year period (2000 - 2010) in our tertiary care pediatric center were retrospectively identified using the pediatric intensive care unit database. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify independent preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with 30-day post-operative mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 437 infants in the study (median gestational age at birth 37 weeks, median birth weight 2,760 grams), 28 (6.4%) patients died before hospital discharge. Of these, 22 patients died within the first post-operative month. Logistic regression analysis showed increased odds of 30-day post-operative mortality among patients who presented American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) score 3 or above (odds ratio 19.268; 95%CI 2.523 - 147.132) and surgery for necrotizing enterocolitis/gastrointestinal perforation (OR 5.291; 95%CI 1.962 - 14.266), compared to those who did not.

CONCLUSION

The overall in-hospital mortality of 6.4% is within the prevalence reported for developed countries. Establishing ASA score 3 or above and necrotizing enterocolitis/gastrointestinal perforation as independent risk factors for early mortality in neonatal surgery may help clinicians to more adequately manage this high risk population.

Could clinical scores guide the surgical treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis?

PURPOSE

Test the diagnostic reliability of the score for neonatal acute physiology-perinatal extension-II (SNAPPE-II) and the metabolic derangement acuity score (MDAS) as predictors of surgery in patients with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

METHODS

The SNAPPE-II and the MDAS were applied to 99 patients with NEC. Both the scores were calculated at the moment of diagnosis (T(0)) and when surgical assessment was required (T(1)). The main outcome was the need of surgical revision. Comparison between models was made through their receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients required surgical treatment (group A) and 64 responded to medical therapy (group B). Median SNAPPE-II was 22 versus 5 for group A (U test 621, p = 0.002) at T(0); and 22 versus 10 for group A (U test 487, p = 0.01) at T(1). Measuring the value of the SNAPPE-II as a predictor of surgery, the ROC curve was 0.69 (CI 95%, 0.57-0.80) at T(0) and 0.67 (CI 95%, 0.55-0.80) at T(1). Median MDAS were 2 for both groups A and B at T(0) (U test 890.5, p = 0.113) and 2 versus 1.5 for group A at T(1) (U test 570, p = 0.043). The ROC curve for MDAS was 0.59 (CI 95%, 0.47-0.71) at T(0) and 0.64 (CI 95%, 0.52-0.77) at T(1).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of the SNAPPE-II offers mild results in the moment of the diagnosis of NEC, and at T(1). The MDAS is non significant at T(0) and obtains moderate results at T(1). These results do not encourage using the SNAPPE-II and the MDAS as definite tools to decide for surgical treatment of the patients affected by NEC.

Peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy as initial surgical treatment for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis or spontaneous intestinal perforation in preterm low birth weight infants

BACKGROUND

Standard surgical management of infants with perforated necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) is laparotomy with the resection of the necrotic or perforated segments of the intestine. Peritoneal drainage is an alternative approach to the management of such infants.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and risks of peritoneal drainage compared to laparotomy as the initial surgical treatment for perforated NEC or SIP in preterm infants.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2010), EMBASE (1980 to July 2010), CINAHL (1982 to July 2010), previous reviews and cross-references were searched. Abstracts of paediatric academic society meetings were also searched (online: 2000 to 2009; handsearching Pediatric Research: 1995 to 2000).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials in preterm (< 37 weeks gestation), low birth weight (< 2500 g) infants with perforated NEC or SIP allocated to peritoneal drainage or laparotomy as initial surgical treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were excerpted from the trial reports and analysed according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

Only two randomised controlled trials (RCT) met the eligibility criteria. Overall, no significant differences were seen between the peritoneal drainage and laparotomy groups regarding the incidence of mortality within 28 days of the primary procedure (28/90 versus 30/95; typical relative risk (RR) 0.99, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.52; N = 185, two trials); mortality by 90 days after the primary procedure (typical RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.55; N = 185, two trials) and the number of infants needing total parenteral nutrition for more than 90 days (typical RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.95; N = 116, two trials). Nearly 50% of the infants in the peritoneal drainage group could avoid the need for laparotomy during the study period (44/90 versus 95/96; typical RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.61; N = 186, two trials). One study found that the time to attain full enteral feeds in infants ≤ 1000 g was prolonged in the peritoneal drainage group (mean difference (MD) 20.77, 95% CI 3.62 to 37.92).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from two RCTs suggests no significant benefits or harms of peritoneal drainage over laparotomy. However, due to the very small sample size, clinically significant differences may have easily been missed. No firm recommendations can be made for clinicians. Large multicentre randomised controlled trials are needed to address this question definitively.

Peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy for necrotizing enterocolitis and intestinal perforation: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To determine whether peritoneal drain (PD) or laparotomy (LAP) is the most effective intervention in premature neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or intestinal perforation (IP).

METHODS

A systematic review of the published literature between January 2000 and December 2008 was undertaken. Prospective studies with at least 25 patients in each of the PD and LAP arms were selected. Gestational age, birth weight, operation, and mortality data were extracted.

RESULTS

Five prospective studies (two level I, three level II) with 523 (273 PD, 250 LAP) participants followed for mortality met selection criteria. Using a fixed effect model, the combined estimate indicates an increased mortality of 55% with PD (OR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.08-2.22, P=0.02) without statistical heterogeneity (chi(2)=5.88, P=0.21). PD patients were 0.78 wk younger (P =0.0002) and 67 g smaller (P =0.0006). Analysis of the three level II trials yielded a combined estimate indicating an excess mortality of 89% with PD patients (95% CI: 1.20-2.98, P =0.006) without statistical heterogeneity (chi(2)=3.74, P=0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

PD is associated with 55% excess mortality compared with LAP. Pediatric surgeons must individually assess and select patients with NEC and IP for optimal surgical therapy.