CXCL13 concentration in latent syphilis patients with treatment failure

Cerebrospinal fluid CXCL13 concentration for diagnosis and monitoring of neurosyphilis in people with HIV

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to assess and compare cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-CXCL13 levels in People with HIV (PWH) with suspected neurosyphilis (NS), those with syphilis but without NS, and patients without treponema infection. Additionally, it aimed to evaluate changes in CSF-CXCL13 concentrations before and after antibiotic treatment.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study involving 93 PWH suspected of NS. All participants underwent lumbar puncture, with CSF-CXCL13 levels measured at baseline and during follow-up in patients diagnosed with NS.

METHODS

CSF-CXCL13 levels were quantified using ELISA. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze differences between groups, while the Wilcoxon test assessed within subject changes. ROC curve analysis determined the diagnostic efficacy of CSF-CXCL13 for NS.

RESULTS

Significantly higher CSF-CXCL13 levels were observed in patients with NS compared to those with syphilis without NS and non-syphilis patients. Posttreatment, a decline in CSF-CXCL13 levels was noted in all NS cases. A CSF-CXCL13 threshold exceeding 60.0 pg/ml, in conjunction with reactive CSF-FTA-ABS, yielded a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 97.6% for NS diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

CSF-CXCL13 emerges as a valuable adjunctive biomarker for detecting NS in PWH, especially in cases with nonreactive CSF-VDRL. Monitoring CSF-CXCL13 levels also appears effective in evaluating therapeutic response in PWH undergoing NS treatment.

Factors Associated With Neurosyphilis in Patients With Syphilis Treatment Failure: A Retrospective Study of 165 HIV-Negative Patients

Background

In recent years, the incidence of syphilis has increased year by year. Our study is to explore the risk factors for the development of neurosyphilis in patients who failed syphilis treatment.

Methods

A total number of 165 patients with complete medical records and who agreed to undergo lumbar puncture were divided into 47 neurosyphilis cases and 118 non-neurosyphilis cases according to the diagnostic criteria of neurosyphilis, and the differences in clinical characteristics and laboratory features between the two groups were analyzed. Significant variables were entered into multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

(1) There were statistical differences (p < 0.05) between the neurosyphilis (NS) group and the non-neurosyphilis (NNS) group in terms of the higher proportion of male and serum rapid plasma reagin (RPR) > 1:32 and the elevated cerebrospinal fluid white blood cell (CSF WBC) and CSF protein in the neurosyphilis group compared with the non-neurosyphilis group. (2) Male gender, serum RPR titers >1:32 at lumbar puncture, CSF WBC >8 × 10⁶/L were significantly associated with neurosyphilis.

Conclusion

For patients who have failed syphilis treatment, lumbar puncture should be performed to exclude neurosyphilis, to enable early diagnosis and treatment, and to prevent irreversible damage of neurosyphilis, especially if the patient is male and has a serum RPR>1:32 and elevated CSF WBC at lumbar puncture, which are risk factors for neurosyphilis.