Incidence of positive peritoneal cytology in patients with endometrial carcinoma after hysteroscopy vs. dilatation and curettage

Characteristic hysteroscopy appearance considerations for detecting uterine endometrial malignancies

AIM

The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in diagnosing endometrial lesions has been demonstrated, showing high diagnostic accuracy for malignant endometrial lesions. Although the characteristic appearances of atypical and malignant endometria have been reported, they are not definitive and sometimes complicated. This study aimed to identify a small number of characteristic features to detect endometrial abnormalities using a simple judgment system and analyze the diagnostic characteristics and their accuracy in endometrial malignancy diagnosis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of hysteroscopy video data of 250 patients, of which we selected for analysis based on pathology examination 152 cases with benign changes, 16 with atypical endometrium, and 18 with carcinoma in situ or endometrial cancer. Endometrial characteristics assessed included protrusion, desquamation, extended vessel, atypical vessel, and white/yellow lesion.

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis revealed that desquamation (p = 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 5.28), atypical vessels (p < 0.001, OR 8.50), and white/yellow lesions (p = 0.011, OR 1.37) were significant predictors for endometrial malignancy. From their contribution status, scoring points of 4, 6, and 1 were settled according to the odds ratio proportions. When scores ≥5 (at least both desquamation and white/yellow lesions or only atypical vessels) were used to define endometrial malignancy, sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 92%, respectively. When detecting cancer, atypical, and benign cases, sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our characteristics hysteroscopic findings showed a higher predictive ability in detecting endometrial malignancies. However, further examination with more cases would be needed to accurately diagnose endometrial malignancy by hysteroscopy.

Preoperative hysteroscopy shortened progression-free survival in advanced FIGO stage in endometrial cancer: Ten year analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of preoperative hysteroscopy on progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DFS), and to explore the factors which contribute to poor clinical outcomes between hysteroscopy and dilation and curettage (D&C) in endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS

A retrospective study was designed by collecting data from women diagnosed with EC through hysteroscopy or D&C from January 2010 to December 2019 in a tertiary hospital in China. A propensity score was used for 1:1 matching of advanced stage patients. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted to determine whether hysteroscopy was a prognostic factor in EC and to identify factors associated with its impact on PFS and DFS in different subgroups.

RESULTS

Overall, 543 and 272 women who underwent D&C and hysteroscopy, respectively were included. Compared to D&C, preoperative hysteroscopy was related to reduced PFS and DFS, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.904 and 3.905, respectively. Hysteroscopy contributed to an increased risk of positive wash cytology (48.27% vs 24.13%), recurrence (48.28% vs 20.69%) and shorter PFS after matching in FIGO Stage I-IV EC, while there was no significance in positive ascites cytology (14.04% vs 13.45%), PFS and DFS in FIGO Stage I EC.

CONCLUSIONS

Hysteroscopy was an independent predictive factor for poor prognosis in EC. Hysteroscopy appeared to be a safe diagnostic method as D&C in FIGO Stage I EC but was a risk factor for increased recurrence and reduced PFS in advanced stage disease. Its impact on DFS is uncertain.

Metastases and Recurrence Risk Factors in Endometrial Cancer-The Role of Selected Molecular Changes, Hormonal Factors, Diagnostic Methods and Surgery Procedures

The presence of metastatic endometrial cancer (EC) is a key problem in treatment failure associated with reduced overall survival rates. The most common metastatic location is the pelvic lymph nodes, and the least common is the brain. The presence of metastasis depends on many factors, including the molecular profile of cancer (according to the TCGA-Genome Atlas), the activity of certain hormones (estrogen, prolactin), and pro-inflammatory adipocytokines. Additionally, an altered expression of microRNAs affecting the regulation of numerous genes is also related to the spread of cancer. This paper also discusses the value of imaging methods in detecting metastases; the primary role is attributed to the standard transvaginal USG with the tumor-free distance (uTFD) option. The influence of diagnostic and therapeutic methods on EC spread is also described. Hysteroscopy, according to the analysis discussed above, may increase the risk of metastases through a fluid medium, mainly performed in advanced stages of EC. According to another analysis, laparoscopic hysterectomy performed with particular attention to avoiding risky procedures (trocar flushing, tissue traumatization, preserving a margin of normal tissue) was not found to increase the risk of EC dissemination.

Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial carcinoma based on ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk classification: A multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology (PC) on endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients under the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk classification.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed EC patients from 27 medical centers in China from 2000 to 2019. Patients were divided into three ESGO risk groups: low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-intermediate risk, and high-risk groups. The covariates were balanced by using the propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (PS-IPTW). The prognostic significance of PC was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 6313 EC patients with PC results were included and positive PC was reported in 384 women (6.1%). The multivariate Cox analysis in all patients showed the positive PC was significantly associated with decreased PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-3.13, P < 0.001) and OS (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.49-3.40, P < 0.001),and the Kaplan-Meier curves also showed a poor survival in the intermediate and high-intermediate risk group (5-year PFS: 75.5% vs. 93.0%, P < 0.001; 5-year OS: 78.3% vs. 96.4%, P < 0.001); While in the low-risk group, there were no significant differences in PFS and OS between different PC status (5-year PFS: 93.1% vs. 97.3%, P = 0.124; 5-year OS: 98.6% vs. 98.2%, P = 0.823); in the high-risk group, significant difference was only found in PFS (5-year PFS: 62.5% vs. 77.9%, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Positive PC was an adverse prognostic factor for EC, especially in the intermediate and high-intermediate risk patients. Gynecologic oncologists should reconsider the effect of positive PC on different ESGO risk groups.

Comparison of prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer after hysteroscopy versus dilatation and curettage: A multicenter retrospective study

Introduction

Hysteroscopy is a useful procedure for diagnosing endometrial cancer. There is controversy regarding whether hysteroscopy affects the prognosis of endometrial cancer by prompting cancer cell into intraperitoneal dissemination. Our purpose was to confirm whether hysteroscopy could be a risk factor of the tumor stage, recurrence and survival rate of endometrial cancer.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study included all consecutive patients who had endometrial carcinoma diagnosed preoperatively with hysteroscopy and directed endometrial biopsy (HSC, group A) and dilatation and curettage (D&C, group B) between February 2014 and December 2018 at the Fujian Provincial, China. We compared the demographic feature, clinical characteristics and prognosis between the two groups.

Results

A total of 429 patients were included in the study (Group A, n = 77; Group B, n = 352). There was no significant difference between their baseline characteristics [including age, BMI, histological type and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage]. By comparing several pathological conditions that may affect prognosis, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the peritoneal cytology, depth of myometrial invasion, the positivity of lymph nodes, lymphovascular space invasion and paraaortic lymph node dissection. Finally, no significant difference was found between the two groups in overall survival (OS) (P = 0.189) or recurrence free survival (RFS) (P = 0.787).

Conclusion

Under certain inflation pressure and distension medium, hysteroscopic examination and lesion biopsy ensure the safety and have no adverse effects on prognosis compared to conventional curettage.

Whether preoperative hysteroscopy increases the dissemination of endometrial cancer cells: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To determine whether hysteroscopy (HSC) increases the risk of intraperitoneal dissemination in endometrial cancer patients.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of multiple databases. Quality assessments of eligible studies were performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa and Jadad scales. Positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) as the outcome of interest was compared between endometrial cancer patients with and without HSC. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as a measure of effects.

RESULTS

Three case-control studies and eight retrospective cohort studies included 3364 patients, of whom 1116 underwent preoperative HSC, which resulted in a significantly higher PPC rate (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.31-2.54; p = 0.0004). I² was 11%, and the heterogeneity was acceptable. The difference between the groups with stages I-II was statistically insignificant (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.75-2.99; p = 0.25). When liquid was used as the uterine distension medium during HSC and the intrauterine pressure was controlled under 80 mmHg, the difference between the two groups was also insignificant (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.50-2.79; p = 0.71). However, when the intrauterine pressure exceeded 80 mmHg, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.28-3.73; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicates that preoperative HSC in patients with endometrial cancer may increase the risk of intraperitoneal dissemination of malignant cells, which may be associated with intrauterine pressure >80 mmHg but not with stages I-II. There is no reason to avoid HSC for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer, especially in early stages, but intrauterine pressure should possibly be controlled below 80 mmHg.

Surgical treatment and fertility perservation in endometrial cancer

Background

Endometrial cancer (EC) represents a high health burden in Slovenia and worldwide. The incidence is increasing due to lifestyle and behavioural risk factors such as obesity, smoking, oestrogen exposure and aging of the population. In many cases, endometrial cancer is diagnosed at an early stage due to obvious signs and symptoms. The standard treatment is surgery with or without adjuvant therapy, depending on the stage of the disease and the risk of recurrence. However, treatment modalities have changed in the last decades, considerably in the extent of lymphadenectomy.

Conclusions

The gold standard of treatment for is surgery, which may be the only treatment modality in the early stages of low-grade tumours. In recent years, a minimally invasive approach with sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been proposed. A conservative approach with hormonal treatment is used if fertility preservation is desired. If EC is in advance stage, high-risk histology, or high grade, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of both is recommended.

Is Diagnostic Hysteroscopy Safe for the Investigation of Type II Endometrial Cancer? A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Although hysteroscopy (HSC) can be used for assessing the uterine cavity in women with suspected endometrial cancer (EC), it remains controversial as a procedure because it can potentially enhance the metastatic spread of cancer cells. Moreover, it is important to assess this hypothesis for type II EC, a more aggressive phenotype that usually presents with endometrial atrophy and has worse prognosis. Thus, we aimed to assess the prevalence of positive peritoneal cytology result in women with type II EC who underwent HSC as a diagnostic tool and to determine the factors associated with patient relapse/survival.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis (2002-2017).

SETTING

Tertiary, academic hospital.

PATIENTS

One hundred twenty-seven women with type II EC.

INTERVENTIONS

Diagnostic HSC (HSC) (n = 43) or dilation/curettage (D&C) (n = 84).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Primary end point was the frequency of positive peritoneal cytology result. Survival curves were projected using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the factors related with the disease-free survival (DFS) and the disease-specific survival (DSS). Advanced cancer stage and greater vascular invasion appeared more frequently in the D&C group (p = .008 and p = .04, respectively). Positive peritoneal cytology result was present in 2 of 43 (4.6%) women following HSC and in 9 of 84 (10.7%) following D&C (p = .22). DFS and DSS curves did not statistically differ between the groups. Multivariate analysis for DFS revealed that advanced cancer stage (III and IV) (HR = 4.67; 95% CI, 2.34-9.34; p <.001) and advanced age (HR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.13]; p <.001) were the factors associated with relapse. For DSS, advanced age (HR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.05-1.12; p <.001), cancer stage III/IV (HR = 3.95; 95% CI, 2.18-7.15; p <.001), and vascular invasion (HR = 2.47; 95% CI, 1.34-4.54; p = .004) increased the risk of mortality.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic HSC did not increase the rate of positive peritoneal cytology result at the time of surgical staging in this cohort of women with type II EC and is probably as safe as D&C.

The function of uterine UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A8 (UGT1A8) and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 (UGT2B7) is involved in endometrial cancer based on estrogen metabolism regulation

BACKGROUND

The progression of endometrial cancer (EC) is closely related to estrogen levels. UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) are an essential class of phase II metabolizing enzymes that play a pivotal role in detoxifying steroid hormone.

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to uncover the role of UGTs in estrogen metabolism and the pathogenesis of EC.

METHODS

A total of 100 unrelated EC patients (mean age 52.15 ± 10.04 y) and 100 healthy subjects (mean age 50.26 ± 8.80 y) were recruited for analysis of the UGT gene polymorphism and estrogen level. In six cases of EC, EC-adjacent tissues and cancer tissues were collected for detection of UGT expression.

RESULTS

Our results showed that the estrogen homeostasis profile was disturbed in EC patients, with carcinogenic catechol estrogens (4-OHE1, 2-OHE1, 2-OHE2) significantly accumulated in the serum of these patients. Also, levels of estrogen-glucuronides were decreased significantly, and the expression of UGT1A8 and UGT2B7 in uterine tissues was downregulated in EC patients. Consistent with this, we observed that the distribution of genotypes and allele frequencies in UGT1A8 rs1042597 and UGT2B7 rs7439366 was significantly different between EC patients and healthy volunteers.

CONCLUSION

These results indicated that UGT1A8 and UGT2B7 may contribute to the estrogen signaling pathway and the pathogenesis of EC.

Usefulness of biopsy by office hysteroscopy for endometrial cancer: A case report

A diagnostic biopsy for endometrial cancer is performed via dilation and curettage (D&C). However, D&C may miss endometrial cancer lesions due to of its 'blind' approach. Hysteroscopy is a useful method that can be used to detect endometrial cancer lesions. In addition, office hysteroscopy is easy to be scheduled and does not require anesthesia. The patient was a 40-year-old woman with suspected endometrial cancer; however, it could not be diagnosed by D&C and biopsy using hysteroscopy during hospitalization. Office hysteroscopy during the proliferative phase indicated that the suspicious endometrial cancerous lesion was minimal at the isthmus of the uterus with atypical vessels and a white spot, for which biopsy was performed. Pathological diagnosis was endometrioid carcinoma with squamous differentiation, G1. Therefore, total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy were performed. In this case, it was difficult to detect minimal lesion in the secretory phase because the endometrial thickness hid the endometrial cancer. It is easy to perform office hysteroscopy in the proliferative phase. This case indicated that office hysteroscopy is a useful method to diagnose and perform biopsy for minimal lesions.