1
|
Sun H, Zhang M, Zou Z, Yan D. Fluidized magnetization roasting utilization of refractory siderite-containing iron ore with low gas reduction potential. ADV POWDER TECHNOL 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2023.103994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
|
2
|
Abstract
Lithium is the principal component of high-energy-density batteries and is a critical material necessary for the economy and security of the United States. Brines from geothermal power production have been identified as a potential domestic source of lithium; however, lithium-rich geothermal brines are characterized by complex chemistry, high salinity, and high temperatures, which pose unique challenges for economic lithium extraction. The purpose of this paper is to examine and analyze direct lithium extraction technology in the context of developing sustainable lithium production from geothermal brines. In this paper, we are focused on the challenges of applying direct lithium extraction technology to geothermal brines; however, applications to other brines (such as coproduced brines from oil wells) are considered. The most technologically advanced approach for direct lithium extraction from geothermal brines is adsorption of lithium using inorganic sorbents. Other separation processes include extraction using solvents, sorption on organic resin and polymer materials, chemical precipitation, and membrane-dependent processes. The Salton Sea geothermal field in California has been identified as the most significant lithium brine resource in the US and past and present efforts to extract lithium and other minerals from Salton Sea brines were evaluated. Extraction of lithium with inorganic molecular sieve ion-exchange sorbents appears to offer the most immediate pathway for the development of economic lithium extraction and recovery from Salton Sea brines. Other promising technologies are still in early development, but may one day offer a second generation of methods for direct, selective lithium extraction. Initial studies have demonstrated that lithium extraction and recovery from geothermal brines are technically feasible, but challenges still remain in developing an economically and environmentally sustainable process at scale.
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhao B, Qian W, Li H, Su Y. Cyclone pressure drop reduction and its effect on gas–particle separation capability: principle, performance, and assessment. REV CHEM ENG 2021. [DOI: 10.1515/revce-2020-0100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Cyclone separators have been widely used for gas–particle separation in chemical engineering. However, their enhancement in separation performances usually increases the pressure drop, which inevitably leads to an increase in operating energy consumption. One of the challenging issues is how to reduce the cyclone pressure drop while improving separation performances. To gain insight into the pathways and impacts of cyclone pressure drop reduction, this work reviews the state-of-the-art technical principles, performances and effects, focusing on the processes, mechanisms, and characteristics of pressure drop reduction by inlet/outlet variations, additional auxiliary devices, local cyclone dimension improvement, and global optimization based on intelligent algorithms. The cyclone performances are assessed using a proposed index that combines the Euler number and the square-root particle cut-off Stokes number. It is suggested that the pressure drop and separation capability usually have a dynamic compromise. Considering the comprehensive performances, the technology using helical roof inlet, cross cone, increasing cylindrical height with h/D = 4.3 (H/D = 6.35), and globally optimized design by Sun et al. (2017) are respectively considered to the others. Particularly, the last one is recommended to be more representative in practice. Finally, the key issues to be considered in further research were also prospected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bingtao Zhao
- School of Energy and Power Engineering , University of Shanghai for Science and Technology , 516 Jungong Road , Shanghai 200093 , China
| | - Weifeng Qian
- School of Energy and Power Engineering , University of Shanghai for Science and Technology , 516 Jungong Road , Shanghai 200093 , China
| | - Huimei Li
- School of Energy and Power Engineering , University of Shanghai for Science and Technology , 516 Jungong Road , Shanghai 200093 , China
| | - Yaxin Su
- School of Environmental Science and Engineering , Donghua University , 2999 North Renmin Road , Shanghai 201620 , China
| |
Collapse
|