The potentials of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Canine dental pulp and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells as alternative sources for cell therapy in dogs

The use of regenerative medicine for pets has been growing in recent years, and an increasing number of studies have contributed to the widespread use of cell therapies in clinical veterinary medicine. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can be isolated from different sources such as dental pulp and umbilical cord. Aiming safety and reproducibility of cell therapy in clinical practice by using sources easily obtained that are usually discarded, this study isolated, characterized, and evaluated the proliferation and colony formation potential of canine dental pulp-derived mesenchymal stem cells (cDPSCs) and canine umbilical cord tissue (cUCSCs). Three samples from each source were collected, isolated, and cultured. MSCs were differentiated into three lineages and quantified by spectrophotometry. For immunophenotypic characterization, antibodies were used to analyze the expression of cell surface markers, and 7-AAD and Annexin-V were used to analyze cell viability and apoptosis, respectively. For the clonogenic assay, cells were cultured, the colonies were stained, and counted. For the proliferation assay, the cells were plated in flasks for three days and added EdU nucleoside. cDPSCs and cUCSCs showed plastic adherence and fibroblastic morphology after cultivation. Both sources showed differentiation potential and showed CD29 and CD44 positivity and CD14, CD45, CD34 and HLA-DR negativity, and low mortality and apoptosis rates. There was no difference in proliferation rates between sources. Overall, although cUCSCs had a higher number of colony-forming units than cDPSCs, both sources presented MSCs characteristics and can be used safely as alternative sources in cell therapy.

The efficiency of PCL/HAp electrospun nanofibers in bone regeneration: a review

Electrospinning is a method which produces various nanofiber scaffolds for different tissues was attractive for researchers. Nanofiber scaffolds could be made from several biomaterials and polymers. Quality and virtues of final scaffolds depend on used biomaterials (even about single substance, the origin is effective), additives (such as some molecules, ions, drugs, and inorganic materials), electrospinning parameter (voltage, injection speed, temperature, …), etc. In addition to its benefits, which makes it more attractive is the possibility of modifications. Common biomaterials in bone tissue engineering such as poly-caprolactone (PCL), hydroxyapatite (HAp), and their important features, electrospinning nanofibers were widely studied. Related investigations indicate the critical role of even small parameters (like the concentration of PCL or HAp) in final product properties. These changes also, cause deference in cell proliferation, adhesion, differentiation, and in vivo repair process. In this review was focussed on PCL/HAp based nanofibers and additives that researchers used for scaffold improvement. Then, reviewing properties of gained nanofibers, their effect on cell behaviour, and finally, their valency in bone tissue engineering studies (in vitro and in vivo).