Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome

Vasculitis presenting as carpal tunnel syndrome: a case report

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common focal mononeuropathy which presents with pain in the wrist and hand, paresthesia, loss of sensation in the distribution of the median nerve, and in more severe cases, weakness and atrophy of the thenar muscles. Meanwhile, carpal tunnel syndrome can present as an initial manifestation of underlying systemic vasculitis disorder and result in severe physical disabilities.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 27-year-old Iranian man was referred to our electrodiagnosis center with a clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome in April 2020. Surgical intervention had been taken into account for him because of unsuccessful conservative therapies. On admission, thenar eminence was reduced. Electrodiagnostic findings were not compatible with median nerve entrapment at the wrist. All sensory modalities in the distribution of the right median nerve were decreased. Additionally, a mild increase in erythrocyte sedimentation rate was noted in laboratory tests. Because of the high vasculitis suspicion, we recommended the nerve biopsy and/or starting a high-dose corticosteroid. However, the surgery release was performed. After 6 months, the patient was referred for progressive weakness and numbness in the upper and lower limbs. After documentation of vasculitis neuropathy by biopsy, a diagnosis of non-systemic vasculitic neuropathy was confirmed. A rehabilitation program started immediately. Rehabilitation led to gradual improvement and recovery of function and muscle strength, and no complications remained, except mild leg paralysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should be suspicious of the median nerve vasculitis mononeuropathy in a patient with carpal tunnel syndrome-like symptoms. Median nerve vasculitis mononeuropathy as an initial presenting feature of vasculitis neuropathy can further result in severe physical impairments and disabilities.

Comparison of acupotomy release combined with glucocorticoid intrathecal injection versus isolated glucocorticoid intrathecal injection for carpal tunnel syndrome: A protocol for a meta-analysis of comparative studies

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is more common in people who need to engage in repetitive wrist work. Once it has occurred, localized pain and numbness of the fingers will develop, in severe cases, muscle atrophy will even arise, and after rest and physical therapy, many patients will still be unable to relieve or recur. In this case, the patient can receive intrathecal glucocorticoid injections, but the hormone injections alone can only provide short-term relief, and because the mechanical factors of median nerve compression are not fundamentally removed. Therefore, combined acupotomy release can help to release the compression of the transverse carpal ligament on the nerve and increase the volume within the carpal tunnel to achieve more satisfactory long-term results. Hence, a meta-analysis is necessary to provide evidence whether there is a significant difference in the treatment of CTS with acupotomy release combined with glucocorticoid intrathecal injection (ARGI) compared with isolated glucocorticoid intrathecal injection (GI).

METHODS

We will search, with no time restriction, without any restriction of language and status, the time from the establishment of the database to October 2022, on the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane central register of controlled trials, Web of Science, Chinese national knowledge infrastructure, Wanfang data, Chinese scientific journals database, Chinese databases SinoMed, and electronic databases. The electronic database search will be supplemented by a manual search of the reference lists of included articles. We will apply the risk-of-bias tool of the Cochrane collaboration for randomized controlled trials to assess the methodological quality. Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool for nonrandomized studies was used to evaluate the quality of comparative studies. Statistical analysis will be conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

This systematic review will evaluate the difference in efficacy of ARGI versus isolated GI in the treatment of CTS.

CONCLUSION

The conclusion of this study will provide evidence for judging whether ARGI is superior to GI for treatment of CTS.

Electrophysiological evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome female patients after vitamin D replacement

OBJECTIVE

The effects of vitamin D on the central and peripheral nervous system continue to be investigated today. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate pain and electrophysiologic response in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) who have undergone replacement therapy due to vitamin D deficiency.

METHODS

Fifty female patients diagnosed with mild and moderate CTS and accompanied by vitamin D deficiency were included in this study. Nerve conduction study (NCS) was performed before and after vitamin D replacement, and the patient's pain was evaluated with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

RESULTS

When NCS were compared before and after treatment, there was a statistically significant improvement in the median distal sensory onset latency (DSOL) and sensory conduction velocity (CV) and motor distal latencies (DML) values (p=0.001; p<0.001; p=0.001, respectively). At the same time, there was a decrease in the VAS values in patients (p<0.001). When the two groups were compared there was an improvement in DSOL and sensory CV in both groups, but in DML only in moderate CTS group.

CONCLUSION

In this study, it was shown that mild and moderate CTS patients had an improvement in pain and electrophysiological parameters after vitamin D replacement. Replacing vitamin D in early stages of CTS may be beneficial.