Allosteric modulation of G-protein-coupled receptors

Current status of A1 adenosine receptor allosteric enhancers

Adenosine is an ubiquitous nucleoside involved in various physiological and pathological functions by stimulating A1, A2A, A2B and A3 adenosine receptors (ARs). Allosteric enhancers to A1ARs may represent novel therapeutic agents because they increase the activity of these receptors by mediating a shift to their active form in the A1AR-G protein ternary complex. In this manner, they are able to amplify the action of endogenous adenosine, which is produced in high concentrations under conditions of metabolic stress. A1AR allosteric enhancers could be used as a justifiable alternative to the exogenous agonists that are characterized by receptor desensitization and downregulation. In this review, an analysis of some of the most interesting allosteric modulators of A1ARs has been reported.

Evaluation of Density Functionals, SCC-DFTB, Neglect of Diatomic Differential Overlap (NDDO) Models and Molecular Mechanics Methods for Prolyl-Leucyl-Glycinamide (PLG) and Structural Derivatives

Prolyl-leucyl-glycinamide (PLG) is a unique endogenous peptide that modulates dopamine receptor subtypes of the D(2) receptor family within the CNS. We seek to elucidate the structural basis and molecular mechanism by which PLG and its analogues modulate dopamine receptors, toward the development of new therapeutics to treat Parkinson's disease, tardive dyskinesia and schizophrenia. As a first step toward establishing a validated protocol for accurate computational modeling of PLG and associated peptidomimetic analogues, we evaluated the accuracy of density functional theory (DFT), wavefunction theory (WFT), and molecular mechanics (MM) calculations for PLG and for a library of structurally related small molecules. We first tested twelve local and nonlocal density functionals, Hartree-Fock (HF) theory, four "semiempirical" methods of the neglect of diatomic differential overlap (NDDO) type, and one self-consistent-charge nonorthogonal tight-binding (SCC-DFTB) method as implemented in two software suites, against coupled-cluster benchmark geometries for 4-methylthiazolidine, a small molecule that comprises key structural features present in our PLG analogue library. DFT and HF calculations were done with the MG3S augmented polarized triple-zeta basis set. We find that for 4-methylthiazolidine bond distances, DFT significantly outperforms NDDO, and both SCC-DFTB versions we evaluated perform worse than HF theory and are less accurate than 83% of the density functionals tested. The top five functionals for 4-methylthiazolidine were M05-2X, mPW1PW, B97-2, M06-2X, and PBEh, with mean unsigned errors (MUEs) in bond length of 0.0017, 0.0020, 0.0023, 0.0025 and 0.0027 Å, respectively. The widely used B3LYP functional ranked 11(th) out of twelve functionals evaluated, slightly below SCC-DFTB, and is significantly less accurate for 4-methylthiazolidine bond distances (MUE = 0.0095 Å) than the best local functional (M06-L, MUE = 0.0030 Å), which is far less computationally costly. Based on that initial analysis, we obtained new M05-2X benchmark geometric parameters for PLG and a library of eleven peptidomimetic derivatives, which we in turn used to examine the accuracy of thirty-four popular molecular mechanics (MM) force fields, four NDDO approaches, and SCC-DFTB for the full compound structures. Here, we found that ∼70% of the MM force fields tested superior to the best semiempirical and SCC-DFTB codings. Moreover, AMBER-type force fields proved most accurate among MM methods for this class of small-molecule peptidomimetics; the AMBER-type methods comprised eight out of the top ten molecular mechanics options we tested.

Muscarinic allosteric modulators: atypical structure-activity-relationships in bispyridinium-type compounds

Allosteric modulators of receptor binding are known for a variety of membrane receptors. In case of muscarinic receptors, a considerable number of structurally divergent modulators have been described. For the M2 receptor subtype which has a high sensitivity to allosteric modulation most of the allosteric agents bind to the common allosteric binding site of the receptor protein. In this study, a series of DUO compounds characterized by a bispyridinium middle chain and lateral benzyloximeether moieties of a systematically varied substitution pattern has been evaluated with regard to their allosteric potency to affect M2 receptors, whose orthosteric site was blocked by [3H]N-methylscopolamine. The variations in potency were found to be surprisingly small and the structure-activity relationships of the DUO compounds diverged from those of correspondingly substituted hexamethonio-type allosteric modulators. One has to conclude that DUO compounds bind in an "atypical" manner which is in agreement with recently reported side-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling studies.

Allosteric modulators affect the internalization of human adenosine A1 receptors

To study the effect of allosteric modulators on the internalization of human adenosine A(1) receptors, the receptor was equipped with a C-terminal yellow fluorescent protein tag. The introduction of this tag did not affect the radioligand binding properties of the receptor. CHO cells stably expressing this receptor were subjected during 16 h to varying concentrations of the agonist N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) in the absence or presence of 10 microM of the allosteric enhancer PD 81,723 ((2-amino-4,5-dimethyl-3-thienyl)-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methanone) or the allosteric inhibitor SCH-202676 (N-(2,3-diphenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5(2H)-ylidene)methanamine). CPA itself was able to internalize 25% and 40% of the receptors at a concentration of 400 nM or 4 muM, respectively. Addition of either PD 81,723 or SCH-202676 alone had no effect on internalization. However, with PD 81,723 a slight amount of internalization was obtained already at 40 nM of CPA and at 400 nM CPA 59% of the receptors internalized. SCH-202676 on the other hand effectively prevented CPA-induced internalization of the receptor.

Interactions of orthosteric and allosteric ligands with [3H]dimethyl-W84 at the common allosteric site of muscarinic M2 receptors

An optimized assay for the binding of [3H]dimethyl-W84 to its allosteric site on M2 muscarinic receptors has been used to directly measure the affinities of allosteric ligands. Their potencies agree with those deduced indirectly by their modulation of the equilibrium binding and kinetics of [3H]N-methylscopolamine ([3H]NMS) binding to the orthosteric site. The affinities and cooperativities of orthosteric antagonists with [3H]dimethyl-W84 have also been quantitated. These affinities agree with those measured directly in a competition assay using [3H]NMS. All these data are compatible with the predictions of the allosteric ternary complex model. The association and dissociation kinetics of [3H]dimethyl-W84 are rapid but the estimate of its association rate constant is nevertheless comparable with that found for the orthosteric radioligand, [3H]NMS. This is unexpected, given that the allosteric site to which [3H]dimethyl-W84 binds is thought to be located on the external face of the receptor and above the [3H]NMS binding site that is buried within the transmembrane helices. The atypical allosteric ligands tacrine and 4,4'-bis-[(2,6-dichloro-benzyloxy-imino)-methyl]-1,1'-propane-1,3-diyl-bis-pyridinium dibromide (Duo3) inhibit [3H]dimethyl-W84 binding with the same potencies and comparably steep slope factors as found for inhibition of [3H]NMS binding. Tacrine and Duo3 decrease [3H]dimethyl-W84 affinity, not the number of binding sites. It is suggested that these atypical ligands either bind to the two known spatially separated allosteric sites on muscarinic receptors with positive cooperativity or their binding to the common allosteric site modulates receptor-receptor interactions such that homotropic positive cooperativity within a dimer or higher oligomer is generated.

Effects of the adenosine A1 receptor allosteric modulators PD 81,723 and LUF 5484 on the striatal acetylcholine release

The objective of the present study was to characterize the adenosine A(1) receptor allosteric enhancing and antagonistic actions of (2-amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[b]thiophen-3-yl)(3,4-dichlorophenyl)methanone (LUF 5484) and (2-amino-4,5-dimethyl-3-thienyl)-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methanone (PD 81,723) on striatal acetylcholine release. Upon local administration in conscious rats, LUF 5484 or PD 81,723 caused a concentration-dependent increase of extracellular acetylcholine levels of approximately 40%, which was similar to that obtained by the selective adenosine A(1) receptor antagonists 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethylxanthine (8CPT) and N(6)-cyclopentyl-9-methyladenine (N0840). In interaction experiments, LUF 5484 or PD 81,723 did not change the inhibition of acetylcholine release by the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), whereas 8CPT caused an eightfold rightward shift. Acetylcholine concentrations were diminished with 62+/-3%, 48+/-11% and 56+/-9% by CPA, CPA+LUF 5484 and CPA+PD 81,723, respectively. In conclusion, the antagonistic action of LUF 5484 and PD 81,723 seems to counteract the putative allosteric actions with respect to the reduction of striatal acetylcholine release.

The use of constitutively active GPCRs in drug discovery and functional genomics

The complete sequencing of the human genome has afforded researchers the opportunity to identify novel G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are expressed in human tissues. The successful identification of hundreds of GPCRs represents the single greatest opportunity for novel drug development today. However, the lack of identified ligands for these GPCRs has limited their utility for traditional drug discovery approaches that focus on ligand-based assay methods to discover and pharmacologically characterize drug candidates. Here, we review the use of constitutively activated GPCRs in the discovery pathway, both as a means to overcome the limitations of traditional drug discovery at novel GPCRs and as a tool to investigate the functionality of these receptors.