Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor antagonists

Discovery of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimido[1,2-a]benzimidazoles as novel class of corticotropin releasing factor 1 receptor antagonists

A new class of corticotropin releasing factor 1 (CRF₁) receptor antagonists characterized by a tricyclic core ring was designed and synthesized. Novel tricyclic derivatives 2a-e were designed as CRF₁ receptor antagonists based on conformation analysis of our original 2-anilinobenzimidazole CRF₁ receptor antagonist. The synthesized tricyclic derivatives 2a-e showed CRF₁ receptor binding activity with IC₅₀ values of less than 400 nM, and the 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimido-[1,2-a]benzimidazole derivative 2e was selected as a lead compound with potent in vitro CRF₁ receptor binding activity (IC₅₀ = 7.1 nM). To optimize the pharmacokinetic profiles of lead compound 2e, we explored suitable substituents on the 1-position and 6-position, leading to the identification of compound 42c-R, which exhibited potent CRF₁ receptor binding activity (IC₅₀ = 58 nM) with good oral bioavailability (F = 68% in rats). Compound 42c-R exhibited dose-dependent inhibition of [¹²⁵I]-CRF binding in the frontal cortex (5 and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) as well as suppression of locomotor activation induced by intracerebroventricular administration of CRF in rats (10 mg/kg, p.o.). These results suggest that compound 42c-R successfully binds CRF₁ receptors in the brain and exhibits the potential to be further examined for clinical studies.

Discovery of 4-chloro-2-(2,4-dichloro-6-methylphenoxy)-1-methyl-7-(pentan-3-yl)-1H-benzimidazole, a novel CRF1 receptor antagonist

Compound 1 exhibits potent binding inhibition activity against a corticotropin-releasing factor 1 (CRF₁) receptor (IC₅₀=9.5nM) and in vitro antagonistic activity (IC₅₀=88nM) but is rapidly metabolized by human hepatic microsomes (182μL/min/mg). Here we identified metabolically stable compounds with potent CRF binding inhibitory activity. Structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies considering in vitro metabolic stability revealed that 4-chloro-2-(2,4-dichloro-6-methylphenoxy)-1-methyl-7-(pentan-3-yl)-1H-benzimidazole 24d was more stable in human microsomes (87μL/min/mg) than compound 1. Compound 24d demonstrated potent CRF binding inhibitory activity (IC₅₀=4.1nM), in vitro antagonistic activity (IC₅₀=44nM), and slow dissociation from the CRF₁ receptor. Orally administered compound 24d (6-24μmol/kg) showed ex vivo CRF₁ receptor binding in the rat pituitary, olfactory bulb, and frontal cortex and suppressed stress-induced adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) secretion. In this report, we discuss SAR studies on the metabolic stability as well as CRF binding inhibitory activity of the benzimidazole series as CRF₁ receptor antagonists and the pharmacological profiles of compound 24d.

Discovery of a 7-arylaminobenzimidazole series as novel CRF1 receptor antagonists

A promising lead compound 1 of a benzimidazole series has been identified as a corticotropin-releasing factor 1 (CRF1) receptor antagonist. In this study, we focused on replacement of a 7-alkylamino group of 1, predicted to occupy a large lipophilic pocket of a CRF1 receptor, with an aryl group. During the course of this examination, we established new synthetic approaches to 2,7-diarylaminobenzimidazoles. The novel synthesis of 7-arylaminobenzimidazoles culminated in the identification of compounds exhibiting inhibitory activities comparable to the alkyl analog 1. A representative compound, p-methoxyanilino analog 16g, showed potent CRF binding inhibitory activity against a human CRF1 receptor and human CRF1 receptor antagonistic activity (IC50=27nM, 56nM, respectively). This compound exhibited ex vivo (125)I-Tyr(0) ((125)I-CRF) binding inhibitory activity in mouse frontal cortex, olfactory bulb, and pituitary gland at 20mg/kg after oral administration. In this report, we discuss the structure-activity-relationship of these 7-arylamino-1H-benzimidazoles and their synthetic method.

Role of Corticotropin-releasing Factor Signaling in Stress-related Alterations of Colonic Motility and Hyperalgesia

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) signaling systems encompass CRF and the structurally related peptide urocortin (Ucn) 1, 2, and 3 along with 2 G-protein coupled receptors, CRF₁ and CRF₂. CRF binds with high and moderate affinity to CRF₁ and CRF₂ receptors, respectively while Ucn1 is a high-affinity agonist at both receptors, and Ucn2 and Ucn3 are selective CRF₂ agonists. The CRF systems are expressed in both the brain and the colon at the gene and protein levels. Experimental studies established that the activation of CRF₁ pathway in the brain or the colon recaptures cardinal features of diarrhea predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (stimulation of colonic motility, activation of mast cells and serotonin, defecation/watery diarrhea, and visceral hyperalgesia). Conversely, selective CRF₁ antagonists or CRF₁/CRF₂ antagonists, abolished or reduced exogenous CRF and stress-induced stimulation of colonic motility, defecation, diarrhea and colonic mast cell activation and visceral hyperalgesia to colorectal distention. By contrast, the CRF₂ signaling in the colon dampened the CRF₁ mediated stimulation of colonic motor function and visceral hyperalgesia. These data provide a conceptual framework that sustained activation of the CRF₁ system at central and/or peripheral sites may be one of the underlying basis of IBS-diarrhea symptoms. While targeting these mechanisms by CRF₁ antagonists provided a relevant novel therapeutic venue, so far these promising preclinical data have not translated into therapeutic use of CRF₁ antagonists. Whether the existing or newly developed CRF₁ antagonists will progress to therapeutic benefits for stress-sensitive diseases including IBS for a subset of patients is still a work in progress.

The effect of plasma protein binding on in vivo efficacy: misconceptions in drug discovery

Data from in vitro plasma protein binding experiments that determine the fraction of protein-bound drug are frequently used in drug discovery to guide structure design and to prioritize compounds for in vivo studies. However, we consider that these practices are usually misleading, because in vivo efficacy is determined by the free (unbound) drug concentration surrounding the therapeutic target, not by the free drug fraction. These practices yield no enhancement of the in vivo free drug concentration. So, decisions based on free drug fraction could result in the wrong compounds being advanced through drug discovery programmes. This Perspective provides guidance on the application of plasma protein binding information in drug discovery.