Strategies for atrial fibrillation therapy: focusing onIKurpotassium channel

Quinazolinone dimers as a potential new class of safer Kv1 inhibitors: Overcoming hERG, sodium and calcium channel affinities

The discovery of more selective and safer voltage-gated potassium channel blockers is an extremely demanding approach. Designing selective Kv1.5 inhibitors is very challenging as only limited data is available on this target due to a lacking crystal structure for this ion channel receptor. Herein, we synthesized a series of 21 novel quinazolinone dimers 3a-i, 5a-i and 10a-c. We tried to avoid structural features responsible for non-selectivity and for most potassium channel blockers' side effects in our design. In contrast to other works, which lack investigation over wide ranges of potassium and sodium channels, we screened the inhibitory activity of our synthesized compounds over multiple voltage-gated potassium channels, including six different human Kv1 channel subtypes Kv1.1, Kv1.2, Kv1.3, Kv1.4, Kv1.5 and Kv1.6 channels as well as Kv2.1, Kv3.1, Kv4.3, Kv7.2, Kv7.3, Kv10.1, hERG, and Shaker IR. Moreover, these compounds' selectivity was investigated on sodium channels Nav1.2, Nav1.4 and Nav1.5 and calcium channels Cav3.1-Cav3.3. The results revealed two compounds (3a and 3e) with low micromolar Kv1.5 inhibition activity with EC₅₀ values of 5.1 ± 0.9 µM and 12.5 ± 1.1 µM, respectively. However, at higher concentrations, they also showed inhibitory activity on Kv1.3 and Kv1.1 channels. This might be due to structural similarities between these three Kv1 channel isoforms. Compound 3a shows a slight preference for Kv1.5. Interestingly, they lack any activity on other potassium channels (including hERG), sodium channels, and calcium channels. Our findings recommend quinazolinone dimers with ethylene linker as a potential new class of safer Kv1 inhibitors and a good start for designing more selective and potent Kv1.5 inhibitors.

Structure-based virtual screening and electrophysiological evaluation of new chemotypes of K(v)1.5 channel blockers

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent nonfatal cardiac rhythm disorder associated with an increased risk of heart failure and stroke. Considering the ventricular side effects induced by anti-arrhythmic agents in current use, K(v)1.5 channel blockers have attracted a great deal of deliberation owing to their selective actions on atrial electrophysiology. Herein we report new chemotypes of K(v)1.5 channel blockers that were identified through a combination of structure-based virtual screening and in silico druglike property prediction including six scoring functions, as well as electrophysiological evaluation. Among them, five of the 18 compounds exhibited >50 % blockade ratio at 10 microM, and have structural features different from conventional K(v)1.5 channel blockers. These novel scaffolds could serve as hits for further optimization and SAR studies for the discovery of selective agents to treat AF.

I(Kur)/Kv1.5 channel blockers for the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia. Anti-arrhythmic drugs remain the mainstay of therapy, but the available class I and III anti-arrhythmic drugs are only moderately effective in long-term restoring/maintaining sinus rhythm (SR) and can produce potentially fatal ventricular pro-arrhythmia. In an attempt to identify safer and more effective anti-arrhythmic drugs, drug discovery efforts have focused on 'atrial selective drugs' that target cardiac ion channel(s) that are exclusively or predominantly expressed in the atria. The ultra-rapid activating delayed rectifier K(+) current (I(Kur)), carried by Kv1.5 channels, is a major repolarizing current in human atria, but seems to play no role in the ventricle. This finding offers the possibility of developing selective I(Kur) blockers to restore and maintain SR without a risk of ventricular pro-arrhythmia. Several I(Kur) blockers are now being developed but clinical data are still limited, so the precise role of these agents in the treatment of AF remains to be defined. In this review we analyze the possible advantages and disadvantages of the developmental I(Kur) blockers as they represent the first step for the development of potential atrial selective drugs for a more effective and safer treatment and prevention of AF.