Current status of platelet-activating factor antagonists

Pulmonary reperfusion injury in post-palliative intervention of oligaemic cyanotic CHD: a new catastrophic consequence or just revisiting the same old story?

Pulmonary reperfusion injury is a well-recognised clinical entity in the setting pulmonary artery angioplasty for pulmonary artery stenosis or chronic thromboembolic disease, but not much is known about this complication in post-palliative intervention of oligaemic cyanotic CHD. The pathophysiology of pulmonary reperfusion injury in this population consists of both ischaemic and reperfusion injury, mainly resulting in oxidative stress from reactive oxygen species generation, followed by endothelial dysfunction, and cytokine storm that may induce multiple organ dysfunction. Other mechanisms of pulmonary reperfusion injury are "no-reflow" phenomenon, overcirculation from high pressure in pulmonary artery, and increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Chronic hypoxia in cyanotic CHD eventually depletes endogenous antioxidant and increased the risk of pulmonary reperfusion injury, thus becoming a concern for palliative interventions in the oligaemic subgroup. The incidence of pulmonary reperfusion injury varies depending on multifactors. Despite its inconsistence occurrence, pulmonary reperfusion injury does occur and may lead to morbidity and mortality in this population. The current management of pulmonary reperfusion injury is supportive therapy to prevent deterioration of lung injury. Therefore, a general consensus on pulmonary reperfusion injury is necessary for the diagnosis and management of this complication as well as further studies to establish the use of novel and potential therapies for pulmonary reperfusion injury.

Rupatadine: global safety evaluation in allergic rhinitis and urticaria

INTRODUCTION

Rupatadine is a second-generation H1-antihistamine with dual affinity for histamine H1 and PAF receptors. Rupatadine is indicated for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria.

AREAS COVERED

A Medline search was conducted to identify preclinical and clinical studies of rupatadine. This was supplemented with additional articles obtained from online sources. The focus of this review is on the safety profile of rupatadine.

EXPERT OPINION

The review of these data indicates that rupatadine is highly selective for histamine H1-receptors, exhibits additional PAF antagonism in in vitro and in vivo studies, does not cross the blood-brain barrier, and has similar adverse events comparable with other second-generation antihistamines. Rupatadine is a safe and well tolerated drug in patients over 2 years old, with no central nervous system or cardiovascular effects and it can be taken with or without foods.

The benefit of H2 receptors antagonist Rupatadine in treatment for urticaria

Second generation antihistamine drugs are mainly used for the therapy of patients suffering from urticaria; however, they are efficient in 45-60% of cases only. New drugs for treatment of urticaria need to be developed and implemented, and second generation antihistamine drug Rupatadine is one of them. At the same time, Rupatadine efficiently inhibits the inflammatory action of the platelet-activating factor. Due to its double action, Rupatadine used perorally in the dose of 10 mg once a day is an efficient drug for treatment of urticaria, and its safety was confirmed by clinical trials.

Rupatadine in allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria

Histamine is the primary mediator involved the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria, and this explains the prominent role that histamine H(1)-receptor antagonists have in the treatment of these disorders. However, histamine is clearly not the only mediator involved in the inflammatory cascade. There is an emerging view that drugs which can inhibit a broader range of inflammatory processes may prove to be more effective in providing symptomatic relief in both allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria. This is an important consideration of the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) initiative which provides a scientific basis for defining what are the desirable properties of an 'ideal' antihistamine. In this review of rupatadine, a newer dual inhibitor of histamine H(1)- and PAF-receptors, we evaluate the evidence for a mechanism of action which includes anti-inflammatory effects in addition to a powerful inhibition of H(1)- and PAF-receptors. We assess this in relation to the clinical efficacy (particularly the speed of onset of action) and safety of rupatadine, and importantly its longer term utility in everyday life. In clinical trials, rupatadine has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU). It has a fast onset of action, producing rapid symptomatic relief, and it also has an extended duration of clinical activity which allows once-daily administration. In comparative clinical trials rupatadine was shown to be at least as effective as drugs such as loratadine, cetirizine, desloratadine and ebastine in reducing allergic symptoms in adult/adolescent patients with seasonal, perennial or persistent allergic rhinitis. Importantly, rupatadine demonstrated no adverse cardiovascular effects in preclinical or extensive clinical testing, nor negative significant effects on cognition or psychomotor performance (including a practical driving study). It improved the overall well-being of patients with allergic rhinitis or CIU based on findings from quality of life questionnaires and patient global rating scores in clinical trials. Thus, rupatadine is a recently introduced dual inhibitor of histamine H(1)- and PAF-receptors, which has been shown to be an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment for allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria. It possesses a broader profile of anti-inflammatory properties inhibiting both inflammatory cells and a range of mediators involved in the early- and late-phase inflammatory response, but the clinical relevance of these effects remain to be clarified.

Influence of platelet activating factor on gastrointestinal electrical activity and some haematological and clinical parameters in the conscious miniature pig

The effects of intravenous (i.v.) infusion of platelet-activating factor (PAF), 100 ng/kg/min for 10 min, with and without pretreatment with a selective PAF-antagonist on gastrointestinal electrical activity, arterial pressure and clinical and haematological parameters were studied. Conscious miniature pigs with electrodes implanted in the wall of the antrum pylori and small and large intestine were used. Platelet-activating factor induced restlessness or depression, shivering, tachypnoea and coughing, retching and vomiting, hypotension and a delayed and sustained increase in leucocyte count with an increase in percentage of segmented neutrophils. The PAF-antagonist, SAH 63-675, administered at 10 mg/kg intravenously, inhibited these effects. Platelet-activating factor resulted in a decrease in electrical activity in the antrum and large intestine, whereas small intestinal activity was not significantly influenced. Pretreatment with the antagonist suppressed these inhibitory effects.