Immunotherapy in atopic dermatitis

Guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) Part II

The existing evidence for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis, AE) is evaluated using the national standard Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation. The consensus process consisted of a nominal group process and a DELPHI procedure. Management of AE must consider the individual symptomatic variability of the disease. Basic therapy is focused on hydrating topical treatment, and avoidance of specific and unspecific provocation factors. Anti-inflammatory treatment based on topical glucocorticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) is used for exacerbation management and more recently for proactive therapy in selected cases. Topical corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy, but the TCI tacrolimus and pimecrolimus are preferred in certain locations. Systemic immune-suppressive treatment is an option for severe refractory cases. Microbial colonization and superinfection may induce disease exacerbation and can justify additional antimicrobial treatment. Adjuvant therapy includes UV irradiation preferably with UVA1 wavelength or UVB 311 nm. Dietary recommendations should be specific and given only in diagnosed individual food allergy. Allergen-specific immunotherapy to aeroallergens may be useful in selected cases. Stress-induced exacerbations may make psychosomatic counselling recommendable. 'Eczema school' educational programs have been proven to be helpful. Pruritus is targeted with the majority of the recommended therapies, but some patients need additional antipruritic therapies.

Allergen-specific immunotherapy in atopic eczema

Aeroallergens are relevant eliciting factors of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and bronchial asthma but also of atopic eczema. The use of allergen-specific immunotherapy as in respiratory atopic diseases is controversial in patients with atopic eczema, but refined diagnostic methods to characterize subgroups of patients with relevant allergies and the results of smaller controlled studies give rise to new approaches in this field. This article reviews the theoretical problems and practical results associated with allergen-specific immunotherapy in atopic eczema.

A review of allergen-specific immunotherapy in human and veterinary medicine

This article reviews allergen-specific immunotherapy in human and veterinary medicine. Current hypotheses of possible mechanisms of actions are outlined. Indications, success rates, adverse effects and factors influencing outcome of therapy are discussed in humans, dogs, cats and horses.

Usefulness of specific immunotherapy in patients with atopic dermatitis and allergic sensitization to house dust mites: a multi-centre, randomized, dose-response study

BACKGROUND

The effect of specific immunotherapy (SIT) on eczema in atopic dermatitis is not known. Therefore, a multi-centre, randomized dose-response trial, double-blind with respect to the efficacy of a biologically standardized depot house dust mite preparation was performed.

METHODS

Eighty-nine adults with a chronic course of atopic dermatitis, SCORAD >or=40 and allergic sensitization to house dust mites [CAP-FEIA >or=3] were included, of whom 51 completed the study. Subcutaneous SIT with a house dust mite preparation (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus/D. farinae) applying maintenance doses of 20, 2,000 and 20,000 SQ-U in weekly intervals for 1 year. The main outcome measures addressed the change of the SCORAD as average of the values after 9 and 12 months of SIT in comparison with the value at baseline.

RESULTS

The SCORAD declined in the three dose groups in a dose-dependent manner (P = 0.0368, Jonckheere-Terpstra test) and was significantly lower in the two high-dose groups (2,000, 20,000 SQ-U) compared with the low-dose group of 20 SQ-U (P = 0.0379, U-test) after 1 year of SIT. The use of topical corticosteroids was significantly reduced with higher doses (P = 0.0007, Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test).

CONCLUSIONS

Allergen-SIT for 1 year with a house dust mite preparation is able to improve the eczema in patients with atopic dermatitis who are sensitized to house dust mite allergens and reduces the need for topical corticosteroids. SIT may be valuable in the treatment of this chronic skin disease.

Mite antigens enhance ICAM-1 and induce VCAM-1 expression on human umbilical vein endothelium

Although sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy has been proved to be effective in the treatment of allergic diseases, controversy surrounds the means by which such a local therapy can induce systemic immunological changes. Adhesion molecules are critical in the regulation of leukocyte traffic. It has been hypothesized that allergenic extract, administered locally, may induce an up-regulation of the mucosal vessel vascular adhesion molecules (CAMs) resulting in local recruitment of circulating inflammatory cells. In the present study we investigated whether the mite antigens, Der p1 and Der p2, can modulate CAM expression of human endothelial cells (HEC). To do this, slices of whole human umbilical cord vein underwent short-term (8 hours) cultures in the presence or absence of mite antigen (baseline, unstimulated controls). Cryostatic sections of the specimens were then evaluated immunohistochemically for expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) molecules. The results revealed that while Der p1 is capable of significantly up-regulating ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on HEC, Der p2 antigen moderately up-regulates ICAM-1 expression but is ineffective in modulating VCAM-1. Although preliminary, these results clearly support the hypothesis that at least some of the effects of sublingual immunotherapy may derive from inflammatory cell recruitment at the site of allergen release.

The potential role of allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy in atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with increasing prevalence, morbidity, and cost in developed Western countries. Frequently associated with respiratory allergy during adulthood, atopic dermatitis often represents the first phenotypic appearance of atopy in early childhood when the allergic 'march' starts and progressively moves toward food allergy, asthma, and rhinitis. At present, a consistent body of evidence supports the view that atopic dermatitis may represent the skin compartmentalization of a systemic allergic inflammation. Lymphocytes infiltrating early lesional skin express a T helper (Th) 2 pattern of cytokine secretion (increased levels of interleukin [IL]-4 and/or IL-13 and decreased levels of interferon-gamma) as well as the typical Th2-type chemokine receptor CCR4, specific to the thymus and activation-regulated chemokines. Keratinocytes from patients with atopic dermatitis produce thymic stromal lymphopoietin, a novel cytokine that supports the early lymphocyte development in mouse models, and activates dendritic cells involved in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases in humans. Increased levels of circulating hemopoietic precursor cells have been reported in atopic dermatitis, as in allergic asthma and rhinitis. Furthermore, the recognition of CD34+ hemopoietic precursor cells, and evidence for cellular differentiation/maturational events occurring within atopic dermatitis skin lesion infiltrates, are consistent with the recent reinterpretation of the Th2/Th1 paradigm, where Th2 cells appear to belong to the early stages and Th1 to the ultimate stages of a linear, rather than divergent, pattern of lymphoid differentiation. This more detailed understanding of the immunologic derangements contributing to the atopic dermatitis pathogenesis has led to growing interest in allergen-specific immunotherapy for the disease. Due to the complexity intrinsic to atopic dermatitis and the lack of consensus-based guidelines for standardized outcome measure, only eight studies are available in the literature for a qualitative evaluation of this treatment approach. Two of these studies were double blind and placebo controlled, and six were cohort studies. Immunotherapy was found to be effective in one controlled study and five observational reports. Uncertain results were provided by one low-powered, controlled study, and negative outcomes were raised by a unique study performed with oral immunotherapy, which is not an effective route of mucosal allergen administration. Thus, more efficacy studies are required before immunotherapy could be recommended for the routine treatment of atopic dermatitis. Allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy, given its excellent safety profile and ability to interfere with the systemic aspects of allergic inflammation, appears a good potential candidate for the pathogenetic treatment of the disease.

CD34+ cells in peripheral blood of healthy human beings and allergic subjects: clue to acute and minimal persistent inflammation

BACKGROUND

There is compelling evidence that hemopoietic precursor cells (HPC) play a crucial role in establishing cellular inflammation in allergic diseases. Increased levels of circulating CD34+ HPC committed to the myeloid lineage have been extensively reported in allergic rhinitis, asthma and eczema, whereas CD34+ cells have been identified within the cellular infiltrates of tissues, at peripheral sites of inflammation.

METHOD

We conducted a pilot study to evaluate CD34+ traffic in the peripheral blood of 22 consecutive patients (13 men and nine women; mean age 28.9 years), independently of treatment. The patients presented rhinitis, asthma, eczema, urticaria and adverse food reactions of suspected allergic origin. Allergic reactions were extrinsic in 18 patients and intrinsic in four. In 12 patients who underwent sublingual specific immunotherapy, CD34+ cells were quantified at enrollment (T0), one year later (T1) and two years later (T2). The severity of symptoms was graded on a five-point scale (0 = absence of symptoms and 4 = severe symptoms). Twenty healthy human subjects (10 men and 10 women; mean age 24.5 years) were evaluated as controls. To obtain information about the total amount of circulating HPC, independently of the lineage commitment (Lin+/-) and the degree of differentiation (CD34bright/dim), we used a modification of the Milan protocol of peripheral blood CD34+ cell estimation. The cells were analyzed using a BD FACScan or FACSCalibur and the results were expressed as the percentage of positive cells.

RESULTS

CD34+ cell traffic in the control group was very low since all values were < 0.10 (median value: 0.03 %). Values in the patient group were increased in both extrinsic and intrinsic forms with a median value of 0.25 % (interquartile range: 0.13- 0.33 %). The relationship between CD34+ traffic and the severity score was highly significant (Spearman's rho = 0.954; test of Ho: CD34; independent score: Pr > t = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

The data reported herein suggest that the method employed is effective in assessing acute allergic inflammation, as well as minimal persistent inflammation underlying an asymptomatic clinical condition. Evaluation of CD34bright/dim peripheral traffic, if confirmed by the outcomes of a multicenter study currently being planned together with traditional study of circulating IgE, could be a reliable non-invasive laboratory tool for monitoring allergic inflammation.

The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (XXIV): allergen-specific immunotherapy

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) has been used for years to treat dogs with atopic dermatitis (AD) and humans with atopic diseases. The efficacy of ASIT has been well documented for humans with respiratory atopic diseases and stinging insect allergy, but its effectiveness seems more controversial for patients with AD. In spite of insufficient evidence derived from randomized controlled trials, multiple open studies and a large body of clinical observations suggest that ASIT is effective in controlling the clinical signs of dogs with AD. As a result of the scarcity of evidence from controlled trials, the true efficacy of ASIT, and the optimal protocols for allergen dose and frequency of injection are currently unknown. Allergen-specific immunotherapy nevertheless may be included in the treatment of canine AD because of its potential advantages and limited disadvantages compared to other forms of therapy. There is no evidence, however, for the preference of any specific treatment protocol. The predictive value of historical, clinical and immunologic features related to the efficacy of ASIT in dogs with AD are discussed in this paper. Adverse reactions, and the requirements for monitoring of patients receiving ASIT, then are reviewed and detailed. Finally, this review highlights aspects of ASIT where further research and controlled studies are needed.

Src inhibitors: genomics to therapeutics

Following the milestone discoveries that identified Src as the first known protein tyrosine kinase and as a prototype oncogene, as well as Src transgenic studies to validate it as a promising therapeutic target for osteoporosis, intense efforts are being made to create Src inhibitor drugs. Drug discovery strategies focused on both the non-catalytic and catalytic domains of Src have successfully resulted in promising Src inhibitor lead compounds with potential therapeutic applications for osteoporosis, cancer, and other diseases. Some noteworthy examples of Src inhibitors are described, and their chemical diversity, structure-based design, and biological activities in vitro and in vivo are illustrated. The potency, selectivity, and in vivo efficacy of key Src inhibitors are being investigated in molecular, cellular and animal models. Consequently, Src inhibitor drug development is imminent, and current studies are well-poised to achieve the ultimate milestone of a Src inhibitor therapeutic.