Inotuzumab ozogamicin in the treatment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

A review of the clinical efficacy of FDA-approved antibody‒drug conjugates in human cancers

While strategies such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy have become the first-line standard therapies for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer, acquired resistance is still inevitable in most cases. The introduction of antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) provides a novel alternative. ADCs are a new class of anticancer drugs comprising the coupling of antitumor mAbs with cytotoxic drugs. Compared with chemotherapeutic drugs, ADCs have the advantages of good tolerance, accurate target recognition, and small effects on noncancerous cells. ADCs occupy an increasingly important position in the therapeutic field. Currently, there are 13 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‒approved ADCs and more than 100 ADC drugs at different stages of clinical trials. This review briefly describes the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved ADCs, and discusses the related problems and challenges to provide a reference for clinical work.

Antibody based therapy in relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Outcomes for relapsed and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remain poor. With the advent of targeted monoclonal antibodies and antibody constructs, these outcomes have been significantly improved both in the frontline and salvage setting. These targets include a bispecific antibody that targets both CD3 and CD19, known as blinatumomab, as well as a conjugated antibody that targets CD22, known as inotuzumab ozogamicin. These agents have been thoroughly studied and successively approved for use as monotherapy, however, more recently they have been incorporated in combination or sequentially with cytotoxic chemotherapy. In this chapter, we will discuss the role that these monoclonal antibodies play as monotherapy and in combination in the treatment of ALL in the salvage setting, and how they continue to transform the treatment management of relapsed and refractory ALL.

Recent Advances in the Management of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia

OPINION STATEMENT

The last few years have seen unprecedented advances in treatment options for patients diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in adulthood. New targeted drug therapies have been shown in randomised trials to offer significant survival improvements above standard-of-care (SoC) for relapsed disease, whilst being relatively well tolerated. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) has offered spectacular promise amongst the young adult population, with the possibility of cure for refractory disease. It has reversed the paradigm that transplant is the only curative option at relapse. Data is awaited regarding its effectiveness in the older adult population. Nelarabine represents an advance, but there remains a pressing need to develop new therapies with efficacy against T-ALL, especially in the relapse setting.Outcomes for younger adults have improved with the adoption of paediatric-like regimens, with a focus on dose intensity and heavy use of pegylated asparaginase. Defining who falls into the "young adult" category and would benefit from this approach remains a controversial area. In elderly patients with ALL, the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and reduction in standard chemotherapy intensity (especially for those with Philadelphia-positive disease) have significantly reduced treatment-associated mortality and resulted in durable remissions with good quality of life.Bone marrow transplantation remains a key therapy in adult ALL, and is still the treatment of choice for relapsed disease. The mortality associated with a myeloablative approach can be substantially lowered by reduced intensity conditioning, without an apparently significant reduction in efficacy.

An Integrated Population Pharmacokinetic Model Versus Individual Models of Depatuxizumab Mafodotin, an Anti-EGFR Antibody Drug Conjugate, in Patients With Solid Tumors Likely to Overexpress EGFR

Depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux-m) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) designed for the treatment of tumors expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), consisting of a veneered "humanized" recombinant IgG1κ antibody that has binding properties specific to a unique epitope of human EGFR with noncleavable maleimido-caproyl linkers each attached to a potent antimitotic cytotoxin, monomethyl auristatin F. We aimed to describe the development and comparison of 2 population pharmacokinetic modeling approaches. Data from 2 phase 1 studies enrolling patients with glioblastoma multiforme or advanced solid tumors were included in the analysis. Patients in these studies received doses of depatux-m ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 mg/kg as monotherapy, in combination with temozolomide, or radiation plus temozolomide depending on the study and/or arm. First, an integrated ADC model to simultaneously describe the concentration-time data for ADC, total antibody, and cys-mafodotin was built using a 2-compartment model for ADC for each drug-to-antibody ratio. Then, 3 individual models were developed for ADC, total antibody, and cys-mafodotin separately using 2-compartment models for ADC and total antibody and a 1-compartment model for cys-mafodotin. Visual predictive checks suggested accurate model fitting across a range of concentrations. The analysis showed that both an integrated complex ADC model and the individual models that have shorter computational time would result in similar outcomes.

Prognostic implications of cytogenetics in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin

Karyotype is frequently used to predict response and outcome in leukemia. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated the relationship between baseline cytogenetics and outcome in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL) treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), a humanized CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, in the phase 3, open-label, randomized INO-VATE trial. Data as of March 8, 2016, are presented in this analysis. Of the 326 patients randomized, 284 had screening karyotyping data (144 in the InO arm and 140 in the standard care [SC] arm). With InO, complete remission or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CR/CRi), minimal residual disease negativity rates, and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between cytogenetic subgroups. CR/CRi rates favored InO over SC in the diploid with ≥20 metaphases, complex, and "other" cytogenetic subgroups. The OS hazard ratio favored InO over SC in the diploid with ≥20 metaphases, complex, and other cytogenetic subgroups. Generally, InO is effective and provides substantial clinical benefit in patients with R/R ALL who have specific baseline karyotypes.

Incorporating Immunotherapy Into the Treatment Strategies of B-Cell Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: The Role of Blinatumomab and Inotuzumab Ozogamicin

Monoclonal antibodies and bispecific antibody constructs hold considerable promise in improving the outcomes of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Antibody-drug conjugates such as inotuzumab ozogamicin and the bispecific T-cell engager blinatumomab represent novel antibody constructs that have shown substantial clinical activity in ALL. Although most studies have focused on the use of these agents in the salvage setting, incorporation of these antibodies into the frontline regimens is imperative to improve long-term survival for patients with ALL and to increase the cure rates of adult ALL to the levels achieved in the pediatric population.

An observational study of Chinese adults with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Aim:

Chinese adults with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph- ALL) have poor outcomes.

Patients & methods:

We conducted a nationwide, retrospective, observational study to assess outcomes in this patient population.

Results:

Of the 270 enrolled patients, 31% of patients at last salvage achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), with median time to CR/CRh of 30 days and median CR/CRh duration of 2.7 months. The CR/CRh rate was more favorable with earlier versus later lines of salvage (41, 24 and 17% at first, second and third or later salvages, respectively).

Conclusion:

This dataset serves as an important reference of real-world outcomes using currently available chemotherapy regimens for high-risk Chinese adults with relapsed/refractory Ph- ALL.

Recent advances in the biology and treatment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a hematologic malignancy arising from precursors of the lymphoid lineage. Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies have resulted in high cure rates of up to 90% in pediatric ALL, but the outcomes for adult patients remain suboptimal with 5-year survival rates of only 30%-40%. Over the last decade, major advances have been made in our understanding and management of ALL. Identification of new prognostic genomic markers and incorporation of minimal residual diseases' assessment into therapeutic protocols have improved risk stratification and treatment strategies. The use of pediatric-inspired regimens for adolescent and young adults, and the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and novel targeted therapies, including monoclonal antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, have redefined the therapeutic paradigm of ALL, and significantly improved the outcomes. In this article, we will provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding the biology and treatment of ALL, and highlight recent diagnostic and therapeutic advances made in this area over the past 5 years.

"Society of Hematologic Oncology (SOHO) State of the Art Updates and Next Questions"-Treatment of ALL

The outcome of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has substantially improved by adopting pediatric-inspired regimens, and approximately half of the patients are nowadays cured. The evaluation of minimal residual disease currently represents the most important prognostic indicator, which drives treatment algorithms, which include allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) allocation. Indeed, for high-risk patients, allo-SCT should be pursued as soon as possible, whereas in standard-risk patients this procedure should be avoided also in light of related toxicity and because there are no significant benefits. Furthermore, better characterization of the molecular genetic events can drive therapeutic decisions: a historical example in this respect is represented by the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL; in the upcoming future, TKIs might be used also in other subgroups, such as breakpoint cluster region/Abelson 1-like cases and others with deregulated tyrosine kinases. Finally, the greatest progress is currently achieved with new immunotherapies targeting frequently expressed surface antigens in ALL. It is also a new chance for elderly ALL patients, so far spared from intensive chemotherapy and allo-SCT. These targeted therapies will substantially change this treatment algorithm and the great challenge is to find optimal sequence of the extended therapy options in an individual patient.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy for older patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a single-arm, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Inotuzumab ozogamicin, an anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody bound to a toxin, calicheamicin, has shown single-agent activity in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. We aimed to assess the activity and safety of inotuzumab ozogamicin in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy in older patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

METHODS

We did a single-arm, phase 2 study at the MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). Eligible patients were aged 60 years or older and had newly diagnosed, Philadelphia chromosome-negative, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 3 or lower. The induction chemotherapy regimen used was mini-hyper-CVD (a lower intensity version of the conventional hyper-CVAD). Odd-numbered cycles (1,3, 5, and 7) comprised intravenous cyclophosphamide (150 mg/m2 every 12 h on days 1-3) and oral or intravenous dexamethasone (20 mg per day on days 1-4 and days 11-14); no anthracycline was administered. Intravenous vincristine (2 mg flat dose) was given on days 1 and 8. Even-numbered cycles comprised intravenous methotrexate (250 mg/m2 on day 1) and intravenous cytarabine (0·5 g/m2 given every 12 h on days 2 and 3). Intravenous inotuzumab ozogamicin was given on day 3 of the first four cycles at the dose of 1·3-1·8 mg/m2 at cycle 1, followed by 1·0 -1·3 mg/m2 in subsequent cycles. Maintenance therapy with dose-reduced POMP (purinethol [6-mercaptopurine], oncovin [vincristine sulfate], methotrexate, and prednisone) was given for 3 years. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival at 2 years. Analyses were by intention to treat. The study is ongoing, recruiting patients for an approved expansion phase with a modified treatment plan by protocol amendment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01371630.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 12, 2011, and April 22, 2017, 52 patients with a median age of 68 years (IQR 64-72) were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 29 months (IQR 13-48), 2-year progression-free survival was 59% (95% CI 43-72). The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were prolonged thrombocytopenia (42 [81%] patients), infections during induction (27 [52%]) and consolidation chemotherapy (36 [69%]), hyperglycaemia (28 [54%]), hypokalaemia (16 [31%]), increased aminotransferases (ten [19%]), hyperbilirubinaemia (nine [17%]), and haemorrhage (seven [15%]). Veno-occlusive disease occurred in four (8%) patients. Six (12%) patients died from adverse events that were deemed treatment related (five [10%] from sepsis and one [2%] from veno-occlusive disease).

INTERPRETATION

Inotuzumab ozogamicin plus mini-hyper-CVD chemotherapy is a safe and active first-line therapy option in older patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and could represent a new therapy for this population. Randomised, phase 3 trials to evaluate the efficacy of this combination compared with the current standard of care in this setting, combination chemotherapy without inotuzumab ozogamicin, are warranted.

FUNDING

MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Efficacy and safety analysis by age cohort of inotuzumab ozogamicin in patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia enrolled in INO-VATE

BACKGROUND

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in patients aged 18 to 78 years with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in the INO-VATE trial. This subset analysis compared the efficacy and safety of InO in younger and older patients.

METHODS

Intent-to-treat analyses of morphologic responses and overall survival (OS) included 326 randomized patients, and safety assessments included 307 patients receiving 1 or more doses of the study treatment. Of the 326 patients, 164 received InO at a starting dose of 1.8 mg/m² /cycle (0.8 mg/m² on day 1 and 0.5 mg/m² on days 8 and 15 of a 21- to 28-day cycle [≤6 cycles]); 60 patients were aged ≥55 years, and 104 were aged <55 years.

RESULTS

For older and younger patients, the median duration of InO therapy and the types and frequencies of adverse events of any grade were generally similar. Although the remission rates, median duration of remission (DOR), and progression-free survival were similar with InO for those aged <55 years and those aged ≥55 years, OS was longer for younger patients (median, 8.6 vs 5.6 months; hazard ratio, 0.610). Among patients proceeding to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after InO treatment (28% of older patients and 58% of younger patients), the incidence of veno-occlusive disease was greater in older patients (41% vs 17%). The study database was not locked at the time of this analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

InO was tolerable in older patients with relapsed/refractory ALL. Although OS was longer for younger patients versus older patients, InO demonstrated high response rates with similar DOR in the 2 age groups. Cancer 2018;124:1722-32. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Immunotherapy in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the role of monoclonal antibodies

Publisher's Note: This article has a companion Counterpoint by Davis and Mackall. Publisher's Note: Join in the discussion of these articles at Blood Advances Community Conversations.

Treating adults with acute lymphocytic leukemia: new pharmacotherapy options

INTRODUCTION

Advances in acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) therapy has led to long-term survival rates in children. However, only 30%-40% of adults achieve long-term disease-free survival. After relapse, the outcome of salvage chemotherapy is very disappointing with less than 10% of long survival. Novel agents are therefore desperately required to improve response rates and survival, but also the quality of life of patients. Areas covered: The following review is a comprehensive summary of various novel options reported over the past few years in the therapeutic area of adult ALL. Expert opinion: Identifying key components involved in disease pathogenesis may lead to new approaches. In a near future, the incorporation of monoclonal antibodies and T-cell directed approaches including blinatumomab and chimeric antigen receptor T cells may increase the cure rates and may reduce the need for intensive therapy.

Role of inotuzumab ozogamicin in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody bound to a toxic natural calicheamicin, which is under investigation for the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. CD22 is commonly expressed in 90-100% of malignant mature B-lymphocyte lineage. The first Phase II study with inotuzumab ozogamicin conducted by Kantarjian et al. gave the opportunity for heavily pretreated patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia to go for allogeneic stem cell transplant. Inotuzumab is well-tolerated with the exception of veno-occlusive disease. Overall inotuzumab ozogamicin is potentially an encouraging and promising therapy for patients.

Monoclonal antibodies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

With modern intensive combination polychemotherapy, the complete response (CR) rate in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is 80% to 90%, and the cure rate is 40% to 50%. Hence, there is a need to develop effective salvage therapies and combine novel agents with standard effective chemotherapy. ALL leukemic cells express several surface antigens amenable to target therapies, including CD20, CD22, and CD19. Monoclonal antibodies target these leukemic surface antigens selectively and minimize off-target toxicity. When added to frontline chemotherapy, rituximab, an antibody directed against CD20, increases cure rates of adults with Burkitt leukemia from 40% to 80% and those with pre-B ALL from 35% to 50%. Inotuzumab ozogamicin, a CD22 monoclonal antibody bound to calicheamicin, has resulted in marrow CR rates of 55% and a median survival of 6 to 7 months when given to patients with refractory-relapsed ALL. Blinatumomab, a biallelic T cell engaging the CD3-CD19 monoclonal antibody, also resulted in overall response rates of 40% to 50% and a median survival of 6.5 months in a similar refractory-relapsed population. Other promising monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20 (ofatumumab and obinutuzumab) or CD19 or CD20 and bound to different cytotoxins or immunotoxins are under development. Combined modalities of chemotherapy and the novel monoclonal antibodies are under investigation.

New insights into the pathophysiology and therapy of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Significant advances have been made in the last decade toward a better understanding of the disease pathogenesis and the development of novel therapies that target specific subsets of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Risk-adapted strategies are transforming the disease treatment and prognosis. With current treatment regimens, long-term survival is achieved by approximately 50% of patients with B-cell ALL, 50% to 60% of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL, and approximately 80% of patients with Burkitt's leukemia. Genomic profiling in ALL has identified new prognostic markers, new therapeutic targets, and novel ALL subtypes. These may be amenable to future targeted therapies that can further improve outcomes. The early recognition of early precursor T-cell ALL, a distinct pathobiological entity with a poor prognosis, is essential for the development of an effective clinical management strategy. The role of monoclonal antibodies and cytotoxic T-cell therapies continues to be defined. Many of the approaches are currently being evaluated for ALL salvage. Their incorporation into frontline adult ALL therapy, in concomitant or sequential strategies, may increase the cure rates to levels achieved in pediatric ALL and may reduce the need for prolonged intensive and maintenance chemotherapy.

Target Therapy in Hematological Malignances: New Monoclonal Antibodies

Apart from radio- and chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) represent a new, more selective tool in the treatment of hematological malignancies. MoAbs bind with the specific antigens of the tumors. This interaction is a basis for targeted therapies which exhibit few side effects and significant antitumor activity. This review provides an overview of the functional characteristics of MoAbs, with some examples of their clinical application. The promising results in the treatment of hematological malignancies have led to the more frequent usage of MoAbs in the therapy. Development of MoAbs is a subject of extensive research. They are a promising method of cancer treatment in the future.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults: encouraging developments on the way to higher cure rates

Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is not adequate to cure most patients of the disease. Complete remission is achieved in the majority of patients, but responses are often not durable. Allogeneic stem cell transplant is used for patients with high risk features, including those who are positive for minimal residual disease after induction and consolidation therapy. Nevertheless, transplant is a toxic intervention, and does not guarantee long-term disease-free survival. Monoclonal antibodies target surface antigens present on leukemic blasts, with the aim of minimizing off-target toxicity. Rituximab, an antibody directed against CD20, prolongs the survival of younger adults with ALL when added to chemotherapy in the frontline setting. Novel agents, such as the cytotoxin-antibody conjugate inotuzumab, and the bispecific T-cell engaging compound blinatumomab, have exhibited marked antileukemic activity in the relapsed setting. As these agents continue in clinical development, it will be important to eventually incorporate them in the frontline treatment approach. We review current strategies for treating adult ALL, with a focus on novel and targeted therapies that are under development.

The antibody-drug conjugate: an enabling modality for natural product-based cancer therapeutics

The Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC) is a therapeutic modality consisting of a monoclonal antibody attached to a cytotoxic, small-molecule payload. The antibody portion of the ADC serves as a transport vehicle that recognizes and binds to a protein antigen expressed in tumor tissues. The localized delivery and release of the payload within or near malignant cells allows for targeted delivery of a potent cytotoxic agent to diseased tissue, while reducing damage to antigen-negative, normal tissues. Recent years have witnessed an explosive increase in ADC-based therapies, due mainly to clinical reports of activity in both hematologic and epithelial cancers. Accompanying this upsurge in ADC development is a renewed interest in natural product cytotoxins, which are typically highly potent cell-killing agents, but suffer from poor drug-like properties and narrow safety margins when systemically administered as conventional chemotherapeutics. In this review, we discuss recent advances related to the construction of ADCs, the optimization of ADC safety and efficacy, and the increasingly pivotal roles of natural product payloads in the current and future landscape of ADC therapy.

Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) clinical pipeline: a review

Biological therapies play an increasing role in cancer treatment, although the number of naked antibodies showing clinical efficacy as single agent remains limited. One way to enhance therapeutic potential of antibodies is to conjugate them to small molecule drugs. This combination is expected to bring together the benefits of highly potent drugs on the one hand and selective binders of specific tumor antigens on the other hand. However, designing an ADC is more complex than a simple meccano game, requiring thoughtful combination of antibody, linker, and drugs in the context of a target and a defined cancer indication. Lessons learned from the first-generation antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) and improvement of the technology guided the design of improved compounds which are now in clinical trials. Brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris(®)), an anti-CD30 antibody conjugated to a potent microtubule inhibitor for the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma and anaplastic large cell lymphomas, is the only marketed ADC today. A total of 27 ADC are currently undergoing clinical trials in both hematological malignancies and solid tumor indications. Among them, T-DM1 (trastuzumab emtansine), an ADC comprised of trastuzumab conjugated to DM1, via a non-cleavable linker, is showing very promising results in phase III for the treatment of HER2-positive refractory/relapsed metastatic breast cancer. Other compounds, such as CMC-544, SAR3419, CDX-011, PSMA-ADC, BT-062, and IMGN901 currently in clinical trials, targeting varied antigens and bearing different linker and drugs, contribute to the learning curve of ADC, as do the discontinued ADC. Current challenges include improvement of the therapeutic index, linked to a careful selection of the targets, a better understanding of ADC mechanism of action, the management and understanding of ADC off-target toxicities, as well as the selection of appropriate clinical settings (patient selection, dosing regimen) where these molecules can bring highest clinical benefit.

Using antibodies to target cancer therapeutics

INTRODUCTION

Over a half a century ago, radiolabeled antibodies were shown to localize selectively in tissues based on the expression of unique antigens. Antibodies have since become the de facto targeting agent, even inspiring the development of non-antibody compounds for targeting purposes.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we review various aspects of how antibodies are transforming the way cancer is being detected and treated, with the growing demand for unconjugated and many new antibody conjugates. While unconjugated antibodies continue to garner most of the attention, interest in new antibody drug conjugates and immunotoxins has expanded over the past few years. However, there continues to be active research with new radioimmunoconjugates for imaging and therapy, particularly with α-emitters, as well as antibody-targeted cytokines and other biological response modifiers.

EXPERT OPINION

The increasing number of new agents being developed and tested clinically suggests that antibody-targeted compounds will have an expanding role in the future.