Investigational therapies for the pharmacological treatment of alcoholism

[A double blind placebo controlled randomized clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in induction of remission in patients with alcohol dependence]

AIM

To study the efficacy of pregabalin for relapse prevention and reduction of drinking in patients with alcohol dependence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred recently detoxified out-patients with alcohol dependence were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. Patients of the first group (n=50; 38 men, 12 women, age 43.0±1.27) received pregabalin (150 mg once a day at night time) for 3 months, while patients of the second group (n=50; 45 men, 5 women, age 45.92±1.4) received identically looking placebo. All patients received standardized manualized weekly counseling (medical management). Drinking was measured on the weekly basis with Time Line Follow Back technique and GGT enzyme activity. Also, craving for alcohol, depression, and anxiety were measured weekly with the number of scales.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly higher retention in treatment and in remission in the pregabalin group (lower drop out and relapse rate) mediana (CL)-12 (10.4-13.6) weeks in the pregabalin group vs. 6 (4.5-7.5) in the placebo group, Log Rank Mantel-Cox test = 0.005). Proportion of patients, who completed treatment in the pregabalin group, was significantly higher compared to the placebo group: 50% vs. 24%. Mean duration of participation in the treatment program was also higher in the pregabalin group: 9.1±0.5 weeks vs. 7.1±0.5 in the placebo group. General linear model demonstrated the significant treatment group effect on: (1) total alcohol consumption (TAC) (mean grams of alcohol per day) with lower TAC in the pregabalin group and (2) on the number of heavy drinking days (NHDD) with lower NHDD in the pregabalin group. Mean NHDD per patient for the period of participation in the study was lower in the pregabalin group (3.6±0.7 vs. 6.4±0.8; p=0.009), while the mean number of abstinent (sober) days was higher (55.9±3.6 vs. 40.0±3.3; p=0.001). No significant differences between the two groups were found in the scores on craving for alcohol, depression and anxiety scales. GGT activity was also similar in both groups throughout the study with no significant between group differences. The rate of adverse events (sleepiness, dizziness, and headache) was insignificantly higher in the pregabalin group compared with the placebo group. All adverse events were mild, gradually disappeared, and did not require any medication.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study provide evidence that pregabalin in a low dose of 150 mg per day is an effective and safe medication for relapse prevention and reduction of drinking in patients with alcohol dependence.

Diagnosis and Pharmacotherapy of Alcohol Use Disorder: A Review

Importance

Alcohol consumption is associated with 88 000 US deaths annually. Although routine screening for heavy alcohol use can identify patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and has been recommended, only 1 in 6 US adults report ever having been asked by a health professional about their drinking behavior. Alcohol use disorder, a problematic pattern of alcohol use accompanied by clinically significant impairment or distress, is present in up to 14% of US adults during a 1-year period, although only about 8% of affected individuals are treated in an alcohol treatment facility.

Observations

Four medications are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat AUD: disulfiram, naltrexone (oral and long-acting injectable formulations), and acamprosate. However, patients with AUD most commonly receive counseling. Medications are prescribed to less than 9% of patients who are likely to benefit from them, given evidence that they exert clinically meaningful effects and their inclusion in clinical practice guidelines as first-line treatments for moderate to severe AUD. Naltrexone, which can be given once daily, reduces the likelihood of a return to any drinking by 5% and binge-drinking risk by 10%. Randomized clinical trials also show that some medications approved for other indications, including seizure disorder (eg, topiramate), are efficacious in treating AUD. Currently, there is not sufficient evidence to support the use of pharmacogenetics to personalize AUD treatments.

Conclusions and Relevance

Alcohol consumption is associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality, and heavy alcohol use is the major risk factor for AUD. Simple, valid screening methods can be used to identify patients with heavy alcohol use, who can then be evaluated for the presence of an AUD. Patients receiving a diagnosis of the disorder should be given brief counseling and prescribed a first-line medication (eg, naltrexone) or referred for a more intensive psychosocial intervention.

Guidelines for biological treatment of substance use and related disorders, part 1: Alcoholism, first revision

These practice guidelines for the biological treatment of alcohol use disorders are an update of the first edition, published in 2008, which was developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). For this 2016 revision, we performed a systematic review (MEDLINE/PUBMED database, Cochrane Library) of all available publications pertaining to the biological treatment of alcoholism and extracted data from national guidelines. The Task Force evaluated the identified literature with respect to the strength of evidence for the efficacy of each medication and subsequently categorised it into six levels of evidence (A-F) and five levels of recommendation (1-5). Thus, the current guidelines provide a clinically and scientifically relevant, evidence-based update of our earlier recommendations. These guidelines are intended for use by clinicians and practitioners who evaluate and treat people with alcohol use disorders and are primarily concerned with the biological treatment of adults with such disorders.

The metabolic syndrome in patients with alcohol dependency: Current research and clinical implications

The relationship between alcohol dependency and disorders such as liver disease and cancer has been thoroughly researched. However, the effects of alcohol on cardiometabolic health remain controversial. Several reports found low to moderate alcohol consumption to be associated with a lower risk for cardiometabolic disorders. In contrast, excessive alcohol consumption has been related to an increased risk. Most of these studies were performed in non-clinical populations, therefore limiting the explanatory power to non-dependent patients. Only a few studies examined cardiovascular disorders and cardiovascular risk factors, in particular the metabolic syndrome (MetS), in alcohol dependent patients. We here present a narrative review of studies performed so far on the MetS in alcohol dependency, and provide current hypotheses on the association of alcohol dependency, appetite regulation and the development of the MetS.

Histamine H3 receptor antagonist decreases cue-induced alcohol reinstatement in mice

We have earlier found that the histamine H3 receptor (H3R) antagonism diminishes motivational aspects of alcohol reinforcement in mice. Here we studied the role of H3Rs in cue-induced reinstatement of alcohol seeking in C57BL/6J mice using two different H3R antagonists. Systemic administration of H3R antagonists attenuated cue-induced alcohol seeking suggesting that H3R antagonists may reduce alcohol craving. To understand how alcohol affects dopamine and histamine release, a microdialysis study was performed on C57BL/6J mice and the levels of histamine, dopamine and dopamine metabolites were measured in the nucleus accumbens. Alcohol administration was combined with an H3R antagonist pretreatment to reveal whether modulation of H3R affects the effects of alcohol on neurotransmitter release. Alcohol significantly increased the release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens but did not affect histamine release. Pretreatment with H3R antagonist ciproxifan did not modify the effect of alcohol on dopamine release. However, histamine release was markedly increased with ciproxifan. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that H3R antagonism attenuates cue-induced reinstatement of alcohol seeking in mice. Alcohol alone does not affect histamine release in the nucleus accumbens but H3R antagonist instead increases histamine release significantly suggesting that the mechanism by which H3R antagonist inhibits alcohol seeking found in the present study and the decreased alcohol reinforcement, reward and consumption found earlier might include alterations in the histaminergic neurotransmission in the nucleus accumbens. These findings imply that selective antagonists of H3Rs could be a therapeutic strategy to prevent relapse and possibly diminish craving to alcohol use. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Histamine Receptors'.