Recent developments in the management of membranous nephropathy

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) for the treatment of recurrent idiopathic membranous nephropathy in a renal transplant patient

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) remains the most common histologic entity associated with adult-onset nephrotic syndrome. The therapy for IMN is challenging. Steroids and various other immunosuppressive agents have been tried in IMN; however, current agents have not altered the course of IMN, are nonspecific and can be very toxic. In native kidneys affected by IMN, rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against the B-cell surface antigen CD20, has been shown to reduce proteinuria and prevent disease progression. In this report, we describe a 39-year-old white male with end-stage renal disease secondary to IMN that, 4 months post living unrelated kidney transplant, developed recurrent IMN with 18 g/day of proteinuria. In addition to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and statins, the patient was treated with 4 weekly doses of 375 mg/m2 of rituximab with significant reduction in proteinuria, a corresponding increase in serum albumin and improvement in hypercholesterolemia. At 3 years post-transplant, his kidney function remains stable with 0.5 g/day of proteinuria.

Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is the most common form of nephrotic syndrome in adults. The disease shows a benign or indolent course in the majority of patients, with a rate of spontaneous complete or partial remission of nephrotic syndrome as high as 30% or more. Despite this, 30-40% of patients progress toward end-stage renal failure (ESRF) within 5-15 years.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of immunosuppressive treatment for IMN in adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group Specialised Register (December 2003), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE and Pre-MEDLINE (1966 - December 2003), EMBASE (1980 - December 2003), reference lists of nephrology textbooks, review articles, prospective trial registers, relevant trials and abstracts from nephrology scientific meetings and the internet without language restriction. We also contacted principal investigators of controlled studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing any immunosuppressive interventions for the treatment of IMN in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed and extracted information. Information was collected on method, participants, interventions and outcomes (death, ESRF, proteinuria, serum creatinine, GRF, remission, adverse events).

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 18 trials with 1025 patients were included. No differences were found when we combined data of all treatment categories as a group and compared them with placebo or no treatment. Oral glucocorticoids. No beneficial effect on any of the end points chosen for efficacy was observed. Alkylating agents showed a significant beneficial effect on complete remission (RR 2.37, 95%CI 1.32 to 4.25, P = 0.004) but not on partial remission (RR 1.22, 95%CI 0.63 to 2.35, P = 0.56) or complete or partial remission (RR 1.55, 95%CI 0.72 to 3.34, P = 0.27). Cyclophosphamide treatment resulted in significantly lower rate of discontinuations due to adverse events as compared to chlorambucil (RR 2.34, 95%CI 1.25 to 4.39, P = 0.008). There was no evidence of clinically relevant differences in favour of cyclosporin and there was insufficient data on anti-proliferative agents.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

This review failed to show any long-term effect of immunosuppressive treatment on patient and/or renal survival. There was an increased number of discontinuations due to adverse events in immunosuppressive treatment groups. Within the class of alkylating agents there is weak evidence supporting the efficacy of cyclophosphamide as compared to chlorambucil. On the other hand, cyclophosphamide had fewer side effects leading to patient withdrawal than chlorambucil.

Rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a one-year prospective study

Currently available monoclonal antibodies against the B cell surface antigen CD20 have been employed to explore whether specific inhibition of B cells may help improve the outcome of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) and may avoid the side effects of steroids and immunosuppressants. This prospective, observational study evaluated the 1-yr outcome of eight IMN patients with persistent (>6 mo) urinary protein excretion > 3.5 g/24 h given four weekly infusions of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (375 mg/m(2)). At 3 and 12 mo, proteinuria significantly decreased from mean (+/- SD) 8.6 +/- 4.2 to 4.3 +/- 3.3 (-51%, P < 0.005) and 3.0 +/- 2.5 (-66%, P < 0.005) g/24 h, albumin fractional clearance from 2.3 +/- 2.1 to 1.2 +/- 1.7 (-47%, P < 0.05) and 0.5 +/- 0.6 (-76%, P < 0.003), and serum albumin concentration increased from 2.7 +/- 0.5 to 3.1 +/- 0.3 (+21%, P < 0.05) and 3.5 +/- 0.4 (+41%, P < 0.05) mg/dl. At 12 mo, proteinuria decreased to < or =0.5 g/24 h or < or =3.5 g/24 h in two and three patients, respectively. Proteinuria decreased in the remaining patients by 74%, 44%, and 41%, respectively. Body weight, diastolic BP, and serum cholesterol progressively decreased in parallel with an improvement of edema in all patients. Renal function stabilized (Delta1/creatinine: +0.002 +/- 0.007). CD20 B lymphocytes fell below normal ranges up to study-end. No patient had major drug-related events or major changes in other laboratory parameters. Rituximab thus promotes sustained disease remission in patients otherwise predicted to progress to ESRD, and it is safe. The long-term risk/benefit profile of this novel, disease-specific approach seems much more favorable to that of commonly employed immunosuppressive drugs.

Rituximab for idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy, a common cause of nephrotic syndrome, can be very toxic. In view of the pathogenic potential of B cells in this disease, we studied the effects of four weekly infusions of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)-- the monoclonal antibody to B-cell antigen CD20--in eight patients who had idiopathic membranous nephropathy with persistent nephrotic syndrome. At weeks 4 and 20, urinary protein decreased from mean (SE) 8.6 g/24 h (1.4) to 3.8 (0.8) and 3.7 (0.9), respectively (p<0.0001). At week 20, albuminuria and albumin fractional clearance decreased by 70% and 65%, and serum albumin increased by 31%. CD20 B lymphocytes fell below normal ranges up to study end. The short-term risk-benefit profile of rituximab seems more favourable to that of any other immunosuppressive drug used to treat idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

ACE inhibition improves glomerular size selectivity in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy and persistent nephrotic syndrome

Patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) and persistent nephrotic-range proteinuria are at risk for progression to end-stage renal failure. Whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are also renoprotective in these patients remains elusive. In 14 patients with IMN (patients) and persistent proteinuria (protein > 3 g/24 h for >6 months), we studied mean arterial pressure (MAP), urinary protein excretion, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal plasma flow (RPF), and albumin and neutral dextran fractional clearance after 2 months washout from previous antihypertensive treatment (basal), after 2 months of enalapril (2.5 to 20 mg/d) therapy (posttreatment), and 2 months after enalapril withdrawal (recovery). MAP, proteinuria, and GFR were also measured at the same time points in 6 patients with IMN and persistent overt proteinuria maintained on conventional treatment throughout the study period (controls). Basal MAP, proteinuria, and GFR were similar in the two study groups. However, in patients at the end of the treatment period, MAP (posttreatment, 99.6 +/- 11.2 versus basal, 103.3 +/- 12.1 mm Hg; P < 0.05), proteinuria (posttreatment protein, 5.0 +/- 2.9 versus basal, 7.1 +/- 4.9 g/24 h; P < 0.05), albumin fractional clearance (posttreatment median, 1.7 x 10(-3); range, 0.2 to 22.7 x 10(-3) versus basal median, 4.1 x 10(-3); range, 0.4 to 22. 1 x 10(-3); P < 0.05), and fractional clearance of largest neutral dextrans (radii from 62 to 66 A) were significantly less than basal values. At recovery, MAP significantly increased to 106.6 +/- 11.7 mm Hg (P < 0.001 versus enalapril), but all other parameters remained less than basal values. GFR and RPF were similar at each evaluation. Changes in proteinuria after treatment withdrawal positively correlated (r = 0.72; P < 0.01) with baseline GFR. Theoretical analysis of dextran-sieving data indicated that ACE inhibitor treatment significantly improved glomerular membrane size-selective dysfunction. This effect persisted more than 2 months after treatment withdrawal. No patient had symptomatic hypotension, acute renal function deterioration, or hyperkalemia during enalapril treatment. Thus, in patients with IMN and long-term nephrotic syndrome, ACE inhibitor treatment, but not conventional therapy, improves glomerular barrier size selectivity. The antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibition is long lasting, especially in patients with more severe renal insufficiency. This is the premise of a long-term renoprotective effect that may limit the need for treatment with more toxic drugs.