Therapy of systemic lupus erythematosus: new agents and new evidence

Successful long-term treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus with rituximab maintenance therapy

Systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE) is a chronic, inflammatory autoimmune disease that may involve multiple organ systems. Treatment consists of immunosuppression, cytotoxic treatment, plasmapheresis and immunoglobuline therapy. Treatment of patients refractory to standard treatment approaches is difficult and results are poor. We describe a 39-year old patient with SLE sufferingfrom grand mal epilepsy due to cerebralvasculopathywith positivelupus anticoagulant, who was refractory to standard treatment modalities. The patient was treated with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (375 mg/m2 ×4, repeated at weekly intervals). Rituximab applications were delivered in October 2000, March 2001 and October 2001. Since March 2002 she has received maintenance therapy with rituximab 375 mg/m2 every three months. A second female with refractory SLE was treated successfully in April 2002 and receives maintenance therapy every three months. Both patients responded well to rituximab therapy. The first patient showed a major improvement of her clinical condition, and 30 months after the beginning of the rituximab therapy she is free of any symptoms. inflammation parameters, ANA and lupus anticoagulantdeclined significantly after the treatment. The clinical conditionof the second patient improved dramatically, all inflammation parameters normalized and her circulating immunocomplexes disappeared. In conclusion, rituximab maintenance treatment may be a new effective therapy in SLE.

Mycophenolate in dermatology

Originally used to treat psoriasis nearly three decades ago, mycophenolic acid, reformulated as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), has been rediscovered by the world of dermatology. As a relatively well-tolerated immunosuppressive used in organ transplant recipients, MMF has recently been reported to show promise for several dermatologic conditions, including psoriasis, pemphigus vulgaris, pyoderma gangrenosum, bullous lichen planus, and even connective tissue diseases such as lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis. Although not intended to be exhaustive, this review discusses MMF with regard to its basic pharmacology, its side effects, and its reported efficacy in a variety of dermatologic indications. Relevant literature was retrieved by a Medline search combining the terms "mycophenolate" or "mycophenolic acid" and "skin" or "skin disease" or a number of specific conditions ("psoriasis", "dermatitis", "eczema", "pemphigoid", "pemphigus", "vasculitis", "pyoderma gangrenosum", "Crohn's disease", "graft-versus-host disease", "lichen planus"). As MMF has only been recently re-introduced for dermatologic application, the nature of much of the literature is admittedly that of case reports or case series. Nevertheless, the results are sufficiently promising to warrant further larger, control studies.

Antimalarial therapy selection for quinolone resistance among Escherichia coli in the absence of quinolone exposure, in tropical South America

Background

Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is thought to develop only in the presence of antibiotic pressure. Here we show evidence to suggest that fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli has developed in the absence of fluoroquinolone use.

Methods

Over 4 years, outreach clinic attendees in one moderately remote and five very remote villages in rural Guyana were surveyed for the presence of rectal carriage of ciprofloxacin-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Drinking water was tested for the presence of resistant GNB by culture, and the presence of antibacterial agents and chloroquine by HPLC. The development of ciprofloxacin resistance in E. coli was examined after serial exposure to chloroquine. Patient and laboratory isolates of E. coli resistant to ciprofloxacin were assessed by PCR-sequencing for quinolone-resistance-determining-region (QRDR) mutations.

Results

In the very remote villages, 4.8% of patients carried ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli with QRDR mutations despite no local availability of quinolones. However, there had been extensive local use of chloroquine, with higher prevalence of resistance seen in the villages shortly after a Plasmodium vivax epidemic (p<0.01). Antibacterial agents were not found in the drinking water, but chloroquine was demonstrated to be present. Chloroquine was found to inhibit the growth of E. coli in vitro. Replica plating demonstrated that 2-step QRDR mutations could be induced in E. coli in response to chloroquine.

Conclusions

In these remote communities, the heavy use of chloroquine to treat malaria likely selected for ciprofloxacin resistance in E. coli. This may be an important public health problem in malarious areas.

Basic immunosuppressive drugs outside solid organ transplantation

Immunosuppressive drugs are the backbone of solid organ transplantation. The introduction of new immunosuppressive drugs led to improved patient and organ survival rates. Nowadays, acute rejection can be reduced to a minimum. Individualization and avoidance of drug-related adverse effects became a new goal to achieve. The potency of immunosuppressive drugs makes them attractive for use in various autoimmune diseases; therefore, the experience on immunosuppressive drugs outside the field of organ transplantation is analysed in this review.

The Use of Systemic Immune Moderators in Dermatology: An Update

In addition to corticosteroids, dermatologists have access to an array of immunomodulatory therapies. Azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, cyclosporine, and mycophenolate mofetil are the systemic immunosuppressive agents most commonly used by dermatologists. In addition, new developments in biotechnology have spurred the development of immunobiologic agents that are able to target the immunologic process of many inflammatory disorders at specific points along the inflammatory cascade. Alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, and infliximab are the immunobiologic agents that are currently the most well known and most commonly used by dermatologists. This article reviews the pharmacology, mechanism of action, side effects, and clinical applications of these therapies.

Immunosuppressants in advanced clinical development for organ transplantation and selected autoimmune diseases

Immunosuppressants dampen the immune response or restore balance among immune system components. They are primarily used to prevent allograft rejection after organ transplantation and to prevent or treat disease flares in autoimmune diseases. Immunosuppressants available at present include the calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporin, tacrolimus), antimetabolites (azathioprine, leflunomide, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil), antiproliferatives (sirolimus), monoclonal antibodies to T lymphocyte (basiliximab, daclizumab, muromonab-CD3) and anticytokines (anakinra, etanercept, infliximab). The immunosuppressive market grows at a rate of > 10% yearly, with total sales in 2001 of US$2.7 billion. Immunotherapy in transplantation and autoimmune diseases is tending towards the use of multi-drug regimens tailored for the individual patient. At least 23 new immunosuppressants are currently in advanced clinical testing or preregistration, and can be divided into three groups. First, emerging drugs targeting intracellular ligands in immune cells are primarily analogues of currently-marketed agents, which attempt to provide improved pharmaceutical or safety profiles compared with the prototype compound. They are largely being developed in organ transplantation. Second, emerging drugs targeting cell surface ligands on immune cells attempt to antagonise novel molecular sites to interfere with immune cell activation via costimulatory signals, immune cell adhesion to tissues or the vasculature and immune cell trafficking. These agents are being primarily developed in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and/or multiple sclerosis. Finally, emerging drugs acting as anticytokines, which largely follow on from the success of those on the market, by antagonising the function of tumour necrosis factor or a narrow selection of interleukins. All are being assessed in rheumatoid arthritis. Drug development of immunosuppressants is increasingly attempting to intervene in disease progression over the long term. These efforts bring with them trial design and regulatory issues, such as what markers can be used as trial outcome measures, over what duration do trials need to be conducted and what labelling claims are allowed. With the intensive activity in this field, it is likely that several new drugs will reach the market in the coming decade. One caveat, however, is that emerging immunosuppressants that are likely to capture a reasonable share of this increasingly-fragmented market must demonstrate the ability to achieve disease remission or long-term slowing of disease progression.

Systemic lupus erythematosus vasculitis: A current therapeutic overview

The development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) vasculitis is of prognostic value. The earlier the vasculitis is treated, the better the prognosis for SLE. Cutaneous vasculitis is common in SLE, whereas visceral vasculitis is rare. Skin SLE vasculitis is successfully treated with antimalarials, but its discontinuation may result in an SLE flare even among patients in remission. When visceral SLE vasculitis is encountered, or when a disease state is perceived to be life-threatening, a more aggressive therapy is warranted. A combination of medications, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin treatment, along with high-dose steroids and cytotoxic drugs, are typically employed in the treatment of severe SLE vasculitis. Finally, patients with SLE vasculitis may benefit from a number of autoimmune disease therapies currently under investigation, such as switching cytokine responses from Th1 to Th2, and the manipulation of toll-like receptors, chemokines, and FcR receptors. Specific B-cell therapies (eg, anti-Blys, B-cell depletion) may also emerge as potential treatments for SLE vasculitis.

Mycophenolate mofetil in solid-organ transplantation

This review focuses on the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as an immunosuppressive agent in solid-organ transplantation. MMF, a non-competitive inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, blocks de novo purine synthesis in T and B lymphocytes, resulting in the selective inhibition of proliferation of these cells in response to antigenic stimuli. MMF may also promote apoptosis of these cells. The immunosuppressive ability of MMF is thought to derive mainly from the inhibition of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase. The other effects of MMF include suppression of antibody synthesis by B lymphocytes, inhibition of proliferation of smooth muscle cells in culture and impaired glycosylation of adhesion molecules. MMF may exhibit anti-inflammatory effects resulting from decreased activity of the inducible form of nitric oxide synthase, a consequence of depletion of tetrahydrobiopterin, which leads to decreased generation of peroxynitrite, a pro-inflammatory molecule. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and principles underlying therapeutic drug monitoring of MMF are reviewed. The results of the pivotal clinical trials of MMF in kidney and heart transplantation are discussed and a summary of the major studies demonstrating a positive effect of MMF on renal transplantation outcomes is presented. The use of MMF in the context of ABO-incompatible renal transplantation, renal transplantation in highly sensitised and cross-match positive recipients, humoral rejection of renal allografts, chronic allograft nephropathy and steroid/calcineurin inhibitor minimisation in renal transplantation are also discussed.

Theoretical basis for the activity of thalidomide

The revival of thalidomide began shortly after the drug was withdrawn from the market because of its teratogenic properties. Therapeutic effects of thalidomide were found accidentally in leprosy patients with erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL). Subsequent research widened the understanding of the activity of thalidomide, and with improved methodology and the augmented background knowledge of immunology it was possible to interpret the properties of thalidomide more coherently. Effects on tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) release play an important role in the ability of thalidomide to affect the immune system. Alteration of synthesis and release of cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 and interferon-gamma is involved in the complex mechanisms of thalidomide. Thalidomide targets leucocytes, endothelial cells and keratinocytes, affecting them in a different manner and at different cellular levels. Changes in the density of adhesion molecules alter leucocyte extravasation and the inflammatory response in the tissue involved. Several mechanisms for the teratogenic action of thalidomide are currently under review, but this mode of action of the drug still remains unclear and we review evidence-based hypotheses for the teratogenicity of thalidomide. Thalidomide shows significant clinical impact in several diseases such as ENL in lepromatous leprosy, chronic graft-versus-host disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoidosis, aphthous lesions in HIV infection, wasting syndrome in chronic illness, inflammatory bowel disease, multiple myeloma and some solid tumours. In 1998 the US Food and Drug Administration approved thalidomide exclusively for the treatment of ENL, and strict conditions were stipulated for its use in order to prevent teratogenic adverse effects. However, despite the promising findings of thalidomide at the molecular level, namely its anti-TNFalpha properties and its intercalation with DNA, and activity in clinical trials, there is still a great need for more intensive research.

Update on therapy--thalidomide in the treatment of lupus

Thalidomide has been shown to be an effective treatment for cutaneous forms of lupus erythematous refractory to other therapies. Thalidomide has very serious side effects, including teratogenicity and neuropathy, which limit its clinical use in lupus to such severe refractory cases. Efficacy has been confirmed in several studies, although recurrence after discontinuation of treatment is frequent. More recent experience suggests that lower doses than originally used may be effective, which may result in a reduction in side effects. Much effort has been expended in studying the mechanisms of action of thalidomide, although as yet it is unclear which of the mechanisms identified to date contribute to its efficacy in treating cutaneous forms of lupus erythematosus. Identification of patients suitable for thalidomide therapy requires a rigorous selection process. Potential side effects should be clearly explained, particularly teratogenicity as many patients are young women. Written consent and a negative pregnancy test must be obtained prior to commencement of therapy. Reliable contraceptive measures should be strictly observed by patients taking thalidomide. Close clinical and neurophysiological supervision using nerve conduction studies should be undertaken.