Pharmacotherapy for diabetic retinopathy

New treatments for diabetic macular edema

This work comprehensively reviews the latest treatment options for diabetic macular edema (DME) used in its management and presents further work on the topic. Diabetic retinopathy is an important and increasingly prevalent cause of preventable blindness worldwide. To meet this increasing burden there has recently been a proliferation of pharmacological therapies being used in clinical practice. A variety of medical treatment options now exist for DME. These include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as nepafenac, as well as intravitreal steroids like triamcinolone (kenalog). Long-term results up to 7 years after commencing treatment are presented for triamcinolone. Studies are reviewed on the use of dexamethasone (ozurdex) and fluocinolone (Retisert and Iluvien implants) including the FAME studies. A variety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents used in DME are considered in detail including ranibizumab (lucentis) and the RESTORE, RIDE, RISE and Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) studies. Bevacizumab (avastin) and pegaptinib (macugen) are also considered. The use of aflibercept (eylea) is reviewed including the significance of the DA VINCI, VISTA-DME, VIVID-DME and the DRCR.net studies which have recently suggested potentially greater efficacy when treating DME for aflibercept in patients with more severely reduced visual acuity at baseline. Evidence for the anti-VEGF agent bevasiranib is also considered. Studies of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents like infliximab are reviewed. So are studies of other agents targeting inflammation including minocycline, rapamycin (sirolimus) and protein kinase C inhibitors such as midostaurin and ruboxistaurin. The protein kinase C β inhibitor Diabetic Macular Edema Study is considered. Other agents which have been suggested for DME are discussed including cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors like celecoxib, phospholipase A2 inhibitors, recombinant erythropoietin, and monoclonal anti-interleukin antibodies such as canakinumab. The management of DME in a variety of clinical scenarios is also discussed - in newly diagnosed DME, refractory DME including after macular laser, and postoperatively after intraocular surgery. Results of long-term intravitreal triamcinolone for DME administered up to seven years after commencing treatment are considered in the context of the niche roles available for such agents in modern management of DME. This is alongside more widely used treatments available to the practitioner such as anti-VEGF agents like aflibercept (Eylea) and ranibizumab (Lucentis) which at present are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment of DME.

Diabetic macular edema: therapeutic options

Treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) is continuously evolving with the advent of pharmacologic therapies. Focal laser photocoagulation remains the historical standard of care; however, a new wave of studies is rapidly emerging that shows the benefit of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor medications and corticosteroids. The goal of this review is to compare the various treatment options for DME, and include data from the most recent clinical trials of therapies for this complex condition.

Leukocytes regulate retinal capillary degeneration in the diabetic mouse via generation of leukotrienes

Understanding the early pathogenesis of DR may uncover new therapeutic targets to prevent or slow the progression of this sight-threatening disorder. We investigated the role of leukocyte-mediated generation of LTs in regulation of retinal capillary degeneration and inflammation in the diabetic mouse. We generated (1) chimeric mice that lacked the ability to generate LTs by transplanting 5LO-/- bone marrow cells into ND.WT mice and into SD.WT mice and (2) "control" chimeric mice by transplanting WT bone marrow cells into 5LO-/- mice or into WT mice. Retinas from diabetic chimeric mice with WT marrow demonstrated capillary degeneration to the same extent as retinas from diabetic, nonchimeric WT mice. In contrast, retinas from diabetic chimeric mice with 5LO-/- marrow developed significantly less capillary degeneration and pericyte loss (P<0.05). In the retinas from chimeric mice with WT marrow, diabetes induced a rise in leukocyte adherence to the microvasculature, expression of the NF-κB p65 subunit, and ICAM1, superoxide generation, and retinal microvascular permeability, yet these characteristic responses were blunted by >50% in diabetic chimeras containing 5LO-/- leukocytes (P<0.05). Our data suggest the critical involvement of leukocytes and LTs in the regulation of inflammation and capillary degeneration in DR.

The relative clinical effectiveness of ranibizumab and bevacizumab in diabetic macular oedema: an indirect comparison in a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To indirectly compare the effectiveness of ranibizumab and bevacizumab in the treatment of diabetic macular oedema.

DESIGN

Systematic review and indirect comparison.

DATA SOURCES

Medline (1996-September 2011), Embase (1996-September 2011), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 4, 2011).

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Randomised trials evaluating ranibizumab or bevacizumab in diabetic macular oedema with a common comparator and sufficient methodological similarity to be included within an indirect comparison were eligible for inclusion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an improvement in best corrected visual acuity of more than two lines on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale. Secondary outcomes included mean changes in best corrected visual acuity and in central macular thickness, and adverse events. Best corrected visual acuity was converted to logMAR units, a linear scale of visual acuity with positive values representing increasing visual loss. Indirect comparisons were done using Bayesian methods to estimate relative treatment effects of bevacizumab and ranibizumab.

RESULTS

Five randomised controlled trials with follow-up of 6-12 months and a common comparator (multiple laser treatment) were sufficiently similar to be included in the indirect comparison. Generally studies were small, resulting in wide credible intervals. The proportions of patients with an improvement in best corrected visual acuity of >2 lines were 21/77 participants (27%) for bevacizumab and 60/152 participants (39%) for ranibizumab (odds ratio 0.95 (95% credible interval 0.23 to 4.32)). The wide credible intervals cannot exclude a greater improvement, or worse outcome, for either drug. The mean change in best corrected visual acuity non-significantly favoured bevacizumab (treatment effect -0.08 logMAR units (-0.19 to 0.04)). The difference in mean change in central macular thickness was not statistically significant between ranibizumab and bevacizumab (treatment effect -6.9 μm (-88.5 to 65.4)).

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest no difference in effectiveness between bevacizumab and ranibizumab, but the wide credible intervals cannot exclude the possibility that either drug might be superior. Sufficiently powered, direct head to head trials are needed.

Development of injectable, resorbable drug-releasing copolymer scaffolds for minimally invasive sustained ophthalmic therapeutics

Copolymers based on N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm), acrylic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide (NAS) and varying concentrations of acrylic acid (AA) and acryloyloxy dimethyl-γ-butyrolactone (DBA) were synthesized to create thermoresponsive, resorbable copolymers for minimally invasive drug and/or cell delivery to the posterior segment of the eye to combat retinal degenerative diseases. Increasing DBA content was found to decrease both copolymer water content and lower critical solution temperature. The incorporation of NAS provided an amine-reactive site, which can be exploited for facile conjugation of bioactive agents. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance analysis revealed the onset of hydrolysis-dependent opening of the DBA lactone ring, which successfully eradicated copolymer phase transition properties and should allow the gelled polymer to re-hydrate, enter systemic circulation and be cleared from the body without the production of degradation byproducts. Hydrolytic ring opening occurs slowly, with over 85% copolymer mass remaining after 130 days of incubation in 37°C phosphate buffered saline. These slow-degrading copolymers are hypothesized to be ideal delivery vehicles to provide minimally invasive, sustained, localized release of pharmaceuticals within the posterior segment of the eye to combat retinal degenerative diseases.

Oral minocycline for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME): results of a phase I/II clinical study

PURPOSE

Inflammation contributes significantly to the pathogenesis of diabetic macular edema (DME). In particular, retinal microglia demonstrate increased activation and aggregation in areas of DME. Study authors investigated the safety and potential efficacy of oral minocycline, a drug capable of inhibiting microglial activation, in the treatment of DME.

METHODS

A single-center, prospective, open-label phase I/II clinical trial enrolled five participants with fovea-involving DME who received oral minocycline 100 mg twice daily for 6 months. Main outcome measurements included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal subfield thickness (CST), and central macular volume using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and late leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA).

RESULTS

Findings indicated that the study drug was well tolerated and not associated with significant safety issues. In study eyes, mean BCVA improved continuously from baseline at 1, 2, 4, and 6 months by +1.0, +4.0, +4.0, and +5.8 letters, respectively, while mean retinal thickness (CST) on OCT decreased by -2.9%, -5.7%, -13.9, and -8.1% for the same time points. At month 6, mean area of late leakage on FA decreased by -34.4% in study eyes. Mean changes in contralateral fellow eyes also demonstrated similar trends. Improvements in outcome measures were not correlated with concurrent changes in systemic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot proof-of-concept study of DME, minocycline as primary treatment was associated with improved visual function, central macular edema, and vascular leakage, comparing favorably with historical controls from previous studies. Microglial inhibition with oral minocycline may be a promising therapeutic strategy targeting the inflammatory etiology of DME. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01120899.).

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Use in Diabetic Macular Edema: Illustrative Cases

The role of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for patients with diabetic macular edema is controversial. Three diabetic macular edema case studies are presented to illustrate short-term outcomes. The main outcome measures included visual acuity (VA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), macular thickening (in microns), and improvement in visual acuity. IVTA appears to have short-term efficacy in selected patients with diabetic macular edema, and it is a reasonable treatment option for patients with very poor presenting VA. A controlled prospective study to evaluate the emerging role of IVTA in combination with other treatment options for diabetic macular edema, especially among patients with poor VA at presentation, is underway through the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research network.