Selegiline transdermal system: a novel treatment option for major depressive disorder

Current Pharmaceutical Treatments and Alternative Therapies of Parkinson's Disease

Over the decades, pharmaceutical treatments, particularly dopaminergic (DAergic) drugs have been considered as the main therapy against motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). It is proposed that DAergic drugs in combination with other medications, such as monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors, catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors, anticholinergics and other newly developed non-DAergic drugs can make a better control of motor symptoms or alleviate levodopa-induced motor complications. Moreover, non-motor symptoms of PD, such as cognitive, neuropsychiatric, sleep, autonomic and sensory disturbances caused by intrinsic PD pathology or drug-induced side effects, are gaining increasing attention and urgently need to be taken care of due to their impact on quality of life. Currently, neuroprotective therapies have been investigated extensively in pre-clinical studies, and some of them have been subjected to clinical trials. Furthermore, non-pharmaceutical treatments, including deep brain stimulation (DBS), gene therapy, cell replacement therapy and some complementary managements, such as Tai chi, Yoga, traditional herbs and molecular targeted therapies have also been considered as effective alternative therapies to classical pharmaceutics. This review will provide us updated information regarding the current drugs and non-drugs therapies for PD.

Placing transdermal selegiline for major depressive disorder into clinical context: number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed

BACKGROUND

This is a quantitative review of existing studies of transdermal selegiline for major depressive disorder.

METHODS

Data for dichotomous outcomes were extracted from the five 6-8 week studies of transdermal selegiline. Number needed to treat (NNT) vs. placebo was calculated for response and remission using standard definitions. Number needed to harm (NNH) vs. placebo for commonly encountered adverse events (AEs), AEs associated with sexual function, incidence of weight gain ≥5% from baseline, and discontinuation due to an AE, were also calculated. Data was pooled as appropriate and likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH) ratios contrasting remission with selected tolerability outcomes were determined.

RESULTS

When pooling together the two pivotal trials as identified in product labeling, NNT for response was 11 (95% CI 6-109) and for remission, 9 (95% CI 6-28). Pooling all trials, NNH for application site reaction was 7 (95% CI 6-10) and for insomnia, 19 (95% CI 12-41). There were no clinically relevant differences from placebo regarding weight gain or impairment in sexual functioning. NNH for discontinuation due to an AE was 32 (95% CI 19-132). LHH for remission vs. discontinuation from treatment due to an AE was 3.6.

LIMITATIONS

The studies included were not identical in design. The studies were registrational in nature and thus not necessarily generalizable.

CONCLUSIONS

NNT for transdermal selegiline for efficacy is similar to that for other antidepressant regimens for which similar analyses have been published. There appear to be no clinically relevant effects of selegiline on weight or sexual functioning.

Selegiline: a reappraisal of its role in Parkinson disease

Selegiline at the doses used in Parkinson disease is a selective irreversible monoamine oxidase type B inhibitor, which potentiates dopaminergic function in the brain, and is used as monotherapy in early Parkinson disease or in combination with levodopa in more advanced disease. A renewed interest in monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors in the treatment of Parkinson disease has emerged after recent clinical trials of agents in this class. The use of selegiline monotherapy in early Parkinson disease is supported by the results of a large well-controlled trial in 800 patients (DATATOP) and several other studies, which demonstrated a symptomatic benefit, a reduction in disability, and a delay in the need to start levodopa therapy. Administered with levodopa in studies of up to 5 years' duration in patients with more advanced disease, selegiline improved disease-related disability, reduced the end-of-dose motor fluctuations, and also led to a reduction of the dose and dose frequency of levodopa required.Selegiline was the first drug to be investigated as a possible neuroprotective agent in patients with Parkinson disease, based on preclinical studies indicating protection of dopaminergic neurons from damage. The results of the extensive body of clinical trials, including delayed and lower levodopa requirements, may indeed suggest that selegiline, in addition to conferring symptomatic benefit, may have other effects on disease progression. Selegiline is well tolerated, and initial fears of increased mortality with the drug have not been borne out by subsequent robust meta-analyses.

Adolescent HIV-1 transgenic rats: evidence for dopaminergic alterations in behavior and neurochemistry revealed by methamphetamine challenge

Since the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in the mid-90s, the most severe forms of HIV-1-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) have diminished. However, milder forms of HAND remain prevalent. Basic and clinical studies implicate alterations in the dopaminergic (DAergic) system in HIV-1 infection. We used the Fischer 344 HIV-1 transgenic (HIV-1 Tg) rat, which expresses 7 of the 9 HIV-1 genes, to examine potential DAergic alterations. Animals were studied beginning at 35 days of age to assess early-onset DAergic alterations, well before any documented neurological symptoms or clinical signs of "wasting". At 48 hr intervals, animals were administered a single dose of methamphetamine (METH) (0, 0.5, 1, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg/ml s.c.) and tested for the auditory startle response (ASR) and prepulse inhibition (PPI), using an auditory prepulse [85 dB(A) broad-band noise stimulus] and an auditory startle stimulus [100 dB(A) broad-band noise stimulus] in a sound-attenuating chamber with a continuous 70 dB(A) white noise background. The protocol used a 5-min acclimation period, 6 startle trials, and 36 PPI trials [ISIs of 0, 8, 40, 80, 120, and 4000 ms, 6-trial blocks, Latin square design]. As the dose of METH increased, PPI of the startle response decreased. The HIV-1 Tg rats displayed a greater dose-dependency to the METH-induced disruption of PPI compared to non-transgenic controls. Western blot analysis of midbrain extracts revealed lower tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) protein levels and higher monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) protein levels in HIV-1 Tg rats treated with METH compared to non-transgenic controls. Early-detected cognitive alterations in the preattentive process of sensorimotor gating may have significant predictive utility regarding the progression of DAergic alterations in HIV-1 infection.

Depression

This article reviews the assessment and treatment for depression in children and adolescents, emphasizing the implementation of evidence-based treatments into clinical care. Past trials of antidepressant medications are reviewed, as well as the clinical use of antidepressants and pharmacologic strategies for refractory illness or in the context of comorbid conditions. Clinicians who treat youth now have a body of empiric research to help guide treatment decisions; however, personalized treatment based on associated symptoms, comorbid conditions, contextual factors, and psychiatric history is essential. Further research is needed in the pharmacologic treatment of depressed youth, including expanding the study of non-SSRI antidepressants, augmentation and adjunctive strategies, and treatment in patients with comorbid conditions.

Depression in medically ill patients

In medically ill patients, given the many entities the phenotype of depression may represent, clinicians must be prepared to cast their diagnostic nets widely, not settling for the obvious but frequently incorrect choice of major depressive episode and throwing antidepressants at it willy nilly. Having chosen the correct diagnosis from among a broad differential of depression “look-alikes,” clinicians can draw upon a broad swath of treatment modalities including medications, psychotherapy, social supports, and spiritual interventions. Working as a psychiatrist in the medical arena requires the curiosity and analytic skills of a detective and the breadth of knowledge of a polymath adapting therapeutic tools from across the biopsychosociospiritual spectrum to the specific needs of the patient.

Pharmacologic approaches to treatment resistant depression: a re-examination for the modern era

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is common and debilitating. Initial treatment is often insufficient to achieve full remission in a given depressive episode, resulting in more frequent episodes, worsened severity, and major disability.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review surveys literature on the diagnosis and pharmacological management of TRD in light of recent developments. Evidence regarding commonly used treatment options is critically examined and key recommendations are offered. The review ends by considering drugs acting on the melatonin, acetylcholine, and glutamate systems that hold promise as future options for TRD.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Recent trends and research findings have impacted how the evidence supporting different approaches to TRD should be evaluated. For example, many earlier TRD studies employed tricyclics as the primary antidepressant, but tricyclics have now been superseded by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in routine clinical practice. This deficiency has been addressed by the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study, the largest effectiveness study of TRD ever conducted. However, design characteristics of the STAR*D study preclude simple comparisons with earlier studies.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

A shortcoming of most treatment recommendations for TRD is their reliance on older studies that do not reflect the current preeminence of SSRIs in clinical practice. This has distorted the prioritization of pharmacological strategies for TRD. Efforts to correct this distortion with effectiveness research, designed to better reflect current practice trends, require critical consideration of the strengths and limitations of this approach.