Biphasic insulin aspart in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Biphasic insulin aspart 30 treatment for people with type 2 diabetes: a budget impact analysis based in Thailand

OBJECTIVE

To assess the financial consequences of different adoption rate of Biphasic Insulin Aspart (BIAsp) 30 instead of Biphasic Human Insulin (BHI) 30 for people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in Thailand from the payer's perspective.

METHODS

The Excel-based International T2DM Budget Impact Model over a 3-year period was used. The cohort was the T2DM patients who received treatment from government hospitals under the Universal Health Coverage Scheme. Demographic, the adverse events, and the costs were derived from published studies in Thailand. Efficacy was based on meta-analysis. Adoption rates were assumed to increase each year. Net budget impact (NBI) and one-way sensitivity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Hypoglycemia costs were lower in BIAsp 30 compared with BHI 30. The NBI per year was 26,511,269 THB (771,349 USD) for year 1, 52,181,133 THB (1,518,218 USD) for year 2, and 76,189,608 THB (2,216,747 USD) for year 3. The NBI per insulin user per year was 33.45 THB (0.97 USD), 67.27 THB (1.96 USD), 101.49 THB (2.95 USD) from year 1 to year 3, respectively Conclusions: Lower rate of hypoglycemia with BIAsp 30 than those treated with BHI 30 generates cost savings resulting in significant deduction in the additional acquisition cost of BIAsp 30. Therefore, the NBI per insulin user per year has become small.

Trend over time in hepatic fibrosis score in a cohort of type 2 diabetes patients

AIMS

The prevalence and progression of hepatic fibrosis and its correlated factors in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are poorly known. We aimed to define the percentage of T2DM patients who progress to fibrosis and the factors associated with disease progression.

METHODS

Data from the electronic health records of 1527 patients with diagnosed T2DM and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), as diagnosed by the Fatty Liver Index, were extracted from the AMD Annals database, which collects data from the Italian network of diabetes clinics. For the main analysis, we evaluated variables associated with Fibrosis 4 [FIB-4] score at baseline and at 3-year follow-up to determine their role in predicting FIB-4 at 3 years and the risk of hepatic fibrosis in T2DM.

RESULTS

High-risk of advanced fibrosis was detected in 13.1% of patients at baseline and in 18.1% at 3 years, LDL cholesterol, and body-mass index, correlated negatively with baseline FIB-4 scores, whereas gamma glutamil transerasi correlated positively . The FIB-4 score at 3 years was associated with lower values of baseline renal function, LDL, and BMI; however, the baseline FIB-4 score was the strongest predictor for the FIB-4 score at 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of and progression to hepatic fibrosis within 3 years in patients with T2DM is not negligible. Patients with a higher likelihood of liver scarring differ from those with hepatic steatosis. Differently from NAFLD, the FIB-4 score is inversely correlated with insulin resistance and appears to increase independent of classic metabolic factors.

Multiple fractures and impaired bone metabolism in Wolfram syndrome: a case report

Wolfram Syndrome (WS) is a rare and lethal disease characterized by optic atrophy, diabetes mellitus, diabetes insipidus, and hearing loss. To date, osteoporotic related fractures have not been reported in affected patients. Here, we describe the case of a man affected by WS complicated by several bone fragility fractures. A 50-year-old Caucasian man was hospitalized because of tibia and fibula fractures. His clinical features included diabetes mellitus, diabetes insipidus, optic atrophy and deafness that were consistent with an unrecognized WS diagnosis, which was confirmed by the identification of a specific mutation in gene WFS1 encoding wolframin. Bone mineral density by phalangeal quantitative ultrasound demonstrated severe osteoporosis, with high serum levels of surrogate markers of bone turn-over. Previously unidentified rib fractures were also detected. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of osteoporotic related fractures in a patient affected by WS. Although no effective treatments are currently available to delay the progression of the disease, this case report suggests to evaluate fracture risk in the diagnostic work-up of WS.

Antihyperglycemic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes in Italy: the impact of age and kidney function

We describe AHA utilization pattern according to age and renal function in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), in real-life conditions.

The analysis was performed using the data set of electronic medical records collected between 1 January and 31 December, 2011 in 207 Italian diabetes centers. The study population consisted of 157,595 individuals with T2DM. The AHA treatment regimens was evaluated. Kidney function was assessed by eGFR, estimated using the CKD-EPI formula. Other determinations: HbA1c, blood pressure (BP), low- density lipoprotein (LDL-c), total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (TC and HDL-c), triglycerides (TG) and serum uric acid (SUA). Quality of care was assessed through Q score.

The proportion of subjects taking metformin declined progressively across age quartiles along with eGFR values, but remained high in oldest subjects (i.e. 54.5 %). On the other hand, the proportion of patients on secretagogues or insulin increased with aging (i.e. 54.7% and 37% in the fourth age quartile, respectively). The percentage of patients with low eGFR (i.e. <30 ml/min/1.73m2) taking either metformin or sulphonilureas/repaglinide was particularly high (i.e. 15.3% and 34.3% respectively).

In a large real-life cohort of T2DM, metformin or sulphonylureas/repaglinide, although not recommended, are frequently prescribed to elderly subjects with severe kidney disease.

Fracture Risk in Type 2 Diabetes: Current Perspectives and Gender Differences

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures, resulting in disabilities and increased mortality. The pathophysiological mechanisms linking diabetes to osteoporosis have not been fully explained, but alterations in bone structure and quality are well described in diabetic subjects, likely due to a combination of different factors. Insulin deficiency and dysfunction, obesity and hyperinsulinemia, altered level of oestrogen, leptin, and adiponectin as well as diabetes-related complications, especially peripheral neuropathy, orthostatic hypotension, or reduced vision due to retinopathy may all be associated with an impairment in bone metabolism and with the increased risk of fractures. Finally, medications commonly used in the treatment of T2DM may have an impact on bone metabolism and on fracture risk, particularly in postmenopausal women. When considering the impact of hypoglycaemic drugs on bone, it is important to balance their potential direct effects on bone quality with the risk of falling-related fractures due to the associated hypoglycaemic risk. In this review, experimental and clinical evidence connecting bone metabolism and fracture risk to T2DM is discussed, with particular emphasis on hypoglycaemic treatments and gender-specific implications.

Science of premix insulin: where have we reached?

Diabetes is a progressive disease and by achieving and maintaining optimal glycemic control, the onset of complications can be prevented or delayed. Insulin is most effective at any stage of diabetes. Although basal-bolus therapy is the gold standard treatment, it has its own limitations such as multiple pricks, close monitoring and cost. Premixed insulin on the other hand is convenient, requires fewer injections, is a single device and delivers both the basal and bolus component till the next meal. Although premixed insulin analogs have the advantages of mealtime flexibility, compliance and better post-prandial glucose control, no significant differences have been observed in HbA1c reduction and overall hypoglycemia when compared to premixed human insulin. This review will attempt to analyze the efficacy, safety and limitations of currently available premix human insulin and premix analogs including recent advancements in the area.

Initiation of biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a largely primary care-based setting in Sweden

AIMS

Despite a wealth of clinical trial data supporting use of the premixed insulin analogue, biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), there is limited documentation of its use in primary care-based clinical practice.

METHODS

An observational study investigating the safety and efficacy of BIAsp 30 in routine clinical practice was conducted. Patients were followed up 3 and 6 months after initiating insulin treatment. Safety and efficacy measures were documented.

RESULTS

During the course of the study, 1154 patients were included (age range 20-95 years), of whom 89% completed the 6-month follow-up period. Mean HbA(1c) at baseline was 8.8% (73mmol/mol), and had improved to 7.2% (55mmol/mol) after 6 months of treatment. The rate of total hypoglycaemia at completion of the study was 4.1 events per patient year. Major hypoglycaemic events were rare (two in total).

CONCLUSIONS

BIAsp 30 was initiated safely and effectively in insulin-naïve patients with T2DM. The safety and efficacy profile observed in clinical trials was confirmed in this largely primary care-based setting in Sweden.

Unintentional therapeutic errors involving insulin in the ambulatory setting reported to poison centers

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug events in the ambulatory care setting are not uncommon and can cause significant morbidity. Little research has been published on the management of adverse drug events involving insulin in the outpatient setting.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze data on patients with unintentional therapeutic errors involving insulin managed by 9 regional poison control centers.

METHODS

A retrospective search was performed for all records involving insulin at 9 poison centers, covering the population of 4 states for the years 2000-2009. A subgroup of the study population was selected with a reason for exposure of "unintentional-therapeutic error."

RESULTS

There were 3819 insulin exposures reported, with an increase in the annual incidence of insulin exposures of 279% (from 170 to 645 patients/year) and a mean annual increase of 18%. Of the insulin exposures, 2584 were unintentional therapeutic errors (68%). The percentage of all insulin exposures that were unintentional therapeutic errors increased progressively, from 41% to 78%. There was a 495% increase in annual incidence of unintentional therapeutic errors involving insulin, with a mean annual increase of 28%. Unintentional therapeutic errors involving insulin occurred primarily in adults >40 years (73%), with 63% occurring in women. There was a pronounced increase in unintentional therapeutic errors involving insulin in the later evening hours, with 71% occurring between 1800 and 2400 and reaching a peak at 2200. The majority (n = 1803; 70%) of patients were managed in a non-health-care facility location, primarily their own residence.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of an increasing trend of insulin-related unintentional therapeutic errors in the ambulatory setting. Our study highlights a number of striking features, including: (1) a consistent and dramatic increase of unintentional therapeutic errors involving insulin over the 10-year period, (2) a high incidence of unintentional therapeutic errors involving insulin in the late evening hours, and (3) a high incidence of unintentional therapeutic errors involving insulin involving adults >40 years and females. With their 24/7 availability, poison centers appear to be an increasingly important resource for patients experiencing unintentional therapeutic errors involving insulin.

Real-life dosage and clinical efficacy of biphasic insulin preparations in patients with type 2 diabetes

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective study used data from a primary care database to compare two insulin products in routine clinical practice for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in the UK.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records were analyzed for patients with type 2 diabetes who had been initiated on biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp30) (n=632) or biphasic isophane human insulin 30 (BHI30) (n=762) and who had a glycated hemoglobin (HbA₁(c)) measurement at baseline (up to 6 months before the index date) and end of study (6-12 months after index date). Regression analyses were used to test for a statistically significant interaction between reduction in HbA₁(c) from baseline to end of study and the log-transformed average daily dose (logADD) of insulin.

RESULTS

With BIAsp30 a significantly lower dose of insulin (47.74 insulin units [IU]/day vs. 66.63 IU/day, P<0.0001) was required to obtain a similar HbA₁(c) reduction (1.71%-point vs. 1.55%-point, P=0.24). To achieve an additional reduction of 0.1 percentage points in HbA₁(c) (eg, reduction from 9% to 7.9% HbA₁(c) instead of from 9% to 8%), the dose of BIAsp30 would need to be increased by a factor of 1.15. For BHI30, a greater increase in dose would be needed to achieve the same additional HbA₁(c) reduction (dose increase by a factor of 1.74).

CONCLUSION

Clinically meaningful reductions in HbA₁(c) can be achieved at lower insulin doses with BIAsp30 treatment than with BHI30. Lower insulin doses may have important implications for medication costs.

IMPROVE™ observational study of biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

The IMPROVE™ study is the largest observational study of therapy in Type 2 diabetes mellitus to date. It is a multinational study investigating the safety and efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) in the routine management of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Five published reports on this study have provided baseline demographic information for patients receiving BIAsp 30 in eight countries, information on the safety and efficacy outcomes for those patients and analyses of three subgroups of patients who were insulin-naive, receiving basal insulin or receiving biphasic human insulin before the start of the study. These subanalyses provided information on the optimal prescribing and dosing strategies when starting treatment with BIAsp 30 in these groups of patients in normal clinical practice. The study extends the results from clinical trials of BIAsp 30 and confirms its benefits in routine care, in a large, global, heterogeneous patient population.