Ciclesonide and the treatment of asthma

Quantitative comparison of different inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma in children

BACKGROUND

The GINA recommends inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) for the treatment of steps 2-3 of childhood asthma. However, the difference in efficacy between these drugs remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of different ICS drugs in the treatment of childhood asthma.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials of ICSs in the treatment of childhood asthma. Using forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV₁) as the primary outcome, a time-course model of ICSs was constructed. In addition, the symptom-free days% were analyzed as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Six studies involving 2237 children that reported FEV₁ were included. The results showed that the ET50 of ciclesonide (CIC) and budesonide (BUD) was 1.23 and 2.97 weeks, respectively. Compared with them, FP had a higher efficacy. In terms of symptom-free days%, we found that the efficacy of beclometasone dipropionate was lower than that of CIC and fluticasone propionate.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the efficacy of three ICS drugs was quantitatively compared, providing necessary information for the implementation of medication guidelines for steps 2-3 of asthma in children.

IMPACT

This study analyzed the entire time-course of the drug efficacy of Inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma in children aged 5-12, which found that although the maximum efficacy of both ciclesonide and budesonide was the same, the onset speed of ciclesonide was faster than that of budesonide. The above information provides the necessary quantitative information for the implementation of medication guidelines for steps 2-3 asthma in children.

Relative potencies of three glucocorticoids to induce hypoplasia of the physis and concomitant biochemical alterations in the rat

Although inhaled glucocorticoids are known to have systemic effects on bone metabolism, there is little comparative information on their relative potencies. The effects of three standard glucocorticoids in causing changes in bone metabolism and growth, therefore, were investigated in relation to other systemic effects in the rat. Given to male Sprague-Dawley rats, 4.5-5.5 weeks old, subcutaneously (s.c.), at doses of 0.3-10 mg/kg daily for 7 days, beclomethasone dipropionate, prednisolone and ciclesonide all dose-dependently inhibited thymus body mass index (BMI) (by 57%, 44% and 76% at 3 mg/kg). Ciclesonide, potently and prednisolone, less effectively, also repressed femoral bone growth (by 41% and 18% at 10 mg/kg), significantly reducing body weight gain (both by 100% at 10 mg/kg), and serum concentrations of acid phosphatase (ACP) and tartarate resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP) (by >30% at 10 mg/kg); both increased serum glucose and triglycerides levels. Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was not affected. Beclomethasone dipropionate had little or no effect on these additional variables. In conclusion, ciclesonide showed pronounced bone growth inhibiting activity after s.c. administration to the rat while other two glucocorticoids showed differences in activity on bone metabolism. However, this model is sufficiently sensitive and specific for testing the effect of glucocorticoids on bone metabolism.

Comparison of the efficacy of ciclesonide with that of budesonide in mild to moderate asthma patients after step-down therapy: a randomised parallel-group study

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are widely used in asthma control. Ciclesonide (CIC) is an ICS with on-site lung activation for potent anti-inflammatory activity.

AIMS

This study aimed to compare the clinical benefit of CIC with budesonide (BUD) in step-down therapy.

METHODS

A total of 150 patients with mild-to-moderate asthma well controlled by a combination of ICS and long-acting β2-agonist were randomised to receive either CIC 320 μg (n=75) once daily or 2 inhalations of BUD 200 μg (n=75) twice daily for 12 weeks. The forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1), maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) and asthma control test (ACT) scores were measured. Ranked stratification of patients and physicians was assessed.

RESULTS

Drug adherence was significantly higher in the CIC group than in the BUD group (76.0% vs. 58.7%, P=0.03). The FEV1 and MMEF remained stable throughout the 12-week CIC treatment. In the BUD group, FEV1 significantly decreased at weeks 4 and 12. MMEF had a higher value in the CIC group than in the BUD group. Both patients and physicians ranked CIC over BUD.

CONCLUSIONS

CIC is more effective and has better drug adherence than BUD as step-down treatment when asthma is well controlled by combination therapy.