Mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler for the treatment of asthma

The efficacy of mometasone furoate for children with asthma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction

The influence of mometasone furoate for paediatric asthma remains controversial.

Aim

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate for paediatric asthma.

Material and methods

We have searched PubMed, Embase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through October 2019 for randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of mometasone furoate versus placebo for paediatric asthma. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model.

Results

Four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, as compared to placebo for paediatric asthma, mometasone furoate is associated with substantially increased predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) (mean difference (MD) = 7.53; 95% CI: 7.02–8.04; p < 0.00001), FEV₁ (MD = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.10–0.12; p < 0.00001), and morning peak expiratory flow (AM PEF) (MD = 17.70; 95% CI: 9.91–25.49; p < 0.00001), but demonstrates no obvious effect on pharyngitis (RR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.59–1.58; p = 0.89), upper respiratory tract infections (RR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.50–1.05; p = 0.09), or adverse events (RR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.84–1.31; p = 0.69).

Conclusions

Mometasone furoate may be effective and safe for paediatric asthma.

WITHDRAWN: Mometasone furoate for children with asthma: A meta-analysis

This paper was withdrawn due to concerns over repetitive publication. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

Mometasone furoate (MF) improves lung function in pediatric asthma: A double-blind, randomized controlled dose-ranging trial of MF metered-dose inhaler

OBJECTIVES

Mometasone furoate (MF), delivered via dry-powder inhaler (DPI) QD in the evening (PM), is a treatment option for pediatric patients with asthma. We evaluated MF delivered via a metered-dose inhaler (MDI), in children ages 5-11 years with persistent asthma.

METHODS

This was a 12-week double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial. Pateints were randomized to the following treatments: MF-MDI 50 mcg BID, MF-MDI 100 mcg BID, MF-MDI 200 mcg BID, MF-DPI 100 mcg QD PM, and placebo. The primary analysis assessed MF-MDI doses versus placebo, on the change in %-predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁ ) from baseline to week-12; a secondary analysis compared MF-MDI 50 mcg BID versus MF-DPI 100 mcg QD PM. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the trial.

RESULTS

For change from baseline in %-predicted FEV₁ at week 12, least-squares (LS) mean differences from placebo were 3.87 (P = 0.019), 6.29 (P < 0.001), and 5.34 (P = 0.001) percentage-points for MF-MDI 50, 100, and 200 mcg BID, respectively. The LS mean difference for MF-MDI 50 mcg BID versus MF-DPI 100 mcg QD PM was 1.39 (P = 0.368). AE incidences were similar among all treatment groups. There were no reports of oropharyngeal candidiasis or dysphonia, which were AEs pre-specified for analysis,.

CONCLUSIONS

In children ages 5-11 years with persistent asthma, all three doses of MF-MDI (50, 100, and 200 mcg BID) demonstrated significant improvement in FEV₁ after 12 weeks of treatment. MF was generally well tolerated with no new safety concerns identified in this trial. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52:310-318. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mometasone furoate nasal spray: a systematic review

The inflammatory diseases of the nose, rhino-pharynx and paranasal sinuses (allergic and non allergic rhinitis, NARES; rhinosinusitis with/without nasal polyposis, adenoidal hypertrophy with/without middle ear involvement) clinically manifest themselves with symptoms and complications severely affecting quality of life and health care expenditure.

Intranasal administration of corticosteroids, being fast, simple, and not requiring cooperation, is the preferred way to treat the patients, to optimize their quality of life, at the same time minimizing the risk of exacerbations and complications.

Among the different topical steroids available on the market, we performed a comparative analysis in terms of effectiveness and safety between mometasone furoate (MF) and its main competitors.

Searching through Pub Med and Google Scholar and using as entries “mometasone furoate”, “rhinitis”, “sinusitis”, “asthma”, “polyposis”, “otitis media with effusion”, and “adenoid hypertrophy” we found 344 articles, 300 of which met the eligibility criteria.

Taking into account relevance and date of publication, a sample of 40 articles was considered for the review.

MF effectiveness for treatment and/or prophylaxis of nasal symptoms in seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis has been fully established with a level of evidence Ia.

Even though it has not been assessed for MF in particular, topical steroids are the most appropriate treatment in mixed rhinitis and NARES.

In acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) evidences support their use as mono-therapy or as adjuvant to antibiotics for reducing the recurrence rate, and decrease the usage of related prescriptions and medical consultations.

In chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with Nasal polyposis, MF reduces polyps size, nasal congestion, improves quality of life and sense of smell and it is also effective in the treatment of daytime cough.

The topical use of MF has great efficacy in the management of adenoidal hypertrophy and otitis media of atopic children.

As regards the safety, MF has demonstrated an excellent safety profile: pregnant women can safely use it; no systemic effects on growth velocity and adrenal suppression have been shown; no changes in epithelial thickness or atrophy have been observed after long term administration of the drug.

Conclusions: MF has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of the inflammatory diseases of the nose and paranasal sinuses; when compared to its competitors it shows a greater symptom control; it is a reliable treatment in the long term thanks not only to its proven efficacy, but also to its safety being on the market since more than 17 years.

Metabolic considerations of drugs in the treatment of allergic diseases

INTRODUCTION

The clinical management of allergic diseases involves a number of drugs, most of which are extensively metabolized. This review aims to analyze the metabolism and the clinical implications of altered metabolism for these drugs.

AREAS COVERED

The authors present an overview of current knowledge of the metabolism of: antihistamine drugs, glucocorticoids, inhaled β-2 bronchodilators, anticholinergics and other drugs used in allergic diseases, such as cromoglycate, omalizumab, montelukast and epinephrine. Polymorphic drug metabolism is relevant for chlorpheniramine, loratadine and montelukast. Inhibition of drug metabolism is relevant for loratadine, methylprednisolone, fluticasone, mometasone, triamcinolone or prednisolone. Polymorphic pre-systemic metabolism may be relevant to budesonide, fluticasone, beclomethasone, mometasone or salmeterol. The authors also discuss the current information on gene variations according to the 1,000 genomes catalog and other databases. Finally, the authors review the clinical implications of these variations with a particular regard to drugs used in the management of allergic diseases.

EXPERT OPINION

Most drugs used in allergic diseases are extensively metabolized. Drug interaction or adverse reactions related to altered metabolism are relevant issues that should be considered in the management of allergic diseases. However, much additional research is required before defining pharmacogenomic biomarkers for the management of drugs used in allergic diseases.