Efficacy and safety of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma

The Application of Nitric Oxide for Ocular Hypertension Treatment

Despite of various therapeutic methods for treating ocular hypertension and glaucoma, it still remains the leading cause of irreversible blindness. Intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering is the most effective way to slow disease progression and prevent blindness. Among the ocular hypotensive drugs currently in use, only a couple act on the conventional outflow system, which is the main pathway for aqueous humor outflow and the major lesion site resulting in ocular hypertension. Nitric oxide (NO) is a commendable new class of glaucoma drugs that acts on the conventional outflow pathway. An increasing number of nitric oxide donors have been developed for glaucoma and ocular hypertension treatment. Here, we will review how NO lowers IOP and the types of nitric oxide donors that have been developed. And a brief analysis of the advantages and challenges associated with the application will be made. The literature used in this review is based on Pubmed database search using ‘nitric oxide’ and ‘glaucoma’ as key words.

Topical preservative-free ophthalmic treatments: an unmet clinical need

Introduction: The main role of preservatives in eyedrops is to ensure sterility and microbiological integrity of the drug, and to facilitate the penetration of active compounds into the eye. However, several studies documented significant toxic effects induced by preservatives, especially on the ocular surface. Consequently, most of the ophthalmic medications became progressively available in preservative-free (PF) formulations.Areas covered: We analyzed pre-clinical and clinical studies on PF eyedrops with particular attention to common chronic diseases such as dry eye and glaucoma. We discussed about the pros and cons of using PF eyedrops, in terms of efficacy, safety, and social-economic aspects.Expert opinion: There are still unresolved issues that make hard for PF medications to definitively conquer the drug market. Despite robust pre-clinical evidences of less toxicity, the low number of randomized clinical trials does not permit to state that PF eyedrops have, in clinical practice, a similar efficacy or a higher safety compared to preserved forms. These aspects limit their use to chronic diseases requiring long-term therapies with multiple daily instillations, especially in the presence of concomitant ophthalmic diseases that expose to a risk of ocular surface worsening.

Current and new pharmacotherapeutic approaches for glaucoma

INTRODUCTION

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Medical therapy is the main line of treatment of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension. Despite the expansion of the glaucoma lineup with the newly approved medication classes, many barriers and issues still exist with topical therapy. Novel non-topical drug delivery may address such issues, adding more options to glaucoma pharmacotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review outlines current topical therapies for glaucoma, in addition to new medications under trials. The issues with topical therapy, in general, are discussed, as well as the new non-topical drug delivery systems. The authors performed a comprehensive search for published studies on glaucoma medical therapy using the electronic database of PubMed and manual search for each medication and non-topical delivery options. The extra- and intraocular delivery methods and the new topical glaucoma medications under research are covered.

EXPERT OPINION

Medical management of glaucoma represents a challenge for both patients and clinicians. Noncompliance (e.g. difficulty with administering the eye drops), cost, side effects, and intraocular pressure fluctuation are the major problems with topical therapy. To overcome such barriers, research should continue in developing new medications and innovation of non-topical drug delivery systems.

Preservative-Free Prostaglandin Analogs and Prostaglandin/Timolol Fixed Combinations in the Treatment of Glaucoma: Efficacy, Safety and Potential Advantages

Glaucoma therapy-related ocular surface disease (OSD) is a serious pathology with a broad spectrum of insidious clinical presentations and complex pathogenesis that undermines long-term glaucoma care. Preservatives, especially benzalkonium chloride (BAK), contained in topical intraocular pressure-lowering medications frequently cause or aggravate OSD in glaucoma. Management of these patients is challenging, and to date often empirical due to the scarcity of controlled long-term clinical trials. Most of the available data are extracted from case series and retrospective analysis. Preservative-free prostaglandins and prostaglandin/timolol fixed combinations are novel options developed to remove the harmful impact of preservatives, especially BAK, upon ocular tissues. Based on what is currently known on the value of preservative-free antiglaucoma therapies it is tempting to speculate how these new therapies may affect the future medical management of all glaucoma patients. This article provides a comprehensive and critical review of the current literature on preservative-free prostaglandins and preservative-free prostaglandin/timolol fixed combinations.

Enhancement and inhibition effects on the corneal permeability of timolol maleate: Polymers, cyclodextrins and chelating agents

This study investigates how both bioadhesive polymers (chitosan, hyaluronic acid and alginate) and permeability enhancers (ethylene glycol- bis(2-aminoethylether)- N, N, N', N'- tetraacetic acid (EGTA) and hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin) influence the permeability of the anti-glaucoma drug timolol maleate through ex vivo bovine corneas. Our results showed that only the permeability enhancers alone were able to increase drug permeability, whereas the polymers significantly reduced drug permeation, and however, they increased the pre-corneal residence of timolol. Ternary systems (polymer-enhancer-drug) showed a reduced drug permeability compared to the polymers alone. Fluorescence microscopy analysis of the epithelium surface confirmed there was no evidence of epithelial disruption caused by these formulations, suggesting that polymer-enhancer interactions reduce drug solubilization and counteract the disruptive effect of the permeability enhancers on the surface of the cornea. Further mucoadhesive tests, revealed a stable interaction of chitosan and hyaluronic acid with the epithelium, while alginate showed poor mucoadhesive properties. The differences in mucoadhesion correlated with the permeability of timolol maleate observed, i.e. formulations containing mucoadhesive polymers showed lower drug permeabilities. The results of the present study indicate polymers acting as an additional barrier towards drug permeability which is even more evident in the presence of permeability enhancers like EGTA and hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin. Then, this study highlights the need to adequately select additives intended for ocular applications since interactions between them can have opposite results to what expected in terms of drug permeability.

Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of the Preservative-free Fixed Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% and Timolol 0.5% in Healthy Volunteers: A Phase I Comparison vs. the Corresponding Preservative-free Monotherapies

PURPOSE

Plasma concentrations of tafluprost acid and timolol were compared after single (Day 1) and repeated (Day 8) instillations of once-daily tafluprost 0.0015%-timolol 0.5% preservative-free (PF) fixed-dose combination (FDC), once-daily PF tafluprost 0.0015%, and twice-daily PF timolol 0.5%.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen healthy volunteers were randomized to this double-masked, single-center, three-period cross-over study. A wash-out interval of at least 4 weeks separated each three 8-day dosing period. Blood samples were drawn on the first and last day of each dosing period, prior to the morning dose, as well as 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 min, and 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h post-dosing. Sample plasma concentrations of tafluprost acid and/or timolol were determined and maximum concentration (C max), area under the concentration-over-time curve from time zero to the last time point with a quantifiable measurement (AUC0-last), and time to maximum concentration were calculated. Intraocular pressure (IOP), adverse events, and ocular/systemic safety variables were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Plasma concentrations of tafluprost acid were low, with similar levels measured subsequent to either single or repeated dosing of PF FDC and PF tafluprost. On both sampling days, concentrations peaked at 10 min after the dose, and were cleared from the blood circulation by 30 min; average C max ranged from 17 to 24 pg/mL, and AUC0-last from 3 to 5 pg*h/mL. Plasma concentrations of timolol were comparable after the first dose of PF FDC or PF timolol. Concentrations peaked at 15 min post-dose and diminished in a similar manner after 2 h; average C max was 800 pg/mL and AUC0-last 3900 pg*h/mL. As expected, PF timolol produced a higher Day 8 pre-dose timolol concentration than PF FDC (235 vs. 37 pg/mL; p < 0.001, respectively). The Day 8 post-dose changes in timolol concentrations were relative to this pre-dose difference. All study treatments were well tolerated and safe. PF FDC seemed to provide the best IOP reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

PF FDC demonstrated good IOP-lowering efficacy and displayed similar pharmacokinetic characteristics to the monotherapy agents. Exposure to timolol was reduced via the halved dosing.

Pediatric Glaucoma: Pharmacotherapeutic Options

Childhood glaucoma is a major therapeutic challenge for pediatric ophthalmologists and glaucoma specialists worldwide. Management depends on the etiology and age at presentation. A variety of drugs are available for the control of intraocular pressure in children; however, none of these drugs have been licensed by the regulatory agencies for use in children. Furthermore, evidence gained from randomized controlled trials in the pediatric population is sparse, and little is known regarding the use of newer anti-glaucoma preparations. This evidence-based review aims to discuss the available pharmacotherapeutic options for glaucoma in children. Topical adrenoceptor blockers, topical and systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, prostaglandin (PG) analogs, adrenoceptor agonists, parasympathomimetics, and combined preparations are available for use in children, but usually as an off-label indication. Therefore, it is important to recognize that serious side effects have been reported, even with topical drops, and measures to reduce systemic absorption should be taken. Most drugs have been shown to have comparable ocular hypotensive effects, with the lowest occurrence of systemic side effects with PG analogs. Whereas a newly introduced prostaglandin analog, tafluprost, and some other preservative-free preparations have shown promising results in adult glaucoma patients, no pediatric reports are available as yet. Future studies may describe their role in treating pediatric glaucoma. This review also shares some suggested treatment pathways for primary congenital glaucoma (PCG), juvenile open angle glaucoma (JOAG), developmental glaucoma, aphakic/pseudophakic glaucoma, and uveitic glaucoma.

New drugs and preparations for open-angle glaucoma in adults

Primary (or chronic) open-angle glaucoma (POAG or COAG) may be asymptomatic but causes progressive optic nerve damage with significant loss of visual field. Treatments aim to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) by reducing the production of aqueous humour and/or increasing its drainage. Here we update our previous articles to reflect new drugs, preservative-free preparations and fixed-dose drug combinations for POAG.