Advances in pharmacotherapy for secondary hyperparathyroidism

Serum nuclear factor IB as a novel and noninvasive indicator in the diagnosis of secondary hyperparathyroidism

BACKGROUND

Chronic renal failure (CRF) referred to chronic progressive renal parenchymal damage caused by various causes, with metabolite retention and imbalance of water, electrolyte, and acid-base balance as the main clinical manifestations. Secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) was a common complication in maintenance hemodialysis patients with CRF. Nuclear factor IB (NFIB) was a newly found tumor suppressor gene in various cancers. The present study aimed to illustrate the role of NFIB in sHPT clinical diagnosis and treatment response.

METHODS

A retrospective, case-control study, including 189 patients with sHPT and 106 CRF patients without sHPT, compared with 95 controls. Serum NFIB and 1,25(OH)₂ D₃ levels were measured by RT-qPCR and ELISAs, respectively. ROC analysis was conducted to verify the diagnostic value of NFIB in sHPT. Spearman's correlation analysis was conducted to verify the association between NFIB and bone mineral density (BMD) scores. After 6 months of treatment, the variance of NFIB and 1,25(OH)₂ D₃ in different groups was recorded.

RESULTS

The expression of NFIB was significantly lower in serum samples from sHPT and non-sHPT CRF patients, compared to controls. Clinicopathological information verified sHPT was associated with NFIB, parathyroid hormone (PTH), serum calcium, serum phosphorus, time of dialysis, and serum 1,25(OH)₂ D₃ levels. Spearman's correlation analysis illustrated the positive correlation between NFIB levels and BMD scores. At receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the cutoff of 1.6508 for NFIB was able to identify patients with sHPT from healthy controls; meanwhile, NFIB could also discriminate sHPT among CRF patients as well (cutoff = 1.4741). Furthermore, we found that during 6 months of treatment, NFIB levels were gradually increased, while PTH and serum P levels were decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum NFIB was a highly accurate tool to identify sHPT from healthy controls and CRF patients. Due to its simplicity, specificity, and sensitivity, this candidate can be proposed as a first-line examination in the diagnostic workup in sHPT.

Efficacy and safety of microwave ablation treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism: systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose: The present systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT).Materials and methods: The study authors systematically searched the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and Ovid databases for studies published in English prior to 7October 2019. All studies included in the meta-analysis measured levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium and phosphorus, and included data related to complications following MWA treatment for SHPT.Results: The meta-analysis ultimately included 233 patients from two retrospective cohort studies and six retrospective self-control studies. Compared to PTH level measurements obtained after MWA, measurements obtained at one day (weighted mean differences (WMD): 890.314, 95% confidence interval (CI): 767.121-1013.506, p < 0.01) , one week (WMD: 860.298, 95% CI: 759.401-961.194, p < 0.01), one month (WMD: 800.846, 95% CI: 687.709-913.983, p < 0.01) and six months (WMD: 860.847, 95% CI: 745.214-976.480, p < 0.01) after MWA were significantly lower. Calcium and phosphorus levels at one day and one week after MWA were also significantly lower than those measured before MWA. After MWA, the incidence of nerve injury was 1.2% (3/233; effect size (ES): 0.022, 95% CI: -0.003-0.048, p < 0.01). After MWA, the incidence of hypocalcemia was 15.8% (37/233; ES: 0.449, 95% CI: 0.341-0.556, p < 0.01).Conclusion: The preliminary results of this meta-analysis indicate that MWA may be effective and safe in treating patients with SHPT, and that future prospective research and randomized controlled trials (RCT) are necessary.

FGF23, Biomarker or Target?

Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) plays a key role in the complex network between the bones and other organs. Initially, it was thought that FGF23 exclusively regulated phosphate and vitamin D metabolism; however, recent research has demonstrated that an excess of FGF23 has other effects that may be detrimental in some cases. The understanding of the signaling pathways through which FGF23 acts in different organs is crucial to develop strategies aiming to prevent the negative effects associated with high FGF23 levels. FGF23 has been described to have effects on the heart, promoting left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH); the liver, leading to production of inflammatory cytokines; the bones, inhibiting mineralization; and the bone marrow, by reducing the production of erythropoietin (EPO). The identification of FGF23 receptors will play a remarkable role in future research since its selective blockade might reduce the adverse effects of FGF23. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have very high levels of FGF23 and may be the population suffering from the most adverse FGF23-related effects. The general population, as well as kidney transplant recipients, may also be affected by high FGF23. Whether the association between FGF23 and clinical events is causal or casual remains controversial. The hypothesis that FGF23 could be considered a therapeutic target is gaining relevance and may become a promising field of investigation in the future.

Pharmacologic Renal Therapy

This article discusses some of the recommended pharmacologic treatments for patients with renal drug toxicity, acute kidney injury (AKI), and chronic kidney injury (CKI). The treatment of AKI often consists of treating patients in emergency departments. Renal pharmacologic management in an acute care setting consists of identifying the cause of AKI, reviewing serum creatinine levels, administration of crystalloids, and the elimination of nephrotoxic agents.