Comparison of the antidiabetic effects of linagliptin among groups with a normal renal function and a mild or severe renal impairment - retrospective observation study of Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Safety and Efficiency of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Inhibitors in Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

To investigate the safety and efficiency of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in patients with diabetic kidney disease.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases, including Embase, PubMed, CNKI, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception to January 2024. The search focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compared DPP-4 inhibitors with placebos or other glucose-lowering therapies. A meta-analysis was performed to pool data and quantify the therapeutic effects and safety profile of DPP-4 inhibitors in DKD.

Results

Twenty-three RCTs with 16,378 participants were included. DPP-4 inhibitors significantly reduced urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and HbA1c levels compared to controls (UACR: SMD -0.23, 95% CI: -0.41, -0.06; p = 0.01; HbA1c: SMD -0.32, 95% CI: -0.51, -0.14; p = 0.0006). A higher proportion of patients in the DPP-4 inhibitor group achieved at least a 30% reduction in UACR (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.10, 2.73; p = 0.02). However, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine (SCr) changes were similar between groups (eGFR: p = 1.00; SCr: p = 0.67). No significant differences were found in all-cause mortality (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83, 1.06; p = 0.31) or hypoglycemia risk (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.52; p = 0.54) between the DPP-4 inhibitor and control groups.

Conclusions

DPP-4 inhibitors exhibit renoprotective properties, indicated by significant reductions in UACR and HbA1c levels. They do not appear to increase the risk of hypoglycemia, presenting a favorable safety profile when compared to placebo or alternative antidiabetic agents.

The effect of linagliptin on microalbuminuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy: a randomized, double blinded clinical trial

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of linagliptin on microalbuminuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). The present double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed on 92 patients with DN who were divided into two groups. The intervention and control groups received linagliptin 5 mg and placebo for 24 weeks, respectively. Blood pressure, lipid profile, liver enzymes, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) were assessed and recorded before, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the beginning of the intervention. The mean value of UACR decrease was significant over time in both groups, with higher decrease in linagliptin group, however, the differences between two groups were not, statistically significant (P > 0.05). However, the percentage of improvement in microalbuminuria (UACR < 30 mg/g) in the linagliptin group was significantly higher than that of the control group during 24 weeks of intervention (68.3% vs. 25%; P-value < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean value of the UACR and other parameters between linagliptin treated and placebo treated patients with diabetic nephropathy. Further studies, with longer periods of follow-up are suggested to examine these patients' renal outcomes.

Different renoprotective effects of luseogliflozin depend on the renal function at the baseline in patients with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective study during 12 months before and after initiation

Aims

The safety and efficacy, particularly, the factors associated with the renal prognosis, were assessed over 12 months after the initiation of luseogliflozin therapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes and renal impairment.

Methods

In total, 238 patients treated with luseogliflozin (2.5 mg, once daily) were studied as the safety analysis set. Two hundred and two subjects whose medication was continued over 12 months were investigated as the full analysis set. The subjects were divided into 3 groups based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): high eGFR (n = 49), normal eGFR (n = 116) and low eGFR (n = 37) groups.

Results

The body weight, systolic blood pressure, HbA1c and urinary protein excretion gradually decreased from baseline in all eGFR groups. While the eGFR was significantly reduced from baseline in the high and normal eGFR groups, the eGFR did not significantly differ over time in the low eGFR group. There was no marked difference in the frequency of adverse events that were specific for SGLT2 inhibitors among the 3 groups in the safety analysis set.

Conclusions

Luseogliflozin can preserve the renal function in the medium term in patients with type 2 diabetes and renal impairment without an increase in specific adverse events.

Changes in medication adherence and unused drugs after switching from daily dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors to once-weekly trelagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes

AIMS

The changes in patients' satisfaction with the treatment, medication adherence and unused drugs before and after switching from daily DPP-4 inhibitors to once-weekly trelagliptin administration were prospectively investigated in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

After excluding 46 patients who declined to switch from daily DPP-4 inhibitors, 79 subjects were included in the present study. The clinical parameters and results of questionnaire surveys regarding satisfaction with treatment as well as impressions of the amount of medicine/number of doses, medication adherence, and unused drug were examined at the baseline and 3 months after switching from daily DPP-4 inhibitors to trelagliptin in 75 patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESULTS

Although the value of HbA1c did not change (7.0% ± 0.5% to 7.0% ± 0.6%), the scores representing satisfaction with the treatment (25.2 ± 6.4 to 26.4 ± 6.0), impression of the amount of medicine (-0.3 ± 1.0 to 0.3 ± 1.0) and number of doses (0.3 ± 1.0 to 0.8 ± 0.6), and medication adherence (0.8 ± 0.4 to 0.9 ± 0.3) as assessed by the questionnaire surveys were significantly improved after switching from DPP-4 inhibitors. The self-reported amount of unused drugs was significantly reduced after switching.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from daily DPP-4 inhibitors to once-weekly trelagliptin improved the satisfaction with the treatment, impression of the prescribed medicine and medication adherence in the type 2 diabetic patients who expresses a desire to reduce their prescription medicines. In such patients, improvements in the glycemic control and long-term prognosis might be expected through the reduction of unused drugs.

Comparison of the changes in the factors associated with the renal prognosis of non-elderly and elderly subjects treated with empagliflozin- a retrospective observation study in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes

PURPOSE

The factors associated with the renal prognosis over six months after the initiation of empagliflozin were compared between the non-elderly and elderly Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 132 patients treated with empagliflozin (10 mg, once daily) were studied as the safety analysis set. One hundred ten subjects whose medications were not changed during the observation period were investigated as the full analysis set to assess the effectiveness. The subjects were divided into two groups: non-elderly subjects (n=72) of<65 years of age and elderly subjects (n=38) of≥65 years of age.

RESULTS

Although the body weight and HbA1c, AST, ALT and γ-GTP levels were significantly reduced in both the non-elderly and elderly subjects, blood pressure, eGFR and urinary protein excretion were only significantly decreased in the non-elderly subjects. The hemoglobin, hematocrit and serum HDL-cholesterol levels were significantly elevated in both groups. The change in eGFR showed a significant positive association with the change in blood pressure. The change in urinary protein excretion tended to be correlated with the change in blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

Although renoprotective effects might be limited, empagliflozin can safely and effectively improve metabolic parameters, even in elderly subjects.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of linagliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, with consideration of Asian patient populations

Our aims were to summarize the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the dipeptidyl‐peptidase‐4 inhibitor, linagliptin, and to consider how these characteristics influence its clinical utility. Differences between linagliptin and other dipeptidyl‐peptidase‐4 inhibitors were also considered, in addition to the influence of Asian race on the pharmacology of linagliptin. Linagliptin has a xanthine‐based structure, a difference that might account for some of the pharmacological differences observed with linagliptin versus other dipeptidyl‐peptidase‐4 inhibitors. The long terminal half‐life of linagliptin results from its strong binding to dipeptidyl‐peptidase‐4. Despite this, linagliptin shows a short accumulation half‐life, as a result of saturable, high‐affinity binding to dipeptidyl‐peptidase‐4. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of linagliptin make it suitable for once‐daily dosing in a broad range of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Unlike most other dipeptidyl‐peptidase‐4 inhibitors, linagliptin has a largely non‐renal excretion route, and dose adjustment is not required in patients with renal impairment. Furthermore, linagliptin exposure is not substantially altered in patients with hepatic impairment, and dose adjustment is not necessary for these patients. The 5‐mg dose is also suitable for patients of Asian ethnicity. Linagliptin shows unique pharmacological features within the dipeptidyl‐peptidase‐4 inhibitor class. Although most clinical trials of linagliptin have involved largely Caucasian populations, data on the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of linagliptin show that these features are not substantially altered in Asian populations. The 5‐mg dose of linagliptin is suitable for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus irrespective of their ethnicity or the presence of renal or hepatic impairment.

The clinical application of linagliptin in Asians

Asia has a growing diabetic population. Linagliptin, a member of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor class, is unique in its nonlinear pharmacokinetics with the characteristics of rapid attainment of steady state, little accumulation, predominantly nonrenal route of elimination, prolonged terminal half-life, and sustained inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme. No clinically relevant difference in pharmacokinetics was observed between Asians and non-Asians. The management of type 2 diabetes is increasingly challenging with the progression of disease, especially with the requirements of minimal hypoglycemia, weight gain, fluid retention, and other adverse effects. Linagliptin was efficacious and well-tolerated in Asian type 2 diabetes patients with or without renal or hepatic dysfunctions, comparable to that in Caucasians. This review will focus on the usage of linagliptin in clinical studies in Asians.

Anagliptin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability

Anagliptin is a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor that has been available in Japan since 2012. Because anagliptin is not generally used in countries other than Japan, there are only a small number of reports investigating the effects of anagliptin. In the present article, we review the safety and efficacy of anagliptin according to data obtained from preclinical trials and postmarketing studies. The usual dose of anagliptin is 200 mg daily, and increases in the dose up to 400 mg daily have been approved in cases in which the blood glucose-lowering effect is insufficient. In a Phase II trial, the reduction in the HbA1c values from baseline after 12 weeks monotherapy with 200 mg and 400 mg of daily anagliptin was 0.75%±0.50% and 0.82%±0.46%, respectively, and more than 40% of the subjects receiving anagliptin at a dose of 200 mg or 400 mg daily achieved an HbA1c level below 6.9%. Furthermore, the levels of HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, and postprandial blood glucose were significantly decreased at 52 weeks compared with the baseline values in a Phase III trial investigating the effects of anagliptin included in combination therapy with other oral antidiabetic agents. In a pooled analysis of Phase II and Phase II/III trials, the goal achievement rates for an HbA1c level below 7.0% at 12 weeks were 40.3%, 39.4%, 30.0%, and 34.8% in the patients treated with anagliptin combined with α-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, and biguanides, respectively. Meanwhile, the serum lipid concentrations significantly improved after the administration of anagliptin in a pooled analysis of Phase III trials, and no serious adverse effects have been reported in preclinical trials. Therefore, the use of anagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes is considered to be safe and effective for both monotherapy and combination therapy.