Levetiracetam: treatment in epilepsy

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children with epilepsy: protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy causes serious suffering in children and is associated with high morbidity and increased mortality. It impairs children's quality of life and places a heavy burden on healthcare resources. Levetiracetam has been used to prevent and treat paediatric epilepsy for years. To date, a number of systematic reviews have been performed to assess the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in a variety of clinical settings. Conflicting outcomes have been reported for the same clinical issues. Our objective is to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature for clinicians and policymakers via an umbrella review that assesses the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children with epilepsy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute's guidelines for umbrella reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The following seven databases will be searched from 1990 to February 2019: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, JBISRIR, EPPI, Epistemonikos and PROSPERO. We will provide evidence from existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials regarding the use of levetiracetam in children with epilepsy. The intervention of interest is levetiracetam monotherapy and add-on therapies for prevention or treatment purposes. Studies will be individually selected and assessed by two reviewers. The primary outcomes of interest are epilepsy control, the efficacy of prophylaxis for provoked seizures and the mortality rate of children with epilepsy who received levetiracetam treatment. The secondary outcomes are adverse events and withdrawal rates due to adverse effects. The methodological quality of all reviews will be individually assessed by two reviewers using the 'A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews' instrument. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment will be applied to evaluate the quality of evidence for each outcome of interest. A narrative description of an analysis of the systematic reviews will be tabulated to address objective and specific questions. Information from each review will be detailed in a table including the population, number of studies, total number of participants, year range of the trials, study designs of the primary trials, countries and settings of the trials, heterogeneity of results and assessment tools. Recommendations regarding each outcome of levetiracetam will be categorised based on a protocol.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This umbrella review will inform clinical and policy decisions regarding the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam for preventing and treating paediatric epilepsy. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. Ethical approval is not required for this study.

Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus Due to Ifosfamide

Objective:

To report 2 cases of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) following infusion of ifosfamide.

Case Summaries:

Two patients who received ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy developed NCSE. One woman received ifosfamide 1000 mg/m2 (1 h infusion on days 1–5); confusion, lethargy, and speech deterioration developed on day 3. The second patient developed similar symptoms on day 3 of treatment with 2500 mg/m2. Both patients responded to intravenous administration of diazepam 10 mg and were given levetiracetam as maintenance therapy.

Discussion:

The severity and presentation of central nervous system toxicity due to ifosfamide varies greatly and involves a spectrum ranging from subclinical electroencephalogram changes to coma. NCSE, an epileptic disorder in which typical convulsive activity is absent, has previously been reported in only 4 patients receiving ifosfamide. Levetiracetam may be used for maintenance antiepileptic therapy after diazepam administration.

Conclusions:

Among the many presentations of ifosfamide neurotoxicity, clinicians should consider NCSE as a possible explanation for changes in consciousness in a patient receiving this agent. An objective causality assessment by use of the Naranjo probability scale revealed that NCSE due to ifosfamide was probable.

An observational trial to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam in trigeminal neuralgia

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam in medical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.

BACKGROUND

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are considered as first-line treatment for trigeminal neuralgia, although their use is often limited due to incomplete efficacy and tolerability. Newer AEDs with improved safety profile may be useful in this disorder.

METHODS

Patients suffering from trigeminal neuralgia (either primary or secondary) refractory to previous treatments were recruited to be treated with levetiracetam (3-4 g/day) for 16 weeks as add-on therapy, after a 2-week baseline period. Rescue medication was allowed in both the baseline and treatment phases. The primary efficacy measure was the number of attacks per day. The patients' efficacy evaluation, the patients' global evaluation for both safety and efficacy, changes in the Hamilton Depression Scale, the Hamilton Anxiety Scale, and the Quality of Life Measure Short Form-36 were secondary parameters.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were included in the analysis. After treatment and compared to the baseline phase, the number of daily attacks decreased by 62.4%. All secondary parameters changed significantly with the exception of the Quality of Life Measure Short Form-36 score. Seven patients withdrew from the study. Five patients (21.7%) reported side effects and 2 withdrew.

CONCLUSIONS

Levetiracetam may be effective and safe in trigeminal neuralgia treatment. Confirmation in a randomized controlled study is needed.

An update in the treatment of neurologic disorders during pregnancy--focus on migraines and seizures

When drug therapy is necessary and cannot be avoided during a pregnancy, the decision of what drug therapy is best may be difficult for the health care provider because the vast majority of drugs are classified as Pregnancy Category C. This classification indicates that information regarding the risk to the fetus is unknown. For ethical reasons, pregnant women are not included in drug studies, so most decisions regarding the safety of a particular drug are based on animal studies, available cases reports, or are theoretical and are based on pharmacokinetic properties. Fortunately, with the development of Pregnancy Registries, more information has been collected, analyzed, and is available regarding the safety of drugs during pregnancy. These registries have expanded in recent years allowing better determination of fetal safety for triptans and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The information assists health care providers in selecting optimal therapy for women seeking pregnancy or those already pregnant. This review presents the most recent information for the treatment and prophylaxis of migraines and seizures during pregnancy.

Haematological side effects of antiepileptic drug treatment in patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

Little is known about the haematological side effects of the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), but recent case reports have raised concerns regarding the possibility of altered thrombocyte counts or function in some patients during levetiracetam (LEV) treatment. The aim of our study was to investigate haematological changes in patients treated with the newer AEDs, LEV and lamotrigine (LTG), compared with the older AEDs, valproate (VPA) and carbamazepine (CBZ).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 251 patients with epilepsy of both genders, aged 18-45 years, using AED monotherapy: 52 patients on LEV (31 men, 21 women), 80 on LTG (37 men, 43 women), 90 on CBZ (61 men, 29 women), 29 on VPA (15 men, 14 women), and 79 healthy controls (36 men, 43 women). Haemoglobin (Hb), white blood cells (WBC) and platelet (thrombocyte) counts were estimated. The subjects were recruited from hospitals in south-eastern Norway and Innsbruck, Austria.

RESULTS

Significantly lower platelet counts were recorded in both men and women on LEV monotherapy. In the LEV group, platelets were 14% lower (40.68 × 10(9) /l lower) than in the control group. There was no difference according to sex or age of the patients. Only minor changes in haematological parameters were observed for the other drugs investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

Both men and women treated with LEV monotherapy have lower blood platelet counts than healthy controls, with no difference in Hb or WBC. Haematological changes observed with the other AEDs were minor.

Antiepileptic drugs, sex hormones, and PCOS

Reproductive endocrine dysfunction in women with epilepsy is an important issue, and in recent years there is growing evidence to support the effect on sex hormones of both epilepsy per se and various antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Focal epileptic discharges from the temporal lobe may have a direct influence on the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, thereby altering the release of sex steroid hormones. The role of laterality and severity of epilepsy is still conflicting. The use of the liver enzyme-inducing AEDs--such as phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine--can increase serum sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations, leading to diminished bioactivity of testosterone (T) and estradiol. Valproic acid, an enzyme inhibitor, has been associated with the occurrence of reproductive endocrine disorders characterized by high serum T, free androgen index, androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations, and with polycystic changes in ovaries and menstrual disorders. A better understanding of the effects of AEDs on sex hormones is key to selecting the appropriate AEDs and is crucial for reproductive health in female patients.

Cardiovascular risk factors in epilepsy patients taking levetiracetam, carbamazepine or lamotrigine

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to investigate risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients with epilepsy using the new antiepileptic drug levetiracetam (LEV), compared with patients taking carbamazepine (CBZ) or lamotrigine (LTG).

METHODS

Two hundred and twelve patients and 80 controls (age: 18-45 years) of both genders were included. The patients had been treated with either LEV (n = 52), CBZ (n = 87) or LTG (n = 73) monotherapy for at least 6 months. Total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were measured. Smoking, drinking habits and physical activity were recorded and body mass index (BMI) was calculated.

RESULTS

Neither LEV nor LTG altered TC, LDL or HDL. Both men and women using CBZ had higher TC, HDL and LDL than controls. LDL/HDL and TC/HDL ratios were unchanged. Women on CBZ and LTG had a greater BMI when compared with the control group. Patients with epilepsy recorded less physical activity and lower alcohol use than the controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither LEV nor LTG affected blood lipid levels, while patients treated with CBZ have higher cholesterol, HDL and LDL than controls. The patients were less physically active, and women on CBZ and LTG had higher BMI.

Differential effects of levetiracetam, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine on reproductive endocrine function in adults

Animal studies have shown endocrine changes after levetiracetam treatment. The present study investigated reproductive and sexual function in patients with epilepsy (aged 18-45) treated with levetiracetam (LEV: 30 men/26 women), carbamazepine (CBZ: 63 men/30 women), or lamotrigine (LTG: 37 men/40 women) monotherapy and in healthy controls (36 men/44 women). In women, no endocrine changes were observed during LEV treatment, whereas steroid hormone-binding globulin levels were greater and progesterone levels lower in women using CBZ. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels were higher and androstenedione levels lower in LTG-treated women. Arizona Sexual Experience Scale scores, which were significantly lower in females using LTG or LEV, suggesting they have better sexual function than CBZ users and controls. In men, no drug-specific hormonal pattern was observed after LEV treatment. Male patients in all treatment groups had lower androstenedione and free testosterone. Those using CBZ had lower free androgen indices and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels, and higher steroid hormone-binding globulin, follicle-stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone levels. Arizona Sexual Experience Scale scores for men were similar in all groups. In conclusion, LEV treatment apparently has no drug-specific sexual or endocrine side effects in men or women in this age group.

Implications of antiinflammatory properties of the anticonvulsant drug levetiracetam in astrocytes

There is accumulating evidence that epileptic activity is accompanied by inflammatory processes. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of levetiracetam (Keppra), an anticonvulsant drug with decisive antiepileptic features, with regard to its putative antiinflammatory potential. We previously established an in vitro cell culture model to mimic inflammatory conditions: Primary astrocytic cultures of newborn rats were cocultured with 30% (M30) microglial cells. Alternatively, cocultures containing 5% microglia (M5) were incubated with the proinflammatory mediator, the cytokine interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a potent bacterial activator of the immune system. For the M30 cocultures, we observed reduced expression of connexin 43 (Cx43), the predominant gap junction protein. Impaired functional dye coupling and depolarized membrane resting potential (MRP) were monitored in M30 cocultures as well as in M5 cocultures treated with IL-1beta and LPS. We could show that the Cx43 expression, the coupling property, and the membrane resting potential on which we focused our inflammatory coculture model were normalized to noninflammatory level under treatment with levetiracetam (Keppra). Cumulatively, our results provide evidence for antiinflammatory properties of levetiracetam in seizure treatment.

Long-term levetiracetam treatment affects reproductive endocrine function in female Wistar rats

PURPOSE

Several antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) induce changes in endocrine function in women with epilepsy. Levetiracetam (LEV) is one of the newer AEDs, and to date no endocrine side-effects have been reported in humans. However, a recent study on ovarian follicular cells from prepubertal pigs showed that LEV affected basal steroid hormone secretion. The aim of the present study was to investigate possible effects of the drug on endocrine function and ovarian morphology in non-epileptic rats.

METHODS

Thirty female Wistar rats were fed per-orally with either 50mg/kg LEV (n=15) or 150 mg/kg LEV (n=15) twice daily for 90-95 days. Twenty rats received a control solution. The rats were killed in the dioestrus phase of the oestrous cycle. Serum concentrations of testosterone, 17beta-oestradiol, progesterone, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and LEV were measured, and the ovaries examined histologically.

RESULTS

Mean ovarian weight showed a significant, dose-dependent increase after LEV treatment. Mean numbers of ovarian follicular cysts were not changed, but the numbers of corpora lutea and secondary follicles were significantly higher in the treated animals. Serum testosterone was significantly increased in treated animals (0.50 nmol/l versus 0.16 nmol/l in controls, p<0.05), while oestradiol was reduced (67.4 compared to 257.5 pmol/l in controls, p<0.05). The low-dose group had significantly lower serum progesterone concentrations than the control group (56.8 nmol/l versus 34.7 nmol/l, respectively, p<0.05). FSH was reduced in the treated animals (3.3 ng/ml versus 5.5 ng/ml, p<0.05) while LH was unaffected.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate a possible effect of LEV on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis and ovarian morphology in non-epileptic rats. The effects differ from those previously described for other AEDs. Caution must be taken before these results can be applied to humans.

The role of hippocampal sclerosis in antiepileptic drug-related depression in patients with epilepsy: A study on levetiracetam

OBJECTIVE

Hippocampal sclerosis (HS) has been described as a relevant factor for the development of topiramate-related depression and cognitive deficits. The aim of our study was to clarify whether patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and HS were also at risk during therapy with levetiracetam (LEV).

METHODS

Data of 156 patients was analysed: 78 with TLE and HS and 78 with TLE and normal MRI matched for age, starting dose and titration schedule of LEV. Patients were selected from a population of consecutive patients started on LEV between 2000 and 2002.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in prevalence of cognitive adverse events and depression between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LEV treatment is not associated with cognitive adverse events and depression in patients with hippocampal sclerosis.

Comparison of Reproductive Effects of Levetiracetam and Valproate Studied in Prepubertal Porcine Ovarian Follicular Cells

PURPOSE

Long-term valproate (VPA) treatment has been associated with reproductive endocrine disorders characterized by hyperandrogenism and polycystic changes in the ovaries in women with epilepsy. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a promising, new antiepileptic drug that may represent an alternative to VPA for many patients. Here the effect of LEV and VPA on basal and gonadotropin-stimulated steroid secretion from prepubertal porcine ovarian follicular cells was compared and the conversion of testosterone to estradiol is measured.

METHODS

Ovarian follicles were obtained from prepubertal pigs. Follicular theca and granulosa cells were cocultured and different concentrations of LEV or VPA added to the control or gonadotropin-stimulated cultures.

RESULTS

VPA, but not LEV, caused a significant increase of LH-stimulated testosterone secretion and decreased FSH-stimulated estradiol secretion. VPA decreased conversion of testosterone to estradiol in both basal and FSH-stimulated cultures, while LEV only decreased testosterone to estradiol conversion after FSH stimulation and only at the highest, nontherapeutic drug concentration. Both drugs increased basal testosterone secretion at therapeutic drug levels. VPA also reduced basal estradiol secretion, while LEV decreased basal estradiol secretion only at nontherapeutic drug levels.

CONCLUSION

Both LEV and VPA affect endocrine function in the prepubertal ovary. But while VPA alters both basal and gonadotropin-stimulated testosterone and estradiol secretion at therapeutic drug concentrations, LEV only affects basal hormone secretion at this concentration level. The possibility that LEV could be an alternative treatment to VPA if reproductive endocrine problems emerge in adult women, is discussed. However, extrapolation to the clinical situation is problematic and particular emphasis is placed on the need for further studies.

Characterization of [(3)H]ucb 30889 binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A in the rat spinal cord

The novel antiepileptic drug levetiracetam ((2S-(2-oxo-1-pyrrolidinyl)butanamide, KEPPRA possesses a specific binding site in brain, which has very recently been identified as the synaptic vesicle protein SV 2 A. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of a levetiracetam binding site in the spinal cord and compare its properties to that in rat brain. We used [(3)H]ucb 30889 ((2S)-2-[4-(3-azidophenyl)-2-oxopyrrolidin-1-yl]butanamide), a levetiracetam analogue, to perform binding assays, photoaffinity labelling and autoradiography experiments, and revealed the presence of SV 2 A by Western-blot analysis. [(3)H]ucb 30889 binding kinetics at 4 degrees C were biphasic and saturation binding curves were compatible with the labelling of a homogenous population of binding sites with a K(d) similar to that in brain. Competition curves with ligands known to interact with levetiracetam binding sites and photolabelling experiments indicated that [(3)H]ucb 30889 labels the same 90 kDa protein in both spinal cord and brain. Levetiracetam binding site was localised in the grey matter of the spinal cord and its expression was not modified in a model of neuropathic pain. This study demonstrates the presence of a specific levetiracetam binding site in the rat spinal cord, which is similar to that found in rat brain.

Levetiracetam in the preventive treatmentof transformed migraine: A prospective, open-label, pilot study

BACKGROUND

Most preventive agents used for transformed migraine (TM)have not been studied specifically for the treatment of this syndrome. Open-label trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of levetiracetam in the treatment of refractory headaches.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerabilityof levetiracetam in the preventive treatment of refractory TM.

METHODS

This prospective, open-label, pilot study was conducted at TheNew England Center for Headache, Stamford, Connecticut. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years with refractory TM according to the criteria proposed by Silberstein et al. All participants had failed on at least 1 but not more than 3 preventive drugs. Other preventive drugs were allowed if they had been received at a stable dose for > 30 days. The dosage of the levetiracetam tablets ranged from 1000 to 3000 mg/d in 2 divided doses. The treatment phase lasted 3 months. The primary end point was headache frequency (expressed as the number of headache days per month), and the secondary end point was the frequency of moderate or severe headache (d/mo). Other end points were headache score, Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire score, and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) score. Statistical analyses were performed in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (patients who received at least 1 dose of study medication) using data subjected to the last-observation-carried-forward algorithm. We also conducted per-protocol (PP) analyses in patients who completed the study.

RESULTS

The ITT population consisted of 36 patients (26 women, 10 men;mean [SD] age, 46.5 [17.4] years). The mean headache frequency at baseline was 24.9 d/mo, and a significant reduction in headache frequency was obtained at l, 2, and 3 months of treatment (19.4, 18.4, and 16.2 d/mo, respectively; all, P < 0.001 Reproduction in whole or part is not permitted. vs baseline). At baseline, the mean number of moderate or severe headache days was 16.8 d/mo compared with 13.2, 11.9, and 9.7 d/mo at 1, 2, and 3 months, respectively (P=NS, <0.01, and <0.01, respectively). The mean MIDAS score was significantly reduced at 3 months compared with baseline (40.8 vs 62.8 d/mo; P = 0.01). The mean HIT-6 score was 59.4 at 3 months versus 63.4 at baseline (P < 0.01). In the PP population, the mean (SD) headache frequency was reduced from 26.1 (4.1) d/mo at baseline to 14.3 (4.8) d/mo at the end of the study (P < 0.001). The mean (SD) headache score was reduced from 51.3 (17.1) at baseline to 34.0 (22.0) at 3 months (P < 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study in patients with TM support the role of levetiracetam in the preventive treatment of refractory TM.

New drugs for the treatment of epilepsy: a practical approach

The availability of new antiepileptic drugs has broadened the spectrum of medical treatment options in epilepsy. The new agents, together with established drugs, offer substantial choice for doctors treating patients with focal or generalised epilepsy. The newer antiepileptic drugs are not necessarily more effective but usually better tolerated than the traditional agents, mainly because of favourable pharmacokinetic profiles and fewer interactions. Because treatment options have increased, drug therapy can now be tailored to the requirements of individual patients. Nevertheless, significant safety and efficacy issues continue to exist and there is a need for the development of even better agents. This review describes the clinical use of the new antiepileptic drugs, but focuses in particular on monotherapy, the treatment of generalised seizures, teratogenicity, and the cognitive side effect profile of the newer compounds.

[Drug interactions with antiepileptic agents]

Drug interactions with antiepileptic agents are based in large part on pharmacokinetic mechanisms. Most prominent are induction or inhibition of enzymes of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system, which is of central importance for metabolic elimination of lipophilic xenobiotics. Potent inductors of CYP isoenzymes are carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and primidone, thereby decreasing not only their own plasma levels and efficacy but also that of other antiepileptics and other drugs. Felbamate, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate are weak inductors of the CYP isoenzyme 3A4, whereas they inhibit CYP2C19. Valproic acid is a potent inhibitor of several CYP isoenzymes and glucuronyltransferases, resulting in an increase in plasma concentrations and toxicity of antiepileptics and other drugs. Antiepileptics that are not involved in drug interactions include gabapentin, levetiracetam, and vigabatrine. The P-glycoprotein may mediate the exit of antiepileptics from the brain. This transport mechanism is inhibited by carbamazepine, which may explain the enhanced clinical efficacy of a combination of carbamazepin with other antiepileptics. Other possible pharmacokinetic interactions are precipitation of antiepileptics in the stomach by antacids or sucralfate and displacement from plasmaprotein binding of one antiepileptic agent by another. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be helpful in assessing pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Pharmacodynamic interactions appear to be responsible for the enhanced efficacy of antiepileptic combination therapy. In prescribing drugs, their spectrum of interactions has to be known.

Management of epileptic seizures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acquired epileptic seizures are common in cancer patients. They heavily impact on the quality of life and may affect survival. Most patients are medically treated, but the use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in neuro-oncology is complicated by serious specific side effects and interference of AEDs with other commonly prescribed drugs such as chemotherapeutic agents and corticosteroids. The main purpose of this review is to help the clinician to select the most appropriate drug or drug combination, and to minimize drug side effects and drug interactions in epilepsy treatment of cancer patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Considerable progress has been achieved recently in epileptology. They include the development of new AEDs and better understanding of their subcellular mechanism of action and of drug interactions. Most studies concerning the efficacy of AEDs have not been performed specifically in neuro-oncological patients, and the extrapolation of their results to tumor-related epilepsy requires some caution. The most significant findings specific to tumor-related epilepsy are (a) the indication that their pathogenesis may be due to a decrease of focal GABA-ergic inhibition, and (b) the guidelines for prophylaxis based on a report by a subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

SUMMARY

The quality of life of epileptic patients has been improved by both a better control of seizures and the use of drugs with fewer side effects. Cancer patients probably benefit from this progress. However, treatment of tumor-related epilepsy faces several specific problems, and there is a real need for conducting clinical trials restricted to cancer patients.