1
|
Zavvar M, Yahyapoor A, Baghdadi H, Zargaran S, Assadiasl S, Abdolmohammadi K, Hossein Abooei A, Reza Sattarian M, JalaliFarahani M, Zarei N, Farahvash A, Fatahi Y, Deniz G, Zarebavani M, Nicknam MH. COVID-19 immunotherapy: Treatment based on the immune cell-mediated approaches. Int Immunopharmacol 2022; 107:108655. [PMID: 35248946 PMCID: PMC8872837 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Multiple efforts are currently underway to control and treat severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) worldwide. Despite all efforts, the virus that emerged in Wuhan city has rapidly spread globally and led to a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) due to the lack of approved antiviral therapy. Nevertheless, SARS-CoV-2 has had a significant influence on the evolution of cellular therapeutic approaches. Adoptive immune cell therapy is innovative and offers either promising prophylactic or therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. This approach is aimed at developing safety and providing secure and effective therapy in combination with standard therapy for all COVID-19 infected individuals. Based on the effective results of previous studies on both inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, various immune cell therapies against COVID-19 have been reviewed and discussed. It must be considered that the application of cell therapy for treatment and to eliminate infected respiratory cells could result in excessive inflammation, so this treatment must be used in combination with other treatments, despite its many beneficial efforts.
Collapse
|
2
|
Han J, Sun J, Zhang G, Chen H. DCs-based therapies: potential strategies in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Int J Med Sci 2021; 18:406-418. [PMID: 33390810 PMCID: PMC7757148 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.47706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Pneumonia caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is spreading globally. There have been strenuous efforts to reveal the mechanisms that the host defends itself against invasion by this virus. The immune system could play a crucial role in virus infection. Dendritic cell as sentinel of the immune system plays an irreplaceable role. Dendritic cells-based therapeutic approach may be a potential strategy for SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this review, the characteristics of coronavirus are described briefly. We focus on the essential functions of dendritic cell in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Basis of treatment based dendritic cells to combat coronavirus infections is summarized. Finally, we propose that the combination of DCs based vaccine and other therapy is worth further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Han
- General Surgery Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- Institute of Integrative Medicine of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences USF Health, Taneja College of Pharmacy University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jiazhi Sun
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences USF Health, Taneja College of Pharmacy University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Guixin Zhang
- General Surgery Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- Institute of Integrative Medicine of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China
| | - Hailong Chen
- General Surgery Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- Institute of Integrative Medicine of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Han P, Hanlon D, Sobolev O, Chaudhury R, Edelson RL. Ex vivo dendritic cell generation-A critical comparison of current approaches. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2019; 349:251-307. [PMID: 31759433 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2019.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells, required for the initiation of naïve and memory T cell responses and regulation of adaptive immunity. The discovery of DCs in 1973, which culminated in the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2011 for Ralph Steinman and colleagues, initially focused on the identification of adherent mononuclear cell fractions with uniquely stellate dendritic morphology, followed by key discoveries of their critical immunologic role in initiating and maintaining antigen-specific immunity and tolerance. The medical promise of marshaling these key capabilities of DCs for therapeutic modulation of antigen-specific immune responses has guided decades of research in hopes to achieve genuine physiologic partnership with the immune system. The potential uses of DCs in immunotherapeutic applications include cancer, infectious diseases, and autoimmune disorders; thus, methods for rapid and reliable large-scale production of DCs have been of great academic and clinical interest. However, difficulties in obtaining DCs from lymphoid and peripheral tissues, low numbers and poor survival in culture, have led to advancements in ex vivo production of DCs, both for probing molecular details of DC function as well as for experimenting with their clinical utility. Here, we review the development of a diverse array of DC production methodologies, ranging from cytokine-based strategies to genetic engineering tools devised for enhancing DC-specific immunologic functions. Further, we explore the current state of DC therapies in clinic, as well as emerging insights into physiologic production of DCs inspired by existing therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Han
- Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Douglas Hanlon
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Olga Sobolev
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Rabib Chaudhury
- Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Richard L Edelson
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gene-modified tumor vaccine secreting a designer cytokine Hyper-Interleukin-6 is an effective therapy in mice bearing orthotopic renal cell cancer. Cancer Gene Ther 2010; 17:465-75. [PMID: 20168352 DOI: 10.1038/cgt.2010.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Although renal cell cancer (RCC) is known to be immunogenic, clinical efficacy of various immunotherapeutic approaches remains unsatisfactory. Novel targeted therapies showing cytostatic rather than cytotoxic activity are unable to cure RCC patients. In our studies, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of whole-cell vaccine based on irradiated murine RENCA cells genetically modified to secrete designer cytokine--Hyper-IL6 (H6)--comprising IL-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor. An orthotopic RCC model based on a subcapsular implantation of RENCA cells into kidneys of Balb/C mice was employed. The efficacy of RENCA-H6 vaccine was compared with control vaccine (RENCA-wt) in relation to naive (non-immunized) animals. Three sets of vaccination experiments were carried out in a (i) protective, (ii) palliative and (iii) adjuvant (following nephrectomy) setting. The influence of vaccination on survival of RCC-bearing animals was analyzed. Specificity of vaccine-induced immune response was studied using model antigen-GFP. RCC-bearing animals immunized with RENCA-H6 vaccine showed prolonged survival compared with other groups. In palliative and adjuvant settings the survival RENCA-H6-immunized animals exceeded 75%. Administration of RENCA-H6 inhibited formation and recruitment of Treg cells (CD4+CD25+Foxp3+) and increased maturation of DCs. RENCA tumors in RENCA-H6- vaccinated animals contained large populations of NK cells and activated CD4+, CD8+ T cells. In addition, in mice vaccinated with RENCA-H6 cells large population of CD4+ and CD8+ memory cells (CD62Llow) were detected. In the orthotopic RCC model, RENCA-H6 vaccine showed high therapeutic potential, which resulted from modulation of numerous immunological mechanisms.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
There is a critical need to develop new and effective cancer therapies that target bone, the primary metastatic site for prostate cancer and other malignancies. Among the various therapeutic approaches being considered for this application, gene-modified cell-based therapies may have specific advantages. Gene-modified cell therapy uses gene transfer and cell-based technologies in a complementary fashion to chaperone appropriate gene expression cassettes to active sites of tumor growth. In this paper, we briefly review potential cell vehicles for this approach and discuss relevant gene therapy strategies for prostate cancer. We further discuss selected studies that led to the conceptual development and preclinical testing of IL-12 gene-modified bone marrow cell therapy for prostate cancer. Finally, we discuss future directions in the development of gene-modified cell therapy for metastatic prostate cancer, including the need to identify and test novel therapeutic genes such as GLIPR1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wysocki PJ, Zolnierek J, Szczylik C, Mackiewicz A. Recent developments in renal cell cancer immunotherapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2007; 7:727-37. [PMID: 17477809 DOI: 10.1517/14712598.7.5.727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Various immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been developed for > 90 years. Existing immunotherapeutic strategies against RCC include: systemic administration of cytokines; therapeutic vaccines based on tumor cells or dendritic cells; monoclonal antibodies; and adoptive immunotherapy (T cell transfer or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation). However, the overall efficacy of immunotherapy for advanced RCC remains moderate. With the advent of molecularly targeted biological therapies that turned out to be significantly effective in the treatment of metastatic RCC, to many oncologists immunotherapy may seem to be moving into the periphery of RCC treatment strategies. However, for the last 2 years there has been significant progress made in immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of RCC. Immunotherapy still remains the only systemic therapeutic strategy that is believed to potentially cure RCC patients. The development of active and passive specific immunotherapeutic approaches, along with the possibility to 'switch off' particular immunosuppressive mechanisms (e.g., elimination of regulatory T cells, blockage of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 signaling), have paved the way for future trials of new immunotherapies of RCC. However, the new studies will have to enroll optimally selected patients (nephrectomized, with non-massive metastases and good performance status) and will use tumor response criteria that are specifically optimized for clinical trials of immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Wysocki
- Chair of Medical Biotechnology, University of Medical Sciences at GreatPoland Cancer Center, Department of Cancer Immunology, ul. Garbary 15, 61-866 Poznan, Poland.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mosca JD, Chang YN, Williams G. Antigen-presenting particle technology using inactivated surface-engineered viruses: induction of immune responses against infectious agents. Retrovirology 2007; 4:32. [PMID: 17504532 PMCID: PMC1885814 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-4-32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2006] [Accepted: 05/15/2007] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Developments in cell-based and gene-based therapies are emerging as highly promising areas to complement pharmaceuticals, but present day approaches are too cumbersome and thereby limit their clinical usefulness. These shortcomings result in procedures that are too complex and too costly for large-scale applications. To overcome these shortcomings, we described a protein delivery system that incorporates over-expressed proteins into viral particles that are non-infectious and stable at room temperature. The system relies on the biological process of viral egress to incorporate cellular surface proteins while exiting their host cells during lytic and non-lytic infections. Results We report here the use of non-infectious surface-engineered virion particles to modulate immunity against three infectious disease agents – human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), herpes simplex virus (HSV), and Influenza. Surface-engineering of particles are accomplished by genetic modification of the host cell surface that produces the egress budding viral particle. Human peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy donors exposed to CD80/B7.1, CD86/B7.2, and/or antiCD3 single-chain antibody surface-engineered non-infectious HIV-1 and HSV-2 particles stimulate T cell proliferation, whereas particles released from non-modified host cells have no T cell stimulatory activity. In addition to T cell proliferation, HIV-based particles specifically suppress HIV-1 replication (both monocytotropic and lymphocytotropic strains) 55 to 96% and HSV-based particles specifically induce cross-reactive HSV-1/HSV-2 anti-herpes virus antibody production. Similar surface engineering of influenza-based particles did not modify the intrinsic ability of influenza particles to stimulate T cell proliferation, but did bestow on the engineered particles the ability to induce cross-strain anti-influenza antibody production. Conclusion We propose that non-infectious viral particles can be surface-engineered to produce antigen-presenting particles that mimic antigen-presenting cells to induce immune responses in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. The viral particles behave as "biological carriers" for recombinant proteins, thereby establishing a new therapeutic paradigm for molecular medicine.
Collapse
|
8
|
MacRae EJ, Giannoudis A, Ryan R, Brown NJ, Hamdy FC, Maitland N, Lewis CE. Gene therapy for prostate cancer: current strategies and new cell-based approaches. Prostate 2006; 66:470-94. [PMID: 16353250 DOI: 10.1002/pros.20388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in adult males in the Western world. It accounts for one in ten cancer cases and is the second leading cause of cancer death in men, after lung cancer. A number of curative treatments are available for patients with localized prostate cancer such as radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, or brachytherapy. However, a proportion of these men will develop progressive disease, and some will present de novo with advanced and metastatic prostate cancer, which is amenable to palliation only with androgen-withdrawal therapy. Most of these patients will eventually develop hormone refractory disease which is incurable, and for whom gene therapy, if feasible may develop as an alternative treatment option. In this review we discuss the gene therapy vectors and strategies that are currently in use, new cell-based approaches, discuss their advantages and disadvantages, and review the potential or proven pre-clinical and clinical efficacy in prostate cancer models/patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J MacRae
- Tumour Targeting Group, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Morse MA, Clay TM, Hobeika AC, Osada T, Khan S, Chui S, Niedzwiecki D, Panicali D, Schlom J, Lyerly HK. Phase I study of immunization with dendritic cells modified with fowlpox encoding carcinoembryonic antigen and costimulatory molecules. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11:3017-24. [PMID: 15837756 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-2172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the safety and immunologic and clinical efficacy of a dendritic cell vaccine modified to hyperexpress costimulatory molecules and tumor antigen. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN In this phase I study, we administered one or two cycles of four triweekly s.c./intradermal injections of ex vivo generated dendritic cells modified with a recombinant fowlpox vector encoding carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and a triad of costimulatory molecules [rF-CEA(6D)-TRICOM]. Controls consisted of immature dendritic cells loaded with tetanus toxoid and a HLA A2-restricted peptide derived from cytomegalovirus pp65 protein. RESULTS Fourteen patients (11 with colorectal cancer and 3 with non-small cell lung cancer) were enrolled and 12 completed at least one cycle of immunization. There were no grade 3/4 toxicities directly referable to the immunizations. One patient had a decrease in the CEA level from 46 to 6.8 and a minor regression in adenopathy that occurred several months after completion of the immunizations. Five other patients were stable through at least one cycle of immunization (3 months). Direct analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells using the ELISpot assay showed an increase in the frequency of CEA-specific T cells in 10 patients (range, 10-541 CEA-specific cells/10(5) peripheral blood mononuclear cells). There was a trend for a greater peak frequency of CEA-specific T cells among those with either a minor response or a stable disease following at least one cycle of therapy. A second cycle was not associated with higher T-cell frequencies. Cytokine flow cytometry showed CEA-specific immune response among both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in all immune responders. CONCLUSION This immunization strategy is safe and activates potent CEA-specific immune responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Morse
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Cancer is a difficult target for any therapeutic strategy; therefore, there is a continuous search for new therapeutic modalities, for application either alone or in combination. In this regard, gene-based therapy is a new approach that offers hope of improved control of tumors. Intensive research to apply gene therapy for cancer treatment has led to identification of the most important technical and theoretical barriers that need to be overcome for clinical success. One of the central unresolved challenges remains the issue of specific and efficient delivery of genes to target cells or tissues, emphasizing the importance of the gene carrier. Along with different viral and non-viral vector systems, mammalian cells have also been considered as vehicles for delivery of anti-cancer therapeutics. The cell-based delivery approach was introduced as the first attempt to apply gene therapy to cancer treatment, and in general, has followed most of the ups and downs of gene therapy applications, progressing alongside new knowledge gained in this field. As a result, significant progress has been made in some aspects of the cell-based approach, while the development of other essential issues is only just gaining speed. It appears that the initial phase of development of cell-based protocols - the achievement of efficient ex vivo cell loading with therapeutics - has largely been fulfilled. However, the desired efficacy of cell-based strategies in general has not yet been reached, and specificity of tumor homing needs to be improved considerably. There is hope that advances in related scientific fields will promote the utilization of cells as powerful and versatile vehicles for cancer gene therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larisa Pereboeva
- Division of Human Gene Therapy, Department of Medicine, The Gene Therapy Center, BMRII-572, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 901 19th Street S., Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|