Vedolizumab for Crohn's disease

Colonic Epithelial Permeability to Ions Is Restored after Vedolizumab Treatment and May Predict Clinical Response in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

Vedolizumab (VDZ) is used for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. A study investigating colonic epithelial barrier function ex vivo following VDZ is lacking. This work aims to evaluate ex vivo the colonic epithelial barrier function in IBD patients at baseline and during VDZ treatment, and to investigate the relationships between barrier function and clinical parameters. Colonic specimens were obtained from 23 IBD patients before, and at 24 and 52 weeks after VDZ treatment, and from 26 healthy volunteers (HV). Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER, permeability to ions) and paracellular permeability were measured in Ussing chambers. IBD patients showed increased epithelial permeability to ions (TEER, 13.80 ± 1.04 Ω × cm2 vs. HV 20.70 ± 1.52 Ω × cm2, p < 0.001) without changes in paracellular permeability of a 4 kDa probe. VDZ increased TEER (18.09 ± 1.44 Ω × cm2, p < 0.001) after 52 weeks. A clinical response was observed in 58% and 25% of patients at week 24, and in 62% and 50% at week 52, in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, respectively. Clinical and endoscopic scores were strongly associated with TEER. TEER < 14.65 Ω × cm2 predicted response to VDZ (OR 11; CI 2-59). VDZ reduces the increased permeability to ions observed in the colonic epithelium of IBD patients before treatment, in parallel to a clinical, histological (inflammatory infiltrate), and endoscopic improvement. A low TEER predicts clinical response to VDZ therapy.

Bedside to bench: defining the immunopathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an immune-mediated, systemic inflammatory disorder. PsA can present with heterogeneous clinical features. Advances in understanding the immunopathogenesis of PsA have helped to facilitate the development of agents targeting specific components of the dysregulated inflammatory and immune responses relevant to PsA. Interestingly, agents with distinct mechanisms of action have shown differential responses across the various disease domains of PsA, counter to what might have been expected from basic science investigations. Here, we review data utilizing various novel targeted therapies for PsA, focusing on biologic and targeted synthetic therapies. These data might support the idea of a 'bedside to bench' concept, whereby results from clinical trials of specific targeted therapies inform our understanding of the immunopathogenesis of PsA. For example, TNF inhibition confers substantial and comparable benefit for all domains of PsA, supporting the view that TNF is a central pro-inflammatory cytokine across diverse areas of disease involvement. On the other hand, inhibition of IL-12-IL-23, as compared with inhibition of TNF, has greater efficacy for psoriasis, comparable efficacy for peripheral arthritis, but was ineffective in studies of axial spondyloarthritis. Data from studies of agents with distinct mechanisms of action will help to further refine our understanding of the immunopathogenesis of PsA.

Vedolizumab in the treatment of Crohn's disease

Vedolizumab, a recent addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in Crohn's disease, is promising in efficacy, durability of remission and safety. It is the first gut selective biologic treatment, acting by targeting α4β7-integrin, a receptor expressed on activated lymphocytes and binding to MAdCAM1, a cell adhesion molecule selectively expressed in the circulatory system of the digestive tract, preventing trafficking of lymphocytes to the gut. The pivotal GEMINI studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in achieving clinical response and clinical remission in patients with moderately to severely active CD who are naïve or have previously failed therapy with TNF-antagonists, immunomodulators or dependent on steroids. Vedolizumab had a favorable safety profile and specifically showed no evidence of PML, reactivation of latent TB or hepatitis B. Overall, the number of malignancies in the clinical trials was small; however, long-term exposure was limited. Vedolizumab can be given as a first-line therapy or following treatment failure, and was tolerated as part of combination therapy. More medications with similar and novel therapeutic mechanisms are anticipated in the coming years.

Expert consensus paper on the use of Vedolizumab for the management of patients with moderate-to-severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Crohn's Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) are chronic, relapsing conditions resulting from uncontrolled inflammation of the intestinal mucosa. Both conditions are associated with significant disability and patients with CD face higher mortality rates compared to the general population. The increasing understanding of the immunological basis of the disease led to the introduction of biologic therapies targeting key pathways of the natural and adaptive immune response such as Tumor Necrosis Factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors and, more recently, integrin-receptor antagonists. Treatment with TNF-α inhibitors improved clinical and patient-reported outcomes for many patients who did not benefit from conventional therapy. However, a sizeable share of patients still face suboptimal outcomes due to primary or secondary therapy failure. With the introduction of VDZ, a biologic treatment targeting novel IBD-relevant biologic pathways, it is crucial to understand how to integrate such innovations into current clinical practice. To this end, a panel of 14 Italian experts in the management of IBD met for a roundtable discussion. Recommendations concerning the management of moderate-to-severe IBD based on experts' opinions and literature review are discussed in the present report.

Recent insights into the molecular pathogenesis of Crohn's disease: a review of emerging therapeutic targets

Chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are a subject of great interest in gastroenterology, due to a pathological mechanism that is difficult to explain and an optimal therapeutic approach still undiscovered. Crohn's disease (CD) is one of the main entities in IBD, characterized by clinical polymorphism and great variability in the treatment response. Modern theories on the pathogenesis of CD have proven that gut microbiome and environmental factors lead to an abnormal immune response in a genetically predisposed patient. Genome-wide association studies in patients with CD worldwide revealed several genetic mutations that increase the risk of IBD and that predispose to a more severe course of disease. Gut microbiota is considered a compulsory and an essential part in the pathogenesis of CD. Intestinal dysmicrobism with excessive amounts of different bacterial strains can be found in all patients with IBD. The discovery of Escherichia coli entero-invasive on resection pieces in patients with CD now increases the likelihood of antimicrobial or vaccine-type treatments. Recent studies targeting intestinal immunology and its molecular activation pathways provide new possibilities for therapeutics. In addition to antitumor necrosis factor molecules, which were a breakthrough in IBD, improving mucosal healing and resection-free survival rate, other classes of therapeutic agents come to focus. Leukocyte adhesion inhibitors block the leukocyte homing mechanism and prevent cellular immune response. In addition to anti-integrin antibodies, chemokine receptor antagonists and SMAD7 antisense oligonucleotides have shown encouraging results in clinical trials. Micro-RNAs have demonstrated their role as disease biomarkers but it could also become useful for the treatment of IBD. Moreover, cellular therapy is another therapeutic approach under development, aimed for severe refractory CD. Other experimental treatments include intravenous immunoglobulins, exclusive enteral nutrition, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factors.

Introducing vedolizumab to clinical practice: who, when, and how?

Vedolizumab (VDZ), a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets α4β7 integrin, is approved for use in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Here we review the evidence for the safety and efficacy of VDZ in IBD, in order to identify patients likely to benefit from therapy and to integrate VDZ into clinical practice. A bibliographic search was performed of the online databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library, using the key words 'inflammatory bowel diseases' OR 'ulcerative colitis' OR 'Crohn's disease' AND 'vedolizumab' OR 'MLN0002' OR 'integrin alpha4beta7' OR 'anti-integrin'. Eight-nine articles were returned using the primary search. Eight randomized controlled trials, one Cochrane review, and two network meta-analyses were identified. VDZ is well tolerated with a low rate of adverse events (similar to placebo), and is associated with minimal systemic immunosuppression. VDZ is effective for induction and maintenance of remission in outpatients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) who have failed conventional and anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. VDZ is also a first-line alternative to anti-TNF therapy in UC. The efficacy of VDZ is best assessed at, or beyond, 10 weeks of therapy. The safety, tolerability, and efficacy profile of VDZ place it as a new therapy in IBD, though further trials directly comparing VDZ with other biological agents as well as pragmatic studies to evaluate cost-effectiveness are necessary.

Efficacy and safety of antiintegrin antibody for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of available biologics that inhibit T-cell migration by blocking α4β7 integrins in inflammatory bowel diseases. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether Crohn disease (CD) patients receiving either vedolizumab or natalizumab have any different effect in CD Activity Index (CDAI). Using Medline, Excerpta Medica dataBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar until October 31, 2013, we identified 10 studies examining the safety and efficacy of specific integrin inhibitors—vedolizumab, which targets an epitope comprising the α4β7 heterodimer; natalizumab, which recognizes the α4 integrin subunit; etrolizumab, which is specific for the β7 subunit—in the treatment of CD and ulcerative colitis (UC). CD patients receiving either vedolizumab or natalizumab demonstrated a modest increase in remission rate, when compared with that of the placebo group. Further, although both treatments reduced the CDAI slightly, the observed clinical response was less robust than that of the remission rate. UC patients treated with vedolizumab and natalizumab were found to show more prominent increases in both remission and clinical response, compared with placebo, than patients with CD. Etrolizumab, however, was not found to significantly affect either response or remission rates in UC patients. Biologics targeting integrins show promise as therapeutics in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in patients who are either nonresponsive or intolerant to traditional approaches, though further research is necessary to optimize treatment efficacies.

PRISMA--efficacy and safety of vedolizumab for inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Vedolizumab is an anti-inflammatory monoclonal antibody that exclusively targets the α4β7 integrin. We aimed to systematically review the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to May 2014. Randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy or safety of vedolizumab in patients with IBDs were eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted independently by 2 investigators and pooled using Review Manager 5.0 software (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). Results were expressed as the relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Six randomized controlled trials involving 2815 patients were eligible for inclusion. Vedolizumab was more effective than placebo for patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease (CD) in clinical response (RR=1.82, 95% CI, [1.43, 2.31]; RR=1.46, 95% CI [1.18,1.81]) and clinical remission (RR=2.23, 95% CI [1.35, 3.68]; RR=1.71, 95% CI [1.25, 2.34]) during induction therapy. A superior effect was found during maintenance therapy in durable clinical/CD Activity Index-100 response (RR=2.22, 95% CI [1.62, 3.05]; RR=1.48, 95% CI [1.13, 1.94]) and clinical remission (RR=2.55, 95% CI [1.38, 4.70]; RR=1.15, 95% CI [0.75, 1.77]). However, vedolizumab may be associated with serious adverse events (RR=1.25, 95% CI [1.03, 1.52]) and nasopharyngitis (RR=1.56, 95% CI [1.08, 2.25]) for patients with CD. Vedolizumab was more effective than placebo as induction and maintenance therapy for IBDs, with an acceptable short-term safety profile, and achieving cure, although it may be associated with serious adverse events and nasopharyngitis for patients with CD.

Is there a role for vedolizumab in the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease?

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality for millions of patients worldwide. Current treatment options include corticosteroids, 5-aminosalicylates, immunosuppressants, and TNFα antagonists. However, these are frequently ineffective in achieving sustained response and remission over time. At present, gastroenterologists lack safe and effective treatments if patients fail anti-TNF therapy. Vedolizumab is a promising new agent for IBD patients refractory to anti-TNF therapy. Vedolizumab is an integrin antagonist which is thought to act by reducing inflammation by selectively inhibiting leukocyte migration in the gut. Emerging evidence from clinical trials suggests a potential role for vedolizumab in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), particularly in patients who have previously failed biological therapy. The safety profile of vedolizumab appears reasonable, possibly because it has a "gut-selective" mode of action, with no reported cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, a condition which has been linked to another integrin antagonist, natalizumab. This review discusses the available evidence for integrin antagonists and their potential role in the management of IBD.

When combination therapy isn’t working: Emerging therapies for the management of inflammatory bowel disease

Although antagonists of tumor necrosis factor have resulted in major therapeutic benefits in inflammatory bowel disease, the magnitude and durability of response are variable. Similar to previously available drugs such as 5-aminosalicylates and immunomodulators, the therapeutic effect is not universal leaving many people searching for options. The development of newer agents has benefited from advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease. Uncontrolled activation of the acquired immune system has an important role, and lymphocytes, cytokines, and adhesion molecules are broadly targeted for therapeutic intervention. There is increasing evidence of an important role of the innate immune system and the intestinal epithelium, and the therapeutic paradigm is also shifting from immunosuppression to the reinforcement of the intestinal barrier, and modification of the disease process. In this review, we explore the limitation of current therapy as well as mechanisms of actions of new drugs and the efficacy and adverse events from data from clinical trials.