Emerging drugs for small-cell lung cancer

Irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor Z25h exhibits pronounced inhibition on non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma cell line Hcc827

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling is frequently activated in lung cancer. In our previous study, a new class of compounds containing pyrido[3,4-d]pyrimidine scaffold with an acrylamide moiety was designed as irreversible EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors to overcome acquired EGFR-T790M resistance. In this study, we selected the most promising compound Z25h to further investigate its effects and the underlying mechanism against non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma cells in vitro. Four different non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma cell lines were selected to test the antiviability profile of Z25h, and Hcc827 was the most sensitive to the drug treatment. Z25h caused cell cycle arrest at G0-G1 phase, and triggered strong early apoptosis in Hcc827 cells at 0.1 μM and late apoptosis in A549, H1975 and H1299 cells at 10 μM by 48 h treatment. Z25h inhibited the activation of EGFR and its downstream PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in the four tested cell lines, leading to the inhibition of cellular biosynthetic and metabolic processes and the promotion of apoptotic process. However, the effect of Z25h on mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway varies from cell lines. In addition, Z25h sensitized H1975 cells to X-ray radiation, and it also enhanced the radiation effect on A549 cells, while no obvious effect of Z25h was observed on the cell viability inhibition of H1299 cells induced by radiation. Hereby, Z25h might be considered as a potential therapeutic drug candidate for non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma treatment.

Real World Analysis of Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Prognostic Factors and Treatment Outcomes

In this observational study, we assessed treatment patterns and prognostic factors in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in a large state-mandated healthcare organization in Israel. Methods: All incident cases with histologically confirmed SCLC who initiated systemic anti-cancer treatment between 2011 and 2017 were identified. Treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) were evaluated for each line of therapy. Results: A total of 235 patients were identified (61% male, median age 64 years, 95% ever smokers, 64% had extensive stage). The first-line treatment was platinum-etoposide regimen for 98.7% of the cohort. The second and third-line regimen were given to 43% and 12% of patients, respectively. Mean OS for extensive and limited stage patients was 9.1 and 23.5 months respectively. In a multivariable model, increased risk for mortality was observed among patients with an ECOG performance status (PS) of 2 compared to a PS of 0-1 for the extensive stage patients (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.63, 95% confidence ratios (CI): 1.00-2.65); and for males compared to females for the limited stage patients (HR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.12-4.20). Regarding all 2nd line patients in a multivariable model incorporating relevant confounding factors, demonstrated a significantly better outcome with platinum-based regimens compared to topotecan. Median survival after initiation of 2nd line in platinum-sensitive patients was longer (p = 0.056) for those re-challenged with platinum-based regimen (n = 7): 6.8mo (6.1-not reported (NR)), compared with those switched to a different treatment (n = 27): 4.5 mo (2.6-6.6) for extensive stage patients, and a non-significant difference was also observed for limited stage patients. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is one of the largest real-world studies of SCLC patients. OS for SCLC patients was similar to that reported in clinical trials. PS for extensive stage patients and sex for limited stage patients were significant correlates of prognosis. Re-challenge of the platinum-based doublet was associated with longer OS compared to switching treatment in extensive stage patients.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR): A rising star in the era of precision medicine of lung cancer

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. In tumors, the important role of noncoding RNA regulatory networks has been more and more reveal. EGFR has been identified as an oncogenic driver of NSCLC, especially activating mutations EGFR and its inhibition with specific TKIs can generate dramatic tumor responses. Studies have shown that EGFR plays significant roles in the progression of NSCLC. Subset analysis of the small proportion of patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer showed a disease-free survival benefit, but was underpowered to detect a survival advantage. Herein, we highlight the progression of EGFR, noncoding RNA, and their roles in carcinogenesis. We also focus on anti-lung cancer drug development and EGFR-related drug resistance.

Evaluation of Circulating Tumor Cells in Predicting Therapeutic Response in Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have prognostic significance in patients with metastatic cancer, but their utility in predicting the response to tumor therapy is unknown. This study examined the correlation of CTCs with the therapeutic response in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

Clinical and pathological data from 96 SCLC patients were evaluated in this study. CellSearch kits were used to detect CTCs in peripheral blood samples. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

At baseline, 47 (50.0%) SCLC patients had detectable CTC counts. Serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) was found to be associated with CTC thresholds. However, no significant differences were observed for an association of any threshold CTC count with the treatment response, with gender, age (≤60 or >60 years), smoking status, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH), or Ki67 expression.

CONCLUSION

Detection of CTCs in SCLC patients was associated with serum NSE but not with response to cancer therapy.

Barasertib (AZD1152), a Small Molecule Aurora B Inhibitor, Inhibits the Growth of SCLC Cell Lines In Vitro and In Vivo

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cells have rapid proliferation, universal Rb inactivation, and high rates of MYC family amplification, making aurora kinase inhibition a natural target. Preclinical studies have demonstrated activity for Aurora A and pan-Aurora inhibitors with some relationship to MYC family expression. A clinical trial showed activity for an Aurora kinase A inhibitor, but no biomarkers were evaluated. We screened a panel of 23 SCLC lines with and without MYC family gene amplification or high MYC family gene expression for growth inhibition by the highly potent, selective aurora kinase B inhibitor barasertib. Nine of the SCLC lines were very sensitive to growth inhibition by barasertib, with IC₅₀ values of <50 nmol/L and >75% growth inhibition at 100 nmol/L. Growth inhibition correlated with cMYC amplification (P = 0.018) and cMYC gene expression (P = 0.026). Sensitive cell lines were also enriched in a published MYC gene signature (P = 0.042). In vivo, barasertib inhibited the growth of xenografts established from an SCLC line that had high cMYC gene expression, no cMYC amplification, and was positive for the core MYC gene signature. Our studies suggest that SCLC tumors with cMYC amplification/high gene expression will frequently respond to Aurora B inhibitors and that clinical studies coupled with predictive biomarkers are indicated. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(10); 2314-22. ©2016 AACR.

Survival outcomes and incidence of brain recurrence in high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung: Implications for clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Among patients with advanced high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) of the lung, the optimal therapeutic management is much less established for large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) than for small cell lung cancers (SCLCs). We evaluated the survival outcomes and incidence of brain recurrence of advanced LCNECs, and compared them with those of a population of SCLCs matched by stage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight unresected stage III HGNECs (16 LCNECs and 32 SCLCs) and 113 stage IV HGNECs (37 LCNECs and 76 SCLCs) were eligible for the analysis. The efficacy of platinum-etoposide chemotherapy with or without thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and/or prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was investigated.

RESULTS

Overall response was significantly lower for LCNECs compared with SCLCs for both stage III (43.8% vs 90.6% respectively, P=0.004) and stage IV (43.3% vs 64.5%, respectively, P=0.04). Similarly, an inferior outcome was observed in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for LCNECs compared with SCLCs, which, however, reached significance only for stage III disease (median: 5.6 vs 8.9 months, P=0.06 and 10.4 vs 17.6 months, P=0.03 for PFS and OS, respectively). In the lack of PCI, LCNECs showed a high cumulative incidence of brain metastases, as 58% and 48% of still living stage III and IV patients, respectively, developed brain metastases at 18 months.

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced LCNECs are at high risk for brain recurrence. Unresected stage III LCNECs treated with platinum-etoposide with or without TRT bear a dismal prognosis, when compared indirectly with SCLC counterparts. Randomized trials should evaluate whether PCI could improve survival of advanced LCNECs.

Oncogenic drivers, targeted therapies, and acquired resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer

In the past decade, a shift toward targeted therapies in non-small-cell lung cancer following molecular profiling has dramatically changed the way advanced adenocarcinoma is treated. However, tumor cells inevitably acquire resistance to such therapies, circumventing any sustained clinical benefit. As the genomic classification of lung cancer continues to evolve and as the mechanisms of acquired resistance to targeted therapies become elucidated and more improved target-specific drugs come into sight, the future will see more promising results from the clinic through the development of new therapeutic strategies to overcome, or prevent the development of, resistance for lung cancer patients.

Immunotherapy treatments for small-cell lung cancer: past, present and future

Small-cell lung cancer remains a considerable cause of morbidity and mortality. To this day, first-line therapy continues to be a platinum agent with etoposide, combined with radiation therapy in cases of limited stage disease. Numerous, largely unsuccessful, attempts at controlling the disease have included different chemotherapy strategies, the utilization of antiangiogenic agents, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and other treatment modalities. Immunotherapy, including vaccines, immune response modifiers, inhibitors of check point blockades and immunologic-targeted toxins may well be the future of treatment, not only to enhance the proven chemotherapy effects, but to improve the control of minimal residual disease and the response with salvage chemotherapy. This article reviews the current advances in immunotherapeutic strategies against small-cell lung cancer.

Third-line chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer: an international analysis

INTRODUCTION

Small-cell lung cancer is an aggressive disease for which the mainstay of treatment is chemotherapy. Despite good initial responses most patients will relapse. Some will receive second-line therapy with clinical benefit, but for third-line chemotherapy there is little evidence to guide treatment decisions and the benefits of treatment are unknown. This study investigated the treatment of SCLC in the third-line setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An international, multicenter retrospective analysis of patients who received at least 3 lines of chemotherapy for their SCLC was performed.

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2010, 120 patients were identified from 5 centers: median age 61, 40% (n = 72) limited stage, and 79% (n = 95) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Only 22% of these patients received 3 distinct lines of chemotherapy. The remainder were rechallenged with a chemotherapy regimen used at least once previously. Six percent received platinum-based chemotherapy in all 3 lines. In third-line, response rate was 18% and median overall survival was 4.7 months. Factors associated with longer survival included normal baseline LDH levels and response to second-line chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis only normal baseline LDH retained statistical significance. Thirty-five patients went on to receive chemotherapy beyond the third line.

CONCLUSION

Few SCLC patients receive 3 chemotherapy lines. Most patients were rechallenged with a similar regimen at least once. Response and survival in the third-line setting are modest. Lack of response to second-line chemotherapy and elevated baseline LDH level might predict lack of benefit from third-line treatment. This data set does not include patients receiving fewer lines for comparison.

Phase II study of induction cisplatin and irinotecan followed by concurrent carboplatin, etoposide, and thoracic radiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer, CALGB 30206

INTRODUCTION

We sought to determine the efficacy of using both irinotecan- and etoposide-containing regimens sequentially for patients with untreated limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with untreated, measurable, limited-stage small-cell lung cancer with performance status 0 to 2, and adequate organ function were eligible. Treatment consisted of induction with cisplatin 30 mg/m and irinotecan 65 mg/m intravenously on day 1 and 8, every 21 days for two cycles. Beginning day 43, daily chest irradiation to 70 Gy was administered concurrently with carboplatin area under curve 5 on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m on days 1 to 3, every 21 days for three cycles. The primary objective was to differentiate between 45% and 60% 2-year survival.

RESULTS

Two induction cycles were delivered to 72 of 75 eligible patients (96%) and all planned treatment was delivered to 59 patients (79%). Cisplatin and irinotecan induction chemotherapy resulted in complete responses in 7% and partial responses in 64% (response rate 71%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 59%-81%). The best response to all therapy included 88% complete or partial responses (95% CI, 78%-94%). With median follow-up of 57 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival are 12.6 (95% CI, 9.4-14.7) and 18.1 months (15.8-22.9), respectively. The 1- and 2-year survival was 69% and 31%, respectively. Frequent (>20%) grade 3 and 4 toxicities were neutropenia in 84%, hemoglobin in 36%, platelets in 51%, esophagitis in 22%, and dehydration in 24%. There were no fatal toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

This treatment regimen of irinotecan-cisplatin induction chemotherapy followed by 70 Gy concurrent radiation and etoposide-carboplatin had tolerable toxicity but did not meet the preplanned 2-year survival target for further development.

Emerging drugs for small cell lung cancer--an update

INTRODUCTION

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a biologically complex tumor whose medical treatment has remained largely unchanged over the last 30 years. The frustration for the invariably negative results reported in the early 2000s in clinical studies investigating new agents for this disease have contributed to the little interest shown by pharmaceutical industries in funding SCLC research. However, recent advances in the molecular understanding of the oncogenic mechanisms underlying SCLC have renewed the attraction for the clinical development of novel active drugs for the treatment of this challenging disease.

AREAS COVERED

The authors briefly touch on the most promising agents under clinical development for the treatment of SCLC, either chemotherapeutic or targeted drugs. Relevant and recent (2 years) studies obtained through Pubmed literature research or released at International scientific meetings are presented.

EXPERT OPINION

The data discussed herein provide evidence in support of the fact that only rationally designed clinical trials including relevant translational research may lead to successful results. Therefore, a thoughtful change in trial construction is crucial for the approval of new active drugs for this orphan disease.

Outcome of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with brain metastases in a routine clinical setting

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents approximately 13 to 18% of all lung cancers. It is the most aggressive among lung cancers, mostly presented at an advanced stage, with median survival rates of 10 to12 months in patients treated with standard chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In approximately 15-20% of patients brain metastases are present already at the time of primary diagnosis; however, it is unclear how much it influences the outcome of disease according the other metastatic localisation. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the median survival of SCLC patients treated by specific therapy (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy) with regard to the presence or absence of brain metastases at the time of diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All SCLC patients have been treated in a routine clinical practice and followed up at the University Clinic Golnik in Slovenia. In the retrospective study the medical files from 2002 to 2007 were review. All patients with cytological or histological confirmed disease and eligible for specific oncological treatment were included in the study. They have been treated according to the guidelines valid at the time. Chemotherapy and regular followed-up were carried out at the University Clinic Golnik and radiotherapy at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana.

RESULTS

We found 251 patients eligible for the study. The median age of them was 65 years, majority were male (67%), smokers or ex-smokers (98%), with performance status 0 to 1 (83%). At the time of diagnosis no metastases were found in 64 patients (25.5%) and metastases outside the brain were presented in 153 (61.0%). Brain metastases, confirmed by a CT scan, were present in 34 patients (13.5%), most of them had also metastases at other localisations. All patients received chemotherapy and all patients with confirmed brain metastases received whole brain irradiation (WBRT). The radiotherapy with radical dose at primary tumour was delivered to 27 patients with limited disease and they got 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy. Median overall survival (OS) of 34 patients with brain metastases was 9 months (95% CI 6-12) while OS of 153 patients with metastases in other locations was 11 months (95% CI 10-12); the difference did not reach the level of significance (p = 0.62). As expected, the OS of patients without metastases at the time of primary diagnosis turned out to be significantly better compared to the survival of patients with either brain or other location metastases at the primary diagnosis (15 months vs 9 and 11 months, respectively, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our investigated population, the prognosis of patients with extensive SCLS with brain metastases at the primary diagnosis treated with chemotherapy and WBRT was not significantly worse compared to the prognosis of patients with extensive SCLC and metastases outside the brain. In extensive SCLC brain metastases were not a negative prognostic factor per se if the patients were able to be treated appropriately. However, the survival rates of extensive SCLC with or without brain metastases remained poor and novel treatment approaches are needed. The major strength of this study is that it has been done on a population of patients treated in a routine clinical setting.

Recent Pharmacological Advances: Focus on Small-cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents approximately 15% of all lung cancers, and is the most aggressive form of lung cancer. Left untreated, the time from diagnosis to death is 2–3 months. With current treatment, expected survival is 7–20 months, depending on the stage of disease. A new drug, amrubicin, is approved in Japan for lung cancer and has demonstrated efficacy in U.S. and European phase II trials of SCLC patients with either untreated disease or relapsed refractory illness. In a phase II study of amrubicin in previously untreated patients, response rates reached 75% with a median survival time of almost 1 year. Amrubicin is a fully synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline, and an analog of doxorubicin and epirubicin. The major mechanism of action of amrubicin is inhibition of topoisomerase II. Unlike doxorubicin, however, it exhibits little or no cardiotoxicity in clinical studies and preclinical models. In preclinical rodent tumor models, it is selectively distributed to tumour tissue and is not detected in the heart when compared with doxorubicin, which is distributed equivalently to these sites. The primary metabolite of amrubicin, amrubicinol, is up to 100 times more cytotoxic in vitro than the parent compound. This review describes the mechanisms of action of amrubicin as well as clinical studies which demonstrate the potential of this drug in future SCLC treatment. The review also puts forward hypothetical considerations for the use of other drugs such as lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug acting on multiple signalling pathways, or histone deacetylase inhibitors, in combination with amrubicin in SCLC.

Capsaicin displays anti-proliferative activity against human small cell lung cancer in cell culture and nude mice models via the E2F pathway

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by rapid progression and low survival rates. Therefore, novel therapeutic agents are urgently needed for this disease. Capsaicin, the active ingredient of chilli peppers, displays anti-proliferative activity in prostate and epidermoid cancer in vitro. However, the anti-proliferative activity of capsaicin has not been studied in human SCLCs. The present manuscript fills this void of knowledge and explores the anti-proliferative effect of capsaicin in SCLC in vitro and in vivo.

Methodology/Principal Findings

BrdU assays and PCNA ELISAs showed that capsaicin displays robust anti-proliferative activity in four human SCLC cell lines. Furthermore, capsaicin potently suppressed the growth of H69 human SCLC tumors in vivo as ascertained by CAM assays and nude mice models. The second part of our study attempted to provide insight into molecular mechanisms underlying the anti-proliferative activity of capsaicin. We found that the anti-proliferative activity of capsaicin is correlated with a decrease in the expression of E2F-responsive proliferative genes like cyclin E, thymidylate synthase, cdc25A and cdc6, both at mRNA and protein levels. The transcription factor E2F4 mediated the anti-proliferative activity of capsaicin. Ablation of E2F4 levels by siRNA methodology suppressed capsaicin-induced G1 arrest. ChIP assays demonstrated that capsaicin caused the recruitment of E2F4 and p130 on E2F-responsive proliferative promoters, thereby inhibiting cell proliferation.

Conclusions/Significance

Our findings suggest that the anti-proliferative effects of capsaicin could be useful in the therapy of human SCLCs.