1
|
Stine KC, Wahl EC, Liu L, Skinner RA, VanderSchilden J, Bunn RC, Montgomery CO, Aronson J, Becton DL, Nicholas RW, Swearingen CJ, Suva LJ, Lumpkin CK. Nutlin-3 treatment spares cisplatin-induced inhibition of bone healing while maintaining osteosarcoma toxicity. J Orthop Res 2016; 34:1716-1724. [PMID: 26867804 PMCID: PMC5516939 DOI: 10.1002/jor.23192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 02/03/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The majority of Osteosarcoma (OS) patients are treated with a combination of chemotherapy, resection, and limb salvage protocols. These protocols include distraction osteogenesis (DO), which is characterized by direct new bone formation. Cisplatin (CDP) is extensively used for OS chemotherapy and recent studies, using a mouse DO model, have demonstrated that CDP has profound negative effects on bone repair. Recent oncological therapeutic strategies are based on the use of standard cytotoxic drugs plus an assortment of biologic agents. Here we demonstrate that the previously reported CDP-associated inhibition of bone repair can be modulated by the administration of a small molecule p53 inducer (nutlin-3). The effects of nutlin-3 on CDP osteotoxicity were studied using both pre- and post-operative treatment models. In both cases the addition of nutlin-3, bracketing CDP exposure, demonstrated robust and significant bone sparing activity (p < 0.01-0.001). In addition the combination of nutlin-3 and CDP induced equivalent OS tumor killing in a xenograft model. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the induction of p53 peri-operatively protects bone healing from the toxic effects of CDP, while maintaining OS toxicity. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1716-1724, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimo C. Stine
- Departments of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas
| | - Elizabeth C. Wahl
- Laboratory for Limb Regeneration Research, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Arkansas
| | - Lichu Liu
- Laboratory for Limb Regeneration Research, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Arkansas
| | - Robert A. Skinner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Orthopaedic Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Jaclyn VanderSchilden
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Orthopaedic Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Robert C. Bunn
- Departments of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas
| | - Corey O. Montgomery
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Orthopaedic Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - James Aronson
- Departments of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas,Laboratory for Limb Regeneration Research, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Arkansas,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Orthopaedic Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - David L. Becton
- Departments of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas
| | - Richard W. Nicholas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Orthopaedic Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Christopher J. Swearingen
- Departments of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas,Pediatric Biostatistics, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Arkansas
| | - Larry J. Suva
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Orthopaedic Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Charles K. Lumpkin
- Departments of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas,Laboratory for Limb Regeneration Research, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Arkansas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stine KC, Wahl EC, Liu L, Skinner RA, Schilden JV, Bunn RC, Montgomery CO, Suva LJ, Aronson J, Becton DL, Nicholas RW, Swearingen CJ, Lumpkin CK. Cisplatin inhibits bone healing during distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Res 2014; 32:464-70. [PMID: 24259375 PMCID: PMC4080883 DOI: 10.1002/jor.22527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2013] [Accepted: 11/01/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common malignant bone tumor affecting children and adolescents. Many patients are treated with a combination of chemotherapy, resection, and limb salvage protocols. Surgical reconstructions after tumor resection include structural allografts, non-cemented endoprostheses, and distraction osteogenesis (DO), which require direct bone formation. Although cisplatin (CDP) is extensively used for OS chemotherapy, the effects on bone regeneration are not well studied. The effects of CDP on direct bone formation in DO were compared using two dosing regimens and both C57BL/6 (B6) and tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 knockout (TNFR1KO) mice, as CDP toxicity is associated with elevated TNF levels. Detailed evaluation of the five-dose CDP regimen (2 mg/kg/day), demonstrated significant decreases in new bone formation in the DO gaps of CDP treated versus vehicle treated mice (p < 0.001). Further, no significant inhibitory effects from the five-dose CDP regimen were observed in TNFR1KO mice. The two-dose regimen significantly inhibited new bone formation in B6 mice. These results demonstrate that CDP has profound short term negative effects on the process of bone repair in DO. These data provide the mechanistic basis for modeling peri-operative chemotherapy doses and schedules and may provide new opportunities to identify molecules that spare normal cells from the inhibitory effects of CDP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimo C. Stine
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Elizabeth C. Wahl
- Department of Laboratory for Limb Regeneration Research, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Lichu Liu
- Department of Laboratory for Limb Regeneration Research, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Robert A. Skinner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Orthopaedic Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Jaclyn Vander Schilden
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Orthopaedic Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Robert C. Bunn
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Corey O. Montgomery
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Orthopaedic Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Larry J. Suva
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Orthopaedic Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - James Aronson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR,Department of Laboratory for Limb Regeneration Research, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Orthopaedic Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - David L. Becton
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Richard W. Nicholas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Orthopaedic Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Christopher J. Swearingen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR,Pediatric Biostatistics, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute
| | - Charles K. Lumpkin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR,Department of Laboratory for Limb Regeneration Research, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lyng MB, Lænkholm AV, Tan Q, Vach W, Gravgaard KH, Knoop A, Ditzel HJ. Gene expression signatures that predict outcome of tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor-positive, high-risk, primary breast cancer patients: a DBCG study. PLoS One 2013; 8:e54078. [PMID: 23342080 PMCID: PMC3546921 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2012] [Accepted: 12/06/2012] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tamoxifen significantly improves outcome for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, but the 15-year recurrence rate remains 30%. The aim of this study was to identify gene profiles that accurately predicted the outcome of ER+ breast cancer patients who received adjuvant Tamoxifen mono-therapy. Methodology/Principal Findings Post-menopausal breast cancer patients diagnosed no later than 2002, being ER+ as defined by >1% IHC staining and having a frozen tumor sample with >50% tumor content were included. Tumor samples from 108 patients treated with adjuvant Tamoxifen were analyzed for the expression of 59 genes using quantitative-PCR. End-point was clinically verified recurrence to distant organs or ipsilateral breast. Gene profiles were identified using a model building procedure based on conditional logistic regression and leave-one-out cross-validation, followed by a non-parametric bootstrap (1000x re-sampling). The optimal profiles were further examined in 5 previously-reported datasets containing similar patient populations that were either treated with Tamoxifen or left untreated (n = 623). Three gene signatures were identified, the strongest being a 2-gene combination of BCL2-CDKN1A, exhibiting an accuracy of 75% for prediction of outcome. Independent examination using 4 previously-reported microarray datasets of Tamoxifen-treated patient samples (n = 503) confirmed the potential of BCL2-CDKN1A. The predictive value was further determined by comparing the ability of the genes to predict recurrence in an additional, previously-published, cohort consisting of Tamoxifen-treated (n = 58, p = 0.015) and untreated patients (n = 62, p = 0.25). Conclusions/Significance A novel gene expression signature predictive of outcome of Tamoxifen-treated patients was identified. The validation suggests that BCL2-CDKN1A exhibit promising predictive potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria B. Lyng
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- * E-mail: (MBL); (HJD)
| | - Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Qihua Tan
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Werner Vach
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Karina H. Gravgaard
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ann Knoop
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik J. Ditzel
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- * E-mail: (MBL); (HJD)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rizzoli R, Body JJ, DeCensi A, Reginster JY, Piscitelli P, Brandi ML. Guidance for the prevention of bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women treated with aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer: an ESCEO position paper. Osteoporos Int 2012; 23:2567-76. [PMID: 22270857 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1870-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2011] [Accepted: 12/05/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are widely used in women with breast cancer, but they are known to increase bone loss and risk of fractures. Based on available evidence and recommendations, an ESCEO working group proposes specific guidance for the prevention of AIs-induced bone loss and fragility fractures. INTRODUCTION Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now the standard treatment for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, deleterious effects of AIs on bone health have been reported. An ESCEO working group proposes guidance for the prevention of bone loss and fragility fractures in post-menopausal women with breast cancer receiving AIs. METHODS A panel of experts addressed the issue of skeletal effects of AIs and effectiveness of antifracture therapies for the prevention of AI-induced bone loss and fractures. Recommendations by national and international organizations, and experts' opinions on this topic were evaluated. RESULTS All aromatase inhibitors are associated with negative effects on the skeleton, resulting in bone loss and increased risk of fragility fractures. Current guidelines suggest approaches that differ both in terms of drugs proposed for fracture prevention and duration of treatment. CONCLUSION The ESCEO working group recommends that all AI-treated women should be evaluated for fracture risk. Besides general recommendations, zoledronic acid 4 mg i.v. every 6 months, denosumab s.c., or possibly oral bisphosphonates should be administered for the entire period of AI treatment to all osteoporotic women (T-score hip/spine <-2.5 or ≥ 1 prevalent fragility fracture), to women aged ≥ 75 irrespective of BMD, and to patients with T-score <-1.5 + ≥ 1 clinical risk factor or T-score <-1.0 + ≥ 2 clinical risk factors. Alternatively, therapy could be considered in patients with a FRAX-determined 10-year hip fracture probability ≥ 3%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Rizzoli
- Division of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Santini D, Bertoldo F, Dell'Aquila E, Cecchini I, Fregosi S, Bortolussi P. The Italian cross-sectional survey of the management of bone metastasis: ZeTa study. J Bone Oncol 2012; 1:35-9. [PMID: 26909253 PMCID: PMC4723326 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2012.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2012] [Revised: 04/26/2012] [Accepted: 04/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several studies have emphasized the importance of the maintenance of bone health in a comprehensive cancer care. However, no survey about approach to bone metastasis care is currently available. The ZeTa study provides a picture of the Italian oncologists' therapeutics habits in this area, in a real clinical-practice scenario. Design This study was based on online questionnaire-based interviews to Italian oncologists that included 145 questions. The aim was to collect information on the treatment of bone metastasis, the current use of bisphosphonates, the awareness of guidelines and the concerns about ONJ, the use of vitamin D supplementation. Results 445 oncologists were contacted, 283 agreed to participate. The results show that the current management of bone metastasis is still sub-optimal, as the recommendations from current clinical guidelines are not completely followed by all specialists. Conclusions This survey highlights the urgent need to improve management of bone metastasis in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Santini
- Oncologia Medica, University Campus Biomedico, Roma, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bauer M, Bryce J, Hadji P. Aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss and its management with bisphosphonates in patients with breast cancer. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2012; 4:91-101. [PMID: 24367197 PMCID: PMC3846762 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s29432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Postmenopausal women have an increased risk of osteopenia and osteoporosis due to loss of the bone-protective effects of estrogen. Disease-related processes may also contribute to the risk of bone loss in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. One of the most common and severe safety issues associated with cancer therapy for patients with breast cancer is bone loss and the associated increase in risk of fractures. This paper reviews the recent literature pertaining to aromatase inhibitor (AI)-associated bone loss, and discusses suggested management and preventative approaches that may help patients remain on therapy to derive maximum clinical benefit. A case study is presented to illustrate the discussion. We observed that AIs are in widespread use for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and are now recommended as adjuvant therapy, either as primary therapy or sequential to tamoxifen, for postmenopausal women. AIs target the estrogen biosynthetic pathway and deprive tumor cells of the growth-promoting effects of estrogen, and AI therapies provide benefits to patients in terms of improved disease-free survival. However, there is a concern regarding the increased risk of bone loss with prolonged AI therapy, which can be managed in many cases with the use of bisphosphonates and other interventions (eg, calcium, vitamin D supplementation, exercise).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bauer
- University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - J Bryce
- National Cancer Institute, Naples, Italy
| | - P Hadji
- University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ponnapakkam T, Katikaneni R, Nichols T, Tobin G, Sakon J, Matsushita O, Gensure RC. Prevention of chemotherapy-induced osteoporosis by cyclophosphamide with a long-acting form of parathyroid hormone. J Endocrinol Invest 2011; 34:e392-7. [PMID: 21750397 DOI: 10.3275/7864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most chemotherapeutics reduce bone mineral density (BMD) and increase risk for fractures by causing gonadal suppression, which in turn increases bone removal. Cyclophosphamide (CYP) also has a direct effect of inhibiting bone formation and removal, making the resulting bone loss particularly difficult to treat with antiresorptive therapy. AIM We tested whether a single dose of the anabolic agent PTH linked to a collagen binding domain (PTHCBD) could prevent the effects of CYP-induced bone loss. METHODS Mice received either buffer alone, CYP, or CYP+ PTH-CBD. BMD and alkaline phosphatase were measured every 2 weeks for a total of 8 weeks. RESULTS After 6 weeks, mice treated with CYP showed expected reductions in BMD (increase from baseline: 7.4 ± 6.9 vs 24.35 ± 4.86% in mice without chemotherapy, p<0.05) and decrease in alkaline phosphatase levels (42.78 ± 6.06 vs 60.62 ± 6.23 IU/l in mice without chemotherapy, p<0.05), consistent with osteoporosis from impaired bone formation. Administration of a single dose of PTH-CBD (320 μg/kg ip) prior to CYP treatment improved BMD (change from baseline: 23.4 ± 5.4 vs 7.4 ± 6.9%, CYP treatment alone, p<0.05) and increased alkaline phosphatase levels (50.14 ± 4.86 vs 42.78 ± 6.06 IU/l in CYP treatment alone, p<0.05). BMD values and alkaline phosphatase levels were restored to those seen in mice not receiving chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS A single dose of PTHCBD prior to chemotherapy reversed CYP-induced suppression of bone formation and prevented CYP-induced bone loss in mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Ponnapakkam
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Children's Hospital at Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
D'Amelio P, Roato I, D'Amico L, Veneziano L, Suman E, Sassi F, Bisignano G, Ferracini R, Gargiulo G, Castoldi F, Pescarmona GP, Isaia GC. Bone and bone marrow pro-osteoclastogenic cytokines are up-regulated in osteoporosis fragility fractures. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22:2869-77. [PMID: 21116815 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1496-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2010] [Accepted: 10/29/2010] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED This study evaluates cytokines production in bone and bone marrow of patients with an osteoporotic fracture or with osteoarthritis by real time PCR, Western blot and immunohistochemistry. We demonstrate that the cytokine pattern is shifted towards osteoclast activation and osteoblast inhibition in patients with osteoporotic fractures. INTRODUCTION Fragility fractures are the resultant of low bone mass and poor bone architecture typical of osteoporosis. Cytokines involved in the control of bone cell maturation and function are produced by both bone itself and bone marrow cells, but the roles of these two sources in its control and the amounts they produce are not clear. This study compares their production in patients with an osteoporotic fracture and those with osteoarthritis. METHODS We evaluated 52 femoral heads from women subjected to hip-joint replacement surgery for femoral neck fractures due to low-energy trauma (37), or for osteoarthritis (15). Total RNA was extracted from both bone and bone marrow, and quantitative PCR was used to identify the receptor activator of nuclear factor kB Ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), Dickoppf-1 (DKK-1) and sclerostin (SOST) expression. Immunohistochemistry and Western blot were performed in order to quantify and localize in bone and bone marrow the cytokines. RESULTS We found an increase of RANKL/OPG ratio, M-CSF, SOST and DKK-1 in fractured patients, whereas TGFβ was increased in osteoarthritic bone. Bone marrow produced greater amounts of RANKL, M-CSF and TGFβ compared to bone, whereas the production of DKK-1 and SOST was higher in bone. CONCLUSIONS We show that bone marrow cells produced the greater amount of pro-osteoclastogenic cytokines, whereas bone cells produced higher amount of osteoblast inhibitors in patients with fragility fracture, thus the cytokine pattern is shifted towards osteoclast activation and osteoblast inhibition in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P D'Amelio
- Gerontology Section, Department of Surgical and Medical Disciplines, University of Torino, Corso Bramante 88/90, Torino, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Current World Literature. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2011; 5:297-305. [DOI: 10.1097/spc.0b013e32834a76ed] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
10
|
Hadji P. Guidelines for Osteoprotection in Breast Cancer Patients on an Aromatase Inhibitor. Breast Care (Basel) 2010; 5:290-296. [PMID: 21779210 PMCID: PMC3132952 DOI: 10.1159/000321426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Postmenopausal women are at an increased risk of osteopenia and osteoporosis due to the physiologic loss of the bone protective effects of estrogen. Additionally, disease-related risk factors also contribute to the increased fracture risk. To further complicate matters, one of the most common and severe safety issues associated with cancer therapies for breast cancer patients is bone loss and the associated increased risk of fractures. These facts underscore the need to carefully monitor bone mineral density in patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer, and to consider adjuvant therapy that may help manage and/or prevent bone loss and fracture. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now in widespread clinical use for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and have replaced tamoxifen as the gold standard of care. AIs target the estrogen biosynthetic pathway and deprive tumor cells of the growth-promoting effects of estrogen. These treatments provide significant benefit to patients in terms of improved disease-free and overall survival. Adversely, there is a concern of an increased risk of bone loss with prolonged therapy consequently leading to an increased fracture risk. This manuscript will review the recent literature pertaining to AI-associated bone loss and discuss suggested management and preventative approaches that may help patients remain on therapy to derive the most clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peyman Hadji
- University Hospital for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|